1
|
Prokofev I, Salim N. Off-isocentric VMAT technique for breast cancer: Effective dose reduction to organs at risk and its applicability based on patient anatomy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14237. [PMID: 38207110 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to explore the off-isocentric volumetric modulated arc therapy (offVMAT) technique for breast cancer and determine its applicability based on patient anatomical parameters. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 44 breast cancer patients with varied lymph node involvement using different arc designs. Off-isocentric techniques were benchmarked against previously published arc techniques: classic arcs (clVMAT), tangential arcs (tVMAT), and split arcs (spVMAT). During optimization, target coverage was made for all plans as close as possible to the criteria D99% > 95% and Dmax < 110% of the prescribed dose. A novel patient categorization, based on anatomical parameters (auxiliary structures) rather than lymph node involvement, is introduced. This categorization considers the volume of ipsilateral organs at risk (OARs) adjacent to the target. A binary regression model was developed on these anatomical parameters. It predicts the likelihood of offVMAT (P[offVMAT]) achieving better criteria. RESULTS Using the regression model, patients were divided into two groups: P(offVMAT) > 0.5 and P(offVMAT) < 0.5. For the P(offVMAT) > 0.5 group, most tVMAT plans are unable to achieve the clinical objectives. Comparing offVMAT with spVMAT, offVMAT exhibited better dose parameters for the heart (V20, V10, and D2 are 7.1, 2.4, and 1.5 times lower respectively), ipsilateral lung (V20, V10, V5 and the mean dose are 1.4, 1.3, 1.2, and 1.2 times lower respectively). The average doses to the contralateral side are consistent. In the P(offVMAT) < 0.5 group, the tVMAT technique showed increased doses at medium and high levels, yet reduced doses in contralateral OARs compared to spVMAT and offVMAT. spVMAT showed lower doses in the contralateral lung relative to the offVMAT technique, while clVMAT trailed in both groups. Validation of the model yielded a 90% accuracy rate. CONCLUSIONS The new off-isocentric breast planning technique effectively reduces doses to ipsilateral OARs, maintaining acceptable contralateral mean doses. This technique has an advantage over other techniques for patients with intricate anatomies. It is evaluated using anatomical parameters, which are also used to build binary regression model, which shows the dependence of anatomical parameters on whether offVMAT is preferred for individual patients. Also, such anatomical parameters provide a more objective and precise comparison between different planning techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Igor Prokofev
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Medical Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Nidal Salim
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Medical Center, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tang R, Li A, Li Y, Deng G, Wang Y, Xiao Q, Zhang L, Luo Y. Dosimetric comparison of two dose expansion methods in intensity modulated radiotherapy for breast cancer. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:23. [PMID: 36737788 PMCID: PMC9898932 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02217-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To explore the dosimetric difference between IMRT-VB plan based on the establishment of external expansion structure and virtual bolus (VB) and IMRT-SF based on the skin flash (SF) tool of the Eclipse treatment planning system in postoperative chest wall target intensity modulation radiotherapy plan of breast cancer. METHODS Twenty patients with breast cancer were randomly selected as subjects to develop IMRT-VB plan based on virtual bolus and IMRT-SF plan based on skin flash tool of Eclipse treatment planning system. The planning target volume, monitor unit (MU) of every single treatment and the dosimetric parameters of organ at risk (OARs) were recorded. Paired t-test was used for normal distribution data while nonparametric paired Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for non-normal distribution data. RESULTS Both IMRT-VB and IMRT-SF plan can expand outward to the chest wall skin and meet the dose requirements of clinical prescription. The conformal index, the homogeneity index, D2%, D98% and D50% were significantly better in IMRT-SF plan than those in IMRT-VB plan (P < 0.05). The average MU of the IMRT-SF plan was much higher than that of the IMRT-VB plan (866.0 ± 68.1 MU vs. 760.9 ± 50.4 MU, P < 0.05). In terms of organ at risk protection, IMRT-SF plan had more advantages in the protection of ipsilateral lung and spinal cord than IMRT-VB plan (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Our study indicated that IMRT-SF plan displayed clinical application superiority compared to IMRT-VB plan, and the operation steps of which are simpler and faster. Besides, IMRT-SF plan took advantages in achieve effective external expansion of skin dose intensity and OARs protection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ran Tang
