Phase I/Ib study of olaparib and carboplatin in women with triple negative breast cancer

Poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer with homologous repair deficiency

Breast cancer (BC) is a highly heterogeneous disease, and the presence of germline breast cancer gene mutation (gBRCAm) is associated with a poor prognosis. Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a BC subtype, characterized by the absence of hormone and growth factor receptor expression, making therapeutic decisions difficult. Defects in the DNA damage response pathway due to mutation in breast cancer genes (BRCA 1/2) lead to homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). However, in HRD conditions, poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) proteins repair DNA damage and lead to tumor cell survival. Biological understanding of HRD leads to the development of PARP inhibitors (PARPi), which trap PARP proteins and cause genomic instability and tumor cell lysis. HRD assessment can be an important biomarker in identifying gBRCAm patients with BC who could benefit from PARPi therapy. HRD can be identified by homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene-based assays, genomic-scarring assays and mutational signatures, transcription and protein expression profiles, and functional assays. However, gold standard methodologies that are robust and reliable to assess HRD are not available currently. Hence, there is a pressing need to develop accurate biomarkers identifying HRD tumors to guide targeted therapies such as PARPi in patients with BC. HRD assessment has shown fruitful outcomes in chemotherapy studies and preliminary evidence on PARPi intervention as monotherapy and combination therapy in HRD-stratified patients. Furthermore, ongoing trials are exploring the potential of PARPi in BC and clinically complex TNBC settings, where HRD testing is used as an adjunct to stratify patients based on BRCA mutations.

Targeted Nanocarrier-Based Drug Delivery Strategies for Improving the Therapeutic Efficacy of PARP Inhibitors against Ovarian Cancer

The current focus of ovarian cancer (OC) research is the improvement of treatment options through maximising drug effectiveness. OC remains the fifth leading cause of cancer-induced mortality in women worldwide. In recent years, nanotechnology has revolutionised drug delivery systems. Nanoparticles may be utilised as carriers in gene therapy or to overcome the problem of drug resistance in tumours by limiting the number of free drugs in circulation and thereby minimising undesired adverse effects. Cell surface receptors, such as human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2), folic acid (FA) receptors, CD44 (also referred to as homing cell adhesion molecule, HCAM), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are highly expressed in ovarian cancer cells. Generation of active targeting nanoparticles involves modification with ligands that recognise cell surface receptors and thereby promote internalisation by cancer cells. Several poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) are currently used for the treatment of high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (HGSOC) or platinum-sensitive relapsed OC. However, PARP resistance and poor drug bioavailability are common challenges, highlighting the urgent need to develop novel, effective strategies for ovarian cancer treatment. This review evaluates the utility of nanoparticles in ovarian cancer therapy, with a specific focus on targeted approaches and the use of PARPi nanocarriers to optimise treatment outcomes.

Advancements in clinical aspects of targeted therapy and immunotherapy in breast cancer

Breast cancer is the second leading cause of death for women worldwide. The heterogeneity of this disease presents a big challenge in its therapeutic management. However, recent advances in molecular biology and immunology enable to develop highly targeted therapies for many forms of breast cancer. The primary objective of targeted therapy is to inhibit a specific target/molecule that supports tumor progression. Ak strain transforming, cyclin-dependent kinases, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase, and different growth factors have emerged as potential therapeutic targets for specific breast cancer subtypes. Many targeted drugs are currently undergoing clinical trials, and some have already received the FDA approval as monotherapy or in combination with other drugs for the treatment of different forms of breast cancer. However, the targeted drugs have yet to achieve therapeutic promise against triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). In this aspect, immune therapy has come up as a promising therapeutic approach specifically for TNBC patients. Different immunotherapeutic modalities including immune-checkpoint blockade, vaccination, and adoptive cell transfer have been extensively studied in the clinical setting of breast cancer, especially in TNBC patients. The FDA has already approved some immune-checkpoint blockers in combination with chemotherapeutic drugs to treat TNBC and several trials are ongoing. This review provides an overview of clinical developments and recent advancements in targeted therapies and immunotherapies for breast cancer treatment. The successes, challenges, and prospects were critically discussed to portray their profound prospects.

