Outcome of patients treated for myelodysplastic syndromes without deletion 5q after failure of lenalidomide therapy

How low risk are low risk myelodysplastic syndromes?

INTRODUCTION

Risk stratification is crucial to the appropriate management of many diseases, but in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), for whom expected survival can vary greatly, accurate disease prognostication is especially important. This is further supported by a relative lack of therapies in MDS, and thus we must prognosticate carefully and accurately. Currently, patients with MDS are often grouped into higher-risk (HR) versus lower-risk (LR) disease using clinical prognostic scoring systems, but these systems have limitations.

AREAS COVERED

The authors reviewed the literature on diagnostics, prognostics, therapeutics and outcomes in MDS. Factors such as disease etiology, specific clinical characteristics, or molecular genetic information not captured in the international prognostic scoring system revised IPSS-R can alter risk stratification, and identify a subset of LR-MDS patients who actually behave more like HR-MDS.

EXPERT OPINION

This review will describe the current identification and management of patients with LR MDS disease whose condition is likely to behave in a less favorable manner than predicted by the IPSS-R. The authors comment on clinical and molecular features which are believe to upstage a patient from lower to higher risk disease.

Lower risk but high risk

Risk stratification is crucial to the appropriate management of most cancers, but in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), for whom expected survival can vary from a few months to more than a decade, accurate disease prognostication is especially important. Currently, patients with MDS are often grouped into higher-risk (HR) vs lower-risk (LR) disease using clinical prognostic scoring systems, but these systems have limitations. Factors such as molecular genetic information or disease characteristics not captured in the International Prognostic Scoring System-Revised (IPSS-R) can alter risk stratification and identify a subset of patients with LR-MDS who actually behave more like those with HR-MDS. This review describes the current identification and management of patients with LR-MDS whose condition is likely to behave in a less favorable manner than predicted by the IPSS-R.

Management of the Older Patient with Myelodysplastic Syndrome

No two diagnoses of myelodysplastic syndrome are genuinely alike, owing to differing and dynamic mutational topography and epigenetic aberrancy. Consequently, no two patients with myelodysplastic syndrome are identical and disease-specific and patient-specific factors are considered in formulating the optimal treatment, which includes few that are disease modifying. Age itself should not be an absolute contraindication to therapy, including intensive therapy such as allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, which is the only curative therapy. However, age associates with an increased prevalence of frailty and comorbidities that must be considered and may preclude a path to cure. Palliative therapies are the mainstay for many patients with myelodysplastic syndrome, which is a disease of older adults with the majority of patients diagnosed at age ≥ 75 years. The older patient requires heightened attention to end organ function/reserve and drug-drug interactions as well as insurance, income, cost, and socioeconomic and psychosocial issues that influence management. Many prior studies have included relatively younger populations or have not specifically performed high-quality subgroup analyses of older patients. In this review, we discuss the available standard-of-care therapies for myelodysplastic syndrome as they specifically relate to the older population and assess the emerging therapeutics that may further the pursuit for personalized treatment and improve both the outcomes and quality of life of the older patient with myelodysplastic syndrome.

Myelodysplastic syndromes: 2021 update on diagnosis, risk stratification and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a very heterogeneous group of myeloid disorders characterized by peripheral blood cytopenias and increased risk of transformation to acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). Myelodysplastic syndromes occur more frequently in older males and in individuals with prior exposure to cytotoxic therapy.

DIAGNOSIS

Diagnosis of MDS is based on morphological evidence of dysplasia upon visual examination of a bone marrow aspirate and biopsy. Information obtained from additional studies such as karyotype, flow cytometry and molecular genetics is usually complementary and may help refine diagnosis.

RISK-STRATIFICATION

Prognosis of patients with MDS can be calculated using a number of scoring systems. In general, all these scoring systems include analysis of peripheral cytopenias, percentage of blasts in the bone marrow and cytogenetic characteristics. The most commonly accepted system is the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R). Somatic mutations can help define prognosis and therapy.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

Therapy is selected based on risk, transfusion needs, percent of bone marrow blasts, cytogenetic and mutational profiles, comorbidities, potential for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) and prior exposure to hypomethylating agents (HMA). Goals of therapy are different in lower-risk patients than in higher-risk individuals and in those with HMA failure. In lower-risk MDS, the goal is to decrease transfusion needs and transformation to higher risk disease or AML, as well as to improve survival. In higher-risk disease, the goal is to prolong survival. In 2020, we witnessed an explosion of new agents and investigational approaches. Current available therapies include growth factor support, lenalidomide, HMAs, intensive chemotherapy and alloSCT. Novel therapeutics approved in 2020 are luspatercept and the oral HMA ASTX727. At the present time, there are no approved interventions for patients with progressive or refractory disease particularly after HMA-based therapy. Options include participation in a clinical trial, cytarabine-based therapy or alloSCT.