- grid.284723.80000 0000 8877 7471Integrated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, No.13 Shiliugang Road, Guangzhou, 510315 Guangdong China ,grid.284723.80000 0000 8877 7471Cancer Center, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510315 China
| | - Aimin Li
- grid.284723.80000 0000 8877 7471Integrated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, No.13 Shiliugang Road, Guangzhou, 510315 Guangdong China ,grid.284723.80000 0000 8877 7471Cancer Center, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510315 China
| | - Yingjing Li
- grid.284723.80000 0000 8877 7471Integrated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, No.13 Shiliugang Road, Guangzhou, 510315 Guangdong China ,grid.284723.80000 0000 8877 7471Cancer Center, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510315 China
| | - Guanhua Deng
- grid.490151.8Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital, Guangzhou, 510510 China
| | - Yufeng Wang
- grid.284723.80000 0000 8877 7471Integrated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, No.13 Shiliugang Road, Guangzhou, 510315 Guangdong China ,grid.284723.80000 0000 8877 7471Cancer Center, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510315 China
| | - Qing Xiao
- grid.284723.80000 0000 8877 7471Integrated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, No.13 Shiliugang Road, Guangzhou, 510315 Guangdong China ,grid.284723.80000 0000 8877 7471Cancer Center, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510315 China
| | - Luosheng Zhang
- grid.284723.80000 0000 8877 7471Integrated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, No.13 Shiliugang Road, Guangzhou, 510315 Guangdong China ,grid.284723.80000 0000 8877 7471Cancer Center, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510315 China
| | - Yue Luo
- Integrated Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, No.13 Shiliugang Road, Guangzhou, 510315, Guangdong, China. .,Cancer Center, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510315, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Leonardi MC, Pepa M, Luraschi R, Vigorito S, Dicuonzo S, Isaksson LJ, La Porta MR, Marino L, Ippolito E, Huscher A, Argenone A, De Rose F, Cucciarelli F, De Santis MC, Rossi F, Prisco A, Guarnaccia R, de Fatis PT, Palumbo I, Colangione SP, Mormile M, Ravo V, Fozza A, Aristei C, Orecchia R, Cattani F, Jereczek-Fossa BA. The dosimetric impact of axillary nodes contouring variability in breast cancer radiotherapy: an AIRO multi-institutional study. Radiother Oncol 2022; 168:113-120. [PMID: 35033602 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2021] [Revised: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
AIM To quantify the dosimetric impact of contouring variability of axillary lymph nodes (L2, L3, L4) in breast cancer (BC) locoregional radiotherapy (RT). MATERIALS AND METHODS 18 RT centres were asked to plan a locoregional treatment on their own planning target volume (single centre, SC-PTV) which was created by applying their institutional margins to the clinical target volume of the axillary nodes of three BC patients (P1, P2, P3) previously delineated (SC-CTV). The gold standard CTVs (GS-CTVs) of P1, P2 and P3 were developed by BC experts' consensus and validated with STAPLE algorithm. For each participating centre, the GS-PTV of each patient was created by applying the same margins as those used for the SC-CTV to SC-PTV expansion and replaced the SC-PTV in the treatment plan. Datasets were imported into MIM v6.1.7 [MIM Software Inc.], where dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were extracted and differences were analysed. RESULTS 17/18 centres used intensity-modulated RT (IMRT). The CTV to PTV margins ranged from 0 to 10 mm (median 5 mm). No correlation was observed between GS-CTV coverage by 95% isodose and GS-PTV margins width. Doses delivered to 98% (D98) and 95% (D95) of GS-CTVs were significantly lower than those delivered to the SC-CTVs. No significant difference between SC-CTV and GS-CTV was observed in maximum dose (D2), always under 110%. Mean dose ≥ 99% of the SC-CTVs and GS-CTVs was satisfied in 84% and 50%, respectively. In less than one half of plans, GS-CTV V95% was above 90%. Breaking down the GS-CTV into the three nodal levels (L2, L3 and L4), L4 had the lowest probability to be covered by the 95% isodose. CONCLUSIONS Overall, GS-CTV resulted worse coverage, especially for L4. IMRT was largely used and CTV-to-PTV margins did not compensate for contouring issues. The results highlighted the need for delineation training and standardization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Matteo Pepa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Rosa Luraschi
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Sabrina Vigorito
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Samantha Dicuonzo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milano, Italy.