Emerging treatment strategies for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous subtype of breast cancer that is often associated with an aggressive phenotype and a poor prognosis. Cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment for most patients with metastatic TNBC (mTNBC), but duration of response is often short and median overall survival is only 12-18 months. Therefore, it is critical to identify novel treatment strategies to improve outcomes for these patients. In this review article, we discuss recent advances in treatment strategies for patients with mTNBC including the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapies, and antibody-drug conjugates. For each topic, we summarize important preclinical and clinical data, discuss implications for clinical practice, and highlight future research directions.

Associations with response to Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in patients with metastatic breast cancer

PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have modest antitumor activity in patients with advanced breast cancer and mutation in BRCA. It is unclear whether some subgroups derive greater benefit from treatment. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched from inception to March 2021 to identify trials of PARPi in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Objective response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) to PARPi were extracted and pooled in a meta-analysis using the Mantel Haenszel random effects model. Meta-regression explored the influence of patient and tumor characteristics on ORR and CBR. For randomized trials, hazard ratio comparing PARPi to control therapy were pooled using inverse variance and random effects. Analysis included 43 studies comprising 2409 patients. Among these, 1798 (75%) patients had BRCA mutations and 1146 (48%) were triple negative. In 10 studies (28%; n = 680 patients), the PARPi was given in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy. Weighted mean ORR was 45%; 64% when combined with platinum vs 37% with PARPi monotherapy (p < 0.001). Previous platinum-based chemotherapy was associated with lower ORR (p = 0.02). Compared to standard chemotherapy, progression-free survival was improved (HR 0.64, p < 0.001), but there was no difference in overall survival (HR 0.87, p = 0.06). There were no differences in ORR or CBR between BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. PARPi are more active in combination with platinum than as monotherapy, with lower response if given as monotherapy after platinum exposure. Significant improvements in ORR translated to modest improvement in progression-free, but not overall survival. There was no association between ORR and BRCA mutations.

Targeted Therapeutic Strategies for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive subtype of breast cancer, which is characterized by the absence of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression and the absence of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression/amplification. Conventional chemotherapy is the mainstay of systemic treatment for TNBC. However, lack of molecular targeted therapies and poor prognosis of TNBC patients have prompted a great effort to discover effective targets for improving the clinical outcomes. For now, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi's) and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of TNBC. Moreover, agents that target signal transduction, angiogenesis, epigenetic modifications, and cell cycle are under active preclinical or clinical investigations. In this review, we highlight the current major developments in targeted therapies of TNBC, with some descriptions about their (dis)advantages and future perspectives.

Phase 1 Combination Study of the CHK1 Inhibitor Prexasertib and the PARP Inhibitor Olaparib in High-grade Serous Ovarian Cancer and Other Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

Checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1) plays a central role in the response to replication stress through modulation of cell-cycle checkpoints and homologous recombination (HR) repair. In BRCA-deficient cancers with de novo or acquired PARP inhibitor resistance, the addition of the CHK1 inhibitor prexasertib to the PARP inhibitor olaparib compromises replication fork stability, as well as HR proficiency, allowing for sensitization to PARP inhibition.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study followed a 3+3 design with a 7-day lead-in of olaparib alone, followed by 28-day cycles with prexasertib administered on days 1 and 15 in combination with an attenuated dose of olaparib on days 1-5 and 15-19. Pharmacokinetic blood samples were collected after olaparib alone and following combination therapy. Patients enrolled to the expansion phase of the study underwent paired tumor biopsies for pharmacodynamic (PD) assessments.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients were treated. DLTs included grade 3 neutropenia and grade 3 febrile neutropenia. The MTD/recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was prexasertib at 70 mg/m² i.v. with olaparib at 100 mg by mouth twice daily. Most common treatment-related adverse events included leukopenia (83%), neutropenia (86%), thrombocytopenia (66%), and anemia (72%). Four of 18 patients with BRCA1-mutant, PARP inhibitor-resistant, high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) achieved partial responses. Paired tumor biopsies demonstrated reduction in RAD51 foci and increased expression of γ-H2AX, pKAP1, and pRPA after combination exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Prexasertib combined with olaparib has preliminary clinical activity in BRCA-mutant patients with HGSOC who have previously progressed on a PARP inhibitor. PD analyses show that prexasertib compromises HR with evidence of induction of DNA damage and replication stress.

