Comparative efficacy of lemborexant and other insomnia treatments: a network meta-analysis

Evaluation of prescribing patterns of switching to and add-on lemborexant in patients treated with hypnotic medication: a nationwide claims database study in Japan

BACKGROUND

When considering changing hypnotic pharmacotherapy, lemborexant has attracted attention as a candidate due to its effectiveness and safety profile. However, few studies have investigated switching patterns in clinical practice.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide claims database. Patients prescribed a single hypnotic who either subsequently switched to (switching cohort) or were additionally prescribed (add-on cohort) lemborexant between July 2020 and December 2021 were identified. Proportion of successful switching was defined as remaining on lemborexant alone or without any hypnotic at 6 months after lemborexant initiation.

RESULTS

The success proportion was 70.1% in the switching cohort (n = 4,861) and 38.6% in the add-on cohort (n = 9,423). In the add-on cohort, the success proportion was lower in patients with a hypnotic history of ≥180 days (31.4%) and in patients whose prescribed hypnotic was a benzodiazepine or non-benzodiazepine (31.5% and 37.6%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The proportion of successful switching was higher in patients who switched to lemborexant than in those who added lemborexant as a concomitant treatment. The lower success proportion in the add-on cohort might be related to clinically more severe insomnia, and/or a concomitant prescription of benzodiazepine or non-benzodiazepine, from which discontinuation may be challenging.

A retrospective clinical practice study comparing the usefulness of dual-orexin receptor antagonists and a melatonin receptor agonist in patients switching from long-term benzodiazepine receptor agonists

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Although novel hypnotics have recently emerged, there are currently no data comparing the clinical potency of benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZRAs) and novel hypnotics, or the effectiveness of different methods of switching between them. This study examined how novel hypnotics might help reduce BZRA use in real-world practice.

METHODS

289 patients with psychiatric disorders who took BZRAs for over 1 year before switching to either of 2 dual-orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs; suvorexant [SUV] or lemborexant [LEM]) or a melatonin receptor agonist (ramelteon [RMT]) were enrolled. We collected data on BZRAs at baseline and 3 months after commencement of SUV/LEM/RMT.

RESULTS

Significant reductions in BZRAs were observed for all 3 agents: -4.10, -2.80, and -1.65 mg in diazepam-equivalent doses in the SUV, LEM, and RMT groups, respectively. Dose reduction was significantly greater in the DORA than the RMT group (F = 15.053, P < .001). Within the DORA group, dose reduction was significantly greater in patients taking SUV than those taking LEM (F = 4.337, P = .043). The switching success rate did not differ among the switching methods for any of the hypnotics.

CONCLUSIONS

The reduction rate of BZRAs achieved by the switch fell into their equivalent-potency range estimated from clinical trials. The results suggest that DORAs can replace approximately 1 tablet of a BZRA. The difference in dose reduction between DORAs and RMT reflected the greater sleeping potency of the DORAs, whereas that between SUV and LEM might have reflected patient backgrounds: patients taking LEM may have been more strongly dependent on BZRAs.

CITATION

Tachibana M, Kanahara N, Oda Y, Hasegawa T, Kimura A, Iyo M. A retrospective clinical practice study comparing the usefulness of dual-orexin receptor antagonists and a melatonin receptor agonist in patients switching from long-term benzodiazepine receptor agonists. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(4):603-613.

Emerging and upcoming therapies in insomnia

Insomnia, commonly treated with benzodiazepine (BZD) receptor agonists, presents challenges due to associated serious side effects such as abuse and dependence. To address these concerns, many researches have been conducted to develop and advance both pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. Dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs), which include suvorexant, daridorexant and lemborexant, have recently been approved by United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) as a novel pharmacotherapeutic alternative. Unlike BZD receptor agonists that act as positive allosteric modulators of the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A subunit alpha 1 receptor, DORAs function by binding to both orexin receptor types 1 and 2, and inhibiting the action of the wake-promoting orexin neuropeptide. These drugs induce normal sleep without sleep stage change, do not impair attention and memory performance, and facilitate easier awakening. However, more real-world safety information is needed. Selective orexin-2 receptor antagonists (2-SORAs) is under clinical developments. This review provides an overview of the mechanism of action in relation to insomnia, pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety information of DORAs and SORA. According to insomnia management guidelines, the first-line treatment for chronic insomnia is cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I). Although it has proven effective in improving sleep-related quality of life, it has several restrictions limitations due to a face-to-face format. Recently, prescription digital therapy such as Somryst® was approved by US FDA. Somryst®, a smartphone app-based CBT-I, demonstrated meaningful responses in patients. However, digital limitations may impact scalability. Overall, these developments offer promising alternatives for insomnia treatment, emphasizing safety, efficacy, and accessibility.

