1
|
Zhang Z, Zhao C, Yang S, Lu W, Shi J. A novel lipid metabolism-based risk model associated with immunosuppressive mechanisms in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Lipids Health Dis 2024; 23:20. [PMID: 38254162 PMCID: PMC10801940 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-024-02017-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The molecular diversity exhibited by diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a significant obstacle facing current precision therapies. However, scoring using the International Prognostic Index (IPI) is inadequate when fully predicting the development of DLBCL. Reprogramming lipid metabolism is crucial for DLBCL carcinogenesis and expansion, while a predictive approach derived from lipid metabolism-associated genes (LMAGs) has not yet been recognized for DLBCL. METHODS Gene expression profiles of DLBCL were generated using the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) databases. The LASSO Cox regression was used to construct an effective predictive risk-scoring model for DLBCL patients. The Kaplan-Meier survival assessment was employed to compare a given risk score with the IPI score and its impact on the survival of DLBCL patients. Functional enrichment examination was performed utilizing the KEGG pathway. After identifying hub genes via single-sample GSEA (ssGSEA), immunohistochemical staining and immunofluorescence were performed on lymph node samples from control and DLBCL patients to confirm these identified genes. RESULTS Sixteen lipid metabolism- and survival-associated genes were identified to construct a prognostic risk-scoring approach. This model demonstrated robust performance over various datasets and emerged as an autonomous risk factor for predicting the development of DLBCL patients. The risk score could significantly distinguish the development of DLBCL patients from the low-risk and elevated-risk IPI classes. Results from the inhibitory immune-related pathways and lower immune scores suggested an immunosuppressive phenotype within the elevated-risk group. Three hub genes, MECR, ARSK, and RAN, were identified to be negatively correlated with activated CD8 T cells and natural killer T cells in the elevated-risk score class. Ultimately, it was determined that these three genes were expressed by lymphoma cells but not by T cells in clinical samples from DLBCL patients. CONCLUSION The risk level model derived from 16 lipid metabolism-associated genes represents a prognostic biomarker for DLBCL that is novel, robust, and may have an immunosuppressive role. It can compensate for the limitations of the IPI score in predicting overall survival and has potential clinical application value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaoli Zhang
- Department of Hematology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chong Zhao
- Department of Hematology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Shaoxin Yang
- Department of Hematology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Lu
- Department of Hematology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| | - Jun Shi
- Department of Hematology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gao H, Yin J, Ji C, Yu X, Xue J, Guan X, Zhang S, Liu X, Xing F. Targeting ubiquitin specific proteases (USPs) in cancer immunotherapy: from basic research to preclinical application. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2023; 42:225. [PMID: 37658402 PMCID: PMC10472646 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-023-02805-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumors have evolved in various mechanisms to evade the immune system, hindering the antitumor immune response and facilitating tumor progression. Immunotherapy has become a potential treatment strategy specific to different cancer types by utilizing multifarious molecular mechanisms to enhance the immune response against tumors. Among these mechanisms, the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) is a significant non-lysosomal pathway specific to protein degradation, regulated by deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) that counterbalance ubiquitin signaling. Ubiquitin-specific proteases (USPs), the largest DUB family with the strongest variety, play critical roles in modulating immune cell function, regulating immune response, and participating in antigen processing and presentation during tumor progression. According to recent studies, the expressions of some USP family members in tumor cells are involved in tumor immune escape and immune microenvironment. This review explores the potential of targeting USPs as a new approach for cancer immunotherapy, highlighting recent basic and preclinical studies investigating the applications of USP inhibitors. By providing insights into the structure and function of USPs in cancer immunity, this review aims at assisting in developing new therapeutic approaches for enhancing the immunotherapy efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongli Gao
- Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China
| | - Jianqiao Yin
- Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China
| | - Ce Ji
- Department of General Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China
| | - Xiaopeng Yu
- Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China
| | - Jinqi Xue
- Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China
| | - Xin Guan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China
| | - Shuang Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China
| | - Xun Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China.