Exploration of therapeutic applicability and different signaling mechanism of various phytopharmacological agents for treatment of breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Cancer is one of the most dreaded diseases characterized by uncontrolled proliferation of abnormal cells that occurs due to impairment of cell division and apoptosis process. Cancer is categorized into several types on the basis of affected organs and breast cancer (BC) is the most predominant cause of mortality among women. Although, several synthetic and semi-synthetic therapies have been developed for the treatment of BC but they exhibit numerous serious adverse effects therefore; pharmacological agents with fewer/no side effects need to be explored. Plants and phytoconstituents perhaps fulfill the aforementioned requirement and could serve as a potential and alternative therapy for BC treatment. The ongoing biomedical research, clinical trials and number of patents granted have further boosted the acceptance of the plants and plant-derived constituents in the effective treatment of BC.

PURPOSE OF STUDY

Various treatment strategies such as checkpoint inhibitors, targeting micro RNA, apoptotic pathway, BRCA-1 gene, P₅₃ protein, P13K/Akt/mTOR pathway, notch signaling pathway, hedgehog/gli-1 signaling pathway, poly-ADP ribose polymerase inhibitors, mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors etc. are available for BC. In addition to these synthetic and semi-synthetic drug therapies, several natural constituents such as alkaloids, sesquiterpenes, polyphenols, flavonoids and diterpenoids from medicinal plants, vegetables and fruits are reported to possess promising anti-cancer activity. The purpose of the present review is to highlight the various signaling pathways through which plants/herbs show the anti-cancer potential especially against the BC.

STUDY DESIGN

The literature for the present study was collected from various databases such as Pubmed, Scopus, Chemical Abstracts, Medicinal and aromatic plant abstracts, Web of Science etc. The different patent databases were also reviewed for the anti-cancer (BC) potential of the particular herbs/plants and their formulations.

RESULT AND CONCLUSION

In this review, we have discussed the number of plants along with their patents of different herbal formulations which are being used for the treatment of BC and other types of cancers. We have also delineated the different signaling mechanisms through which they inhibit the growth of BC cells. In nutshell, we can conclude that large numbers of herbs or their extracts are reported for the treatment of BC. But still, there is further need for research in-depth to translate the use of natural products clinically BC treatment.

Effect of Oxaliplatin, Olaparib and LY294002 in Combination on Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has a poor prognosis as the therapy has several limitations, most importantly, treatment resistance. In this study we examined the different responses of triple-negative breast cancer line MDA-MB-231 and hormone receptor-positive breast cancer line MCF7 to a combined treatment including olaparib, a poly-(ADP ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, oxaliplatin, a third-generation platinum compound and LY294002, an Akt pathway inhibitor. We applied the drugs in a single, therapeutically relevant concentration individually and in all possible combinations, and we assessed the viability, type of cell death, reactive oxygen species production, cell-cycle phases, colony formation and invasive growth. In agreement with the literature, the MDA-MB-231 cells were more treatment resistant than the MCF7 cells. However, and in contrast with the findings of others, we detected no synergistic effect between olaparib and oxaliplatin, and we found that the Akt pathway inhibitor augmented the cytostatic properties of the platinum compound and/or prevented the cytoprotective effects of PARP inhibition. Our results suggest that, at therapeutically relevant concentrations, the cytotoxicity of the platinum compound dominated over that of the PARP inhibitor and the PI3K inhibitor, even though a regression-based model could have indicated an overall synergy at lower and/or higher concentrations.

PARP Inhibitors in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Including Those With BRCA Mutations

ABSTRACT

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) is involved in single-strand DNA break base excision repair. PARP inhibition causes synthetic lethality in breast cancers associated with germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations and is routinely used in clinical practice for metastatic breast cancer. Breast cancers with homologous recombination deficiency or BRCAness, most commonly triple-negative breast cancers, may also benefit. Currently, PARP inhibitor use for triple-negative breast cancer with wild-type BRCA does not have definitive efficacy; however, this is an area of active research. Further clinical and translational data may identify additional patient populations that will benefit from PARP inhibitor therapy.