Switching to lemborexant for the management of insomnia in mental disorders: the SLIM study

STUDY OBJECTIVES

We conducted a retrospective study to investigate the efficacy and safety of switching from other hypnotics, including benzodiazepines and Z-drugs, suvorexant, ramelteon, mirtazapine, trazodone, and antipsychotics, to lemborexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist, for 3 months.

METHODS

Clinical data obtained from the medical records of 61 patients treated at the Horikoshi Psychosomatic Clinic between December 2020 and February 2022 were analyzed, including the Athens Insomnia Scale, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-5. The primary outcome was the mean change in Athens Insomnia Scale score after 3 months. Secondary outcomes were the mean changes in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-5 scores over 3 months. We also compared pre- and post-diazepam equivalents.

RESULTS

The mean Athens Insomnia Scale score decreased over 3 months after switching to lemborexant (1 mo: -2.98 ± 5.19, P < .001; 2 mo: -3.20 ± 5.64, P < .001; 3 mo: -3.38 ± 5.61, P < .001). Mean Epworth Sleepiness Scale score did not change from baseline to 1 month (-0.49 ± 3.41, P = 0.27), 2 months (0.082 ± 4.62, P = .89), or 3 months (-0.64 ± 4.80, P = .30). Mean Perceived Deficits Questionnaire-5 score did improve from baseline to 1 month (-1.17 ± 2.47, P = .004), 2 months (-1.05 ± 2.97, P = .029), and 3 months (-1.24 ± 3.06, P = .013). There was also a reduction in the total diazepam equivalent (baseline vs 3 mo: 14.0 ± 20.2 vs 11.3 ± 20.6, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that, by switching to lemborexant from other hypnotics, the risks associated with benzodiazepines and Z-drugs may be reduced.

CITATION

Horikoshi S, Miura I, Suzuki Y, et al. Switching to lemborexant for the management of insomnia in mental disorders: the SLIM study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(10):1753-1758.

Insomnia Management: A Review and Update

KEY TAKEAWAYS

Insomnia is a distinct disorder that is common, yet underrecognized and undertreated in primary care. Treating insomnia has been shown to improve outcomes, including reduced risk of developing cardiovascular and mental health disorders. Insomnia is influenced by the brain's regulation of sleep and wake, which are mutually exclusive events. Insomnia should be treated as a distinct condition, even when occurring with a comorbid diagnosis such as depression or anxiety. Clinicians should implement a multimodal approach to insomnia management, including nonpharmacologic interventions and pharmacologic therapy (when indicated). Pharmacologic agents that are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for insomnia include benzodiazepine receptor agonists (zolpidem, eszopiclone, and zaleplon), low-dose doxepin (tricyclic antidepressant), ramelteon (melatonin receptor agonist), and dual orexin receptor agonists (DORAs, daridorexant, lemborexant, and suvorexant). Unlike other pharmacologic agents, DORAs inhibit wakefulness rather than induce sedation. Additionally, these medications have no evidence of rebound insomnia or withdrawal, and little to no abuse potential. Daridorexant is the newest DORA, has an ideal half-life of 8 hours, and has demonstrated continued efficacy over a 12-month period. Selection of pharmacologic agent should be based on the patient's comorbid conditions, treatment goals and preferences, and other clinical characteristics.

Effects of Japanese policies and novel hypnotics on long-term prescriptions of hypnotics

AIM

The current study aimed to examine the effect of Japanese policies for appropriate hypnotics use and novel hypnotics (e.g. melatonin receptor agonist and orexin receptor antagonist [ORA]) on long-term prescriptions of hypnotics.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted using a large-scale health insurance claims database. Among subscribers prescribed hypnotics at least once between April 2005 and March 2021, those prescribed hypnotics for the first time after being included in the database in three periods (period 1: April 2012-March 2013; period 2: April 2016-March 2017; and period 3: April 2018-March 2019) were eligible. These were set considering the timing of the 2014 and 2018 medical fee revisions (2014 for polypharmacy of three or more hypnotics, 2018 for long-term prescription of benzodiazepine receptor agonists for >12 months). The duration of consecutive prescriptions of hypnotics over 12 months was evaluated. Factors associated with short-term prescriptions of hypnotics were also investigated.

