Health care resource utilization and costs associated with advanced or metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer in the United States

Treatment Patterns and Health Care Resource Utilization of Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Puerto Rico: The TREATLINES-ONCOLUNG Study

PURPOSE

Lung cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. It is the third cause of death among patients with cancer in Puerto Rico (PR) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most prevalent. This study aims to describe the first-line treatment (1LT) and health care resource utilization (HCRU) among patients with NSCLC in PR.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the PR Central Cancer Registry Health Insurance Linkage Database to describe patients with NSCLC from 2012 to 2016. It describes sociodemographic and clinical characteristics on the basis of stage and histology and includes 1LT patterns and HCRU.

RESULTS

A total of 1,011 patients met the inclusion criteria. Most were male (57.1%), married (54.1%), and had no comorbidities (55.8%). A significant proportion of patients (71.1%) were diagnosed at stages III and IV, with nonsquamous cell carcinoma being the most prevalent histology group (75.9%). About 61.7% received systemic therapy, 36.7% received radiotherapy, and 21.9% underwent surgery. Platinum (Pt)-based combinations were the most common 1LT (82.9%). On average, patients had 4.7 emergency room visits, nearly six hospitalizations, and 22.4 outpatient visits annually. The mean frequencies of positron emission tomography, ultrasounds, computerized tomography scans, and magnetic resonance imaging were 0.95, 0.11, 4.88, and 0.91, respectively.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this study provides the first description of 1LT patterns, HCRU, and sociodemographic information among patients with NSCLC in PR. A significant number of patients were diagnosed at stage III or higher and received Pt-based systemic therapy as their 1LT. More research is required to investigate treatment patterns beyond the 1LT and to gain a comprehensive understanding of optimal care interventions and factors associated with early NSCLC diagnosis.

Costs of biomarker testing among patients with metastatic lung or thyroid cancer in the USA: a real-world commercial claims database study

OBJECTIVE

This real-world retrospective database study quantified the costs of biomarker testing in a US population of patients with lung or thyroid cancers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The commercial claims IBM Marketscan database, a de-identified real-world dataset, was used to identify patients diagnosed with lung or thyroid cancer between 1/2015 and 12/2019. Eligible patients were 18 years or older with two or more lung or thyroid diagnosis codes. Patients were excluded who had evidence of prior cancer diagnoses. Subgroup analyses evaluated eligible patients with metastatic disease. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate commercial insurance plan payer and patient out-of-pocket costs for diagnostic testing overall as well as by test procedure code and payer type. Costs were adjusted to 2020 US dollars.

RESULTS

A total of 23,633 patients with lung cancer were eligible, 13,320 of whom had metastatic disease. There were 36,867 patients with thyroid cancer, 2,241 of whom had metastatic disease. Biomarker codes were observed among 68.4/75.8% (lung/metastatic lung) and 18.2/42.3% (thyroid/metastatic thyroid). Few patients had codes for comprehensive biomarker tests (5.2/6.7% lung/metastatic lung, 0.3/2.2% thyroid/metastatic thyroid) Among those with biomarker tests, the median per-patient total payer lifetime costs of all biomarker testing were $394/$462 (lung/metastatic lung) and $148/$232 (thyroid/metastatic thyroid). Total lifetime biomarker costs for payers ranged from a median of $128 (consumer-driven health plans) to $477 (preferred provider organizations). Median lifetime patient out-of-pocket costs were $0.00 for both tumor types and all payer types except for consumer-driven health plans ($12 for thyroid and $10 for metastatic lung).

CONCLUSIONS

While comprehensive testing adds to the cost of biomarker testing, these data suggest the relatively low lifetime cost of biomarker testing for both payers and patients. Costs for biomarker testing should not be a limitation to access among these populations with commercial insurance plans in the US.

Radionuclide Imaging of Cytotoxic Immune Cell Responses to Anti-Cancer Immunotherapy

Cancer immunotherapy is an evolving and promising cancer treatment that takes advantage of the body’s immune system to yield effective tumor elimination. Importantly, immunotherapy has changed the treatment landscape for many cancers, resulting in remarkable tumor responses and improvements in patient survival. However, despite impressive tumor effects and extended patient survival, only a small proportion of patients respond, and others can develop immune-related adverse events associated with these therapies, which are associated with considerable costs. Therefore, strategies to increase the proportion of patients gaining a benefit from these treatments and/or increasing the durability of immune-mediated tumor response are still urgently needed. Currently, measurement of blood or tissue biomarkers has demonstrated sampling limitations, due to intrinsic tumor heterogeneity and the latter being invasive. In addition, the unique response patterns of these therapies are not adequately captured by conventional imaging modalities. Consequently, non-invasive, sensitive, and quantitative molecular imaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) using specific radiotracers, have been increasingly used for longitudinal whole-body monitoring of immune responses. Immunotherapies rely on the effector function of CD8⁺ T cells and natural killer cells (NK) at tumor lesions; therefore, the monitoring of these cytotoxic immune cells is of value for therapy response assessment. Different immune cell targets have been investigated as surrogate markers of response to immunotherapy, which motivated the development of multiple imaging agents. In this review, the targets and radiotracers being investigated for monitoring the functional status of immune effector cells are summarized, and their use for imaging of immune-related responses are reviewed along their limitations and pitfalls, of which multiple have already been translated to the clinic. Finally, emerging effector immune cell imaging strategies and future directions are provided.