Udaondo P, Adan A, Arias-Barquet L, Ascaso FJ, Cabrera-López F, Castro-Navarro V, Donate-López J, García-Layana A, Lavid FJ, Rodríguez-Maqueda M, Ruiz-Moreno JM. Challenges in Diabetic Macular Edema Management: An Expert Consensus Report.
Clin Ophthalmol 2021;
15:3183-3195. [PMID:
34349495 PMCID:
PMC8327476 DOI:
10.2147/opth.s320948]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose
This paper aimed to present daily-practice recommendations for the management of diabetic macular edema (DME) patients based on available scientific evidence and the clinical experience of the consensus panel.
Methods
A group of Spanish retina experts agreed to discuss different aspects related with the clinical management of DME patients.
Results
Panel was mainly focused on therapeutic objectives in DME management; definition terms; and role of biomarkers as prognostic and predictive factors to intravitreal treatment response. The panel recommends to start DME treatment as soon as possible in those eyes with a visual acuity less than 20/25 (always according to the retina unit capacity). Naïve patient was defined, in a strict manner, as a patient who, up to that moment, had never received any treatment. A refractory DME patient may be defined as the one who did not achieve a complete resolution of the disease, regardless of the treatment administered. Different optical coherence tomography biomarkers, such as disorganization of the retinal inner layers, hyperreflective dots, and cysts, have been identified as prognostic factors.
Conclusion
This document has sought to lay down a set of recommendations and to identify key issues that may be useful for the daily management of DME patients.
Collapse