Veliparib with carboplatin and paclitaxel in BRCA-mutated advanced breast cancer (BROCADE3): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

BRCA1 or BRCA2-mutated breast cancers are sensitive to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors and platinum agents owing to deficiency in homologous recombination repair of DNA damage. In this trial, we compared veliparib versus placebo in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel, and continued as monotherapy if carboplatin and paclitaxel were discontinued before progression, in patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer and a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

METHODS

BROCADE3 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial done at 147 hospitals in 36 countries. Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) had deleterious germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation-associated, histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced HER2-negative breast cancer, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, and had received up to two previous lines of chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) by interactive response technology by means of permuted blocks within strata (block size of 3 or 6) to carboplatin (area under the concentration curve 6 mg/mL per min intravenously) on day 1 and paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 intravenously) on days 1, 8, and 15 of 21-day cycles combined with either veliparib (120 mg orally twice daily, on days -2 to 5) or matching placebo. If patients discontinued carboplatin and paclitaxel before progression, they could continue veliparib or placebo at an intensified dose (300 mg twice daily continuously, escalating to 400 mg twice daily if tolerated) until disease progression. Patients in the control group could receive open-label veliparib monotherapy after disease progression. Randomisation was stratified by previous platinum use, history of CNS metastases, and oestrogen and progesterone receptor status. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Efficacy analyses were done by intention to treat, which included all randomly assigned patients with a centrally confirmed BRCA mutation, and safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of velilparib or placebo. This study is ongoing and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02163694.

FINDINGS

Between July 30, 2014, and Jan 17, 2018, 2202 patients were screened, of whom 513 eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned. In the intention-to-treat population (n=509), 337 patients were assigned to receive veliparib plus carboplatin-paclitaxel (veliparib group) and 172 were assigned to receive placebo plus carboplatin-paclitaxel (control group). Median follow-up at data cutoff (April 5, 2019) was 35·7 months (IQR 24·9-43·6) in the veliparib group and 35·5 months (23·1-45·9) in the control group. Median progression-free survival was 14·5 months (95% CI 12·5-17·7) in the veliparib group versus 12·6 months (10·6-14·4) in the control group (hazard ratio 0·71 [95% CI 0·57-0·88], p=0·0016). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were neutropenia (272 [81%] of 336 patients in the veliparib group vs 143 [84%] of 171 patients in the control group), anaemia (142 [42%] vs 68 [40%]), and thrombocytopenia (134 [40%] vs 48 [28%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 115 (34%) patients in the veliparib group versus 49 (29%) patients in the control group. There were no study drug-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

The addition of veliparib to a highly active platinum doublet, with continuation as monotherapy if the doublet were discontinued, resulted in significant and durable improvement in progression-free survival in patients with germline BRCA mutation-associated advanced breast cancer. These data indicate the utility of combining platinum and PARP inhibitors in this patient population.

FUNDING

AbbVie.

PARP Inhibitors in First-Line Therapy of Ovarian Cancer: Are There Any Doubts?

The standard of care for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (NADOC) is represented by surgical debulking followed by systemic platinum–taxanes combination chemotherapy. At the last European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress, results from three trials testing three different poly-adenosine-diphosphate-ribose-polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (olaparib, niraparib, veliparib) in first-line therapy of OC have been presented. For the first time, these studies evaluated the efficacy of PARP inhibitors in this setting and the relative predictive biomarkers for patients' selection. The use of a PARP inhibitor is related with prolonged progression free survival (PFS) in the whole population of NADOC, although the magnitude of benefit varies widely among subgroups, highlighting the need to identify specific biological subtypes into clinical practice. In this minireview, we discuss the updated data available from clinical studies in this scenario.

Olaparib for advanced breast cancer

Olaparib, an oral PARP-inhibitor, has shown clinical benefit for HER2-negative advanced breast cancer patients carrying a germinal BRCA1/2 mutation. In a randomized Phase III trial, olaparib significantly prolonged progression-free survival as compared with chemotherapy of physician choice. Moreover, in the same trial, a prespecified subgroup analysis reported an overall survival benefit for patients not previously pretreated with chemotherapy for metastatic disease. This review focuses on available preclinical, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data regarding olaparib and clinical evidence of its antitumor efficacy (both as monotherapy and in combination) and tolerability in breast cancer patients. Open questions, such as use of appropriate biomarkers for patient selection and combination/sequencing with other anticancer drugs, are also addressed.

