1
|
Cao Y, Huang B, Tang H, Dong D, Shen T, Chen X, Feng X, Zhang J, Shi L, Li C, Jiao H, Tan L, Zhang J, Li H, Zhang Y. Online tools to predict individualised survival for primary oesophageal cancer patients with and without pathological complete response after neoadjuvant therapy followed by oesophagectomy: development and external validation of two independent nomograms. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2024; 11:e001253. [PMID: 38538088 PMCID: PMC10982901 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to develop and validate robust predictive models for patients with oesophageal cancer who achieved a pathological complete response (pCR) and those who did not (non-pCR) after neoadjuvant therapy and oesophagectomy. DESIGN Clinicopathological data of 6517 primary oesophageal cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and oesophagectomy were obtained from the National Cancer Database for the training cohort. An independent cohort of 444 Chinese patients served as the validation set. Two distinct multivariable Cox models of overall survival (OS) were constructed for pCR and non-pCR patients, respectively, and were presented using web-based dynamic nomograms (graphical representation of predicted OS based on the clinical characteristics that a patient could input into the website). The calibration plot, concordance index and decision curve analysis were employed to assess calibration, discrimination and clinical usefulness of the predictive models. RESULTS In total, 13 and 15 variables were used to predict OS for pCR and non-pCR patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy followed by oesophagectomy, respectively. Key predictors included demographic characteristics, pretreatment clinical stage, surgical approach, pathological information and postoperative treatments. The predictive models for pCR and non-pCR patients demonstrated good calibration and clinical utility, with acceptable discrimination that surpassed that of the current tumour, node, metastases staging system. CONCLUSIONS The web-based dynamic nomograms for pCR (https://predict-survival.shinyapps.io/pCR-eso/) and non-pCR patients (https://predict-survival.shinyapps.io/non-pCR-eso/) developed in this study can facilitate the calculation of OS probability for individual patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy and radical oesophagectomy, aiding clinicians and patients in making personalised treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuqin Cao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Binhao Huang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Han Tang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Dong Dong
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Tianzheng Shen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiang Chen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Xijia Feng
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiahao Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Liqiang Shi
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Chengqiang Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Heng Jiao
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Lijie Tan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hecheng Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Yajie Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gao T, Yang Y, Zhang Z, Yang Y, Liu S, Hu Y, Zhu Y, Yang H, Fu J, Wang J, Lin T, Xi M, Li Q, Liu M, Zhao L. A Surrogate Endpoint for Overall Survival in Locally Advanced and Resectable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Reanalysis of Data From the NEOCRTEC5010 Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:809-820. [PMID: 37210047 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.05.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Revised: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to investigate disease-free survival (DFS) as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced and resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS We re-analyzed patient data from the NEOCRTEC5010 randomized controlled trial (N = 451 patients) to compare their OS with that of an age- and sex-matched cohort from the general population of China. We used expected survival and the standardized mortality ratio, respectively, in our analysis of data collected from a neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NCRT) plus surgery group and a surgery-only group. Published data from 6 randomized controlled trials and 20 retrospective studies were used to examine the correlation between DFS and OS at the trial level. RESULTS The annual hazard rate of disease progression decreased to 4.9% and 8.1% within 3 years in the NCRT and surgery groups, respectively. Patients who were disease-free at 36 months had a 5-year OS of 93.9% (95% CI, 89.7%-98.4%) in the NCRT group with a standardized mortality ratio of 1.1 (95% CI, 0.7-1.8; P = .5639). In contrast, the 5-year OS was only 12.9% (95% CI, 7.3%-22.6%) for patients in the NCRT group who exhibited disease progression within 36 months. At the trial level, DFS and OS were correlated with treatment effect (R2 = 0.605). CONCLUSIONS Disease-free status at 36 months is a valid surrogate endpoint for 5-year OS in patients with locally advanced and resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Patients who were disease-free at 36 months showed a favorable OS, which was indistinguishable from that of the age- and sex-matched comparison group from the general population; otherwise, their 5-year OS was extremely poor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiantian Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yong Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Precision Radiotherapy for Tumors (Fujian Medical University), Clinical Research Center for Radiology and Radiotherapy of Fujian Province (Digestive, Hematological and Breast Malignancies), Fuzhou, China
| | - Zewei Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuxian Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shiliang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Precision Radiotherapy for Tumors (Fujian Medical University), Clinical Research Center for Radiology and Radiotherapy of Fujian Province (Digestive, Hematological and Breast Malignancies), Fuzhou, China
| | - Yonghong Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Precision Radiotherapy for Tumors (Fujian Medical University), Clinical Research Center for Radiology and Radiotherapy of Fujian Province (Digestive, Hematological and Breast Malignancies), Fuzhou, China
