Comparison of combined leflunomide and low-dose corticosteroid therapy with full-dose corticosteroid monotherapy for progressive IgA nephropathy

The efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine versus leflunomide in patients with IgA nephropathy: a single-center experience

PURPOSE

To date, our understanding of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) pathophysiology has remained incomplete; therefore, treatment remains largely empiric, and the efficacy and safety of immunosuppressants remain controversial. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine and leflunomide therapy in a retrospective cohort of patients with IgAN.

METHODS

We screened the IgAN registration database in our department, and a total of 159 kidney patients with biopsy-confirmed IgAN were enrolled, with 57 patients receiving hydroxychloroquine plus a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (hydroxychloroquine group), 52 patients receiving leflunomide plus a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (leflunomide group), and 50 patients receiving only a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor (renin-angiotensin system inhibitor-only group). Changes in proteinuria, hematuria, and the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), as well as adverse events, were analyzed during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

At the end of 6-month follow-up, proteinuria significantly decreased by 70.36 (57.54, 79.33)%, 57.29 (46.79, 67.29)% and 41.20 (25.76, 48.94)% in the hydroxychloroquine, leflunomide and renin-angiotensin system inhibitor-only groups, respectively, compared to baseline (all P values < 0.001). Hematuria significantly decreased by 71.07 (56.48, 82.47)% in the leflunomide group (P < 0.001). The eGFR improved by 3.72 ± 2.97%, 3.16 ± 2.00% and 1.91 ± 2.41%, respectively, in the hydroxychloroquine, leflunomide and renin-angiotensin system inhibitor-only groups, but without statistical significance. No serious adverse events occurred during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Both hydroxychloroquine combined with a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor and leflunomide combined with a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor were more effective than a renin-angiotensin system inhibitor alone in improving proteinuria in IgAN patients. Hydroxychloroquine was more effective in reducing proteinuria, and leflunomide showed superiority in reducing hematuria. Our results need to be verified in large-scale randomized controlled trials.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose corticosteroids combined with leflunomide for progressive IgA nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The effectiveness of immunosuppressive and corticosteroid treatments for Immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy (IgAN) remains thoroughly evaluated. We undertook a meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose corticosteroids plus leflunomide for progressive IgA nephropathy.

METHODS

Eligible studies were obtained from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. We also searched the references of the included studies. Our protocol followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Eligibility criteria were defined using a PICOS framework.

RESULTS

Our study included three articles presenting 342 patient cases. Findings revealed that low-dose corticosteroids combined with the leflunomide group were effective in relieving urine protein excretion (UPE) [mean difference (MD) = -0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.41 to -0.30, P < 0.00001] compared with the full-dose corticosteroids group. Regarding serum creatinine (SCr), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), complete remission rate, and overall response rate, there was no difference between the groups (p > 0.05). Regarding safety, low-dose corticosteroids combined with leflunomide significantly reduced the risk of serious adverse events [odds ratio (OR): 0.11, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.91, P = 0.04]. Besides, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in the incidence of respiratory infection, abnormal liver function, diarrhea, herpes zoster, alopecia, pruritus, insomnia, pneumonia, diabetes, and urinary tract infection (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose corticosteroids combined with leflunomide are a safe and effective treatment for progressive IgA nephropathy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42022361883.

Efficacy and safety of leflunomide combined with corticosteroids for the treatment of IgA nephropathy: a Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of leflunomide combined with corticosteroids, compared with corticosteroids alone, for IgA nephropathy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Studies were retrieved by searching of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane's Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang databases on 11 October 2021. A random-effect model incorporating the heterogeneity was used to pool the results. The efficacy outcomes included the complete remission rate of proteinuria, overall response rate (the combined rates of patients with complete and partial remission of proteinuria), changes of urine protein excretion (UPE), serum creatinine (SCr), and estimated glomerular infiltrating rate (eGFR).

RESULTS

Nineteen studies were included. Patients receiving the combined therapy had a higher complete remission rate (relative risk [RR]: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.08-1.55, p = 0.006; I2 = 0%) and overall response rate (RR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.10-1.26, p < 0.001, I2 = 0%) compared to patients who received CS alone. Besides, combined therapy was associated with significantly reduced levels of UPE (mean difference [MD]: -0.30 g/24h, 95% CI: -0.43 to -0.16, p < 0.001; I2 = 34%) and SCr (MD: -7.55 mmol/L, 95% CI: -11.06 to -4.04, p < 0.001; I2 = 34%), and increased level of eGFR (MD: 6.51 mL/min/1.73 m2, 95% CI: 4.06-8.97, p < 0.001; I2 = 0%). The incidence of adverse events was not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined treatment with leflunomide and corticosteroids was more effective than corticosteroids alone for patients with IgA nephropathy.