RESULTS

In total, 186 535 participants were newly prescribed hypnotics. The mean duration of prescriptions was 2.9 months, and 9.3% of participants were prescribed hypnotics for 12 months. Prescription periods were not associated with short-term prescriptions of hypnotics. ORA use was associated with short-term prescriptions of hypnotics (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.077 [95% confidence interval, 1.035-1.120]; P < 0.001), but melatonin receptor agonist use was not.

CONCLUSION

Japanese policies had no statistically significant effect on long-term prescriptions of hypnotics. Although this study suggests initiating ORA for insomniacs as a candidate strategy to prevent long-term prescriptions of hypnotics, further research is necessary to draw conclusions.

The Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Insomnia Drugs: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of 153 Randomized Trials

BACKGROUND

Pharmacological treatment is common in practice and widely used for the management of insomnia. However, evidence comparing the relative effectiveness, safety, and certainty of evidence among drug classes and individual drugs for insomnia are still lacking. This study aimed to determine the relative effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of drugs for insomnia.

METHODS

In this systematic review and network meta-analysis we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, and ClinicalTrials.gov, from inception to January 10, 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials that compared insomnia drugs with placebo or an active comparator in adults with insomnia. We conducted random-effects frequentist network meta-analyses to summarize the evidence, and used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty, categorize interventionsand present the findings.

RESULTS

A total of 148 articles met our eligibility criteria; these included 153 trials which enrolled 46,412 participants and assessed 36 individual drugs from eight drug classes. Compared with placebo, both subjectively and objectively measured total sleep time were significantly improved with non-benzodiazepine (subjective: mean difference [MD] 25.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 15.49-34.64, low certainty; objective: MD 22.34, 95% CI 7.64-37.05, high certainty), antidepressants (subjective: MD 54.40, 95% CI 34.96-75.83, low certainty; objective: MD 35.64, 95% CI 13.05-58.24, high certainty), and orexin receptor antagonists (subjective: MD 21.62, 95% CI 0.84-42.40, high certainty; objective: MD 31.81, 95% CI 2.66-60.95, high certainty); of which doxepin, almorexant, suvorexant, and lemborexant were among the relatively effective drugs with relatively good tolerability and lower risks of any adverse events (AEs). Both subjectively and objectively measured sleep onset latency were significantly shortened with non-benzodiazepines (subjective: MD - 10.12, 95% CI - 13.84 to - 6.40, moderate certainty; objective: MD - 12.11, 95% CI - 19.31 to - 4.90, moderate certainty) and melatonin receptor agonists (subjective: MD - 7.73, 95% CI - 15.21 to - 0.26, high certainty; objective: MD - 7.04, 95% CI - 12.12 to - 1.95, moderate certainty); in particular, zopiclone was among the most effective drugs with a lower risk of any AEs but worse tolerability. Non-benzodiazepines could significantly decrease both subjective and objective measured wake time after sleep onset (subjective: MD - 16.67, 95% CI - 21.79 to - 11.56, moderate certainty; objective: MD - 13.92, 95% CI - 22.71 to - 5.14, moderate certainty).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-benzodiazepines probably improve total sleep time, sleep onset latency, and wake time after sleep onset. Other insomnia drug classes and individual drugs also showed potential benefits in improving insomnia symptoms. However, the choice of insomnia drugs should be based on the phenotype of insomnia presented, as well as each drug's safety and tolerability. Protocol registration PROSPERO (CRD42019138790).

Comparative risk of fracture in community-dwelling older adults initiating suvorexant versus Z-drugs: Results from LIFE study

BACKGROUND

An increased risk of fracture has been reported in older adults taking hypnotics. However, few studies have reported the comparative safety of hypnotics with different mechanisms of action. We examined the risk of fracture in older adults initiating suvorexant compared to those initiating Z-drugs.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using a claims database within a longevity improvement and fair evidence (LIFE) study in Japan (1.5 million beneficiaries). People aged ≥65 years were included in this study. Exposure was defined as the initiation of either suvorexant or Z-drugs (eszopiclone, zolpidem, or zopiclone). The evaluated outcomes were hip fracture and all-cause fracture requiring hospitalization. We used inverse probability of treatment weights to adjust for confounding and followed the incidence of the outcome for three different periods: 30, 90, and 365 days. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted to the weighted population to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). Sensitivity analyses were performed with narrowed outcome definitions and inverse probability of censoring weights.