| | - Yujia Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Precision Radiotherapy for Tumors (Fujian Medical University), Clinical Research Center for Radiology and Radiotherapy of Fujian Province (Digestive, Hematological and Breast Malignancies), Fuzhou, China
| | - Hong Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Precision Radiotherapy for Tumors (Fujian Medical University), Clinical Research Center for Radiology and Radiotherapy of Fujian Province (Digestive, Hematological and Breast Malignancies), Fuzhou, China; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jianhua Fu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Precision Radiotherapy for Tumors (Fujian Medical University), Clinical Research Center for Radiology and Radiotherapy of Fujian Province (Digestive, Hematological and Breast Malignancies), Fuzhou, China; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Junye Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ting Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Precision Radiotherapy for Tumors (Fujian Medical University), Clinical Research Center for Radiology and Radiotherapy of Fujian Province (Digestive, Hematological and Breast Malignancies), Fuzhou, China; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Mian Xi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Precision Radiotherapy for Tumors (Fujian Medical University), Clinical Research Center for Radiology and Radiotherapy of Fujian Province (Digestive, Hematological and Breast Malignancies), Fuzhou, China
| | - Qiaoqiao Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Precision Radiotherapy for Tumors (Fujian Medical University), Clinical Research Center for Radiology and Radiotherapy of Fujian Province (Digestive, Hematological and Breast Malignancies), Fuzhou, China
| | - Mengzhong Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Precision Radiotherapy for Tumors (Fujian Medical University), Clinical Research Center for Radiology and Radiotherapy of Fujian Province (Digestive, Hematological and Breast Malignancies), Fuzhou, China.
| | - Lei Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Esophageal Cancer Institute, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Key Laboratory of Intelligent Imaging and Precision Radiotherapy for Tumors (Fujian Medical University), Clinical Research Center for Radiology and Radiotherapy of Fujian Province (Digestive, Hematological and Breast Malignancies), Fuzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee W, Lam SK, Zhang Y, Yang R, Cai J. Review of methodological workflow, interpretation and limitations of nomogram application in cancer study. RADIATION MEDICINE AND PROTECTION 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radmp.2022.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/08/2022] Open
|
4
|
Shang QX, Yang YS, Xu LY, Yang H, Li Y, Li Y, Wu ZY, Fu JH, Yao XD, Xu XE, Wu JY, Chen LQ. Prognostic impact of lymph node harvest for patients with node-negative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a large-scale multicenter study. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12:1951-1962. [PMID: 34790363 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 07/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background We examined the association between the number of resected lymph nodes and survival to determine the optimal lymphadenectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients with negative lymph node. Methods We included 1,836 patients from Chinese three high-volumed hospitals with corresponding clinicopathological characters such as gender, age, tumor location, tumor grade and TNM stage of patients. The median follow-up of included patients was 45.7 months (range, 1.03-117.3 months). X-Tile plot was used to identify the lowest number of lymphadenectomy. The multivariate model's construction was in use of parameters with clinical significance for survival and a nomogram based on clinical variable with P<0.05 in Cox regression analysis. Both two models were validated using a cohort extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 registries database between 1975 and 2016 (n=951). Results More lymphadenectomy numbers were significantly associated with better survival in patients both in training cohort [hazard ratio (HR) =0.980; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.971-0.988; P<0.001] and validation cohort (HR =0.980; 95% CI: 0.968-0.991; P=0.001). Cut-off point analysis determined the lowest number of 9 for thoracic ESCC patients in N0 stage through training cohort (C-index: 0.623; sensitivity: 80.7%; 1 - specificity: 72.5%) when compared with 10 in validation cohort (C-index: 0.643; sensitivity: 78.2%; 1 - specificity: 63.0%). The cut-off points of 9 were examined in training cohort and validated in the divided cohort from validation cohort (all P<0.05). Meanwhile, nomograms for both cohorts were constructed and the calibration curves for both cohorts agreed well with the actual observations in terms of predicting 3- and 5-year survival, respectively. Conclusions Larger number for lymphadenectomy was associated with better survival in thoracic ESCC patients in N0 stage. Nine was what we got as the lowest number for lymphadenectomy in pN0 ESCC patients through this study, and our result should be confirmed further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi-Xin Shang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yu-Shang Yang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Li-Yan Xu
- Department of Oncology Surgery, Shantou Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hong Yang
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yin Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Yi Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Zhi-Yong Wu
- Department of Oncology Surgery, Shantou Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jian-Hua Fu
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Dong Yao
- Department of Oncology Surgery, Shantou Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiu-E Xu
- Department of Oncology Surgery, Shantou Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jian-Yi Wu
- Department of Oncology Surgery, Shantou Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Long-Qi Chen
