m6A regulator-mediated methylation modification patterns and tumor immune microenvironment in sarcoma

Link between m6A modification and infiltration characterization of tumor microenvironment in lung adenocarcinoma

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methylation plays a pivotal role in immune responses and the onset and advancement of cancer. Nonetheless, the precise impact of m6A modification in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and its associated tumor microenvironment (TME) remains to be fully elucidated. Here, we distinguished distinct m6A modification patterns within two separate LUAD cohorts using a set of 21 m6A regulators. The TME characteristics associated with these two patterns align with the immune-inflamed and immune-excluded phenotypes, respectively. We identified 2064 m6A-related genes, which were used as a basis to divide all LUAD samples into three distinct m6A gene clusters. We applied a scoring system to evaluate the m6A gene signature of the m6A modification pattern in individual patients. To authenticate the categorization significance of m6A modification patterns, we established a correlation between m6A score and TME infiltration profiling, tumor somatic mutations, and responses to immunotherapy. A high level of m6A modification may be associated with the aggressiveness and poor prognosis of LUAD. Further studies should investigate the mechanism of action of m6A regulators and m6A-related genes to improve the diagnosis and treatment of patients with LUAD.

A novel inflammatory signature for evaluating immune microenvironment status in soft tissue sarcoma

Background

Tumorigenesis and progression are intimately associated with inflammation. However, the inflammatory landscape in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and its clinical consequences are yet unknown, and more investigation is needed.

Methods

RNA-seq expression data for STS and corresponding normal tissues were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas database and the Genotype-Tissue Expression Portal. Differential and prognostic analyses were performed based on known inflammatory response genes from Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). We utilized LASSO-Cox analysis to determine hub genes and built an inflammatory score (INFscore) and risk stratification model. Furthermore, a nomogram, including the risk stratification model, was established to predict the prognosis. We further elucidated the characteristics among different risk STS patients by GSEA, gene set variation analysis, and detailed immune infiltration analysis. Finally, the INFscore and risk stratification model in predicting prognosis and depicting immune microenvironment status were verified by pan-cancer analysis.

Results

Five hub genes (HAS2, IL1R1, NMI, SERPINE1, and TACR1) were identified and were used to develop the INFscore. The risk stratification model distinguished the immune microenvironment status and evaluated the efficacy of immunotherapy and chemotherapy in STS. The novel nomogram had good efficacy in predicting the prognosis of STS patients. Finally, a pan-cancer investigation verified the association of INFscore with prognosis and immunity.

Conclusions

According to the present study, the risk stratification model can be used to evaluate STS prognosis, tumor microenvironment status, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy efficacy. The novel nomogram has an excellent predictive value. Thus, the INFscore and risk stratification model has potential value in assessing the prognosis and immune status of multiple malignancies.