Levels of agreement among clinical pharmacists on the impact of pharmaceutical interventions in Oman: A retrospective analysis

Inappropriate Polypharmacy and the Need for Comprehensive Medication Management Service

NONE

Impact of Clinical Pharmacists-driven Bundled Activities from Admission to Discharge on 90-day Hospital Readmissions and Emergency Department Visits

Objectives

Patient-centered clinical pharmacists' activities play a major role in improving clinical outcomes by optimizing the efficacy of drug therapies and minimizing associated toxicities during hospitalization, at the transition of care, and upon discharge. We aimed to compare the impact of comprehensive versus partial clinical pharmacists-driven bundled of care services on the rate of 90-day hospital readmissions and emergency department (ED) visits.

Methods

This retrospective study included all admitted patients who received a comprehensive or partial bundle of clinical pharmacy services (medication history, interventions, counseling, and discharge prescription review) from 1 January 2021 to 30 June 2021 at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital. The comprehensive bundle of care included the four services, while the partial bundle of care included one, two, or three services only. Analyses were performed using univariate and multivariate statistical techniques.

Results

The study included 430 patients with a mean age of 56.021.0 years, and 43.7% (n = 188) were male. Of the patients, 12.1% (n = 52) received a comprehensive bundle of care. Compared with the partial bundle of care group, the comprehensive bundle of care group had significantly more patients with diabetes (65.4% vs. 42.9%; p =0.002), % 3 comorbidities (50.0% vs. 29.4%; p =0.003), and polypharmacy (% 5 medications) (73.1% vs. 46.0%; p < 0.001). The comprehensive bundle of care group was significantly associated with a lower 90-day readmission rate (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.90?"0.82; p =0.021) but not with ED visits (aOR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.13?"2.57; p =0.461).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated a significant reduction in the 90-day readmission rate for patients on a comprehensive bundle of care but not ED visits. These findings emphasize the importance of the comprehensive services provided by clinical pharmacists on the healthcare resources use and clinical outcomes.

Clinical Associations with the differences in rivaroxaban dosing in patients with atrial fibrillation stratified by three renal function formulae

Background

Clinical trials used Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula to calculate the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in order to dose rivaroxaban for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Objectives

The aim of this study is to evaluate rivaroxaban dosing appropriateness in patients with AF with or without renal impairment based on the CG formula and other formulae, including Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation and the isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) traceable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation and the associated clinical outcomes.

Methodology

A retrospective cohort study conducted at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH) from 1st January 2016 to 31st December 2020, included all adult patients (≥ 18 years) treated with rivaroxaban for AF and followed up for one year after starting the treatment.

Results

Based on the CG formula, the rivaroxaban dose was inappropriately prescribed in 27% of the patients (21% overdosed and 6% underdosed). Higher baseline creatinine (P=0.0014) and concurrent use of antiplatelet therapy (P<0.001) were associated with the tendency to rivaroxaban overdosing. Higher Body Mass Index (BMI) (P=0.002), female sex (P=0.032), and CKD (P=0.003) were associated with rivaroxaban underdosing. The degree of agreement between the renal function tests when comparing MDRD vs CG and CKD-EPI vs CG in terms of estimated glomerular filtration rate/creatine clearance (eGFR/CrCl) calculation was moderate (κ=0.46) and poor (κ=0.00), respectively, while, in terms of rivaroxaban dose appropriateness was almost perfect (κ=0.82) and substantial (κ=0.77). Clinical outcomes measured by stroke and bleeding events were not significantly different according to the appropriateness of the rivaroxaban dose.

Conclusion

This study has shown a relatively high consistency with the gold standard in dosing rivaroxaban in AF patients using CG formula. Treatment efficiency and safety were not affected by the proportion of dose inappropriateness found in this cohort.