NPM1 upregulates the transcription of PD-L1 and suppresses T cell activity in triple-negative breast cancer

Programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) interaction plays a crucial role in tumor-associated immune escape. Here, we verify that triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has higher PD-L1 expression than other subtypes. We then discover that nucleophosmin (NPM1) binds to PD-L1 promoter specifically in TNBC cells and activates PD-L1 transcription, thus inhibiting T cell activity in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, we demonstrate that PARP1 suppresses PD-L1 transcription through its interaction with the nucleic acid binding domain of NPM1, which is required for the binding of NPM1 at PD-L1 promoter. Consistently, the PARP1 inhibitor olaparib elevates PD-L1 expression in TNBC and exerts a better effect with anti-PD-L1 therapy. Together, our research has revealed NPM1 as a transcription regulator of PD-L1 in TNBC, which could lead to potential therapeutic strategies to enhance the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy.

PD-L1 is highly expressed in triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC). Here, the authors show that nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) transcriptionally activates PD-L1 expression and inhibits T cell activity in TNBC.

Veliparib with First-Line Chemotherapy and as Maintenance Therapy in Ovarian Cancer

BACKGROUND

Data are limited regarding the use of poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, such as veliparib, in combination with chemotherapy followed by maintenance as initial treatment in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma.

METHODS

In an international, phase 3, placebo-controlled trial, we assessed the efficacy of veliparib added to first-line induction chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel and continued as maintenance monotherapy in patients with previously untreated stage III or IV high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive chemotherapy plus placebo followed by placebo maintenance (control), chemotherapy plus veliparib followed by placebo maintenance (veliparib combination only), or chemotherapy plus veliparib followed by veliparib maintenance (veliparib throughout). Cytoreductive surgery could be performed before initiation or after 3 cycles of trial treatment. Combination chemotherapy was 6 cycles, and maintenance therapy was 30 additional cycles. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival in the veliparib-throughout group as compared with the control group, analyzed sequentially in the BRCA-mutation cohort, the cohort with homologous-recombination deficiency (HRD) (which included the BRCA-mutation cohort), and the intention-to-treat population.

RESULTS

A total of 1140 patients underwent randomization. In the BRCA-mutation cohort, the median progression-free survival was 34.7 months in the veliparib-throughout group and 22.0 months in the control group (hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28 to 0.68; P<0.001); in the HRD cohort, it was 31.9 months and 20.5 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.57; 95 CI, 0.43 to 0.76; P<0.001); and in the intention-to-treat population, it was 23.5 months and 17.3 months (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.83; P<0.001). Veliparib led to a higher incidence of anemia and thrombocytopenia when combined with chemotherapy as well as of nausea and fatigue overall.

CONCLUSIONS

Across all trial populations, a regimen of carboplatin, paclitaxel, and veliparib induction therapy followed by veliparib maintenance therapy led to significantly longer progression-free survival than carboplatin plus paclitaxel induction therapy alone. The independent value of adding veliparib during induction therapy without veliparib maintenance was less clear. (Funded by AbbVie; VELIA/GOG-3005 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02470585.).

Preclinical Studies Comparing Efficacy and Toxicity of DNA Repair Inhibitors, Olaparib, and AsiDNA, in the Treatment of Carboplatin-Resistant Tumors

Purpose: Carboplatin is used to treat many cancers, but occurrence of drug resistance and its high toxicity remain a clinical hurdle limiting its efficacy. We compared the efficacy and toxicity of DNA repair inhibitors olaparib or AsiDNA administered alone or in combination with carboplatin. Olaparib acts by inhibiting PARP-dependent repair pathways whereas AsiDNA inhibits double-strand break repair by preventing recruitment of enzymes involved in homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining. Experimental Design: Mice with MDA-MB-231 tumors were treated with carboplatin or/and olaparib or AsiDNA for three treatment cycles. Survival and tumor growth were monitored. Toxicities of treatments were assayed in C57BL/6 immunocompetent mice. Circulating blood hematocrits, bone marrow cells, and organs were analyzed 10 and 21 days after end of treatment using flow cytometry and microscopy analysis. Resistance occurrence was monitored after cycles of treatments with combination of AsiDNA and carboplatin in independent BC227 cell cultures. Results: Olaparib or AsiDNA monotherapies decreased tumor growth and increased mean survival of grafted animals. The combination with carboplatin further increased survival. Carboplatin toxicity resulted in a decrease of most blood cells, platelets, thymus, and spleen lymphocytes. Olaparib or AsiDNA monotherapies had no toxicity, and their combination with carboplatin did not increase toxicity in the bone marrow or thrombocytopenia. All animals receiving carboplatin combined with olaparib developed high liver toxicity with acute hepatitis at 21 days. In vitro, carboplatin resistance occurs after three cycles of treatment in all six tested cultures, whereas only one became resistant (1/5) after five cycles when carboplatin was associated to low doses of AsiDNA. All selected carboplatin-resistant clones retain sensitivity to AsiDNA. Conclusion: DNA repair inhibitor treatments are efficient in the platinum resistant model, MDA-MB-231. The combination with carboplatin improves survival. The association of carboplatin with olaparib is associated with high liver toxicity, which is not observed with AsiDNA. AsiDNA could delay resistance to carboplatin without increasing its toxicity.

