1
|
Boman BM, Dinh TN, Decker K, Emerick B, Modarai S, Opdenaker L, Fields JZ, Raymond C, Schleiniger G. Beyond the Genetic Code: A Tissue Code?. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023. [PMID: 36945600 PMCID: PMC10028806 DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.05.531161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/10/2023]
Abstract
The genetic code determines how the precise amino acid sequence of proteins is specified by genomic information in cells. But what specifies the precise histologic organization of cells in plant and animal tissues is unclear. We now hypothesize that another code, the tissue code , exists at an even higher level of complexity which determines how tissue organization is dynamically maintained. Accordingly, we modeled spatial and temporal asymmetries of cell division and established that five simple mathematical laws ("the tissue code") convey a set of biological rules that maintain the specific organization and continuous self-renewal dynamics of cells in tissues. These laws might even help us understand wound healing, and how tissue disorganization leads to birth defects and tissue pathology like cancer.
Collapse
|
2
|
Rotoli D, Díaz-Flores L, Gutiérrez R, Morales M, Ávila J, Martín-Vasallo P. AmotL2, IQGAP1, and FKBP51 Scaffold Proteins in Glioblastoma Stem Cell Niches. J Histochem Cytochem 2022; 70:9-16. [PMID: 34165350 PMCID: PMC8721575 DOI: 10.1369/00221554211025480] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Glioma stem cells (GSCs) live in a continuous process of stemness reprogramming to achieve specific cell commitment within the so-called GSC niches, specifically located in periarteriolar regions. In this review, we analyze the expression levels, cellular and subcellular location, and role of three scaffold proteins (IQGAP1, FKBP51, and AmotL2) in GSC niches. Scaffold proteins contribute to cell differentiation, migration, and angiogenesis in glioblastoma. It could be of diagnostic interest for establishing stages, for therapeutic targets, and for improving glioblastoma prognosis, which is still at the experimental level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Rotoli
- Department of Bioquímica, Microbiología, Biología Celular y Genética, Universidad de La Laguna, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain,Instituto de Tecnología Biomédicas de Canarias, Universidad de La Laguna, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain,Istituto per l’Endocrinologia e l’Oncologia Gaetano Salvatore, Naples, Italy
| | - Lucio Díaz-Flores
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences and Department of Anatomy, Pathology, Histology and Radiology, Universidad de La Laguna, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain
| | - Ricardo Gutiérrez
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences and Department of Anatomy, Pathology, Histology and Radiology, Universidad de La Laguna, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain
| | - Manuel Morales
- Oncología Médica, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Julio Ávila
- Department of Bioquímica, Microbiología, Biología Celular y Genética, Universidad de La Laguna, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain,Instituto de Tecnología Biomédicas de Canarias, Universidad de La Laguna, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain
| | - Pablo Martín-Vasallo
- Pablo Martín-Vasallo, UD Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Universidad de La Laguna, Av/Astrofísico Sánchez s/n, 38206 San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kosol S, Contreras-Martos S, Piai A, Varadi M, Lazar T, Bekesi A, Lebrun P, Felli IC, Pierattelli R, Tompa P. Interaction between the scaffold proteins CBP by IQGAP1 provides an interface between gene expression and cytoskeletal activity. Sci Rep 2020; 10:5753. [PMID: 32238831 PMCID: PMC7113243 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-62069-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2019] [Accepted: 03/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Crosstalk between cellular pathways is often mediated through scaffold proteins that function as platforms for the assembly of signaling complexes. Based on yeast two-hybrid analysis, we report here the interaction between two complex scaffold proteins, CREB-binding protein (CBP) and the Ras GTPase-activating-like protein 1 (IQGAP1). Dissection of the interaction between the two proteins reveals that the central, thus far uncharacterized, region of IQGAP1 interacts with the HAT domain and the C-terminal intrinsically disordered region of CBP (termed ID5). Structural analysis of ID5 by solution NMR spectroscopy and SAXS reveals the presence of two regions with pronounced helical propensity. The ID5 region(s) involved in the interaction of nanomolar affinity were delineated by solution NMR titrations and pull-down assays. Moreover, we found that IQGAP1 acts as an inhibitor of the histone acetyltransferase (HAT) activity of CBP. In in vitro assays, the CBP-binding region of IQGAP1 positively and negatively regulates the function of HAT proteins of different families including CBP, KAT5 and PCAF. As many signaling pathways converge on CBP and IQGAP1, their interaction provides an interface between transcription regulation and the coordination of cytoskeleton. Disruption or alteration of the interaction between these scaffold proteins may lead to cancer development or metastatic processes, highlighting the importance of this interaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Kosol
- VIB Center for Structural Biology (CSB), Brussels, Belgium
- Structural Biology Brussels (SBB), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sara Contreras-Martos
- VIB Center for Structural Biology (CSB), Brussels, Belgium
- Structural Biology Brussels (SBB), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alessandro Piai
- Magnetic Resonance Center, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Chemistry "Ugo Schiff", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Mihaly Varadi
- VIB Center for Structural Biology (CSB), Brussels, Belgium
- Structural Biology Brussels (SBB), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Tamas Lazar
- VIB Center for Structural Biology (CSB), Brussels, Belgium
- Structural Biology Brussels (SBB), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Angela Bekesi
- VIB Center for Structural Biology (CSB), Brussels, Belgium
- Structural Biology Brussels (SBB), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Pierre Lebrun
- VIB Center for Structural Biology (CSB), Brussels, Belgium
- Structural Biology Brussels (SBB), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Isabella C Felli
- Magnetic Resonance Center, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Chemistry "Ugo Schiff", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Roberta Pierattelli
- Magnetic Resonance Center, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- Department of Chemistry "Ugo Schiff", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Peter Tompa
- VIB Center for Structural Biology (CSB), Brussels, Belgium.
- Structural Biology Brussels (SBB), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
- Institute of Enzymology, Research Centre for Natural Sciences of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
| |
Collapse
|