1
|
Almeida D, Umuhire D, Gonzalez-Quevedo R, António A, Burgos JG, Verpillat P, Bere N, Sepodes B, Torre C. Leveraging patient experience data to guide medicines development, regulation, access decisions and clinical care in the EU. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1408636. [PMID: 38846141 PMCID: PMC11153762 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1408636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Patient experience data (PED), provided by patients/their carers without interpretation by clinicians, directly capture what matters more to patients on their medical condition, treatment and impact of healthcare. PED can be collected through different methodologies and these need to be robust and validated for its intended use. Medicine regulators are increasingly encouraging stakeholders to generate, collect and submit PED to support both scientific advice in development programs and regulatory decisions on the approval and use of these medicines. This article reviews the existing definitions and types of PED and demonstrate the potential for use in different settings of medicines' life cycle, focusing on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) and Patient Preferences (PP). Furthermore, it addresses some challenges and opportunities, alluding to important regulatory guidance that has been published, methodological aspects and digitalization, highlighting the lack of guidance as a key hurdle to achieve more systematic inclusion of PED in regulatory submissions. In addition, the article discusses opportunities at European and global level that could be implemented to leverage PED use. New digital tools that allow patients to collect PED in real time could also contribute to these advances, but it is equally important not to overlook the challenges they entail. The numerous and relevant initiatives being developed by various stakeholders in this field, including regulators, show their confidence in PED's value and create an ideal moment to address challenges and consolidate PED use across medicines' life cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diogo Almeida
- Laboratory of Systems Integration Pharmacology, Clinical and Regulatory Science, Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Lisbon, Portugal
- Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Denise Umuhire
- Data Analytics and Methods Task Force, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Rosa Gonzalez-Quevedo
- Public and Stakeholders Engagement Department, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ana António
- Referrals Office, Quality and Safety of Medicines Department, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Juan Garcia Burgos
- Public and Stakeholders Engagement Department, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Patrice Verpillat
- Data Analytics and Methods Task Force, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Nathalie Bere
- Regulatory Practice and Analysis, Medsafe—New Zealand Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Authority, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Bruno Sepodes
- Laboratory of Systems Integration Pharmacology, Clinical and Regulatory Science, Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Lisbon, Portugal
- Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Carla Torre
- Laboratory of Systems Integration Pharmacology, Clinical and Regulatory Science, Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Lisbon, Portugal
- Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
DiStefano MJ, Zemplenyi A, McQueen RB. Assessing clinical benefit in the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program: A 2-step approach for improving transparency, consistency, and meaningful patient engagement. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2024; 30:252-258. [PMID: 38241282 PMCID: PMC10906446 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.23255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2024]
Abstract
In early 2024, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) will send initial price offers to the manufacturers of the first 10 drugs selected for the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program, established under the Inflation Reduction Act. However, CMS has not specified exactly how it will adjust the starting point for an initial price offer based on assessment of a drug's clinical benefit. This article addresses unanswered questions relating to CMS' methods for assessing clinical benefit. Specifically, we address how CMS can weigh various measures of evidence, ensure transparency and consistency, meaningfully incorporate patient and other stakeholder perspectives, and support addressing evidence gaps. We propose a 2-step approach for assessing the overall clinical benefit of a selected drug compared with its therapeutic alternatives that builds on the framework outlined by CMS. In step 1, CMS would evaluate conventional clinical benefit, defined in terms of outcomes commonly used in clinical studies for the selected drug and indications. In step 2, CMS would evaluate other outcomes broadly related to patient experience that are not adequately represented in the clinical literature. Overall, our approach incorporates the advantages of both qualitative and quantitative approaches to value assessment and decision-making. We describe a set of loose decision rules to improve transparency and consistency, recommend incorporating ranks and weights to signal to researchers and manufacturers which elements of clinical benefit and sources of data are the most important, and center meaningful deliberation with clinical experts, patients, and caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J. DiStefano