Druggable Molecular Targets for the Treatment of Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Breast cancer (BC) is still the most common cancer among women worldwide. Amongst the subtypes of BC, triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by deficient expression of estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 receptors. These patients are therefore not given the option of targeted therapy and have worse prognosis as a result. Consequently, much research has been devoted to identifying specific molecular targets that can be utilized for targeted cancer therapy, thereby limiting the progression and metastasis of this invasive tumor, and improving patient outcomes. In this review, we have focused on the molecular targets in TNBC, categorizing these into targets within the immune system such as immune checkpoint modulators, intra-nuclear targets, intracellular targets, and cell surface targets. The aim of this review is to introduce and summarize the known targets and drugs under investigation in phase II or III clinical trials, while introducing additional possible targets for future drug development. This review brings a tangible benefit to cancer researchers who seek a comprehensive comparison of TNBC treatment options.

Layer-by-layer nanoparticles for novel delivery of cisplatin and PARP inhibitors for platinum-based drug resistance therapy in ovarian cancer

Advanced staged high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the leading cause of gynecological cancer death in the developed world, with 5-year survival rates of only 25-30% due to late-stage diagnosis and the shortcomings of platinum-based therapies. A Phase I clinical trial of a combination of free cisplatin and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) showed therapeutic benefit for HGSOC. In this study, we address the challenge of resistance to platinum-based therapy by developing a targeted delivery approach. Novel electrostatic layer-by-layer (LbL) liposomal nanoparticles (NPs) with a terminal hyaluronic acid layer that facilitates CD44 receptor targeting are designed for selective targeting of HGSOC cells; the liposomes can be formulated to contain both cisplatin and the PARPi drug within the liposomal core and bilayer. The therapeutic effectiveness of LbL NP-encapsulated cisplatin and PARPi alone and in combination was compared with the corresponding free drugs in luciferase and CD44-expressing OVCAR8 orthotopic xenografts in female nude mice. The NPs exhibited prolonged blood circulation half-life, mechanistic staged drug release and targeted codelivery of the therapeutic agents to HGSOC cells. Moreover, compared to the free drugs, the NPs resulted in significantly reduced tumor metastasis, extended survival, and moderated systemic toxicity.

Phase I/Ib study of olaparib and carboplatin in heavily pretreated recurrent high-grade serous ovarian cancer at low genetic risk

Purpose: To investigate maximum tolerated dose (MTD), activity and predictive biomarkers of olaparib with carboplatin in BRCA wild-type (BRCAwt) high grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) patients. Methods: A 3+3 dose escalation study examined olaparib capsules (400 mg twice daily [BID], days 1-7) with carboplatin (AUC3-5 on day 1) every 21 days for 8 cycles, followed by olaparib 400 mg BID maintenance. Blood and tumor biopsy samples were collected pre- and on-treatment in the expansion cohort for PAR levels and proteomic endpoints. Results: 30 patients (median 7 prior regimens [2-12], 63% (19/30) platinum-resistant) were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicity was thrombocytopenia/neutropenia, and infection with carboplatin AUC5 (2/6 patients). MTD was olaparib 400 mg BID + carboplatin AUC4. Grade 3/4 adverse events (>10%) included neutropenia (23%), thrombocytopenia (20%), and anemia (13%). Five of 25 (20%) evaluable patients had partial response (PR; median 4.5 months [3.3-9.5]). Clinical benefit rate (PR + stable disease ≥4 months) was 64% (16/25). A greater decrease in tissue PAR levels was seen in the clinical benefit group versus no benefit (median normalized linear change -1.84 [-3.39- -0.28] vs 0.51 [-0.27- 1.29], p = 0.001) and a DNA repair score by proteomics did not correlate with response. Conclusions: The olaparib and carboplatin combination is tolerable and has clinical benefit in subsets of heavily pretreated BRCAwt HGSOC, independent of platinum sensitivity.

