Effect of Lumacaftor/Ivacaftor on Pulmonary Exacerbation Rates in Members with Cystic Fibrosis in a Medicaid Population

Real-world outcomes and direct care cost before and after elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor initiation in commercially insured members with cystic fibrosis

BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a chronic, progressive genetic disease caused by mutations in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene resulting in a dysfunctional CFTR protein. Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) is a triple combination oral drug therapy with an annual cost greater than $300,000 and available to nearly 90% of the CF population based on age and genotype. Limited real-world direct medical cost offset data are available for ELX/TEZ/IVA among commercially insured individuals. OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare total cost of care and health care resource utilization (HRU) 180 days before and 180 days after first ELX/TEZ/IVA drug claim among CFTR modulator treatment-naive, commercially insured members. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of integrated pharmacy and medical claims data from 17.9 million commercially insured members. A 180-day prestudy and 180-day poststudy design was used to compare outcomes prior to and following ELX/TEZ/IVA initiation. Study inclusion was limited to members with first ELX/TEZ/IVA claim (index date) between October 21, 2019, and December 31, 2021, continuously enrolled 180 days before and 180 days after index date, and no CFTR-modulator drug claim 180 days prior to index date. Total paid amounts from medical and pharmacy claims after network discounts (defined as total cost of care), HRU, and pulmonary exacerbation events were summarized using descriptive statistics and compared using Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: 494 members newly initiating ELX/TEZ/IVA met inclusion criteria. Prestudy to poststudy mean member total cost of care increased from $58,180 to $198,815 (difference: $140,635; P < 0.001). Mean member medical benefit costs decreased from $28,764 to $12,484 (difference: -$16,280; P < 0.001), whereas mean member pharmacy benefit costs increased from $29,416 to $186,331 (difference: $156,915; P < 0.001). Mean member inpatient hospitalizations (62% absolute reduction; P < 0.001), emergency department visits (43% absolute reduction; P < 0.01), and pulmonary exacerbation events (44% absolute reduction; P < 0.001) were significantly lower in the postperiod compared with the preperiod. CONCLUSIONS: Among members with CF newly initiating CFTR modulator with ELX/TEZ/IVA, mean member total cost of care increased 3-fold despite significant and meaningful reductions in pulmonary exacerbation events, HRU, and medical benefit spend. Pharmacy benefit spend outpaced medical benefit spend at a rate of $9.64 to $1 in the 180 days following ELX/TEZ/IVA initiation. Real-world data should be used to objectively measure the clinical and economic benefits of costly medications, such as CFTR modulators, to align price with value. DISCLOSURES: Drs Marshall, Espinosa, Starner, and Gleason are employees of Prime Therapeutics. The study was funded by Prime Therapeutics.

Brazilian guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of the pulmonary symptoms of cystic fibrosis. Official document of the Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia (SBPT, Brazilian Thoracic Association)

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a genetic disease that results in dysfunction of the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) protein, which is a chloride and bicarbonate channel expressed in the apical portion of epithelial cells of various organs. Dysfunction of that protein results in diverse clinical manifestations, primarily involving the respiratory and gastrointestinal systems, impairing quality of life and reducing life expectancy. Although CF is still an incurable pathology, the therapeutic and prognostic perspectives are now totally different and much more favorable. The purpose of these guidelines is to define evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of pharmacological agents in the treatment of the pulmonary symptoms of CF in Brazil. Questions in the Patients of interest, Intervention to be studied, Comparison of interventions, and Outcome of interest (PICO) format were employed to address aspects related to the use of modulators of this protein (ivacaftor, lumacaftor+ivacaftor, and tezacaftor+ivacaftor), use of dornase alfa, eradication therapy and chronic suppression of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Burkholderia cepacia complex. To formulate the PICO questions, a group of Brazilian specialists was assembled and a systematic review was carried out on the themes, with meta-analysis when applicable. The results obtained were analyzed in terms of the strength of the evidence compiled, the recommendations being devised by employing the GRADE approach. We believe that these guidelines represent a major advance to be incorporated into the approach to patients with CF, mainly aiming to favor the management of the disease, and could become an auxiliary tool in the definition of public policies related to CF.

Current and Emerging Therapies to Combat Cystic Fibrosis Lung Infections

The ultimate aim of any antimicrobial treatment is a better infection outcome for the patient. Here, we review the current state of treatment for bacterial infections in cystic fibrosis (CF) lung while also investigating potential new treatments being developed to see how they may change the dynamics of antimicrobial therapy. Treatment with antibiotics coupled with regular physical therapy has been shown to reduce exacerbations and may eradicate some strains. Therapies such as hypertonic saline and inhaled Pulmozyme^TM (DNase-I) improve mucus clearance, while modifier drugs, singly and more successfully in combination, re-open certain mutant forms of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) to enable ion passage. No current method, however, completely eradicates infection, mainly due to bacterial survival within biofilm aggregates. Lung transplants increase lifespan, but reinfection is a continuing problem. CFTR modifiers normalise ion transport for the affected mutations, but there is conflicting evidence on bacterial clearance. Emerging treatments combine antibiotics with novel compounds including quorum-sensing inhibitors, antioxidants, and enzymes, or with bacteriophages, aiming to disrupt the biofilm matrix and improve antibiotic access. Other treatments involve bacteriophages that target, infect and kill bacteria. These novel therapeutic approaches are showing good promise in vitro, and a few have made the leap to in vivo testing.

