Male patients with TERT mutation may be more likely to benefit from immunotherapy, especially for melanoma

TERT Promoter Mutations Frequency Across Race, Sex, and Cancer Type

BACKGROUND

Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) gene promoter mutations have been explored, as biomarkers of improved survival for patients with cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. We sought to investigate their prevalence by race and sex across different cancer types to inform patient selection in clinical trials.

RESULTS

In this observational study, 31 925 patients with cancer underwent next-generation sequencing of their tumors with 88% (27 970) patients self-reported being Whites, 7.1% (2273) Asians, and 5.3% (1682) Blacks. Examining the distribution of TERT promoter mutations by race, White patients with melanoma harbored more TERT promoter mutations than Asian and Black patients (OR = 25.83; 95%CI, 6.84-217.42; P < .001). In contrast, Asian patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) harbored more TERT promoter mutations compared to White patients (OR = 2.47; 95%CI, 1.39-4.37; P = .004). In addition, the distribution of TERT promoter mutations differed by sex. Males were enriched for TERT gene promoter mutations compared to females with melanoma (OR = 1.82; 95%CI, 1.53-2.16; P < .001), cancer of unknown primary (OR = 1.96; 95%CI, 1.43-2.69; P < .001), hepatobiliary (OR = 3.89; 95%CI, 2.65-5.69; P < .001), and thyroid cancers (OR = 1.42; 95%CI, 1.10-1.84; P = .0087), while females were more enriched for TERT promoter mutations compared to males for HNC (OR = 0.56; 95%CI, 0.39-0.81; P = .0021).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of TERT gene promoter mutations varies among patients with cancer based on race and sex. These findings inform our understanding of cancer biology and can assist in the design of future clinical trials that leverage drugs targeting TERT promoter dependencies.

Telomerase and hallmarks of cancer: An intricate interplay governing cancer cell evolution

Transformed cells must acquire specific characteristics to be malignant. Weinberg and Hanahan characterize these characteristics as cancer hallmarks. Though these features are independently driven, substantial signaling crosstalk in transformed cells efficiently promotes these feature acquisitions. Telomerase is an enzyme complex that maintains telomere length. However, its main component, Telomere reverse transcriptase (TERT), has been found to interact with various signaling molecules like cMYC, NF-kB, BRG1 and cooperate in transcription and metabolic reprogramming, acting as a strong proponent of malignant features such as cell death resistance, sustained proliferation, angiogenesis activation, and metastasis, among others. It allows cells to avoid replicative senescence and achieve endless replicative potential. This review summarizes both the canonical and noncanonical functions of TERT and discusses how they promote cancer hallmarks. Understanding the role of Telomerase in promoting cancer hallmarks provides vital insight into the underlying mechanism of cancer genesis and progression and telomerase intervention as a possible therapeutic target for cancer treatment. More investigation into the precise molecular mechanisms of telomerase-mediated impacts on cancer hallmarks will contribute to developing more focused and customized cancer treatment methods.

TERT mutations-associated alterations in clinical characteristics, immune environment and therapy response in glioblastomas

OBJECTIVE TERT: is the most frequently mutated gene in adult glioblastomas (GBMs) defined by the 2021 World Health Organization classification system. The present study aims to explore differences in clinical characteristics and immune microenvironment between TERT mutant and wild-type GBM.

METHODS

Three GBM-related cohorts consisting of 205 GBM patients in our cohort, 463 GBM patients without immune checkpoint inhibitor(ICI) therapy and 1465 tumour patients (including 92 GBM cases) receiving ICI treatment in the MSK cohort were included. Retrospective analysis and immunohistochemistry assay were used for investigating the local (including tumour cells, local immune cells, and seizures) and systemic (including circulating immune cells, coagulation-related functions, and prognosis) effects of TERT mutations. Besides, differences in genetic alterations and immunotherapy responses between TERT mutant and wild-type GBMs were also explored.

RESULTS

We found that TERT mutant and wild-type GBMs possessed similar initial clinic symptoms, circulating immune microenvironment and immunotherapy response. With respect to that in TERT wild-type GBMs, mutations in TERT resulted in higher levels of tumour-infiltrating neutrophils, prolonged coagulation time, worse chemotherapy response and poorer overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Mutations in TERT alter the local immune environment and decrease the sensitivity of GBM to chemotherapy.

Anchored Multiplex PCR Custom Melanoma Next Generation Sequencing Panel for Analysis of Circulating Tumor DNA

Detection of melanoma mutations using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is a potential alternative to using genomic DNA from invasive tissue biopsies. To date, mutations in the GC-rich TERT promoter region, which is commonly mutated in melanoma, have been technically difficult to detect in ctDNA using next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels. In this study, we developed a custom melanoma NGS panel for detection of ctDNA, which encompasses the top 15 gene mutations in melanoma including the TERT promoter. We analyzed 21 stage III and IV melanoma patient samples who were treatment-naïve or on therapy. The overall detection rate of the custom panel, based on BRAF/NRAS/TERT promoter mutations, was 14/21 (67%) patient samples which included a TERT C250T mutation in one BRAF and NRAS mutation negative sample. A BRAF or NRAS mutation was detected in the ctDNA of 13/21 (62%) patients while TERT promoter mutations were detected in 10/21 (48%) patients. Co-occurrence of TERT promoter mutations with BRAF or NRAS mutations was found in 9/10 (90%) patients. The custom ctDNA panel showed a concordance of 16/21 (76%) with tissue based-detection and included 12 BRAF/NRAS mutation positive and 4 BRAF/NRAS mutation negative patients. The ctDNA mutation detection rate for stage IV was 12/16 (75%) and for stage III was 1/5 (20%). Based on BRAF, NRAS and TERT promoter mutations, the custom melanoma panel displayed a limit of detection of ~0.2% mutant allele frequency and showed significant correlation with droplet digital PCR. For one patient, a novel MAP2K1 H119Y mutation was detected in an NRAS/BRAF/TERT promoter mutation negative background. To increase the detection rate to >90% for stage IV melanoma patients, we plan to expand our custom panel to 50 genes. This study represents one of the first to successfully detect TERT promoter mutations in ctDNA from cutaneous melanoma patients using a targeted NGS panel.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Marjolin Ulcer: A Case Series

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. However, the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of Marjolin ulcer (MU), a rare cutaneous malignancy that arises from previously traumatized and chronically inflamed skin, is not well defined. Thus, efficacy and clinical response to immunotherapy in patients with MU requires further investigation. MU with squamous cell carcinoma, the most commonly associated malignancy, is highly aggressive with a greater risk for lymph node and distant metastasis compared with non-MU cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Often associated with nonhealing chronic wounds from burn scars, injuries, venous stasis ulcers, osteomyelitis, and radiotherapy, MU carries a poor prognosis. We conducted a retrospective study and describe a single institution experience of patients with MU treated with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) therapy at Massachusetts General Hospital between 2016 and 2020. Five subjects with this rare presentation met inclusion criteria and were treated with pembrolizumab (N=2) or cemiplimab (N=3). Four subjects received immunotherapy in the first-line setting. Notably, 1 patient had durable disease control for 1 year while on immunotherapy, with continued disease control after the cessation of anti-PD-1 therapy. Of the 4 patients that progressed on anti-PD-1 therapy, disease control at 5 months was achieved in 2 patients. Furthermore, 60% overall survival (3 patients) was observed in this limited cohort at 12 months after initiating anti-PD-1 therapy for MU. We describe the clinicopathologic features and clinical outcomes of our MU-SCC cohort.