HTA'd in the USA: A Comparison of ICER in the United States with NICE in England and Wales

Institutional design and moral conflict in health care priority-setting

Priority-setting policy-makers often face moral and political pressure to balance the conflicting motivations of efficiency and rescue/non-abandonment. Using the conflict between these motivations as a case study can enrich the understanding of institutional design in developed democracies. This essay presents a cognitive-psychological account of the conflict between efficiency and rescue/non-abandonment in health care priority-setting. It then describes three sets of institutional arrangements-in Australia, England/Wales, and Germany, respectively-that contend with this conflict in interestingly different ways. The analysis yields at least three implications for institutional design in developed democracies: (1) indeterminacy at the level of moral psychology can increase the probability of indeterminacy at the level of institutional design; (2) situational constraints in effect require priority-setting policy-makers to adopt normative-moral pluralism; and (3) the U.S. health care system may be in an anti-priority-setting equilibrium.

Different regulatory framework for medical devices and drugs in the European Union: Impact on clinical research and health technology assessments

OBJECTIVES

Understanding whether the regulatory framework in the European Union creates different standards for medical devices and drugs, assessing whether there is evidence on the impact of those standards on clinical and HTA research, and reflecting on findings in order to propose legislative changes for promoting a more efficient allocation of resources in the healthcare systems.

METHODS

Reviewing and comparing the legal framework for the approval of medical devices and drugs in the EU, with a particular focus on the changes brought by Regulation (EU) 2017/745. Investigating the available information on manufacturer sponsored clinical studies and HTA-supported recommendations for medical devices and drugs.

RESULTS

The review of the legislation identified different standards for approval of devices and drugs on their quality, safety, and performance/efficacy dimensions and fewer manufacturer sponsored clinical studies and HTA-supported recommendations for medical devices versus drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

Policy changes could be implemented in order to promote an integrated evidence-based assessment system for a better allocation of resources in healthcare, namely: a consensual classification of medical devices from an HTA perspective, which could be used as a guide for generating outcomes in clinical investigation, and the adoption of conditional coverage practices including mandatory post-approval evidence development for performing periodic technology assessments.

Early Cost-Effectiveness and Price Threshold Analyses of Resmetirom: An Investigational Treatment for Management of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

BACKGROUND

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is characterized by inflammation and hepatocellular damage caused by accumulation of fat in the liver. Resmetirom (MGL-3196) is an orally administered, small-molecule, liver-targeted, selective thyroid hormone receptor-β agonist. This early analysis explored the potential cost effectiveness of resmetirom for the treatment of NASH from a US commercial payer perspective.

METHODS

An early economic model was developed to reflect the clinical pathways typically followed by patients with NASH and liver fibrosis. Use of resmetirom, compared with placebo, was assessed. The Markov model structure was informed by a previous modeling study and a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II trial of resmetirom. Costs and outcomes were assessed over a lifetime time horizon with results presented in terms of cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained.

RESULTS

Resmetirom treatment resulted in increased costs of US$66,764 per patient, while increasing QALYs by 1.24. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was US$53,929 per QALY gained, indicating resmetirom treatment would potentially be cost effective at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of US$100,000. Results indicated that resmetirom would reduce the lifetime number of cases of decompensated cirrhosis (- 87), hepatocellular carcinoma (- 59), and liver transplants (- 30) per 1,000 patients compared with placebo. Resmetirom treatment remained cost effective at a US$100,000 WTP threshold up to a daily price point of US$72.00.

CONCLUSION

Resmetirom is a potentially cost-effective treatment option for patients with NASH and liver fibrosis based on an analysis performed from a US commercial payer perspective. Future economic analyses of the technology should, however, focus on overcoming the limitations of existing modeling methodology.

Using Economic Evaluation to Inform Responses to the Opioid Epidemic in the United States: Challenges and Suggestions for Future Research

Background: Several aspects of the opioid epidemic and of public health care organization in the United States (US) make the conduct of economic evaluation and the design of policies to respond to this crisis particularly challenging. Objectives: This commentary offers suggestions for how economic evaluation may address and overcome four key features of the opioid epidemic: 1) its magnitude and geographical distribution, 2) its intersection with multiple epidemics, 3) its rapidly changing dynamics, 4) its multi-sectoral causes and consequences. Results: We first offer pragmatic suggestions to address the difficulties in delivering a coordinated response given the fragmented nature of health care in the US. In view of the broad suite of responses required to address opioid use disorder and its associated comorbidities, we highlight the need for economic evaluations which consider interventions throughout the continuum of care (i.e. primary, secondary and tertiary levels of prevention). We examine how the use of predictive modelling alongside economic evaluation might be adopted to address the rapidly evolving situation affecting distinct populations and geographic areas and encourage investments in epidemic preparedness. Finally, we propose methods to capture the interdependence of various sectors of government affected by the opioid crisis in economic evaluations to ensure optimal levels of investment towards a comprehensive response. Conclusions: The opioid epidemic in the US represents an unprecedented public health challenge, but sound epidemiological modelling and economic analysis can help to guide use of limited resources committed to addressing it in ways that can have greatest impact in limiting its adverse consequences.