Inflammatory macrophages facilitate mechanical stress-induced osteogenesis

Pain Experience and Sensory Changes in Astronauts During and After Short-Lasting Commercial Spaceflight: A Proof-of-Concept Study

Space travel has been associated with musculoskeletal pain, yet little is known about the nociceptive changes and pain experience during spaceflight. This preliminary study aims to investigate the pain experience and sensory alterations in astronauts following a 17-day mission to the International Space Station (ISS) on Axiom Space's AX-1 commercial space flight. Two participants were enrolled, and data were collected pre-flight, in-flight, post-flight, and three-month post-flight. Validated pain questionnaires assessed anxiety, catastrophizing, impact on physical and mental health, disability, and overall pain experience. Qualitative interviews were conducted post-landing and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) and quantitative sensory testing (QST) were performed. Both astronauts reported musculoskeletal pain during and after the flight, which was managed with anti-inflammatories and stretching techniques. Pain levels returned to baseline after three months. Pain questionnaires revealed heightened pain experiences in-flight and immediately post-flight, although their adequacy in assessing pain in space is uncertain. Qualitative interviews allowed astronauts to describe their pain experiences during the flight. Sensory changes included increased mechanical touch detection thresholds, temporal pain summation, heat pain thresholds, and differences in conditioned pain modulation post-flight. This preliminary study suggested that spaceflight may affect various aspects of sensory perception and regulation in astronauts, albeit in a variable manner. More data are needed to gain insight of on gain and loss of sensory functions during space missions. Further investigation into the multifactorial stressors affecting the somatosensory system during space travel could contribute to advancements in space and pain medicine.

Surgical Site-Released Tissue Is Potent to Generate Bone onto TCP and PCL-TCP Scaffolds In Vitro

There is evidence that surgical site tissue (SSRT) released during orthopedic surgery has a strong mesenchymal regenerative potential. Some data also suggest that this tissue may activate synthetic or natural bone substitute materials and can thus upgrade its osteopromoting properties. In this comparative in vitro study, we investigate the composition of SSRT during total hip replacement (n = 20) harvested using a surgical suction handle. In addition, the osteopromoting effect of the cells isolated from SSRT is elucidated when incubated with porous beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) or 80% medical-grade poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL)/20% TCP composite material. We identified multiple growth factors and cytokines with significantly higher levels of PDGF and VEGF in SSRT compared to peripheral blood. The overall number of MSC was 0.09 ± 0.12‱ per gram of SSRT. A three-lineage specific differentiation was possible in all cases. PCL-TCP cultures showed a higher cell density and cell viability compared to TCP after 6 weeks in vitro. Moreover, PCL-TCP cultures showed a higher osteocalcin expression but no significant differences in osteopontin and collagen I synthesis. We could demonstrate the high regenerative potential from SSRT harvested under vacuum in a PMMA filter device. The in vitro data suggest advantages in cytocompatibility for the PCL-TCP composite compared to TCP alone.

High-mobility group box 1 accelerates distraction osteogenesis healing via the recruitment of endogenous stem/progenitor cells

BACKGROUND AIMS

While distraction osteogenesis (DO) achieves substantial bone regeneration, prolonged fixation may lead to infections. Existing stem cell and physical therapies have limitations, requiring the development of novel therapeutic approaches. Here, we evaluated high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) as a novel therapeutic target for DO treatment.

METHODS

Micro-computed tomography (Micro-CT) analysis and histological staining of samples obtained from tibial DO model mice was performed. Transwell migration, wound healing, and proliferation assays were also performed on cultured human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) and human umbilival vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). Tube formation assay was performed on HUVECs, whereas osteogenic differentiation assay was performed on hMSCs.

RESULTS

Micro-CT analysis and histological staining of mouse samples revealed that HMGB1 promotes bone regeneration during DO via the recruitment of PDGFRα and Sca-1 positve (PαS⁺) cells and endothelial progenitor cells. Furthermore, HMGB1 accelerated angiogenesis during DO, promoted the migration and osteogenic differentiation of hMSCs as well as the proliferation, migration and angiogenesis of HUVECs in vitro.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that HMGB1 has a positive influence on endogenous stem/progenitor cells, representing a novel therapeutic target for the acceleration of DO-driven bone regeneration.

