Prophylactic cranial irradiation reduces the incidence of brain metastasis in a mouse model of metastatic, HER2-positive breast cancer

De novo versus recurrent metastatic breast cancer affects the extent of brain metastases

PURPOSE

We aimed to identify factors associated with the extent of brain metastases in patients with breast cancer to help distinguish brain oligometastases (1-4 brain metastases) from extensive metastases (5 or more brain metastases).

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included 100 female patients diagnosed with brain metastases from breast cancer at a single institution between January 2011 and April 2022. Patient demographics and tumor characteristics were compared between the brain oligometastases group and the extensive metastases group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the independent factors, including age at initial diagnosis, initial stage, breast cancer subtype, detection time of brain metastases, and de novo or recurrent status of the metastatic disease. In a subgroup analysis of patients with brain oligometastases, demographic and tumor characteristics were compared between patients with single and two-four brain metastases.

RESULTS

Of the 100 patients, 56 had brain oligometastases, while 44 had extensive brain metastases. The multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that only the de novo/recurrent status of metastatic breast cancer was significantly associated with the extent of brain metastasis (p = 0.023). In the subgroup analysis of 56 patients with brain oligometastases, those diagnosed at an earlier stage were more likely to have a single brain metastasis (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer are more likely to develop extensive brain metastases than those with recurrent metastatic breast cancer. This insight could influence the development of tailored approaches for monitoring and treating brain metastases, supporting the potential advantages of routine brain screening for patients newly diagnosed with stage IV breast cancer.

In Vivo Simvastatin and Brain Radiation in a Model of HER2 + Inflammatory Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis

Purpose

Inhibiting HMG-CoA reductase with simvastatin prevents breast cancer metastases in preclinical models and radiosensitizes monolayer and stem-like IBC cell lines in vitro . Given the extensive use of simvastatin worldwide and its expected penetration into the brain, we examined whether regulating cholesterol with simvastatin affected IBC3 HER2+ brain metastases.

Methods and Materials

Breast cancer cell lines KPL4 and MDA-IBC3 were examined in vitro for DNA repair after radiation with or without statin treatment. Brain metastasis endpoints were examined in the MDA-IBC3 brain metastasis model after ex vivo exposure to lipoproteins and after tail vein injections with and without whole-brain radiotherapy (WBR) and oral statin exposure.

Results

Ex vivo preculture of MDA-IBC3 cells with very low-density lipoprotein (vLDL) enhanced the growth of colonized lesions in the brain in vivo compared with control or high-density lipoprotein (HDL), and concurrent oral simvastatin/ WBR reduced the incidence of micrometastatic lesions evaluated 10 days after WBR. However, statin, with or without WBR, did not reduce the incidence, burden, or number of macrometastatic brain lesions evaluated 5 weeks after WBR.

Conclusions

Although a role for cholesterol biosynthesis is demonstrated in DNA repair and response to whole brain radiation in this model, durable in vivo efficacy of concurrent whole brain irradiation and oral statin was not demonstrated.

Navigating breast cancer brain metastasis: Risk factors, prognostic indicators, and treatment perspectives

In this editorial, we comment on the article by Chen et al. We specifically focus on the risk factors, prognostic factors, and management of brain metastasis (BM) in breast cancer (BC). BC is the second most common cancer to have BM after lung cancer. Independent risk factors for BM in BC are: HER-2 positive BC, triple-negative BC, and germline BRCA mutation. Other factors associated with BM are lung metastasis, age less than 40 years, and African and American ancestry. Even though risk factors associated with BM in BC are elucidated, there is a lack of data on predictive models for BM in BC. Few studies have been made to formulate predictive models or nomograms to address this issue, where age, grade of tumor, HER-2 receptor status, and number of metastatic sites (1 vs > 1) were predictive of BM in metastatic BC. However, none have been used in clinical practice. National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends screening of BM in advanced BC only when the patient is symptomatic or suspicious of central nervous system symptoms; routine screening for BM in BC is not recommended in the guidelines. BM decreases the quality of life and will have a significant psychological impact. Further studies are required for designing validated nomograms or predictive models for BM in BC; these models can be used in the future to develop treatment approaches to prevent BM, which improves the quality of life and overall survival.

