YTHDF2 correlates with tumor immune infiltrates in lower-grade glioma

Dynamic RNA methylation modifications and their regulatory role in mammalian development and diseases

Among over 170 different types of chemical modifications on RNA nucleobases identified so far, RNA methylation is the major type of epitranscriptomic modifications existing on almost all types of RNAs, and has been demonstrated to participate in the entire process of RNA metabolism, including transcription, pre-mRNA alternative splicing and maturation, mRNA nucleus export, mRNA degradation and stabilization, mRNA translation. Attributing to the development of high-throughput detection technologies and the identification of both dynamic regulators and recognition proteins, mechanisms of RNA methylation modification in regulating the normal development of the organism as well as various disease occurrence and developmental abnormalities upon RNA methylation dysregulation have become increasingly clear. Here, we particularly focus on three types of RNA methylations: N6-methylcytosine (m6A), 5-methylcytosine (m5C), and N7-methyladenosine (m7G). We summarize the elements related to their dynamic installment and removal, specific binding proteins, and the development of high-throughput detection technologies. Then, for a comprehensive understanding of their biological significance, we also overview the latest knowledge on the underlying mechanisms and key roles of these three mRNA methylation modifications in gametogenesis, embryonic development, immune system development, as well as disease and tumor progression.

The Regulation of m6A Modification in Glioblastoma: Functional Mechanisms and Therapeutic Approaches

Glioblastoma is the most prevalent primary brain tumour and invariably confers a poor prognosis. The immense intra-tumoral heterogeneity of glioblastoma and its ability to rapidly develop treatment resistance are key barriers to successful therapy. As such, there is an urgent need for the greater understanding of the tumour biology in order to guide the development of novel therapeutics in this field. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most abundant of the RNA modifications in eukaryotes. Studies have demonstrated that the regulation of this RNA modification is altered in glioblastoma and may serve to regulate diverse mechanisms including glioma stem-cell self-renewal, tumorigenesis, invasion and treatment evasion. However, the precise mechanisms by which m6A modifications exert their functional effects are poorly understood. This review summarises the evidence for the disordered regulation of m6A in glioblastoma and discusses the downstream functional effects of m6A modification on RNA fate. The wide-ranging biological consequences of m6A modification raises the hope that novel cancer therapies can be targeted against this mechanism.

Epigenetic regulation in the tumor microenvironment: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets

Over decades, researchers have focused on the epigenetic control of DNA-templated processes. Histone modification, DNA methylation, chromatin remodeling, RNA modification, and noncoding RNAs modulate many biological processes that are crucial to the development of cancers. Dysregulation of the epigenome drives aberrant transcriptional programs. A growing body of evidence suggests that the mechanisms of epigenetic modification are dysregulated in human cancers and might be excellent targets for tumor treatment. Epigenetics has also been shown to influence tumor immunogenicity and immune cells involved in antitumor responses. Thus, the development and application of epigenetic therapy and cancer immunotherapy and their combinations may have important implications for cancer treatment. Here, we present an up-to-date and thorough description of how epigenetic modifications in tumor cells influence immune cell responses in the tumor microenvironment (TME) and how epigenetics influence immune cells internally to modify the TME. Additionally, we highlight the therapeutic potential of targeting epigenetic regulators for cancer immunotherapy. Harnessing the complex interplay between epigenetics and cancer immunology to develop therapeutics that combine thereof is challenging but could yield significant benefits. The purpose of this review is to assist researchers in understanding how epigenetics impact immune responses in the TME, so that better cancer immunotherapies can be developed.

Targeting RNA N6-methyladenosine to synergize with immune checkpoint therapy

Cancer immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint therapy, has revolutionized therapeutic options by reactivating the host immune system. However, the efficacy varies, and only a small portion of patients develop sustained antitumor responses. Hence, illustrating novel strategies that improve the clinical outcome of immune checkpoint therapy is urgently needed. N6-methyladenosine (m⁶A) has been proved to be an efficient and dynamic posttranscriptional modification process. It is involved in numerous RNA processing, such as splicing, trafficking, translation and degradation. Compelling evidence emphasizes the paramount role of m⁶A modification in the regulation of immune response. These findings may provide a foundation for the rational combination of targeting m⁶A modification and immune checkpoints in cancer treatment. In the present review, we summarize the current landscape of m⁶A modification in RNA biology, and highlight the latest findings on the complex mechanisms by which m⁶A modification governs immune checkpoint molecules. Furthermore, given the critical role of m⁶A modification in antitumor immunity, we discuss the clinical significance of targeting m⁶A modification to improve the efficacy of immune checkpoint therapy for cancer control.

