Effect of anti-VEGF treatment on retinopathy of prematurity in Zone II Stage 3. Int J Ophthalmol 2018;11:641-644. [PMID: 29675384 DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2018.04.17]

Comparison of ranibizumab and conbercept treatment in type 1 prethreshold retinopathy of prematurity in zone II

PURPOSE

The treatment with anti-VEGF for Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) has already been widely applied in clinics even though there are still many concerns about this treatment. In this project we investigated the clinical outcomes of intra-vitreous conbercept (IVC) and ranibizumab (IVR) injection for treating type 1 prethreshold ROP in Zone II.

METHODS

The data of ROP infants receiving IVR or IVC from January 2017 to March 2020 who were followed up for at least 12 months in our hospital was studied in the present retrospective study. Regression, reactivation, complications, and ocular biological parameters were evaluated.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-five eyes (64 infants) in IVC group and 229 eyes (117 infants) in IVR group were observed in the study. All infants showed good response to the two anti-VEGF agents. No eyes deteriorated during the observation. No significant difference was found between the two groups as to the regression within one week and one month, the reactivation rate, and the retreatment interval (p > 0.05) whereas retinal complete vascularization rate at 6 mons after the initial treatment and mean completion time of retinal vascularization after initial injection showed significant difference (p < 0.05). At 12 mons PMA the ocular parameters also presented no statistical difference between the two treated groups (p > 0.05). However, the ocular showed slight myopic tendency with the anti-VEGF treatment when compared to the control group (p < 0.05) whereas there was no statistical difference revealed between the two treated groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Both conbercept and ranibizumab for treating type 1 prethreshold ROP in Zone II are safe and effective. They had little effect on the development of ocular whereas there was a slight tendency of myopia after the treatment.

Recurrence risk factors of intravitreal ranibizumab monotherapy in retinopathy of prematurity: a retrospective study at one center

AIM

To identify risk factors of recurrence of this disorder after intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) monotherapy.

METHODS

Totally 33 eyes of 19 patients who underwent initial IVR treatments for type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) at our center were retrospectively reviewed between April 1, 2016 and December 31, 2017. Patient demographics, the side of ROP, multiple gestations, Apgar scores, zone, stage, plus disease, postmenstrual age at injection, surfactant therapy, blood transfusion therapy, hemorrhage before IVR, hemorrhage after IVR, gestational diabetes mellitus, pregnancy-induced hypertension, anemia, intraventricular hemorrhage, sepsis, respiratory distress syndrome, carbohemia, and congenital heart defects were recorded. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals were determined after adjusting for potential confounders using multivariate proportional Cox regression.

RESULTS

Of the 33 eyes, 12 (36.4%) had ROP recurrences 45.3 (5.1, 50.9)mo after initial IVR treatments. The independent risk factors for ROP recurrences were zone (II vs I, HR: 0.056, P=0.003) and gestational diabetes mellitus (no vs yes, HR: 0.095, P<0.001). The mean uncorrected visual acuity for four recurrence eyes was 0.46 logMAR (0.13, 0.70) at 55.0 (51.0, 58.9) mo after the initial IVR treatment. The mean uncorrected visual acuity for 10 eyes without recurrence was 0.46 logMAR (0.19, 0.63) at 48.0 (43.8, 58.4) mo after the initial IVR treatment.

CONCLUSION

Two independent risk factors for type 1 ROP recurrence after IVR treatment involving zone I and gestational diabetes mellitus are identified, and the mean uncorrected visual acuity is 0.46 logMAR at 51.0 (44.0, 58.9)mo. The findings of this study are important for follow-up management and for improving the visual function of ROP patients.

Clinical outcome following reinjection of Ranibizumab for reactivation of retinopathy of prematurity

BACKGROUND

To assess reactivation after initial intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR) for type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) or worse and the outcome following reinjection of ranibizumab for this reactivation.

METHODS

This retrospective study was performed on infants screened for ROP between March 2013 and February 2020 in Mansoura University Children Hospital, Mansoura, Egypt. Infants treated with ranibizumab 0.25 mg/0.025 mL were identified for review of their clinical outcomes. Data of infants with reactivation and IVR re-injection were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 2318 infants were screened for ROP, 115 (5%) infants (216 eyes) with a mean gestational age of 30 ± 2.5 weeks and mean birth weight of 1290 ± 355.2 g received IVR at mean postmenstrual age (PMA) of 38 ± 3.1 weeks. All treated eyes demonstrated initial regression of ROP. However, ROP reactivation occurred in 5 (2.3%) eyes of 3 patients, at an average of 9.6 ± 2.9 weeks after treatment. None of these eyes had retinal detachment. A second dose IVR was administered and all five eyes showed regression with complete retinal vascularisation, at a mean PMA of 60 ± 5.1 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

IVR is beneficial as an initial and subsequent treatment for type 1 ROP or APROP. A long-term follow-up until complete retinal vascularisation is recommended to avoid disease reactivation.