| | - Lars Johannes Isaksson
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Lorenza Marino
- Radiotherapy Unit, REM Radioterapia, Viagrande, (CT), Italy
| | - Edy Ippolito
- Department of Radiotherapy, Campus Bio-Medico University, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Angela Argenone
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale San Pio, Benevento, Italy
| | - Fiorenza De Rose
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Clinical and Research Centre IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Francesca Cucciarelli
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radiotherapy Institute, Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I, G.M. Lancisi, G. Salesi, Ancona, Italy
| | - Maria Carmen De Santis
- Radiotherapy Unit 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT), Milano, Italy
| | - Francesca Rossi
- Radiotherapy Unit, Usl Toscana Centro, Ospedale Santa Maria Annunziata, Firenze, Italy
| | - Agnese Prisco
- Department of Radiotherapy, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - Roberta Guarnaccia
- Radiotherapy Unit, Ospedale Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Isabella Palumbo
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Sarah Pia Colangione
- Radiotherapy Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Maria Mormile
- Unit of Medical Physics, ASL Napoli 1 Centro - Ospedale del Mare, Napoli, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Ravo
- Unit of Radiotherapy, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Alessandra Fozza
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Nazionale SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Direction, IEO, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milano, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milano, Italy
| | -
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS, Milano, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Duane FK, Kerr A, Wang Z, Darby SC, Ntentas G, Aznar MC, Taylor CW. Exposure of the oesophagus in breast cancer radiotherapy: A systematic review of oesophagus doses published 2010-2020. Radiother Oncol 2021; 164:261-267. [PMID: 34626725 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.09.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Revised: 09/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Breast cancer radiotherapy can increase the risk of subsequent primary oesophageal cancer, with risk increasing according to oesophagus radiation dose. We describe oesophagus exposure from modern breast cancer regimens and discuss the risks of oesophageal cancer for women irradiated recently. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review was undertaken of oesophagus doses from breast cancer radiotherapy regimens published during 2010-2020. Mean and maximum oesophagus doses were described for different target regions irradiated and different radiotherapy techniques. RESULTS In 112 published regimens from 18 countries, oesophagus doses varied with target region. For partial breast irradiation, average mean oesophagus dose was 0.2 Gy (range 0.1-0.4) in four regimens; maximum dose was not reported. For breast or chest wall radiotherapy, average oesophagus doses were mean 1.8 Gy (range 0.1-10.4) in 24 regimens and maximum 6.7 Gy (range 0.4-14.3) in seven regimens. For radiotherapy including a nodal region, average oesophagus doses were higher: mean 11.4 Gy (range <0.1-29.3) in 61 regimens and maximum 34.4 Gy (range 3.4-51.3) in 55 regimens. Average mean oesophagus doses were >10 Gy for intensity modulated nodal radiotherapy, but lower for other node techniques. CONCLUSIONS Mean oesophagus doses from partial breast and breast/chest wall regimens were usually less than 2 Gy, hence radiation-risks will be very small. However, for radiotherapy including lymph nodes, average mean oesophagus dose of 11.4 Gy may nearly double oesophageal cancer risk. Consideration of oesophageal exposure during nodal radiotherapy planning may reduce the risks of radiation-related oesophageal cancer for women irradiated today.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frances K Duane
- St. Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, St. Luke's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; Trinity St James's Cancer Institute, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Amanda Kerr
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Zhe Wang
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sarah C Darby
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Georgios Ntentas
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Medical Physics, London, UK
| | - Marianne C Aznar
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, UK
| | - Carolyn W Taylor
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen H, Huang Y, Wang H, Shao Y, Yue NJ, Gu H, Duan Y, Feng A, Xu Z. Dosimetric comparison and biological evaluation of fixed-jaw intensity-modulated radiation therapy for T-shaped esophageal cancer. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:158. [PMID: 34412656 PMCID: PMC8375041 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01882-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To evaluate the dosimetric and biological benefits of the fixed-jaw (FJ) intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technique for patients with T-shaped esophageal cancer. Methods FJ IMRT plans were generated for thirty-five patients and compared with jaw tracking (JT) IMRT, static jaw (SJ) IMRT and JT volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Dosimetric parameters, tumor control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP), monitor units (MUs), delivery time and gamma passing rate, as a measure of dosimetric verification, were compared. The correlation between the length of PTV-C below the upper boundary of lung tissue (PTV-Cinferior) and dosimetric parameters and NTCP of the lung tissue were analyzed. Results The homogeneity and conformity of the target in the four plans were basically equivalent. When compared to the JT IMRT and SJ IMRT plans, FJ IMRT plan led to a statistically significant improvement in the NTCP and low-middle dosimetric parameters of the lung, and the improvement had a moderately positive correlation with the length of PTV-Cinferior, with a correlation coefficient ranging from 0.523 to 0.797; the FJ IMRT plan exhibited better lung sparing in low-dose volumes than the JT VMAT plan. The FJ IMRT plan had similar MUs (888 ± 99) and delivery times (516.1 ± 54.7 s) as the JT IMRT plan (937 ± 194, 522 ± 5.6 s) but higher than SJ IMRT (713 ± 137, 488.8 ± 45.2 s) and JT VMAT plan (517 ± 59, 263.7 ± 43.3 s). Conclusions The FJ IMRT technique is superior in reducing the low-dose volumes of lung tissues for patients with T-shaped esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hua Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 West Huaihai Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200030, China
| | - Ying Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 West Huaihai Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200030, China
| | - Hao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 West Huaihai Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200030, China