Biological and pharmacological roles of m6A modifications in cancer drug resistance

Cancer drug resistance represents the main obstacle in cancer treatment. Drug-resistant cancers exhibit complex molecular mechanisms to hit back therapy under pharmacological pressure. As a reversible epigenetic modification, N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A) RNA modification was regarded to be the most common epigenetic RNA modification. RNA methyltransferases (writers), demethylases (erasers), and m⁶A-binding proteins (readers) are frequently disordered in several tumors, thus regulating the expression of oncoproteins, enhancing tumorigenesis, cancer proliferation, development, and metastasis. The review elucidated the underlying role of m⁶A in therapy resistance. Alteration of the m⁶A modification affected drug efficacy by restructuring multidrug efflux transporters, drug-metabolizing enzymes, and anticancer drug targets. Furthermore, the variation resulted in resistance by regulating DNA damage repair, downstream adaptive response (apoptosis, autophagy, and oncogenic bypass signaling), cell stemness, tumor immune microenvironment, and exosomal non-coding RNA. It is highlighted that several small molecules targeting m⁶A regulators have shown significant potential for overcoming drug resistance in different cancer categories. Further inhibitors and activators of RNA m⁶A-modified proteins are expected to provide novel anticancer drugs, delivering the therapeutic potential for addressing the challenge of resistance in clinical resistance.

Overexpression of Pleckstrin Homology Domain-Containing Family A Member 4 Is Correlated with Poor Prognostic Outcomes and Immune Infiltration in Lower-Grade Glioma

INTRODUCTION

The global incidence of brain tumors, the most common of which is lower grade glioma (LGG), remains high. Pleckstrin homology domain-containing family A member 4 (PLEKHA4) has been reported to be related to tumor invasion and growth. However, its role and correlation with immunity in LGG remain elusive.

METHODS

We evaluated the expression pattern, prognostic value, biological functions, and immune effects of PLEKHA4 in LGG. We also analyzed the association between PLEKHA4 levels in different tumors, patient prognosis, and its role in tumor immunity. Depending on the type of research data, we used statistical methods such as Student's t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests one-way ANOVA tests Kruskal-Wallis tests Pearson's or Spearman's correlation analysis Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests in this paper. Results and Conclusions. The results revealed that PLEKHA4 levels were markedly elevated in most tumors (such as LGG). High PLEKHA4 levels are associated with poor overall survival (OS), progression-free interval (PFI) rates, and disease-specific survival (DSS) in LGG patients. Cox regression analysis and nomograms showed that PLEKHA4 levels are independent prognostic factors for LGG patients. According to functional enrichment analysis, PLEKHA4 levels in LGG are associated with immune infiltration and immunotherapy. In conclusion, PLEKHA4 is a potential prognostic marker and immunotherapy target for LGG.

Targeting RNA N6-methyladenosine modification: a precise weapon in overcoming tumor immune escape

Immunotherapy, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has revolutionized the treatment of many types of cancer, particularly advanced-stage cancers. Nevertheless, although a subset of patients experiences dramatic and long-term disease regression in response to ICIs, most patients do not benefit from these treatments. Some may even experience cancer progression. Immune escape by tumor cells may be a key reason for this low response rate. N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A) is the most common type of RNA methylation and has been recognized as a critical regulator of tumors and the immune system. Therefore, m⁶A modification and related regulators are promising targets for improving the efficacy of tumor immunotherapy. However, the association between m⁶A modification and tumor immune escape (TIE) has not been comprehensively summarized. Therefore, this review summarizes the existing knowledge regarding m⁶A modifications involved in TIE and their potential mechanisms of action. Moreover, we provide an overview of currently available agents targeting m⁶A regulators that have been tested for their elevated effects on TIE. This review establishes the association between m⁶A modifications and TIE and provides new insights and strategies for maximizing the efficacy of immunotherapy by specifically targeting m⁶A modifications involved in TIE.

