Health care costs and resource use of managing hemophilia A: A targeted literature review

Rapid recognition and optimal management of hemophilia in the emergency department: A quality improvement project

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a continuous quality improvement initiative at the University of Florida Health Physicians practice in reducing the time to administer factor replacement therapy (FRT) for hemophilia patients presenting with bleeding in the emergency department (ED).

Methods

The study, a quasi-experimental, interventional design, was conducted between January 2020 and January 2023. The intervention, implemented in September 2021, involved training ED physicians, creating a specialized medication order set within the electronic health record (EHR), and a rapid triage system. The effectiveness was measured by comparing the time from ED arrival to factor administration before and after the intervention and benchmarking it against the National Bleeding Disorders Foundation's Medical and Scientific Advisory Council (MASAC)-recommended 1-hour timeline for factor administration. An interrupted time series (ITS) analysis with a generalized least squares model assessed the intervention's impact.

Results

A total of 43 ED visits (22 pre-intervention and 21 post-intervention) were recorded. Post-intervention, the average time from ED arrival to factor administration decreased from 5.63 to 3.15 hours. There was no significant increase (27% vs. 29%) in the patients receiving factor within 1-hour of ED arrival. The ITS analysis predicted a 20-hour reduction in the average quarterly time to administer factor by the end of the study, an 84% decrease.

Conclusions

The quality improvement program decreased the time to administer FRT for patients with hemophilia in the ED. However, the majority of patients did not achieve the 1-hour MASAC-recommended timeline for factor administration after ED arrival.

Exploring Female Relatives of Patients with Hemophilia' Awareness, Attitudes, and Understanding Towards Genetic Testing

Purpose

A better understanding of the factors that influence engagement is needed to provide a reference for conducting genetic testing in female relatives of patients with hemophilia (PWH). We therefore determined the perceptions and understanding of genetic testing among female relatives of PWH in China.

Methods

We carried out a qualitative study using in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 11 female relatives of PWH in Shanxi Province, China. The resulting data were analyzed using thematic analyses.

Results

This study extracted four topics: uncertainty about carrier genetic status; limited understanding of genetic testing; coexistence of positive and negative coping; and multi-aspect demands.

Conclusion

Healthcare professionals should provide personalized and multidimensional health education and comprehensive decision-making support to female relatives of PWH, to enhance their motivation and willingness to undergo genetic testing. It is also important to actively improve relevant policies, strengthen the genetic testing service system, and promote the popularization of genetic testing in female relatives of PWH.

Efficacy/effectiveness and safety of emicizumab prophylaxis of people with hemophilia A: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Emicizumab is a monoclonal antibody approved for prophylaxis against bleeds for people with hemophilia A (PwHA). A systematic review was conducted evaluating the efficacy/effectiveness and the safety of emicizumab as prophylaxis for PwHA compared to prophylaxis with factor VIII (FVIII) or bypassing agents (BPA), respectively in patients without and with inhibitors.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Database-directed search strategies were performed in Aug/26/2022 and updated in Mar/16/2023. Studies evaluating the prophylaxis with emicizumab versus prophylaxis with FVIII or BPA in PwHA without or with inhibitors, respectively, were selected by two independent reviewers. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. Annualized bleeding rates for total treated bleeding events (ABR-all) were evaluated by meta-analysis. The quality of studies and certainty of evidence were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies were included. The standard mean differences for ABR-all were -0.6 (95%CI -1.0 to -0.2, p-value = 0.0002), among PwHA without inhibitors, and -1.7 (95%CI -2.4 to -0.9, p-value <0.00001), among PwHA with inhibitors. However, there was moderate heterogeneity in both meta-analyses. The most frequent adverse event was injection site reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Emicizumab prophylaxis was superior in reducing the ABR-all when compared with prophylaxis with FVIII or BPA.