Effect of AR antagonist combined with PARP1 inhibitor on sporadic triple-negative breast cancer bearing AR expression and methylation-mediated BRCA1 dysfunction

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients usually present worse clinical outcomes due to their high heterogeneity. The purpose of our study is to investigate the prognostic role of AR and BRCA1 expression in sporadic TNBC patients, and effect of AR blockade and PARP1 inhibitor for TNBC patients who characterized by positive-AR expression and BRCA1 inactivation or dysfunction. In our present study, we found that AR is expressed in 43.6% and 34.0% of TNBC tissues, when 1% or 10% staining was used as the threshold for AR positivity, respectively. When 1% staining was used as the threshold, AR expression indicates a poor disease-free survival (DFS) of TNBC patients. TNBC patients with negative BRCA1 show a poor DFS, and BRCA1 suppression is associated with the methylation status of its promoter. Interestingly, BRCA1-/AR + TNBC patients have shorter DFS than other TNBC patients regardless of the threshold for AR positivity. AR antagonists MDV3100 enhances the PARP1 inhibitor Olaparib-mediated decrease of cell viability in AR-positive/BRCA1-inactivated cells in vitro and in vivo. Our results suggested that combination of AR blockade and PARP1 inhibitor may be a potential strategy for sporadic TNBC patients who characterized by positive-AR expression and BRCA1 inactivation or dysfunction.

Antitumor effects and mechanisms of olaparib in combination with carboplatin and BKM120 on human triple‑negative breast cancer cells

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) refers to a heterogeneous group of tumors, for which there is currently a lack of targeted therapies. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors and carboplatin (CBP) have demonstrated sufficient efficacy and safety for their use as individual drugs for the treatment of TNBC; however, their effects on TNBC when used as a combination have not been investigated. The primary objectives of the present study were to determine the effects of a combination of CBP, olaparib and NVP-BKM120 (BKM120), and to investigate the mechanism underlying their effects on TNBC cells. The drug combination was cytotoxic to TNBC cells, both with regards to short-term and long-term sensitivity, as determined using colony forming assays, and they exerted strong synergistic effects on MDA-MB-231 and CAL51 cell lines. All drugs affected cell cycle progression, and western blotting and immunofluorescence indicated that the the drug combination exerted its cytotoxicity via DNA damage, enhancing non-homologous end joining repair and inhibiting homologous recombination repair. These data provide a strong rationale to explore the therapeutic use of olaparib in combination with CBP and BKM120 in animal models, and later in clinical trials on patients with TNBC.

Olaparib tablets for the treatment of germ line BRCA-mutated metastatic breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Germ line BRCA mutations (gBRCAm) are diagnosed in approximately 5% of unselected breast cancer patients. Olaparib is a new treatment option for patients with a gBRCAm who have metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer. Areas covered: Olaparib is an oral poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor that has been shown in phase I-III clinical trials to have single-agent efficacy in breast cancer patients with gBRCAm. The recent phase III OlympiAD study demonstrated a statistically significant progression-free survival benefit compared with the chemotherapy control arm, although an overall survival benefit has not been demonstrated. The most common adverse events seen with olaparib include nausea, anemia, and vomiting. The most common grade 3 adverse events are anemia and neutropenia. Expert commentary: The US FDA-approved olaparib tablets in January 2018 for the treatment of patients with a gBRCAm and metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer. This is a well-tolerated and effective treatment option for this patient population, particularly in patients with triple-negative breast cancer in which chemotherapy is the only alternative. More data are needed to understand the role of olaparib in combination with endocrine therapy, other targeted agents, and chemotherapy, as well as sequentially with platinum chemotherapy in the metastatic setting.