YT521-B homology domain family proteins as N6-methyladenosine readers in tumors

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most abundant internal chemical modification of eukaryotic mRNA and plays diverse roles in gene regulation. The m6A modification plays a significant role in numerous cancer types, including kidney, stomach, lung, bladder tumors, and melanoma, through varied mechanisms. As direct m6A readers, the YT521-B homology domain family proteins (YTHDFs) play a key role in tumor transcription, translation, protein synthesis, tumor stemness, epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), immune escape, and chemotherapy resistance. An in-depth understanding of the molecular mechanism of YTHDFs is expected to provide new strategies for tumor treatment. In this review, we provide a systematic description of YTHDF protein structure and its function in tumor progression.

Roles of the m6A Modification of RNA in the Glioblastoma Microenvironment as Revealed by Single-Cell Analyses

Purpose

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a common and aggressive form of brain tumor. The N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A) mRNA modification plays multiple roles in many biological processes and disease states. However, the relationship between m⁶A modifications and the tumor microenvironment in GBM remains unclear, especially at the single-cell level.

Experimental Design

Single-cell and bulk RNA-sequencing data were acquired from the GEO and TCGA databases, respectively. We used bioinformatics and statistical tools to analyze associations between m⁶A regulators and multiple factors.

Results

HNRNPA2B1 and HNRNPC were extensively expressed in the GBM microenvironment. m⁶A regulators promoted the stemness state in GBM cancer cells. Immune-related BP terms were enriched in modules of m⁶A-related genes. Cell communication analysis identified genes in the GALECTIN signaling network in GBM samples, and expression of these genes (LGALS9, CD44, CD45, and HAVCR2) correlated with that of m⁶A regulators. Validation experiments revealed that MDK in MK signaling network promoted migration and immunosuppressive polarization of macrophage. Expression of m⁶A regulators correlated with ICPs in GBM cancer cells, M2 macrophages and T/NK cells. Bulk RNA-seq analysis identified two expression patterns (low m⁶A/high ICP and high m⁶A/low ICP) with different predicted immune infiltration and responses to ICP inhibitors. A predictive nomogram model to distinguish these 2 clusters was constructed and validated with excellent performance.

Conclusion

At the single-cell level, m⁶A modification facilitates the stemness state in GBM cancer cells and promotes an immunosuppressive microenvironment through ICPs and the GALECTIN signaling pathway network. And we also identified two m⁶A-ICP expression patterns. These findings could lead to novel treatment strategies for GBM patients.

The Roles and Regulation of m6A Modification in Glioblastoma Stem Cells and Tumorigenesis

Glioblastoma is the most common and most lethal primary malignant brain tumor. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is a widespread and abundant internal messenger RNA (mRNA) modification found in eukaryotes. Accumulated evidence demonstrates that m6A modification is aberrantly activated in human cancers and is critical for tumorigenesis and metastasis. m6A modification is also strongly involved in key signaling pathways and is associated with prognosis in glioblastoma. Here, we briefly outline the functions of m6A and its regulatory proteins, including m6A writers, erasers, and readers of the fate of RNA. We also summarize the latest breakthroughs in this field, describe the underlying molecular mechanisms that contribute to the tumorigenesis and progression, and highlight the inhibitors targeting the factors in m6A modification in glioblastoma. Further studies focusing on the specific pathways of m6A modification could help identify biomarkers and therapeutic targets that might prevent and treat glioblastoma.

Molecular Characteristics of m6A Regulators and Tumor Microenvironment Infiltration in Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Gene-Based Study

Background: N6-methyladenosine (m6A) methylation played a key role in tumor growth. However, the relationship between m6A and soft tissue sarcoma (STS) was still unclear.

Methods: The characterization and patterns of m6A modification in STS (TCGA-SARC and GSE17674) were analyzed comprehensively through bioinformatics and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The effects of different m6A modification patterns on prognosis and immune infiltration of STS were further explored. Differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis was performed. Moreover, an m6Ascore was constructed by principal component analysis (PCA). In addition, two immunotherapy datasets (IMvigor210 and GSE78220) and a sarcoma dataset (GSE17618) were used to evaluate the m6Ascore.