| | - Fei Xing
- Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110004, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Elkrief A, Odintsov I, Markov V, Caeser R, Sobczuk P, Tischfield SE, Bhanot U, Vanderbilt CM, Cheng EH, Drilon A, Riely GJ, Lockwood WW, de Stanchina E, Tirunagaru VG, Doebele RC, Quintanal-Villalonga Á, Rudin CM, Somwar R, Ladanyi M. Combination Therapy With MDM2 and MEK Inhibitors Is Effective in Patient-Derived Models of Lung Adenocarcinoma With Concurrent Oncogenic Drivers and MDM2 Amplification. J Thorac Oncol 2023; 18:1165-1183. [PMID: 37182602 PMCID: PMC10524759 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although targeted therapies have revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs), disease progression on single-agent targeted therapy against known oncogenic drivers is common, and therapeutic options after disease progression are limited. In patients with MDM2 amplification (MDM2amp) and a concurrent oncogenic driver alteration, we hypothesized that targeting of the tumor-suppressor pathway (by means of restoration of p53 using MDM2 inhibition) and simultaneous targeting of co-occurring MAPK oncogenic pathway might represent a more durably effective therapeutic strategy. METHODS We evaluated genomic next-generation sequencing data using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets platform to nominate potential targets for combination therapy in LUAD. We investigated the small molecule MDM2 inhibitor milademetan in cell lines and patient-derived xenografts of LUAD with a known driver alteration and MDM2amp. RESULTS Of 10,587 patient samples from 7121 patients with LUAD profiled by next-generation sequencing, 6% (410 of 7121) harbored MDM2amp. MDM2amp was significantly enriched among tumors with driver alterations in METex14 (36%, p < 0.001), EGFR (8%, p < 0.001), RET (12%, p < 0.01), and ALK (10%, p < 0.01). The combination of milademetan and the MEK inhibitor trametinib was synergistic in growth inhibition of ECLC5-GLx (TRIM33-RET/MDM2amp), LUAD12c (METex14/KRASG12S/MDM2amp), SW1573 (KRASG12C, TP53 wild type), and A549 (KRASG12S) cells and in increasing expression of proapoptotic proteins PUMA and BIM. Treatment of ECLC5-GLx and LUAD12c with single-agent milademetan increased ERK phosphorylation, consistent with previous data on ERK activation with MDM2 inhibition. This ERK activation was effectively suppressed by concomitant administration of trametinib. In contrast, ERK phosphorylation induced by milademetan was not suppressed by concurrent RET inhibition using selpercatinib (in ECLC5-GLx) or MET inhibition using capmatinib (in LUAD12c). In vivo, combination milademetan and trametinib was more effective than either agent alone in ECLC5-GLx, LX-285 (EGFRex19del/MDM2amp), L13BS1 (METex14/MDM2amp), and A549 (KRASG12S, TP53 wild type). CONCLUSIONS Combined MDM2/MEK inhibition was found to have efficacy across multiple patient-derived LUAD models harboring MDM2amp and concurrent oncogenic drivers. This combination, potentially applicable to LUADs with a wide variety of oncogenic driver mutations and kinase fusions activating the MAPK pathway, has evident clinical implications and will be investigated as part of a planned phase 1/2 clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arielle Elkrief
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Igor Odintsov
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Vladimir Markov
- Antitumor Assessment Core Facility, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Rebecca Caeser
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Pawel Sobczuk
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sam E Tischfield
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Umesh Bhanot
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Chad M Vanderbilt
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Emily H Cheng
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Alexander Drilon
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Gregory J Riely
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - William W Lockwood
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Elisa de Stanchina
- Antitumor Assessment Core Facility, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | - Charles M Rudin
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Romel Somwar
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Marc Ladanyi
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
USPs in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Comprehensive Bioinformatic Analysis of Expression, Prognostic Significance, and Immune Infiltration. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2022; 2022:6109052. [PMID: 36582601 PMCID: PMC9794441 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6109052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 11/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), as an intractable malignancy, still causes an extremely high mortality worldwide. The ubiquitin-specific protease (USP) family constitutes the major part of deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) which has been reported to be involved in initiation and progression of various malignancies via the function of deubiquitination. However, the biological function and clinical values of USPs in PDAC have not been comprehensively elucidated. In this study, Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA), Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets, UALCAN database, and the Human Protein Atlas (HPA) online tool were used to analyze the expression level and the relationship between USP expression and clinicopathological features in PDAC. Survival module of HPA and Kaplan-Meier plotter (KMP) databases was recruited to explore the prognostic value of USPs. Tumor Immune Estimation Resource (TIMER) online tool and KMP databases were utilized to elucidate tumor immune infiltration and immune-related survival of USPs. CBioPortal online tool was used to identify the gene mutation level of USPs in PDAC. Both cBioPortal and LinkedOmics were used to confirm the potential biological functions of USPs in PDAC. Our study showed that USP10, USP14, USP18, USP32, USP33, and USP39 (termed as six-USPs) expressions were significantly elevated in tumor tissues. The high expression of the four USPs (USP10, USP14, USP18, and USP39) indicated a poor prognosis. A significant relationship was indicated between the expression of six-USPs and clinicopathological features. Also, the expression of six-USPs was related to promoter methylation level. Moreover, more than 40% genetic alterations and mutations were discovered in six-USPs. Furthermore, the six-USP expression was correlated with immune infiltration and immune-related prognosis. The functional analysis found that the six-USPs were involved in various biological processes and signaling pathways, such as nucleocytoplasmic transport, choline metabolism in cancer, cell cycle, ErbB signaling pathway, RIG-I-like receptor signaling pathway, TGF-β signaling pathway, and TNF signaling pathway. In conclusion, the results showed that six-USPs are potential prognostic biomarkers and can be recruited as possible therapeutic targets of PDAC.