RESULTS

We identified 16,148 suvorexant new users and 54,327 Z-drugs new users. During the 30-day follow-up, 21 (16.6 events per 1000 person-years) and 53 hip fractures (12.2 events per 1000 person-years) were identified among suvorexant and Z-drugs new users, respectively (HR: 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-1.76). The analysis for all-cause fracture showed an HR of 1.03 (95% CI: 0.78-1.36). Extended follow-up (90 and 365 days) showed similar results for both outcomes. Sensitivity analyses showed consistent results except for an increased risk of all-cause fracture requiring surgery (HR: 1.41, 95% CI: 0.87-2.29) during the 30-day follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to show that suvorexant has a generally comparable risk of fracture as compared to Z-drugs. Further research is needed to investigate the potential short-term increased risk of all-cause fracture requiring surgery among suvorexant initiators.

Network meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness of a prescription digital therapeutic for chronic insomnia to medications and face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy in adults

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the only Food and Drug Administration-authorized prescription digital therapeutic (PDT) Somryst versus face-to-face cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I), or FDA-approved prescription medications for insomnia.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was undertaken to identify relevant studies. A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to examine (1) mean change in insomnia severity index (ISI); (2) proportional change in ISI remitters; (3) mean change in wake after sleep onset (WASO); and (4) mean change in sleep onset latency (SOL).

RESULTS

Twenty studies provided data on the PDT, CBT-I, CBT-I in combination with self-help (SH), or two prescription medications (eszopiclone and zolpidem). The PDT was associated with significant mean change in ISI (-5.77, 95% Credible Interval [CrI] - 8.53, -3.07) and ISI remitters (OR 12.33; 95% CrI 2.28, 155.91) compared to placebo, and had the highest probability of being the most effective treatment overall for ISI mean change (56%), and ISI remitters (64%). All evaluated interventions significantly outperformed placebo for WASO but no significant differences were observed for SOL (five interventions). Sensitivity analyses excluding medications and meta-regression (assessing type, duration, delivery method for CBT-I) did not affect NMA results.

CONCLUSIONS

This network meta-analysis demonstrated that a PDT delivering CBT-I had the highest probability of being most effective compared to face-to-face CBT-I, prescription sleep medications, or placebo, as measured by reductions in mean ISI score from baseline and ISI-determined remittance.

Dual orexin receptor antagonists for treatment of insomnia: A systematic review and meta-analysis on randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of suvorexant and lemborexant

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Recent treatment guidelines for chronic insomnia recommend pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies. One of the contemporary drug options for insomnia includes dual orexin receptor antagonist (DORA), such as suvorexant and lemborexant. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis for the treatment of insomnia with suvorexant and lemborexant based on randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Trials.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search on three databases (PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) till August 14, 2021, without any restrictions to retrieve the relevant articles. The effect sizes were computed presenting the pooled mean difference or risk ratio along with 95% confidence interval of each outcome.

RESULTS

Our search showed eight articles (five for suvorexant and three for lemborexant). Results of diary measures, rating scales, polysomnography results, treatment discontinuation, and adverse events were measured. All efficacy outcome measures favorably and significantly differed in the suvorexant compared to placebo. Safety profile did not differ significantly except for somnolence, excessive daytime sleepiness/sedation, fatigue, back pain, dry mouth, and abnormal dreams. Important adverse events including hallucinations, suicidal ideation/behavior and motor vehicle accidents did not differ between suvorexant and placebo. All the efficacy outcomes significantly differed between lemborexant 5 and lemborexant 10 compared to placebo. Somnolence rate for lemborexant 5 and lemborexant 10 and nightmare for lemborexant 10 were significantly higher than placebo.

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analysis reported that suvorexant and lemborexant are efficacious and safe agents for the patients with insomnia. Further data in patients with insomnia and various comorbid conditions are needed.