1
|
Maliar NL, Talbot EJ, Edwards AR, Khoronenkova SV. Microglial inflammation in genome instability: A neurodegenerative perspective. DNA Repair (Amst) 2024; 135:103634. [PMID: 38290197 DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2024.103634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
The maintenance of genome stability is crucial for cell homeostasis and tissue integrity. Numerous human neuropathologies display chronic inflammation in the central nervous system, set against a backdrop of genome instability, implying a close interplay between the DNA damage and immune responses in the context of neurological disease. Dissecting the molecular mechanisms of this crosstalk is essential for holistic understanding of neuroinflammatory pathways in genome instability disorders. Non-neuronal cell types, specifically microglia, are major drivers of neuroinflammation in the central nervous system with neuro-protective and -toxic capabilities. Here, we discuss how persistent DNA damage affects microglial homeostasis, zooming in on the cytosolic DNA sensing cGAS-STING pathway and the downstream inflammatory response, which can drive neurotoxic outcomes in the context of genome instability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina L Maliar
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Emily J Talbot
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Abigail R Edwards
- Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Heimes A, Brodhagen J, Weikard R, Becker D, Meyerholz MM, Petzl W, Zerbe H, Schuberth HJ, Hoedemaker M, Schmicke M, Engelmann S, Kühn C. Cows selected for divergent mastitis susceptibility display a differential liver transcriptome profile after experimental Staphylococcus aureus mammary gland inoculation. J Dairy Sci 2020; 103:6364-6373. [PMID: 32307160 DOI: 10.3168/jds.2019-17612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Infection and inflammation of the mammary gland, and especially prevention of mastitis, are still major challenges for the dairy industry. Different approaches have been tried to reduce the incidence of mastitis. Genetic selection of cows with lower susceptibility to mastitis promises sustainable success in this regard. Bos taurus autosome (BTA) 18, particularly the region between 43 and 59 Mb, harbors quantitative trait loci (QTL) for somatic cell score, a surrogate trait for mastitis susceptibility. Scrutinizing the molecular bases hereof, we challenged udders from half-sib heifers having inherited either favorable paternal haplotypes for somatic cell score (Q) or unfavorable haplotypes (q) with the Staphylococcus aureus pathogen. RNA sequencing was used for an in-depth analysis of challenge-related alterations in the hepatic transcriptome. Liver exerts highly relevant immune functions aside from being the key metabolic organ. Hence, a holistic approach focusing on the liver enabled us to identify challenge-related and genotype-dependent differentially expressed genes and underlying regulatory networks. In response to the S. aureus challenge, we found that heifers with Q haplotypes displayed more activated immune genes and pathways after S. aureus challenge compared with their q half-sibs. Furthermore, we found a significant enrichment of differentially expressed loci in the genomic target region on BTA18, suggesting the existence of a regionally acting regulatory element with effects on a variety of genes in this region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Heimes
- Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Institute of Genome Biology, 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany
| | - J Brodhagen
- Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Institute of Genome Biology, 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany
| | - R Weikard
- Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Institute of Genome Biology, 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany
| | - D Becker
- Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Institute of Genome Biology, 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany
| | - M M Meyerholz
- Clinic for Ruminants with Ambulatory and Herd Health Services, Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany; Immunology Unit, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany
| | - W Petzl
- Clinic for Ruminants with Ambulatory and Herd Health Services, Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | - H Zerbe
- Clinic for Ruminants with Ambulatory and Herd Health Services, Centre for Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | - H-J Schuberth
- Immunology Unit, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30559 Hannover, Germany
| | - M Hoedemaker
- Clinic for Cattle, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, 30173 Hannover, Germany
| | - M Schmicke
- Faculty of Natural Sciences III, Martin-Luther Universität Halle-Wittenberg, 06120 Halle, Germany
| | - S Engelmann
- Technical University Braunschweig, Institute for Microbiology, 38023 Braunschweig, Germany; Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Microbial Proteomics, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany
| | - C Kühn
- Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology (FBN), Institute of Genome Biology, 18196 Dummerstorf, Germany; Agricultural and Environmental Faculty, University Rostock, 18059 Rostock, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|