Clinical and molecular aspects of breast cancer: Targets and therapies

Breast Cancer is a complex disease characterized by the occurrence of multiple molecular alterations. Currently, some molecular markers are in use for breast cancer diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive purposes. Thus, genetic signatures are available for improving the decision-making. The biomarkers are also essential as therapeutic approaches, but many questions remain due to the lack of efficacy on breast cancer treatment, mainly for triple-negative breast cancer subtype. Since the genetic profile of breast cancer can also be related to different ethnic groups and geographic areas, the reference populations of the genetic assays and clinical trials need to include a broader population beyond the European and North American patients. In this review, we analyzed the current and potential molecular markers that could help to improve the strategies for breast cancer therapy.

The role of PARP inhibition in triple-negative breast cancer: Unraveling the wide spectrum of synthetic lethality

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for approximately 15-20% of all breast cancers and is characterized by a lack of immunohistochemical expression of estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR) and HER2. TNBC is associated with poor long-term outcomes compared with other breast cancer subtypes. Many of these tumors are also basal-like cancers which are characterized by an aggressive biological behavior with a distant recurrence peak observed early at 3 years following diagnosis. Furthermore, metastatic TNBC bears a dismal prognosis with an average survival of 12 months. Although the prevalence of genetic alterations among women with TNBC differs significantly by ethnicity, race and age, BRCA mutations (including both germline mutations and somatic genetic aberrations) are found in up to 20-25% of unselected patients and especially in those of the basal-like immunophenotype. Therefore, defects in the DNA repair pathway could represent a promising therapeutic target for this subgroup of TNBC patients. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors exploit this deficiency through synthetic lethality and have emerged as promising anticancer therapies, especially in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. Several PARP inhibitors are currently being evaluated in the adjuvant, neo-adjuvant, and metastatic setting for the treatment of breast cancer patients with a deficient homologous recombination pathway. In this article, we review the major molecular characteristics of TNBC, the mechanisms of homologous recombination, and the role of PARP inhibition as an emerging therapeutic strategy.

Update on PARP Inhibitors in Breast Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

The single agent activity of PARP inhibitors (PARPi) in germline BRCA mutated (gBRCAm) breast and ovarian cancer suggests untapped potential for this new class of drug in breast cancer. The US Food and Drug Administration has approved three PARPi (olaparib, rucaparib, and niraparib) so far to treat certain ovarian cancers, including those with gBRCAm and olaparib for treatment of gBRCAm breast cancers. Several PARPi are now under clinical development for breast cancer in the various treatment settings. Recently, two phase III trials of olaparib (OlympiaD) and talazoparib (EMBRACA) demonstrated 3-month progression-free survival improvement with PARPi compared to physician's choice single agent chemotherapy in metastatic gBRCAm breast cancer. To date, PARPi seems less efficacious in metastatic breast cancer patients than those with BRCA mutated platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, perhaps reflecting the biologic heterogeneity and low somatic BRCA mutation rate in breast cancer. The use of PARPi is gradually evolving, including combination strategies with chemotherapy, targeted agents, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy in women with and without gBRCAm. The role of predictive biomarkers, including molecular signatures and homologous recombination repair deficiency scores based on loss of heterozygosity and other structural genomic aberrations, will be crucial to identify a subgroup of patients who may have benefit from PARPi. An improved understanding of the mechanisms underlying PARPi clinical resistance will also be important to enable the development of new approaches to increase efficacy. This is a field rich in opportunity, and the coming years should see a better understanding of which breast cancer patients we should treat with PARPi and where these agents should come in over the course of treatment.

Olaparib for the treatment of breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes account for around 2-3% of breast cancer events and more than 10% of triple negative breast cancers. Olaparib (Lynparza®), an orally administered PARP inhibitor, demonstrated clinical benefit in a phase III trial for mutated BRCA-positive HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer. Areas covered: This review gives an overview of available preclinical and clinical data regarding olaparib, including its chemistry, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and evidence supporting antitumor efficacy and safety profile in breast cancer patients. Expert commentary: Olaparib improves progression-free survival in germline BRCA mutated HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer patients as compared to standard chemotherapy, with a manageable toxicity profile. Efficacy is of clinical relevance especially in the context of triple negative breast cancer. However, several aspects, such as sequencing or combination of these agents with other anticancer agents and identification of appropriate biomarkers, still need to be clearly defined.