VEGFR1 signaling in retinal angiogenesis and microinflammation

Five vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) ligands (VEGF-A, -B, -C, -D, and placental growth factor [PlGF]) constitute the VEGF family. VEGF-A binds VEGF receptors 1 and 2 (VEGFR1/2), whereas VEGF-B and PlGF only bind VEGFR1. Although much research has been conducted on VEGFR2 to elucidate its key role in retinal diseases, recent efforts have shown the importance and involvement of VEGFR1 and its family of ligands in angiogenesis, vascular permeability, and microinflammatory cascades within the retina. Expression of VEGFR1 depends on the microenvironment, is differentially regulated under hypoxic and inflammatory conditions, and it has been detected in retinal and choroidal endothelial cells, pericytes, retinal and choroidal mononuclear phagocytes (including microglia), Müller cells, photoreceptor cells, and the retinal pigment epithelium. Whilst the VEGF-A decoy function of VEGFR1 is well established, consequences of its direct signaling are less clear. VEGFR1 activation can affect vascular permeability and induce macrophage and microglia production of proinflammatory and proangiogenic mediators. However the ability of the VEGFR1 ligands (VEGF-A, PlGF, and VEGF-B) to compete against each other for receptor binding and to heterodimerize complicates our understanding of the relative contribution of VEGFR1 signaling alone toward the pathologic processes seen in diabetic retinopathy, retinal vascular occlusions, retinopathy of prematurity, and age-related macular degeneration. Clinically, anti-VEGF drugs have proven transformational in these pathologies and their impact on modulation of VEGFR1 signaling is still an opportunity-rich field for further research.

An Updated and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Association between VEGA -634G > C, -460T > C, +405G > C and +936C > T Polymorphisms and Retinopathy of Prematurity Risk

Previous studies have suggested an association between VEGF-A polymorphisms and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) risk. But the conclusions are still controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between the VEGF-A polymorphisms and susceptibility of ROP. Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, WanFang and CNKI databases for all eligible case-control studies published before September 30, 2019. Results: A total of 27 case-control studies with 5,748 ROP cases and 6,146 controls were selected. The results suggested that there was an association between VEGF-A -460T > C polymorphism and increased risk of ROP under the allele model (C vs. T: OR= 0.879, 95% CI 0.776-0.994, p = 0.040). However, VEGF-A -634G > C, +405G > C and +936C > T polymorphisms were not significantly associated with risk of ROP. The subgroup analysis demonstrated that VEGF-A +405G > C polymorphism was associated with ROP risk in Caucasians. Conclusions: This meta-analysis indicates that VEGF-A -460T > C polymorphism may contribute to the susceptibility for ROP.

A proposal of an algorithm for the diagnosis and treatment of recurrence or treatment failure of retinopathy of prematurity after anti-VEGF therapy based on a large case series

PURPOSE

To provide a diagnostic algorithm of recurrence and treatment failure after intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection for retinopathy of prematurity type 1 (ROP1) and the stepwise therapeutic approach for both conditions.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of all patients diagnosed with ROP1 initially treated with IVB in 6 tertiary referral centers of Toluca and Mexico City from 2005 to 2017. Treatment failure was defined as persistence or progression of neovascularization, elevation of the ridge, worsening of plus disease, or retinal crunch within the first week after treatment. Recurrence was defined as the new appearance of plus disease, an elevated ridge, or pathological new vessels after an initial regression of ROP following treatment. Therapy was observation, switch of anti-VEGF agent, retinal photocoagulation, vitrectomy, or a combination of two or more, depending on the severity of findings.

RESULTS

A total of 672 patients who received intravitreal bevacizumab injection for ROP1 treatment were included. Of these, 2.5% (17 patients) failed to treatment, 6.8% (46 patients) developed a recurrence for ROP, and 5.5% (37 patients) carried a misdiagnosis of recurrence and were diagnosed with other than ROP1 after examination. Based on the severity of findings, patients with recurrence or treatment failure were further treated by observation, repeat anti-VEGF intravitreal injection (bevacizumab or other), laser photocoagulation, vitrectomy, or a combination of these. Based on the treatment results, a therapeutic algorithm was created.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravitreal injection of anti-VEGFs for the treatment of ROP warrants close follow-up as some of these patients may have treatment failure or recurrence of the disease. It is crucial to differentiate between them to avoid a misdiagnosis and offer the correct treatment. We propose a novel algorithm for the follow-up and treatment approach of ROP1 following initial treatment with IVB. This algorithm offers a summary of our recommendations based on a large case series of ROP1 patients. It is meant to grow and expand as more clinical evidence becomes available.