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zheng R, Guo D, Dong Y, Wang M, Hu M, Ren Y. Prognostic Factors and Prediction of Survival for Patients with Brain Metastases of Lung Adenocarcinoma. J NIPPON MED SCH 2021; 88:319-325. [PMID: 33455976 DOI: 10.1272/jnms.jnms.2021_88-410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The study aimed to identify risk factors associated with overall survival (OS) of patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LACA) with brain metastasis and developed a prognostic tool (nomogram) for these patients. METHODS LACA patients with brain metastases between 2010 and 2013 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Kaplan-Meier analysis and a Cox regression model were used to assess the prognostic effect of variables on survival rate. A nomogram was developed to predict 3-, 6- and 9-month OS rates. RESULTS 2,631 LACA patients with brain metastases were studied. A nomogram was developed by using variables that affected OS and was validated by internal bootstrap resampling, which revealed that the nomogram had satisfactory discrimination. CONCLUSIONS The nomogram was able to predict 3-, 6- and 9-month OS for patients with LACA and brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dina Guo
- Department of Pulmonology, Ningbo Yinzhou No 2. Hospital
| | - Yongquan Dong
- Department of Pulmonology, Ningbo Yinzhou No 2. Hospital
| | - Mingming Wang
- Department of Pulmonology, Ningbo Yinzhou No 2. Hospital
| | - Meiling Hu
- Cixi People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province
| | - Yifeng Ren
- Department of Pulmonology, Ningbo Yinzhou No 2. Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li Z, Xiao Q, Wang Y, Wang W, Li S, Shan F, Zhou Z, Ji J. A Modified ypTNM Staging System-Development and External Validation of a Nomogram Predicting the Overall Survival of Gastric Cancer Patients Received Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:2047-2055. [PMID: 32256112 PMCID: PMC7090192 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s236696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is now widely used in gastric cancer patients. However, the current 8th ypTNM staging system is developed based on patients with less extensive lymph node dissection and the predictive value is relatively limited. In this study, we aim to develop and validate a nomogram that predicts overall survival in gastric cancer patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients and Methods From January, 2007 to December, 2014, 471 patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy at our center were enrolled in the study. Based on the Cox proportional hazard model, a nomogram was developed from them and then an external validation was conducted on a cohort of 239 patients from another cancer center. Results The overall survival (OS) rates of 1 year and 3 years were 90.0% and 64.1%, respectively. Body mass index category, tumor location, T stage and N stage were independent prognostic factors for the survival outcome. The C-index of the model was 0.74 in the development cohort and 0.69 in the validation cohort. Our nomogram also showed good calibration in both cohorts. Conclusion We developed and validated a nomogram to predict the 1- and 3-year OS of patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection. This nomogram predicts survival more accurately than the AJCC TNM staging system, which is the current golden standard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziyu Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiyan Xiao
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, People's Republic of China
| | - Yinkui Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, People's Republic of China
| | - Wei Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Shuangxi Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, People's Republic of China
| | - Fei Shan
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhiwei Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiafu Ji
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hagens ERC, Feenstra ML, Eshuis WJ, Hulshof MCCM, van Laarhoven HWM, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gisbertz SS. Conditional survival after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for oesophageal cancer. Br J Surg 2020; 107:1053-1061. [PMID: 32017047 PMCID: PMC7317937 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Revised: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 11/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background Conditional survival accounts for the time already survived after surgery and may be of additional informative value. The aim was to assess conditional survival in patients with oesophageal cancer and to create a nomogram predicting the conditional probability of survival after oesophagectomy. Methods This retrospective study included consecutive patients with oesophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by oesophagectomy between January 2004 and 2019. Conditional survival was defined as the probability of surviving y years after already surviving for x years. The formula used for conditional survival (CS) was: CS(x|y) = S(x + y)/S(x), where S(x) represents overall survival at x years. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate predictors of overall survival. A nomogram was constructed to predict 5‐year survival directly after surgery and given survival for 1, 2, 3 and 4 years after surgery. Results Some 660 patients were included. Median overall survival was 44·4 (95 per cent c.i. 37·0 to 51·8) months. The probability of achieving 5‐year overall survival after resection increased from 45 per cent directly after surgery to 54, 65, 79 and 88 per cent given 1, 2, 3 and 4 years already survived respectively. Cardiac co‐morbidity, cN category, ypT category, ypN category, chyle leakage and pulmonary complications were independent predictors of survival. The nomogram predicted 5‐year survival using these predictors and number of years already survived. Conclusion The probability of achieving 5‐year overall survival after oesophagectomy for cancer increases with each additional year survived. The proposed nomogram predicts survival in patients after oesophagectomy, taking the years already survived into account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E R C Hagens
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M L Feenstra
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W J Eshuis
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M C C M Hulshof
- Department of Radiotherapy, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H W M van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M I van Berge Henegouwen