Research Progress of Macrophages in Bone Regeneration

Bone tissue regeneration plays an increasingly important role in contemporary clinical treatment. The reconstruction of bone defects remains a huge challenge for clinicians. Bone regeneration is regulated by the immune system, in which inflammation is an important regulating factor in bone formation and remodeling. As the main cells involved in inflammation, macrophages play a key role in osteogenesis by polarizing into different phenotypes during different stages of bone regeneration. Considering this, this review mainly summarizes the function of macrophage in bone regeneration based on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and vascular cells. In conclusion, anti-inflammatory macrophages (M2) have a greater potentiality to promote bone regeneration than M0 and classically activated proinflammatory macrophages (M1). In the fracture and bone defect models, tissue engineering materials can induce the transition from M1 to M2, alter the bone microenvironment, and promote bone regeneration through interactions with bone-related cells and blood vessels. The review provides a further understanding of macrophage polarization behavior in the evolving field of bone immunology.

Immune and stem cell compartments of acetabular and femoral bone marrow in hip osteoarthritis patients

OBJECTIVE

Hip osteoarthritis (OA) affects all components of the osteochondral unit, leading to bone marrow (BM) lesions, and unknown consequences on BM cell functionality. We analyzed the cellular composition in OA-affected acetabula compared to proximal femur shafts obtained of hip OA patients to reveal yet not explored immune and stem cell compartments.

DESIGN

Combining flow cytometry, cellular assays and transcription analyses, we performed extensive ex vivo phenotyping of acetabular BM cells from 18 hip OA patients, comparing them with their counterparts from patient-matched femoral shaft BM samples. Findings were related to differences in skeletal sites and age.

RESULTS

Acetabular BM had a greater frequency of T-lymphocytes, non-hematopoietic cells and colony-forming units fibroblastic potential than femoral BM. The incidence of acetabular CD45⁺CD3⁺ T-lymphocytes increased (95% CI: 0.1770 to 0.0.8416), while clonogenic hematopoietic progenitors declined (95% CI: -0.9023 to -0.2399) with age of patients. On the other side, in femoral BM, we observed higher B-lymphocyte, myeloid and erythroid cell frequencies. Acetabular mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) showed a senescent profile associated with the expression of survival and inflammation-related genes. Efficient osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation was detected in acetabular MSCs, while adipogenesis was more pronounced in their femoral counterparts.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that distinctions in BM cellular compartments and MSCs may be due to the influence of the OA-stressed microenvironment, but also acetabular vs femoral shaft-specific peculiarities cannot be excluded. These results bring new knowledge on acetabular BM cell populations and may be addressed as novel pathogenic mechanisms and therapeutic targets in OA.

Suture Cells in a Mechanical Stretching Niche: Critical Contributors to Trans-sutural Distraction Osteogenesis

Trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis has been proposed as an alternative technique of craniofacial remodelling surgery for craniosynostosis correction. Many studies have defined the contribution of a series of biological events to distraction osteogenesis, such as changes in gene expression, changes in suture cell behaviour and changes in suture collagen fibre characteristics. However, few studies have elucidated the systematic molecular and cellular mechanisms of trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis, and no study has highlighted the contribution of cell-cell or cell-matrix interactions with respect to the whole expansion process to date. Therefore, it is difficult to translate largely primary mechanistic insights into clinical applications and optimize the clinical outcome of trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis. In this review, we carefully summarize in detail the literature related to the effects of mechanical stretching on osteoblasts, endothelial cells, fibroblasts, immune cells (macrophages and T cells), mesenchymal stem cells and collagen fibres in sutures during the distraction osteogenesis process. We also briefly review the contribution of cell-cell or cell-matrix interactions to bone regeneration at the osteogenic suture front from a comprehensive viewpoint.

Immunomodulatory effects and mechanisms of distraction osteogenesis

Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is widely used for bone tissue engineering technology. Immune regulations play important roles in the process of DO like other bone regeneration mechanisms. Compared with others, the immune regulation processes of DO have their distinct features. In this review, we summarized the immune-related events including changes in and effects of immune cells, immune-related cytokines, and signaling pathways at different periods in the process of DO. We aim to elucidated our understanding and unknowns about the immunomodulatory role of DO. The goal of this is to use the known knowledge to further modify existing methods of DO, and to develop novel DO strategies in our unknown areas through more detailed studies of the work we have done.