Exploring immune-related signatures for predicting immunotherapeutic responsiveness, prognosis, and diagnosis of patients with colon cancer

Comprehensive assessment of regulatory T-cells-related scoring system for predicting the prognosis, immune microenvironment and therapeutic response in hepatocellular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) play important roles in tumor immunosuppression and immune escape. The aim of the present study was to construct a novel Tregs-associated biomarker for the prediction of tumour immune microenvironment (TIME), clinical outcomes, and individualised treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

Single-cell sequencing data were obtained from the three independent cohorts. Cox and LASSO regression were utilised to develop the Tregs Related Scoring System (TRSSys). GSE140520, ICGC-LIRI and CHCC cohorts were used for the validation of TRSSys. Kaplan-Meier, ROC, and Cox regression were utilised for the evaluation of TRSSys. The ESTIMATE, TIMER 2.0, and ssGSEA algorithm were utilised to determine the value of TRSSys in predicting the TIME. GSVA, GO, KEGG, and TMB analyses were used for mechanistic exploration. Finally, the value of TRSSys in predicting drug sensitivity was evaluated based on the oncoPredict algorithm.

RESULTS

Comprehensive validation showed that TRSSys had good prognostic predictive efficacy and applicability. Additionally, ssGSEA, TIMER and ESTIMATE algorithm suggested that TRSSys could help to distinguish different TIME subtypes and determine the beneficiary population of immunotherapy. Finally, the oncoPredict algorithm suggests that TRSSys provides a basis for individualised treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

TRSSys constructed in the current study is a novel HCC prognostic prediction biomarker with good predictive efficacy and stability. Additionally, risk stratification based on TRSSys can help to identify the TIME landscape subtypes and provide a basis for individualized treatment options.

Diagnostic potential of NRG1 in benign nerve sheath tumors and its influence on the PI3K-Akt signaling and tumor immunity

OBJECTIVE

Benign nerve sheath tumors (BNSTs) present diagnostic challenges due to their heterogeneous nature. This study aimed to determine the significance of NRG1 as a novel diagnostic biomarker in BNST, emphasizing its involvement in the PI3K-Akt pathway and tumor immune regulation.

METHODS

Differential genes related to BNST were identified from the GEO database. Gene co-expression networks, protein-protein interaction networks, and LASSO regression were utilized to pinpoint key genes. The CIBERSORT algorithm assessed immune cell infiltration differences, and functional enrichment analyses explored BNST signaling pathways. Clinical samples helped establish PDX models, and in vitro cell lines to validate NRG1's role via the PI3K-Akt pathway.

RESULTS

Nine hundred eighty-two genes were upregulated, and 375 downregulated in BNST samples. WGCNA revealed the brown module with the most significant difference. Top hub genes included NRG1, which was also determined as a pivotal gene in disease characterization. Immune infiltration showed significant variances in neutrophils and M2 macrophages, with NRG1 playing a central role. Functional analyses confirmed NRG1's involvement in key pathways. Validation experiments using PDX models and cell lines further solidified NRG1's role in BNST.

CONCLUSION

NRG1 emerges as a potential diagnostic biomarker for BNST, influencing the PI3K-Akt pathway, and shaping the tumor immune microenvironment.

Comparative analyses of the prognosis, tumor immune microenvironment, and drug treatment response between left-sided and right-sided colon cancer by integrating scRNA-seq and bulk RNA-seq data

BACKGROUND

In this study, we compared the prognosis, tumor immune microenvironment (TIM), and drug treatment response between left-sided (LCC) and right-sided (RCC) colon cancer to predict outcomes in patients with LCC and RCC.

METHODS

Based on identified differentially expressed genes and using single-cell RNA sequencing data, we constructed and validated a prognostic model for LCC and RCC patients in the TCGA-COAD cohort and GSE103479 cohort. Moreover, we compared the differences of TIM characteristics and drug treatment response between LCC and RCC patients.

RESULTS

We constructed and validated a five-gene prognostic model for LCC patients and a four-gene prognostic model for RCC patients, and both showed excellent performance. The RCC patients with higher risk scores were significantly associated with greater metastasis (P = 2.6×10-5), N stage (P = 0.012), advanced pathological stage (P = 1.4×10-4), and more stable microsatellite status (P = 0.007) but not T stage (P = 0.200). For LCC patients, the risk scores were not significantly associated with tumor stage and microsatellite status (P > 0.05). Additionally, immune infiltration by CD8 and regulatory T cells and M0, M1, and M2 macrophages differed significantly between LCC and RCC patients (P < 0.05). APC and TP53 mutations were significantly more common in LCC patients (P < 0.05). In contrast, KRAS, SYNE1, and MUC16 mutations were significantly more common in RCC patients (P < 0.05). In addition, tumor mutation burden values were significantly higher in RCC patients than in LCC patients (P = 5.9×10-8). Moreover, the expression of immune checkpoint targets was significantly higher in RCC patients than in LCC patients (P < 0.05), indicating that RCC patients maybe more sensitive to immunotherapy. However, LCC and RCC patients did not differ significantly in their sensitivity to eight selected chemicals or target drugs (P > 0.05). The average half-maximal inhibitory concentrations for camptothecin, teniposide, vinorelbine, and mitoxantrone were significantly lower in low-risk than in high-risk RCC patients (P < 0.05), indicating that the lower risk score of RCC patients, the more sensitive they were to these four drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

We investigated the differences in prognosis, TIM, and drug treatment response between LCC and RCC patients, which may contribute to accurate colon cancer prognosis and treatment of colon cancer.