Adherence to cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators: analysis of a national specialty pharmacy database

BACKGROUND

There have been significant advances in Cystic Fibrosis (CF) treatment, with the introduction of Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator (CFTR) modulators. Adherence is an important goal for CF management, as nonadherence is linked to poor health outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To calculate the medication adherence in patients taking CFTR modulators using a national specialty pharmacy database.

METHODS

This retrospective observational cohort study utilized de-identified specialty pharmacy data from September 2017 to August 2018 to assess medication adherence for three CFTR modulators: ivacaftor, lumacaftor/ivacaftor, and tezacaftor/ivacaftor & ivacaftor. The primary outcome was proportion of days covered (PDC) for each medication, with mean PDC values compared across age groups and insurance characteristics. All analyses were performed using the SAS 9.4 University Edition (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).

RESULTS

A total of 2,548 patients were analyzed, including 1,289 (50.59%) patients on lumacaftor/ivacaftor, 784 (30.77%) on ivacaftor, and 475 (18.64%) on tezacaftor/ivacaftor & ivacaftor. The mean PDC value for all CFTR modulators was above 0.80. Tezacaftor/ivacaftor & ivacaftor had the highest overall PDC of 0.92, while PDC values for both lumacaftor/ivacaftor and ivacaftor were 0.84. Children/adolescents on lumacaftor/ivacaftor (p = 0.0001) and tezacaftor/ivacaftor & ivacaftor (p = 0.001) had significantly higher mean PDC values compared to adults but not for ivacaftor (p = 0.3744). No statistical differences were seen in PDC across insurance characteristics.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to assess the adherence of three CFTR modulators using a large nationwide specialty database. With high acquisition costs of CFTR modulator therapies, there is a need to improve rates of adherence in patients with CF.

Long-Term Outcomes in Real Life of Lumacaftor-Ivacaftor Treatment in Adolescents With Cystic Fibrosis

Background: The combination of the CFTR corrector lumacaftor (LUM) and potentiator ivacaftor (IVA) has been labeled in France since 2015 for F508del homozygote cystic fibrosis (CF) patients over 12 years. In this real-life study, we aimed (i) to compare the changes in lung function, clinical (e.g., body mass index and pulmonary exacerbations) and radiological parameters, and in sweat chloride concentration before and after initiation of LUM/IVA treatment; (ii) to identify factors associated with response to treatment; and (iii) to assess the tolerance to treatment. Materials and Methods: In this tri-center, non-interventional, and observational cohort study, children (12-18 years old) were assessed prospectively during the 2 years of therapy, and retrospectively during the 2 years preceding treatment. Data collected and analyzed for the study were exclusively extracted from the medical electronic system records of the patients. Results: Forty adolescents aged 12.0-17.4 years at LUM/IVA initiation were included. The lung function decreased significantly during and prior to treatment and increased after LUM/IVA initiation, becoming significant after 2 years of treatment. LUM/IVA significantly improved the BMI Z-score and sweat chloride concentration. By contrast, there was no significant change in exacerbation rates, antibiotic use, or CT scan scores. Age at LUM/IVA initiation was lower in good responders and associated with greater ppFEV1 change during the 2 years of treatment. LUM/IVA was well-tolerated. Conclusion: In F508del homozygote adolescents, real-life long-term LUM/IVA improved the ppFEV1 trajectory, particularly in the youngest patients, nutritional status, and sweat chloride concentration but not exacerbation rates or radiological scores. LUM/IVA was generally well-tolerated and safe.

How Clinically Efficient Is Lumacaftor/Ivacaftor for Cystic Fibrosis Patients? An Updated Literature Review

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive illness caused by the defective cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. These patients suffer from repeated chronic sinuses and lung infections, resulting in frequent hospital admissions and antibiotic (Abx) courses. These are the major contributing factors responsible for a low health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and increasing the disease burden. The introduction and approval of CFTR modulators-lumacaftor (LUM) and ivacaftor (IVA) in 2015 by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reduced the mortality and morbidity rates associated with the disease. In 2018, the FDA approved these drugs from age two and five years with two copies of F5806 del. This literature review aims to present the studies centered on the clinical effects of LUM/IVA. We searched for the relevant articles, from 2016 to 2020, in PubMed Central (PMC), Google Scholars, and Journal of Cystic Fibrosis. LUM/IVA has a broader range of effects. They showed marked improvement in the reduction of pulmonary exacerbations (PEx), Hospitalization rates, Abx use, and modification in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) status of pre-existing severe lung disease. Now, there is a need for an initiative to conduct more clinical trials and studies in the future to assess and evaluate the long-term clinical benefits and safety of LUM/IVA therapy in all age groups.