| | - Yan Shao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 West Huaihai Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200030, China
| | - Ning J Yue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, 08903, USA
| | - Hengle Gu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 West Huaihai Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200030, China
| | - Yanhua Duan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 West Huaihai Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200030, China
| | - Aihui Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 West Huaihai Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200030, China
| | - Zhiyong Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 241 West Huaihai Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200030, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Takano S, Omura M, Suzuki R, Tayama Y, Matsui K, Hashimoto H, Hongo H, Nagata H, Tanaka K, Hata M, Inoue T. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy using TomoDirect for postoperative radiation of left-sided breast cancer including lymph node area: comparison with TomoHelical and three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2019; 60:694-704. [PMID: 31365118 PMCID: PMC6805983 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrz052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Revised: 05/25/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivers an excellent dose distribution compared with conventional three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) for postoperative radiation including the lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. The TomoTherapy system, developed exclusively for IMRT, has two treatment modes: TomoDirect (TD) with a fixed gantry angle for beam delivery, and TomoHelical (TH) with rotational beam delivery. We compared the characteristics of TD with TH and 3D-CRT plans in the breast cancer patients. Ten consecutive women with left breast cancer received postoperative radiation therapy using TD including the chest wall/residual breast tissue and level II-III axial and supraclavicular lymph node area. Fifty percent of the planning target volume (PTV) was covered with at least 50 Gy in 25 fractions. TD, TH and 3D-CRT plans were created for each patient, with the same dosimetric constraints. TD and TH showed better dose distribution to the PTV than 3D-CRT. TD and 3D-CRT markedly suppressed low-dose spread to the lung compared with TH. Total lung V5 and V10 were significantly lower, while V20 was significantly higher in the TD and 3D-CRT plans. The mean total lung, heart and contralateral breast doses were significantly lower using TD compared with the other plans. Compared with 3D-CRT and TH, TD can provide better target dose distribution with optimal normal-organ sparing for postoperative radiation therapy including the chest wall/residual breast tissue and lymph node area in breast cancer patients. TD is thus a useful treatment modality in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoko Takano
- Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1370-1 Okamoto, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan
- Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Motoko Omura
- Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1370-1 Okamoto, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Ryoko Suzuki
- Cancer Institute Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yumiko Tayama
- Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1370-1 Okamoto, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kengo Matsui
- Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1370-1 Okamoto, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Harumitsu Hashimoto
- Shonan Fujisawa Tokushukai Hospital, 1-5-1 Tsujidokandai, Fujisawa, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Hongo
- Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1370-1 Okamoto, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hironori Nagata
- Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1370-1 Okamoto, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kumiko Tanaka
- Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Department of Breast Surgery, 1370-1 Okamoto, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masaharu Hata
- Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Tomio Inoue
- Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Advanced Medical Center, 1370-1 Okamoto, Kamakura, Kanagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Song W, Lu H, Liu J, Zhao D, Ma J, Zhang B, Yu D, Sun X, Li J. Fixed-jaw technique to improve IMRT plan quality for the treatment of cervical and upper thoracic esophageal cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019; 20:24-32. [PMID: 31460704 PMCID: PMC6806698 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2019] [Revised: 06/30/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential advantages of the fixed-jaw technique (FJT) over the conventional split-field technique (SFT) for cervical and upper thoracic esophageal cancer (EC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The SFT and FJT plans were generated for 15 patients with cervical and upper thoracic EC. Dosimetric parameters and delivery efficiency were compared. An area ratio (AR) of the jaw opening to multileaf collimator (MLC) aperture weighted by the number of monitor units (MUs) was defined to evaluate the impact of the transmission through the MLC on the dose gradient outside the PTV50.4, and the correlation between the gradient index (GI) and AR was analyzed. The FJT plans achieved a better GI and AR (P < 0.001). There was a positive correlation between the GI and AR in the FJT (r = 0.883, P < 0.001) and SFT plans (r = 0.836, P < 0.001), respectively. Moreover, the mean dose (Dmean ), V5Gy -V40Gy for the lungs and the Dmean , V5Gy -V50Gy for the body-PTV50.4 in the FJT plans were lower than those in the SFT plans (P < 0.05). The FJT plans demonstrated a reduction trend in the doses to the spinal cord PRV and heart, but only the difference in the heart Dmean reached statistical significance (P < 0.05). The FJT plans reduced the number of MUs and subfields by 5.5% and 17.9% and slightly shortened the delivery time by 0.23 min (P < 0.05). The gamma-index passing rates were above 95% for both plans. The FJT combined with target splitting can provide superior organs at risk sparing and similar target coverage without compromising delivery efficiency and should be a preferred intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning method for cervical and upper thoracic EC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Hong Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Jie Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Di Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Jun Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Biyun Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Dahai Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China
| | - Xinchen Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jinkai Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|