Results: Huge differences were found in somatic mutation, CNV, and expression of 25 m6A regulators in STS. Two modification patterns (A and B) in STS were further identified and the m6A cluster A showed a better clinical outcome with a lower immune/stromal score compared with the m6A cluster B (p < 0.050).In addition to , most STS samples from m6A cluster A showed a high m6Ascore, which was related to mismatch repair and a better prognosis of STS (p < 0.001). In contrast, the m6A cluster B, characterized by a low m6Ascore, was related to the MYC signaling pathway, which led to a poor prognosis of STS. A high m6Ascore also contributed to a better outcome of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade immunotherapy.

Conclusion: The modification patterns of 25 m6A regulators in the STS microenvironment were explored comprehensively. The novel m6Ascore effectively predicted the characteristics of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and outcome in STS and provided novel insights for future immunotherapy.

Targeting the RNA m6A modification for cancer immunotherapy

N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A) is the most abundant epigenetic modification of RNA, and its dysregulation drives aberrant transcription and translation programs that promote cancer occurrence and progression. Although defective gene regulation resulting from m⁶A often affects oncogenic and tumor-suppressing networks, m⁶A can also modulate tumor immunogenicity and immune cells involved in anti-tumor responses. Understanding this counterintuitive concept can aid the design of new drugs that target m⁶A to potentially improve the outcomes of cancer immunotherapies. Here, we provide an up-to-date and comprehensive overview of how m⁶A modifications intrinsically affect immune cells and how alterations in tumor cell m⁶A modifications extrinsically affect immune cell responses in the tumor microenvironment (TME). We also review strategies for modulating endogenous anti-tumor immunity and discuss the challenge of reshaping the TME. Strategies include: combining specific and efficient inhibitors against m⁶A regulators with immune checkpoint blockers; generating an effective programmable m⁶A gene-editing system that enables efficient manipulation of individual m⁶A sites; establishing an effective m⁶A modification system to enhance anti-tumor immune responses in T cells or natural killer cells; and using nanoparticles that specifically target tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) to deliver messenger RNA or small interfering RNA of m⁶A-related molecules that repolarize TAMs, enabling them to remodel the TME. The goal of this review is to help the field understand how m⁶A modifications intrinsically and extrinsically shape immune responses in the TME so that better cancer immunotherapy can be designed and developed.

THRSP identified as a potential hepatocellular carcinoma marker by integrated bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common malignant liver tumor with high mortality and poor prognosis worldwide. This study aimed to identify hub genes and investigate the underlying molecular mechanisms in HCC progression by integrated bioinformatics analysis and experimental validation. Based on the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), 12 critical differential co-expression genes were identified between tumor and normal tissues. Via survival analysis, we found higher expression of LCAT, ACSM3, IGF1, SRD5A2, THRSP and ACADS was associated with better prognoses in HCC patients. Among which, THRSP was selected for the next investigations. We found that THRSP mRNA expression was negatively correlated with its methylation and closely associated with clinical characteristics in HCC patients. Moreover, THRSP expression had a negative correlation with the infiltration levels of several immune cells (e.g., B cells and CD4+ T cells). qRT-PCR verified that THRSP was lower expressed in HCC tissues and cell lines compared with control. Silencing of THRSP promoted the migration, invasion, proliferation, and inhibited cell apoptosis of HCCLM and Huh7 cell lines. Decreased expression of THRSP promoted HCC progression by NF-κB, ERK1/2, and p38 MAPK signaling pathways. In conclusion, THRSP might serve as a novel biomarker and therapeutic target of HCC.

