Refractive outcomes after vitrectomy combined with phacoemulsification of idiopathic macular holes

Posterior Corneal Asphericity and the Refractive Outcome after Combined Phacovitrectomy

BACKGROUND

We assessed the correlation of posterior corneal asphericity and the refractive prediction error of the SRK-T and Barrett II Universal formulas for eyes following phacovitrectomy with peeling of the internal limiting membrane (ILM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 41 eyes of 41 patients following a combined phacovitrectomy with ILM peeling. Surgeries were performed by one fellowship-trained vitreoretinal surgeon between 2016 and 2021.

RESULTS

Of the 41 patients, 41 eyes were included, with all having at least 1 month of postoperative data. Of the 41 eyes, 19 eyes were female (46%) and 22 were male (54%). The average age of the study population was 77.5 ± 10.7 years. The mean axial length (AL) was 22.7 ± 4.6 mm and the mean anterior chamber depth (ACD) was 3 ± 0.8 mm. The mean posterior Q value was - 0.29 ± 0.27. The mean absolute error (MAE) values 1-month postoperatively for the SRK-T and Barrett II Universal formulas were 0.73 and 0.65, respectively. Regression analysis yielded a significant correlation between posterior corneal asphericity and SRK-T MAE (r = 0.35, R² = 0.12, p < 0.05) only.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior corneal surface asphericity is correlated to the refractive error of the SRK-T formula for eyes following phacovitrectomy.

Refractive error after combined phaco-vitrectomy: A multicentric study

PURPOSE

To study the post-operative refractive error (RE) of patients undergoing combined phaco-vitrectomy and to find out which intraocular lens (IOL)-power formula had the best refractive outcomes.

METHODS

In this retrospective multicentric study we compared the preoperative expected target with the postoperative RE of patients undergoing combined phaco-vitrectomy due to vitreomacular traction, macular pucker, full thickness macular hole or lamellar macular hole. A multinomial logistic regression was performed to compare the postoperative REs and the differences between expected and postoperative REs among the SRK-T, Olsen's and Holladay-2 formulas. The correlation between the difference in REs and IOL-power was also studied.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven eyes with a mean axial length of 23.73 ± 1.21 mm were included. Forty-two (63%), 14 (21%) and 11 (16%) eyes were implanted with an IOL that was calculated respectively with SRK-T, Olsen's and the Holladay-2 formula. The mean preoperative expected- and post-operative REs were -0.16 ± 0.12D and -0.48 ± 0.17, respectively (p = 0.045). SRK-T and Holladay-2 formulas led to a significant myopic shift whereas Olsen's caused a significant hyperopic error, independently from the IOL power.

CONCLUSION

Independently from the IOL power, none of the analyzed formulas is precise at calculating the post-operative RE.

Temporal Change in Anterior Chamber Depth after Combined Vitrectomy and Cataract Surgery Using Different Sizes of Intraocular Lens

This study aimed to investigate the temporal changes in the anterior chamber depth (ACD) and refractive prediction error (RPE) of 6 and 7 mm diameter intraocular lenses (IOLs) after cataract surgery or phacovitrectomy with or without sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) gas. We reviewed 120 eyes (120 patients) and divided them into six groups: three groups of cataract surgery alone and phacovitrectomy (with or without SF6), which were further divided according to IOL diameter (6 and 7 mm) used. We examined the ACD and IOL position using a swept-source anterior segment optical coherence tomograph at 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively; and the RPE at 1 month postoperatively. The ACD and IOL position at postoperative day 1 in the SF6 injection groups were significantly smaller than those in the other groups (p < 0.01). At 1 week, the ACD and IOL position of the 6 mm IOL SF6 injection group was smaller than those in the other groups (p < 0.01); thus, complications such as synechia or pupillary capture should be considered in the early postopera-tive period of phacovitrectomy with SF6, especially in the 6 mm IOL. The ACD, IOL position, and RPE at 1 month did not significantly differ among the groups, regardless of the IOL diameter or SF6. In the SF6 injection groups, the ACD and IOL position gradually deepened with less gas.

Comparison of outcomes of idiopathic macular holes treated by vitrectomy with air or silicone oil tamponade based on the hole size

AIM

To compare the efficacy of vitrectomy combined with air or silicone oil in the treatment of idiopathic macular hole (IMH).