Animal models of brain and spinal cord metastases of NSCLC established using a brain stereotactic instrument

Objective

Animal models of brain and spinal cord metastases of non-small cell lung cancer were established through the intracranial injection of PC-9 Luc cells with a brain stereotaxic device. This method provides a reliable modeling method for studying brain and spinal cord metastases of non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods

PC-9 Luc cells at logarithmic growth stage were injected into the skulls of 5-week-old BALB/c nude mice at different cell volumes (30 × 104, 80 × 104) and different locations (using anterior fontanel as a location point, 1 mm from the coronal suture, and 1.5 mm from the sagittal suture on the right upper and right lower side of the skull). After 1 week of cell inoculation, fluorescence signals of tumor cells in the brain and spinal were detected using the IVIS Xenogen Imaging system. After 4 weeks, brain and spinal tissues from the nude mice were harvested. Following paraffin-embedded sectioning, HE staining was performed on the tissues.

Results

The fluorescence signals revealed that both brain and spinal cord metastasis occurred in the mice where the cells were injected at the lower right side of the skull. There was only brain metastasis in the nude mice injected with 30 × 104 cells at the upper right side of the skull. Both brain and spinal cord metastasis occurred in the nude mice injected with 80 × 104 cells. The HE staining revealed that both brain and spinal cord metastasis occurred in the mice injected with different amounts of PC-9 Luc cells, consistent with the results detected using the IVIS Xenogen Imaging system, thereby demonstrating the reliability of detecting fluorescent signals in vivo to determine tumor growth.

Conclusion

It is a reliable method to establish the animal model of brain and spinal cord metastases of non-small cell lung cancer by injecting different quantities of cells from different positions with a brain stereotaxic device. The IVIS Xenogen Imaging system has high reliability in detecting the fluorescence signals of brain and spinal cord metastatic tumors.

Radiotherapy in Preclinical Models of Brain Metastases: A Review and Recommendations for Future Studies

Brain metastases (BMs) frequently occur in primary tumors such as lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma, and are associated with notably short natural survival. In addition to surgical interventions, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, radiotherapy (RT) is a crucial treatment for BM and encompasses whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Validating the efficacy and safety of treatment regimens through preclinical models is imperative for successful translation to clinical application. This not only advances fundamental research but also forms the theoretical foundation for clinical study. This review, grounded in animal models of brain metastases (AM-BM), explores the theoretical underpinnings and practical applications of radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and emerging technologies such as nanomaterials and oxygen-containing microbubbles. Initially, we provided a concise overview of the establishment of AM-BMs. Subsequently, we summarize key RT parameters (RT mode, dose, fraction, dose rate) and their corresponding effects in AM-BMs. Finally, we present a comprehensive analysis of the current research status and future directions for combination therapy based on RT. In summary, there is presently no standardized regimen for AM-BM treatment involving RT. Further research is essential to deepen our understanding of the relationships between various parameters and their respective effects.

NDRG1 in Aggressive Breast Cancer Progression and Brain Metastasis

BACKGROUND

N-Myc downstream regulated gene 1 (NDRG1) suppresses metastasis in many human malignancies, including breast cancer, yet has been associated with worse survival in patients with inflammatory breast cancer. The role of NDRG1 in the pathobiology of aggressive breast cancers remains elusive.

METHODS

To study the role of NDRG1 in tumor growth and brain metastasis in vivo, we transplanted cells into cleared mammary fat pads or injected them in tail veins of SCID/Beige mice (n = 7-10 per group). NDRG1 protein expression in patient breast tumors (n = 216) was assessed by immunohistochemical staining. Kaplan-Meier method with 2-sided log-rank test was used to analyze the associations between NDRG1 and time-to-event outcomes. A multivariable Cox regression model was used to determine independent prognostic factors. All statistical tests were 2-sided.

RESULTS

We generated new sublines that exhibited a distinct propensity to metastasize to the brain. NDRG1-high-expressing cells produced more prevalent brain metastases (100% vs 44.4% for NDRG1-low sublines, P = .01, Fisher's exact test), greater tumor burden, and reduced survival in mice. In aggressive breast cancer cell lines, silencing NDRG1 led to reduced migration, invasion, and tumor-initiating cell subpopulations. In xenograft models, depleting NDRG1 inhibited primary tumor growth and brain metastasis. In patient breast tumors, NDRG1 was associated with aggressiveness: NDRG1-high expression was also associated with shorter overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.27, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.20 to 4.29, P = .009) and breast cancer-specific survival (HR = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.07 to 4.48, P = .03). Multivariable analysis showed NDRG1 to be an independent predictor of overall survival (HR = 2.17, 95% CI = 1.10 to 4.30, P = .03) and breast cancer-specific survival rates (HR = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.05 to 4.92, P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that NDRG1 drives tumor progression and brain metastasis in aggressive breast cancers and that NDRG1-high expression correlates with worse clinical outcomes, suggesting that NDRG1 may serve as a therapeutic target and prognostic biomarker in aggressive breast cancers.