Epitranscriptomic Approach: To Improve the Efficacy of ICB Therapy by Co-Targeting Intracellular Checkpoint CISH

Cellular immunotherapy has recently emerged as a fourth pillar in cancer treatment co-joining surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Where, the discovery of immune checkpoint blockage or inhibition (ICB/ICI), anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and anti-CTLA4-based, therapy has revolutionized the class of cancer treatment at a different level. However, some cancer patients escape this immune surveillance mechanism and become resistant to ICB-therapy. Therefore, a more advanced or an alternative treatment is required urgently. Despite the functional importance of epitranscriptomics in diverse clinico-biological practices, its role in improving the efficacy of ICB therapeutics has been limited. Consequently, our study encapsulates the evidence, as a possible strategy, to improve the efficacy of ICB-therapy by co-targeting molecular checkpoints especially N6A-modification machineries which can be reformed into RNA modifying drugs (RMD). Here, we have explained the mechanism of individual RNA-modifiers (editor/writer, eraser/remover, and effector/reader) in overcoming the issues associated with high-dose antibody toxicities and drug-resistance. Moreover, we have shed light on the importance of suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS/CISH) and microRNAs in improving the efficacy of ICB-therapy, with brief insight on the current monoclonal antibodies undergoing clinical trials or already approved against several solid tumor and metastatic cancers. We anticipate our investigation will encourage researchers and clinicians to further strengthen the efficacy of ICB-therapeutics by considering the importance of epitranscriptomics as a personalized medicine.

Decoding m6A mRNA methylation by reader proteins in cancer

N⁶-methyladenosine (m⁶A), the most prevalent internal modification in eukaryotic mRNAs, regulates gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. The reader proteins of m⁶A, mainly YTH domain-containing proteins, specifically recognize m⁶A-modified mRNAs and regulate their metabolism. Recent studies have highlighted essential roles of m⁶A readers in the initiation and development of human cancers. In this review, we summarize recent findings about the biological functions of YTH domain proteins in cancers, the underlying mechanisms, and clinical implications. Gene expression reprogramming by dysregulated m⁶A reader proteins offers potential targets for cancer treatment, while targeted m⁶A editors and readers provide tools to manipulate m⁶A metabolism in cancers.

Pan-Cancer Prognostic, Immunity, Stemness, and Anticancer Drug Sensitivity Characterization of N6-Methyladenosine RNA Modification Regulators in Human Cancers

N6-methyladenosine RNA modification plays a significant role in the progression of multiple tumorigenesis. Our study identified the imperative role of m6A regulators in the tumor immune microenvironment, survival, stemness score, and anticancer drug sensitivity of pan-cancer. The Wilcox test was to identify the differential expression between 17 m6A regulators across 33 TCGA cancer types and their normal tissues from UCSC Xena GDC pan-cancer. Survival analysis of m6A-related regulators in 33 TCGA cancer types was identified using the "survival" and "survminer" package. The Spearman correlation test and Pearson correlation test were used to identify the correlation relationship between m6A regulators expression and tumor microenvironment, tumor stem cell score, and drug sensitivity of anticancer drugs. ConsensusPathDB was used for exploring m6A regulators functional enrichment. The 17 (METTL3, WTAP, METTL14, RBM15, RBM15B, VIRMA, HNRNPC, HNRNPA2B1, YTHDC1, ZC3H13, YTHDF1, YTHDC2, YTHDF2, IGF2BP3, IGF2BP1, FTO, and ALKBH5) m6A regulators were differentially expressed in 18 TCGA cancer types and adjacent normal tissues. Correlation analysis indicated that the relationship between the expression of 17 m6A regulators and tumor microenvironment indicated that the higher expression of m6A regulators, the higher the degree of tumor stem cells. The anticancer drug sensitivity analysis indicated that ZC3H13 expression had a positive relationship with anticancer drugs such as selumetinib, dabrafenib, cobimetinib, trametinib, and hypothemycin (p < 0.001). YTHDF2 expression was significantly negatively correlated with the anticancer drug dasatinib (p < 0.001). The pan-cancer immune subtype analysis showed that the 17 m6A regulators were significantly different in immune subtype C1 (wound healing), C3 (inflammatory), C2 (IFN-gamma dominant), C5 (immunological quiet), C4 (lymphocyte depleted), and C6 (TGF-beta dominant) (p < 0.001). Our study provides a comprehensive insight for revealing the significant role of m6A regulators in the tumor immune microenvironment, stemness score, and anticancer drug sensitivity of human cancers.