Collapse
|
5
|
He WP, Chen YY, Wu LX, Guo YY, You ZS, Yang GF. A novel necroptosis-related lncRNA signature for predicting prognosis and anti-cancer treatment response in endometrial cancer. Front Immunol 2022; 13:1018544. [PMID: 36466815 PMCID: PMC9708746 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1018544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 10/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Necroptosis, a form of programmed cell death, underlies tumorigenesis and the progression of cancers. Anti-cancer strategies targeting necroptosis have increasingly been shown to present a potential cancer therapy. However, the predictive utility and anticancer sensitivity value of necroptosis-related lncRNAs (NRLs) for endometrial cancer (EC) are currently unknown. METHODS EC patient gene expression profiles and the corresponding clinical information collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas were used to identify NRLs that constituted a predictive signature for EC. The functional pathways, immune status, clinicopathological correlation, and anticancer drug sensitivity of the patients relative to the NRLs signatures were analyzed. RESULTS A signature composed of 7 NRLs (AC019080.5, BOLA3-AS1, AC022144.1, AP000345.2, LEF1-AS1, AC010503.4, and RPARP-AS1) was identified. The high-risk patient group with this signature exhibited a poorer prognosis and lower survival rate than low-risk group lacking this signature. This necroptosis-related lncRNA signature had a higher predictive accuracy compared with other clinicopathological variables (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the risk score: 0.717). Additionally, when patients were stratified based on other clinicopathological variables, the overall survival was significantly shorter in the high-risk versus low-risk group across all cohorts. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed that immune- and tumor-related signaling pathways and biological processes were enriched in the high-risk group compared to the low-risk group. Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) additionally showed that the resulting risk score was strongly correlated with EC patient immune status. Finally, patients with high-risk scores were more sensitive to the anti-cancer drugs such as Docetaxel, Mitomycin.C, Vinblastine, AZD.2281 (olaparib), AZD6244, and PD.0332991 (Palbociclib). CONCLUSION These findings reveal a novel necroptosis-related lncRNA signature for predicting EC patient prognosis and shed new light on anticancer therapy strategies for EC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Guo-Fen Yang
- Department of Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ge X, Zhang D, Song S, Mi Y, Shen Y, Jiang Q, Liang Y, Wang J, Ye Q. USP18 reduces paclitaxol sensitivity of triple-negative breast cancer via autophagy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2022; 599:120-126. [PMID: 35180471 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.02.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Paclitaxol is a first-line treatment for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The molecular mechanisms underlying paclitaxol resistance in TNBC remain largely unclear. In this study, differential expressed genes (DEGs) between TNBC cells and paclitaxol-resistant (taxol-R) TNBC cells were screened by bioinformatics analysis. Among these DEGs, USP18 mRNA expression was significantly increased in taxol-R TNBC cells. USP18 overexpression reduced paclitaxol sensitivity by decreasing paclitaxol-induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in TNBC cells. In contrast, USP18 knockdown increased paclitaxol mediated anticancer activity in taxol-R TNBC cells in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, USP18 induced autophagy, an important pathway in chemotherapy resistance. The autophagy inhibitor leupeptin could effectively reverse the effect of USP18 on paclitaxol resistance phenotype. These findings suggested that USP18 may be a promising target for overcoming paclitaxol resistance in TNBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiangwei Ge
- Department of Medical Molecular Biology, Beijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, 100850, China; Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100071, China
| | - Deyu Zhang
- Department of Medical Molecular Biology, Beijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, 100850, China
| | - Songze Song
- Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, Liaoning, 121001, China
| | - Yue Mi
- Department of Medical Molecular Biology, Beijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, 100850, China
| | - Yanjie Shen
- Department of Medical Molecular Biology, Beijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, 100850, China
| | - Qiwei Jiang
- Department of Medical Molecular Biology, Beijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, 100850, China
| | - Yingchun Liang
- Department of Medical Molecular Biology, Beijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, 100850, China
| | - Jinliang Wang
- Department of Oncology, The Fifth Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100071, China.
| | - Qinong Ye
- Department of Medical Molecular Biology, Beijing Institute of Biotechnology, Beijing, 100850, China.
| |
Collapse
|