METHODS

According to the results of high-definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT), 75 cases (75 eyes) of IMH in stage II-IV (Gass stage) in the General Hospital of Chinese PLA from January 2017 to December 2019 were collected for this retrospective study. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and minimum diameter of IMH (MMHD) were measured. Eyes underwent vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane peeling operation, and were divided into disinfection air group (30 eyes) and silicone oil group (45 eyes) according to the intraocular tamponade. For MMHD≤400 µm (MMHD1), there were 23 eyes in air group and 16 eyes in silicone oil group. For MMHD2>400 µm (MMHD2), there were 7 eyes in air group and 29 eyes in silicone oil group. One month after surgery, the closure rates of IMH and BCVA were compared and analyzed. According to HD-OCT, the closure shape was graded with A (bridge closure) and B (good closure).

RESULTS

The closure rates of air group and silicone oil group were 86.67% and 95.56% respectively with no significant difference (P>0.05); For MMHD1, those of air group and silicone oil group were 95.65% and 100% respectively with no significant difference (P>0.05); For MMHD2, those of air group and silicone oil group were 57.14% and 93.10% respectively, and those of the silicone oil group were higher than the air group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the closure shape grade between MMHD1 air group and silicone oil group (P>0.05). The proportion of Grade B in MMHD2 silicone oil group was higher than that in the air group (P<0.05). BCVA of each group after operation was better than that before operation, and there was no significant difference between air group and silicone oil group. While among them, MMHD1 air group was better than silicone oil group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference between MMHD2 air group and silicone oil group (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

For smaller IMH (≤400 µm), the efficacy of vitrectomy combined with air should be considered better than silicone oil; for larger IMH (>400 µm), the efficacy of silicone oil may be better than air.

The Postvitrectomy Cataract

To review the recent literature regarding risk factors for cataract formation after vitrectomy, the challenges and management strategies for anterior segment surgeons when facing post-vitrectomy cataract surgery, and the visual outcomes of patients undergoing post-vitrectomy cataract surgery. Cataract surgery after vitrectomy can be safely performed to significantly improve the visual outcome in most post-vitrectomy patients, although final visual acuity is primarily limited by the patient’s underlying vitreoretinal pathology.

Comparable postoperative myopic shift in eyes with retinal vascular diseases and vitreomacular interface diseases after phacovitrectomy

PURPOSE

To compare the predictive refractive error (PRE) of intraocular lens (IOL) power between retinal vascular and vitreomacular interface diseases after phacovitrectomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent phacovitrectomy for various retinal diseases. Patients with retinal vascular diseases and vitreomacular interface diseases were included in group A and group B, respectively. Age- and gender-matched senile cataract patients with phacoemulsification were set as controls. The mean PRE and absolute value of refractive error (ARE) among different groups were compared. The associated risk factors with ARE were also analyzed in the univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

In total, 106 patients (Group A), 108 patients (Group B), and 110 patients as controls were included. The PRE in Group A (- 0.35 ± 0.83D) and Group B (- 0.53 ± 0.74D) were more myopic compared to the control group (- 0.11 ± 0.58D) (p < 0.05). The ARE in Group A (0.70 ± 0.57D) and Group B (0.75 ± 0.51D) were significantly higher compared to the control group (0.47 ± 0.35D) (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the PRE and ARE values between the two study groups (p = 0.267 and 0.861, respectively). There were no significant differences of the PRE and ARE in the eyes with silicone oil tamponade (- 0.63 ± 0.75D, 0.81 ± 0.54D) and gas tamponade (- 0.42 ± 0.83D, 0.74 ± 0.56D) (p = 0.693 and 0.988, respectively). In the multivariate model, preoperative LogMAR visual acuity (β = 0.162, 95%CI = 0.113-0.211, p < 0.001), mean corneal curvature (β = 0.105, 95% CI = 0.074-0.135, p < 0.001), and age (β = 0.012, 95% CI = 0.005-0.019, p = 0.001) were all positively correlated with the ARE.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative myopic shift after phacovitrectomy may be comparable in retinal vascular diseases and vitreomacular interface diseases, no matter the gas or silicone oil tamponade. Older age, steeper corneal curvature, and worse preoperative visual acuity could produce more prediction errors.