- Center for Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| | - Antal Zemplenyi
- Center for Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - R. Brett McQueen
- Center for Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jakab I, Dimitrova M, Houÿez F, Bereczky T, Fövényes M, Maravic Z, Belina I, Andriciuc C, Tóth K, Piniazhko O, Hren R, Gutierrez-Ibarluzea I, Czech M, Tesar T, Niewada M, Lorenzovici L, Kamusheva M, Manova M, Savova A, Mitkova Z, Tachkov K, Németh B, Petykó ZI, Dawoud D, Delnoij D, Knies S, Goettsch W, Kaló Z. Recommendations for patient involvement in health technology assessment in Central and Eastern European countries. Front Public Health 2023; 11:1176200. [PMID: 37465169 PMCID: PMC10350487 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1176200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Meaningful patient involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) is essential in ensuring that the interests of the affected patient population, their families, and the general public are accurately reflected in coverage and reimbursement decisions. Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries are generally at less advanced stages of implementing HTA, which is particularly true for patient involvement activities. As part of the Horizon2020 HTx project, this research aimed to form recommendations for critical barriers to patient involvement in HTA in CEE countries. Methods Built on previous research findings on potential barriers, a prioritisation survey was conducted online with CEE stakeholders. Recommendations for prioritised barriers were formed through a face-to-face workshop by CEE stakeholders and HTx experts. Results A total of 105 stakeholders from 13 CEE countries completed the prioritisation survey and identified 12 of the 22 potential barriers as highly important. The workshop had 36 participants representing 9 CEE countries, and 5 Western European countries coming together to discuss solutions in order to form recommendations based on best practices, real-life experience, and transferability aspects. Stakeholder groups involved in both phases included HTA organisation representatives, payers, patients, caregivers, patient organisation representatives, patient experts, health care providers, academic and non-academic researchers, health care consultants and health technology manufacturers/providers. As a result, 12 recommendations were formed specified to the CEE region's context, but potentially useful for a broader geographic audience. Conclusion In this paper, we present 12 recommendations for meaningful, systematic, and sustainable patient involvement in HTA in CEE countries. Our hope is that engaging more than a hundred CEE stakeholders in the study helped to spread awareness of the importance and potential of patient involvement and that the resulting recommendations provide tangible steps for the way forward. Future studies shall focus on country-specific case studies of the implemented recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivett Jakab
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
- Patient advocate, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Maria Dimitrova
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - François Houÿez
- European Organisation for Rare Diseases (EURORDIS), Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Ivica Belina
- Coalition of Associations in Healthcare, Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | - Krisztina Tóth
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
- Bridge of Health Alliance against Breast Cancer Association, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Oresta Piniazhko
- Health Technology Assessment Department of State Expert Centre, Ministry of Health of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Rok Hren
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
- Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - Marcin Czech
- Head of Pharmacoeconomic Department, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Tomas Tesar
- Department of Organisation and Management in Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Maciej Niewada
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - László Lorenzovici
- Syreon Research Romania, Tirgu Mures, Romania
- Department of Doctoral School of Medicine and Pharmacy, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology, Targu Mures, Romania
| | - Maria Kamusheva
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Manoela Manova
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
- National Council on Prices and Reimbursement of Medicines, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Alexandra Savova
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
- National Council on Prices and Reimbursement of Medicines, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Zornitsa Mitkova
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | | | | | - Zsuzsanna Ida Petykó
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
- Centre for Health Technology Assessment, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Dalia Dawoud
- Science, Policy and Research Programme, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, United Kingdom
| | - Diana Delnoij
- National Health Care Institute (ZIN), Diemen, Netherlands
| | - Saskia Knies
- National Health Care Institute (ZIN), Diemen, Netherlands
| | - Wim Goettsch
- National Health Care Institute (ZIN), Diemen, Netherlands
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Policy and Regulation, Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Zoltán Kaló
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
- Centre for Health Technology Assessment, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|