1
|
Chen F, Chen Y, Zou Y, Wang Y, Wu X, Chen M. Comparison of holmium laser enucleation and transurethral resection of prostate in benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Int Med Res 2023; 51:3000605231190763. [PMID: 37561537 PMCID: PMC10416666 DOI: 10.1177/03000605231190763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the gold-standard classical method for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). In minimally invasive surgery, holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is considered an alternative option. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to comprehensively evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of TURP and HoLEP the treating BPH. We comprehensively searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for all randomized controlled trials published before 1 December 2022 comparing HoLEP and TURP. The study protocol is registered on INPLASY (DOI: 10.37766/inplasy2023.5.0065). Compared with TURP, HoLEP required longer operation time but shorter catheter duration, hospital stay, and bladder irrigation time, as well as less postoperative irrigation. With HoLEP, maximum urinary flow rate at 12 and 24 months after surgery; post-void residual volume at 1, 6, and 12 months; and International Prostate Symptom Score at 12 months after surgery were superior to those with TURP. HoLEP was associated with significantly lower risk of hyponatremia, blood transfusion, and urethral stricture but greater risk of postoperative dysuria. Compared with TURP, HoLEP had better curative efficacy at 6, 12, and 24 months after operation and lower incidence of adverse events in patients with BPH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Chen
- Department of Urology, Shehong People's Hospital, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yijin Chen
- Department of Urology, Shehong People's Hospital, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yongsheng Zou
- Department of Urology, Shehong People's Hospital, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yunxiao Wang
- Department of Urology, Shehong People's Hospital, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Xiaogang Wu
- Department of Urology, Shehong People's Hospital, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Milian Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shehong People's Hospital, Sichuan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sun I, Yoo S, Park J, Cho SY, Jeong H, Son H, Oh SJ, Paick JS, Cho MC. Quality of life after photo-selective vaporization and holmium-laser enucleation of the prostate: 5-year outcomes. Sci Rep 2019; 9:8261. [PMID: 31164686 PMCID: PMC6547661 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44686-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
This study was aimed to compare serial long-term postoperative changes in quality-of-life (QoL) between photoselective-vaporization (PVP) using 120W-High-Performance-System and holmium-laser-enucleation (HoLEP) in benign-prostatic-hyperplasia (BPH) patients and to identify factors influencing the QoL improvement at the short-term, mid-term and long-term follow-up visits after surgery. We analyzed 1,193 patients with a baseline QoL-index ≥2 who underwent PVP (n = 439) or HoLEP (n = 754). Surgical outcomes were serially compared between the two groups at up to 60-months using the International-Prostatic-Symptom-Score (I-PSS), uroflowmetry, and serum PSA. We used logistic regression analysis to identify predictors of QoL improvement (a reduction in the QoL-index ≥50% compared with baseline) at the short-term (12-months), mid-term (36-months), and long term (60-months) follow-up after surgery. In both groups, the QoL-index was decreased throughout the entire follow-up period compared with that at baseline. There were no significant differences in postoperative changes from the baseline QoL-index between the two groups during the 48-month follow-up, except at 60-months. The degree of improvement in QoL at 60-months after HoLEP was greater than that after PVP. A lower baseline storage-symptom-subscore and a higher bladder-outlet-obstruction-index (BOOI) were independent factors influencing QoL improvement at the short-term. No independent factor influences QoL improvement at the mid- or long-term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inyoung Sun
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Sangjun Yoo
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, 07061, Republic of Korea
| | - Juhyun Park
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, 07061, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Yong Cho
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, 07061, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyeon Jeong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, 07061, Republic of Korea
| | - Hwancheol Son
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, 07061, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung-June Oh
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae-Seung Paick
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, 03080, Republic of Korea
| | - Min Chul Cho
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, 07061, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|