Cui bono? Finding the value of allogeneic stem cell transplantation for lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes

Introduction: The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) vary in their risk of disease progression; progression includes increasingly severe bone marrow failure, reclassification as acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and death. Prognostic tools guide recommendations for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT), the only curative option. AlloSCT is typically reserved for patients with higher-risk MDS as defined by existing prognostic tools, although additional clinical and biological factors in lower-risk patients may influence this dogma.Areas covered: This review discusses the current understanding of MDS risk stratification as it pertains to the use of alloSCT in subpopulations of MDS patients with a particular focus on the use of alloSCT in patients with lower-risk disease.Expert commentary: Though high-quality data are lacking, some lower-risk MDS patients may benefit from alloSCT, which offers the only prospect of cure. Understanding the etiologic role and prognostic impact of recurring genetic events may improve existing risk stratification and become integral facets of prognostic schemata. The identification of additional factors influencing the prognoses of patients currently lumped together as 'lower-risk' will likewise improve the selection of MDS patients for early intervention or aggressive therapies such as alloSCT.

Myelodysplastic syndromes: 2018 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

The myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are a very heterogeneous group of myeloid disorders characterized by peripheral blood cytopenias and increased risk of transformation to acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). MDS occurs more frequently in older males and in individuals with prior exposure to cytotoxic therapy.

DIAGNOSIS

Diagnosis of MDS is based on morphological evidence of dysplasia upon visual examination of a bone marrow aspirate and biopsy. Information obtained from additional studies such as karyotype, flow cytometry or molecular genetics is usually complementary and may help refine diagnosis.

RISK-STRATIFICATION

Prognosis of patients with MDS can be calculated using a number of scoring systems. In general, all these scoring systems include analysis of peripheral cytopenias, percentage of blasts in the bone marrow and cytogenetic characteristics. The most commonly used system is probably the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS). IPSS is now replaced by the revised IPSS-R score. Although not systematically incorporated into new validated prognostic systems, somatic mutations can help define prognosis and should be considered as new prognostic factors.

RISK-ADAPTED THERAPY

Therapy is selected based on risk, transfusion needs, percent of bone marrow blasts and cytogenetic and mutational profiles. Goals of therapy are different in lower risk patients than in higher risk. In lower risk, the goal is to decrease transfusion needs and transformation to higher risk disease or AML, as well as to improve survival. In higher risk, the goal is to prolong survival. Current available therapies include growth factor support, lenalidomide, hypomethylating agents, intensive chemotherapy and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. The use of lenalidomide has significant clinical activity in patients with lower risk disease, anemia and a chromosome 5 alteration. 5-azacitidine and decitabine have activity in both lower and higher-risk MDS. 5-azacitidine has been shown to improve survival in higher risk MDS. A number of new molecular lesions have been described in MDS that may serve as new therapeutic targets or aid in the selection of currently available agents. Additional supportive care measures may include the use of prophylactic antibiotics and iron chelation.

MANAGEMENT OF PROGRESSIVE OR REFRACTORY DISEASE

At the present time there are no approved interventions for patients with progressive or refractory disease particularly after hypomethylating based therapy. Options include participation in a clinical trial or cytarabine based therapy and stem cell transplantation.

Hypomethylating agents (HMA) treatment for myelodysplastic syndromes: alternatives in the frontline and relapse settings

INTRODUCTION

Hypomethylating agents (HMA) have played a pivotal role for treating myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) over the past decade, inducing sustained hematological responses and delaying progression to leukemia. However, a vast majority of patients will experience treatment failure within 2 years, with poor prognoses and limited options, and management of this growing patient population remains unclear. Areas covered: With the introduction of new agents in the MDS field, a better understanding of the biology of MDS, and updated information on standard of care options (including allogeneic transplantation), we re-evaluate the global treatment strategy in MDS via novel agents, focusing in particular on investigational approaches for patients who fail to respond to HMA when applicable. This review aims to address two questions: what are reasonable alternatives to HMA in MDS, and what strategies can be used for patients experiencing HMA failure. Expert opinion/commentary: HMA therapy remains a mainstay of treatment, even if additional research is still warranted to maximize its benefits for the different groups of patients. The outcome of patients experiencing HMA failure remains grim, without standard of care, but several new approaches seem promising, as there is an increasing focus on studying treatments for patients refractory to HMA treatment.