["If there is a risk, I should have a choice:" Risk management and risk perception in Italian vaccine hesitancy movements]

[Public conversation on vaccines during the covid-19 pandemic in Argentina, 2021-2022]

In the face of declining vaccination coverage and the dissemination of health-related information, conversations in the public/mediatic digital sphere constitute a relevant study area for the field of health communication. Through a qualitative study based on the analysis of government publications, digital press, and social media, we characterize the public conversation on vaccines - in terms of topics, moments, axes, and framings in Argentina during the 2020-2021 period - marked by the debate on covid-19 vaccines. The results show that public conversation focused on covid-19 vaccination, structured in two distinct moments (vaccine production and vaccination campaign), and under moral framings grounded in vaccination as a care practice and science as an authoritative voice. Simultaneously, doubts about the safety and efficacy of vaccines shaped arguments of vaccine hesitancy, which we understand as part of extended practices associated with distrust towards institutions and reinterpretations of scientific knowledge and care.

[Interest in disinterestedness in the epidemiology of health systems and services]

This article intends to critique of the cultural authority of the medical sciences, opening up a discussion on its publicization from a political standpoint. At the same time, from a more technical standpoint, it proposes the implementation of an epidemiology of health systems and services. Based on Pierre Bourdieu's concept of interest in disinterestedness and Joseph Gusfield's notion of the cultural authority of public problems, it analyzes why epidemiological information is so rarely used in the evaluation and monitoring of clinical, population, institutional, and territorial practices. That is, why does the dominant culture of decision making eschew epidemiological information? Within this conceptual framework, a body of documental evidence is analyzed that sheds light on the weak scientific basis that upholds or that has underpinned certain practices in the health field at different historical moments. The discussion is organized around three major themes: assistentialist professional practice, medication, and biomedical technologies.