Clinical efficacy and safety of full-dose versus half-dose corticosteroids plus leflunomide for IgA nephropathy

BACKGROUND

The results of leflunomide (LEF) in patients with IgA nephropathy (IgAN) were inconsistent.

METHODS

A total of 149 kidney biopsy-confirmed IgAN patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 50 ml/min/1.73 m² and protein excretion levels ≥0.75 g/d were enrolled, with 65 subjects receiving half-dose CS plus LEF (LEF group), and the 84 counterpart patients accepting full-dose corticosteroid (Full CS group). The primary outcomes included the complete remission (CR) rates and incidence of adverse events (AEs). The secondary outcomes were the overall remission (OR) rates and a combined event (eGFR reduced ≥30%, end-stage renal disease [ESRD], hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis or kidney transplantation).

RESULTS

During the 18 months of follow-up, the CR rates were 72 and 64% in the LEF and Full CS groups (P = 0.299), respectively. The proportion of patients with OR rates in the LEF group and Full CS group was 89% versus 75%, respectively (P = 0.027). Serious AEs were observed only in the Full CS group (P = 0.017). The incidences of total AEs (P = 0.036) and infections (P = 0.024) were lower in the LEF group than in the Full CS group.

CONCLUSIONS

LEF combined with half-dose CS is superior to full-dose CS in the treatment of IgAN.

Leflunomide plus low-dose prednisone in patients with progressive IgA nephropathy: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-labeled, and controlled trial

Background

Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common cause of glomerulonephritis worldwide, and the optimal approach to its treatment remains a significant challenge.

Methods

We did a prospective, randomized, open-labeled, multicenter, controlled trial, comprised of 3-month run-in, 12-month treatment, and 12-month follow-up phases. After 3-month run-in phase, patients with biopsy-confirmed IgAN at risk of progression were randomly allocated to LEF plus low-dose prednisone (LEF + prednisone group) or conventionally accepted-dose prednisone [prednisone(alone) group] Our primary outcome was 24-h urine protein excretion (UPE) and secondary outcomes were serum albumin (sALB), serum creatinine (Scr), and eGFR. Safety was evaluated in all patients who received the trial medications.

Results

One hundred and eight patients [59 in LEF + prednisone group, 49 in prednisone (alone) group]were enrolled and finished their treatment and follow-up periods. There is no significant difference in the baseline level between the two groups. Compared with baseline, both groups showed a significant decrease in 24-h UPE (p < 0.01) and increase in sALB (p < 0.01), with stable Scr and eGFR throughout the 12-month treatment period. What’s more, these effects were sustained through the 12-month follow-up period. However, there was no difference in 24-h UPE, sALB, Scr, and eGFR between the two groups (p > 0.05). At 12 months, a difference in overall response rate, relapsing rate, and incidence of adverse events between the two groups was not significant.

Conclusions

The efficacy and safety of LEF plus low-dose prednisone and conventionally accepted-dose prednisone in the treatment of progressive IgAN are comparable.

IgA Nephropathy: "The Times They Are a-Changin"

Background

Primary IgA Nephropathy (IgA N) is a very common and often progressive glomerular disease. At present, the diagnosis of IgA N is totally dependent on kidney biopsy, but the prospect for a future diagnosis by means of a "liquid" biopsy is promising. A great deal is now understood regarding its diverse clinical and pathological features as well as its epidemiology, genetics, prognosis, and pathogenesis. Treatment approaches are now on increasingly solid evidence-based grounds, but many uncertainties continue to be devil the field. Better means of categorization of patients into a hierarchy of progression risk at the time of diagnosis will undoubtedly refine and personalize treatment decisions.

Summary

The panorama of treatment strategies is undergoing a rapid transformation, largely due to an increase in large randomized clinical trials testing available agents and novel therapeutic classes. It is anticipated that the combination of better prognostic tools and new strategies for treatment of IgA N will alter the landscape of therapeutic algorithms for patients with IgA N.

Key Messages

This review seeks to describe some of the evolutionary changes in the approach to treatment of IgA N, to place them in the context of current management, and to identify knowledge gaps that need to be addressed.

Efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive therapies in the treatment of high-risk IgA nephropathy: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is one of the significant contributing factors of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). It is reported that over half of patients with IgAN accompany multiple high-risk factors, which increase the risk of ESRD progression. Studies have shown that immunosuppressive agents were beneficial in high-risk IgAN, but the efficacy and safety have not been fully demonstrated yet. The present study aims to elucidate the efficacy of commonly used immunosuppressants in high-risk IgAN and their relative safety profiles via a network meta-analysis strategy.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) eligible for this network meta-analysis were included to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different immunosuppressants for high-risk IgAN. Main outcomes and measures include incidence of renal composite end point, the rate of total remission, adverse events, and proteinuria. Besides, subgroup analysis and cluster analysis were carried out.

RESULTS

This network meta-analysis of 37 RCTs involving 3012 participants found that Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) combined with corticosteroids (CS) was superior to other interventions in end point events and proteinuria. Cyclosporine A (CsA) plus CS was the best option for clinical remission rate, and supportive care (SC) was the safest treatment. Cluster analysis showed that MMF+CS and Leflunomide (LEF)+CS were best protocols in efficacy and safety. Subgroup analysis indicated the best benefits of MMF were presented among the Asian population, and the benefits increased with the increase of follow-up duration. The effect of Cyclophosphamide (CTX) +CS on crescent IgAN was better than that of other risk factors. Moreover, the increasing follow-up duration was negatively associated with the effect.

CONCLUSIONS

MMF+CS and LEF+CS appear to serve as the best choice for treating high-risk IgAN than other immunosuppressive therapies.

Immunosuppressive agents for treating IgA nephropathy

BACKGROUND

IgA nephropathy is the most common glomerulonephritis world-wide. IgA nephropathy causes end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in 15% to 20% of affected patients within 10 years and in 30% to 40% of patients within 20 years from the onset of disease. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2003 and updated in 2015.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefits and harms of immunosuppression strategies for the treatment of IgA nephropathy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 9 September 2019 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs of treatment for IgA nephropathy in adults and children and that compared immunosuppressive agents with placebo, no treatment, or other immunosuppressive or non-immunosuppressive agents.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed study risk of bias and extracted data. Estimates of treatment effect were summarised using random effects meta-analysis. Treatment effects were expressed as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Risks of bias were assessed using the Cochrane tool. Evidence certainty was evaluated using GRADE methodology.

MAIN RESULTS

Fifty-eight studies involving 3933 randomised participants were included. Six studies involving children were eligible. Disease characteristics (kidney function and level of proteinuria) were heterogeneous across studies. Studies evaluating steroid therapy generally included patients with protein excretion of 1 g/day or more. Risk of bias within the included studies was generally high or unclear for many of the assessed methodological domains. In patients with IgA nephropathy and proteinuria > 1 g/day, steroid therapy given for generally two to four months with a tapering course probably prevents the progression to ESKD compared to placebo or standard care (8 studies; 741 participants: RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.65; moderate certainty evidence). Steroid therapy may induce complete remission (4 studies, 305 participants: RR 1.76, 95% CI 1.03 to 3.01; low certainty evidence), prevent doubling of serum creatinine (SCr) (7 studies, 404 participants: RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.29 to 0.65; low certainty evidence), and may lower urinary protein excretion (10 studies, 705 participants: MD -0.58 g/24 h, 95% CI -0.84 to -0.33;low certainty evidence). Steroid therapy had uncertain effects on glomerular filtration rate (GFR), death, infection and malignancy. The risk of adverse events with steroid therapy was uncertain due to heterogeneity in the type of steroid treatment used and the rarity of events. Cytotoxic agents (azathioprine (AZA) or cyclophosphamide (CPA) alone or with concomitant steroid therapy had uncertain effects on ESKD (7 studies, 463 participants: RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.20; low certainty evidence), complete remission (5 studies; 381 participants: RR 1.47, 95% CI 0.94 to 2.30; very low certainty evidence), GFR (any measure), and protein excretion. Doubling of serum creatinine was not reported. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) had uncertain effects on the progression to ESKD, complete remission, doubling of SCr, GFR, protein excretion, infection, and malignancy. Death was not reported. Calcineurin inhibitors compared with placebo or standard care had uncertain effects on complete remission, SCr, GFR, protein excretion, infection, and malignancy. ESKD and death were not reported. Mizoribine administered with renin-angiotensin system inhibitor treatment had uncertain effects on progression to ESKD, complete remission, GFR, protein excretion, infection, and malignancy. Death and SCr were not reported. Leflunomide followed by a tapering course with oral prednisone compared to prednisone had uncertain effects on the progression to ESKD, complete remission, doubling of SCr, GFR, protein excretion, and infection. Death and malignancy were not reported. Effects of other immunosuppressive regimens (including steroid plus non-immunosuppressive agents or mTOR inhibitors) were inconclusive primarily due to insufficient data from the individual studies in low or very low certainty evidence. The effects of treatments on death, malignancy, reduction in GFR at least of 25% and adverse events were very uncertain. Subgroup analyses to determine the impact of specific patient characteristics such as ethnicity or disease severity on treatment effectiveness were not possible.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In moderate certainty evidence, corticosteroid therapy probably prevents decline in GFR or doubling of SCr in adults and children with IgA nephropathy and proteinuria. Evidence for treatment effects of immunosuppressive agents on death, infection, and malignancy is generally sparse or low-quality. Steroid therapy has uncertain adverse effects due to a paucity of studies. Available studies are few, small, have high risk of bias and generally do not systematically identify treatment-related harms. Subgroup analyses to identify specific patient characteristics that might predict better response to therapy were not possible due to a lack of studies. There is no evidence that other immunosuppressive agents including CPA, AZA, or MMF improve clinical outcomes in IgA nephropathy.

