Methotrexate plus idarubicin improves outcome of patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma

A prospective cohort study of methotrexate plus idarubicin in newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma

PURPOSE

High-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX)-based chemotherapy regimen is the first-line option for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). This prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of HD-MTX plus idarubicin (IDA) in patients with newly diagnosed immunocompetent PCNSL.

METHODS

We recruited newly diagnosed PCNSL patients from January 2017 to August 2020. Patients were assigned into two groups: HD-MTX monotherapy and HD-MTX plus IDA (HD-MTX/IDA). In the HD-MTX monotherapy group, patients were treated with MTX 8 g/m² alone on day 1, while the HD-MTX/IDA group received MTX 8 g/m² on day 1 and IDA 10 mg/m² on day 2. Treatments were repeated every 3 weeks for 8 cycles except for progression and/or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

We recruited 61 PCNSL patients, including 36 in the HD-MTX and 25 in the HD-MTX/IDA group. The CR rate was 68% in the HD-MTX/IDA group and 72.22% of patients in the HD-MTX monotherapy group (p = 0.7221), while the overall response rate was 72% vs. 77.78% (p = 0.6063). Median PFS in HD-MTX/IDA group and HD-MTX monotherapy group were 15.6 months and 18.5 months, respectively (p = 0.6374). Median OS was not reached in both groups. There were no significant differences in adverse effects between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of IDA with HD-MTX showed no obvious therapeutic advantage over HD-MTX monotherapy in newly diagnosed patients with PCNSL. HD-MTX dose of 8 g/m² monotherapy can still provide better therapeutic benefits in patients with acceptable adverse effects. Future studies could explore HD-MTX in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents in the first-line treatment of PCNSL.

R-IDARAM treatment in central nervous system lymphomas: A single-center experience and review of the literature

Introduction:

Central nervous system lymphomas (CNSLs) require effective treatment strategies due to aggressive nature of disease. Despite therapeutic approaches having improved in the last decades, there is no standard treatment for these patients. As a CNSL targeted-therapy IDARAM protocol was developed, the outcomes were reported with a few studies. We observed the R-IDARAM protocol in our CNSL cases, and we discuss the effectiveness, tolerability, and toxicity with a review of the literature in this article.

Subjects and Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed response rates, progression-free survival, adverse events, and long-term side effects in patients who were treated by modified R-IDARAM as standard clinical care of CNSL in our hematology department.

Results:

Response was achieved in five of nine patients. Three patients (two primary CNSL and one secondary CNSL) are still being followed up without disease progression with a median duration of follow-up of 79 months (88, 79, and 17 months, respectively). Manageable hematological side effects including thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were experienced by all patients.

Conclusion:

R-IDARAM protocol may be an option with high early response rates and manageable toxicity. Hematological side effects are the main problem, and long-term neurological toxicity is not common. Eligible patients must continue with autologous stem cell transplantation due to poor long-term survival outcomes.

Management of primary central nervous system lymphoma

A rare tumor, primary central nervous system lymphoma can affect immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients. While sensitive to radiotherapy or chemotherapy crossing the blood-brain barrier, it often recurs. Modern treatment consists of high-dose methotrexate-based induction chemotherapy, often followed by consolidation with either radiotherapy or further chemotherapy. Neurotoxicity is however a concern with radiotherapy, especially for patients older than 60 years. The benefit of the addition of rituximab to chemotherapy is unclear. Targeted therapies and immunotherapy have been effective in some patients and are tested on a larger scale. Survival has improved in the last decade, but remains poor in older patients.

Balancing relapses versus cognitive impairment in primary central nervous system lymphoma: a single-center experience

OBJECTIVES

The outcomes of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) are much improved with multi-modality regimens. Unfortunately, in limited-resource countries, chemo-radiotherapy is the only option of curative-intent treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of low-dose whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) as a consolidation on disease control and long-term neurocognitive functions.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective single-center study enrolling PCNSL patients from 2011 to May 2016 to evaluate the real-life treatment outcome and neurotoxicity from treatment especially radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven newly diagnosed immunocompetent PCNSL patients were treated with a high-dose methotrexate-based regimen with or without WBRT. The median age was 56 (range 16-78) years old. After chemotherapy, the overall response and complete response (CR) rates were 59.5% and 43.2%, respectively. All 6 partial response (PR) patients and 6 of 16 CR patients underwent radiotherapy. In 22 patients who achieved CR, the progression-free survival (PFS) of patients without WBRT was significantly inferior to the WBRT group with the hazard ratio of 4.7 (95% confidence interval 1.14-19.82, p = 0.03). The 3-year PFS were 35% and 78.75%, respectively, but there was no difference in overall survival. The serial Montreal Cognitive Assessment evaluations (20-72 months post chemotherapy) of 10 long-term CR patients revealed one dementia among three patients without WBRT and five mild cognitive impairments in seven patients with WBRT. Except for the dementia case, all the other patients can perform daily activities without assistance.

CONCLUSION

The low-dose WBRT consolidation is associated with lower PCNSL relapses with only mild neurocognitive toxicity.