Efficacy and safety of leflunomide in IgA nephropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal therapy for immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) remains uncertain. Leflunomide (LEF) is an immunosuppressive drug which may reduce deposition of glomerular autoantibodies and immune complexes. Several clinical trials were designed to evaluate the efficacy of LEF, but their results were controversial.

METHODS

Ovid Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and CNKI were systematically searched. Search terms included ("glomerulonephritis" OR "nephritis") AND ("immunoglobulin A" OR "IgA") AND "leflunomide". Studies in which patients were diagnosed with IgAN based on renal biopsy were included. Studies needed to report clinical outcomes via either short- or long-term clinical examination, remission rate, or complication rate.

RESULTS

Forty-four studies encompassing 1802 patients were included, of which 35 were randomized controlled trials. Results of 24 h post-treatment urine protein tests and serum creatinine tests were significantly lower in patients treat with LEF and corticosteroids (CS) or valsartan (ACEI) (CS + LEF or CS + ACEI) compared with patients treated with CS or ACEI alone (P < 0.05). More patients treated with CS + LEF (31.2%) achieved complete remission (CR) than patients treated with CS alone (22.2%) (RR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.59-0.85, P < 0.05). Although there was no significant difference in CR between patients treated with cyclophosphamide and CS (CS + CTX) and those treated with CS + LEF, the complication rate in the former group was higher (28.4%) than in the latter one (11.4%) (RR = 2.46, 95% CI 1.47-4.13, P < 0.005).

CONCLUSION

LEF appears to improve renal function while decreasing loss of urine protein. Combination regimens including LEF were better and safer compared with CS or ACEI alone or combinations including CTX.

Effects of Two Immunosuppressive Treatment Protocols for IgA Nephropathy

The role of immunosuppression in IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is controversial. In the Supportive Versus Immunosuppressive Therapy for the Treatment of Progressive IgA Nephropathy (STOP-IgAN) Trial, 162 patients with IgAN and proteinuria >0.75 g/d after 6 months of optimized supportive care were randomized into two groups: continued supportive care or additional immunosuppression (GFR≥60 ml/min per 1.73 m²: 6-month corticosteroid monotherapy; GFR=30-59 ml/min per 1.73 m²: cyclophosphamide for 3 months followed by azathioprine plus oral prednisolone). Coprimary end points were full clinical remission and GFR loss ≥15 ml/min per 1.73 m² during the 3-year trial phase. In this secondary intention to treat analysis, we separately analyzed data from each immunosuppression subgroup and the corresponding patients on supportive care. Full clinical remission occurred in 11 (20%) patients receiving corticosteroid monotherapy and three (6%) patients on supportive care (odds ratio, 5.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 26.36; P=0.02), but the rate did not differ between patients receiving immunosuppressive combination and controls on supportive care (11% versus 4%, respectively; P=0.30). The end point of GFR loss ≥15 ml/min per 1.73 m² did not differ between groups. Only corticosteroid monotherapy transiently reduced proteinuria at 12 months. Severe infections, impaired glucose tolerance, and/or weight gain in the first year were more frequent with either immunosuppressive regimen than with supportive care. In conclusion, only corticosteroid monotherapy induced disease remission in a minority of patients who had IgAN with relatively well preserved GFR and persistent proteinuria. Neither immunosuppressive regimen prevented GFR loss, and both associated with substantial adverse events.