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S S Gisbertz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Location AMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Curragh DS, Psaltis AJ, Tan NC, Selva D. Prelacrimal approach for nasolacrimal duct excision in the management of lacrimal system tumours. Orbit 2019; 38:308-312. [PMID: 30234416 DOI: 10.1080/01676830.2018.1518464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Purpose: To report a case of a lacrimal sac tumour and describe a prelacrimal approach to the maxillary sinus to excise the nasolacrimal duct in its management. To our knowledge, this approach has not been adapted to remove the nasolacrimal duct for the management of pathological processes involving the nasolacrimal system. Methods: A 58-year-old female patient presented with a 6-month history of epiphora. A lacrimal sac mass was identified, and a biopsy revealed squamous cell carcinoma. Surgical excision was performed via a combined external and endoscopic prelacrimal approach. Results: A prelacrimal approach to the maxillary sinus to excise the nasolacrimal duct in combination with an external approach facilitated an en-bloc excision of the nasolacrimal apparatus. This allowed preservation on the entire inferior turbinate following reconstitution of the lateral nasal wall at the completion of the procedure. Conclusion: The endoscopic endonasal prelacrimal approach to the maxillary sinus is a useful method to approach and excise the nasolacrimal duct in the management of nasolacrimal pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David S Curragh
- a South Australian Institute of Ophthalmology, Royal Adelaide Hospital , Adelaide , Australia
| | - Alkis J Psaltis
- b Department of Surgery, Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Adelaide , Adelaide , Australia
| | - Neil C Tan
- b Department of Surgery, Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Adelaide , Adelaide , Australia
| | - Dinesh Selva
- a South Australian Institute of Ophthalmology, Royal Adelaide Hospital , Adelaide , Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yang D, Li R, Wang H, Wang J, Li Y, Wang H, Wang W, Liu Z. Clinical significance of tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 in middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Lett 2018; 16:2971-2978. [PMID: 30127886 PMCID: PMC6096069 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.8998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2017] [Accepted: 05/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
High expression and role of tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 (TNFR2) in cancer progression and prognosis has been reported in several types of tumors. However, its role in esophageal carcinoma (EC) remains unknown. In the present study, TNFR2 expression in middle and lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) was detected using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Chi-square test revealed that TNFR2 was positively correlated with invasion depth, advanced clinical stage and low differentiation degree. Furthermore, survival analysis revealed that TNFR2 was positively correlated with poor overall survival (OS). Moreover, univariate COX regression analysis revealed that clinical stage, lymph node involvement, and invasion depth can affect the OS of ESCC patients, while multivariate COX regression analysis revealed that lymph node involvement and invasion depth can affect the OS of ESCC patients. In middle thoracic ESCC patients, TNFR2 was positively correlated with invasion depth, advanced clinical stage and poor OS. Furthermore, univariate and multivariate COX regression analysis both revealed that clinical stage, lymph node involvement, and invasion depth can affect OS. In lower thoracic ESCC patients, TNFR2 was positively correlated with low differentiation degree. Furthermore, the positive correlation of TNFR2 with poor OS did not reach statistical significance. In addition, univariate COX regression analysis revealed that only lymph node involvement could affect OS. All the results suggest that TNFR2 can play an important role in the progression and poor prognosis of ESCC patients. Moreover, the role of TNFR2 in the prognosis of middle thoracic ESCC patients was earlier and stronger than in lower thoracic ESCC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Yang
- Oncology Department, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong 272029, P.R. China
| | - Ruidong Li
- Oncology Department, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong 272029, P.R. China
| | - Huili Wang
- Oncology Department, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong 272029, P.R. China
| | - Junye Wang
- Oncology Department, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong 272029, P.R. China
| | - Ye Li
- Pathology Department, Feixian People's Hospital, Linyi, Shandong 273400, P.R. China
| | - Hongbo Wang
- Pathology Department, Juye County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Heze, Shandong 274900, P.R. China
| | - Wei Wang
- Pathology Department, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong 272029, P.R. China
| | - Zifeng Liu
- Digestive Department, Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University, Jining, Shandong 272029, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Survival prediction tools for esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer: A systematic review. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018; 156:847-856. [PMID: 30011772 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.03.146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2017] [Revised: 02/05/2018] [Accepted: 03/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical, pathological, and molecular information combined with cancer stage in prognostication algorithms can offer more personalized estimates of survival, which might guide treatment choices. Our aim was to evaluate the quality of prognostication tools in esophageal cancer. METHODS We systematically searched MedLine and Embase from 2005 to 2017 for studies reporting development or validation of models predicting long-term survival in esophageal cancer. We evaluated tools using the Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies guidelines and the American Joint Committee on Cancer acceptance criteria for risk models. RESULTS We identified 16 prognostication tools for patients treated with curative intent and 1 for patients with metastatic disease. These tools frequently excluded adenocarcinoma, contained outdated data, and were developed with a limited sample size. Nine tools were developed in China for squamous cell cancer, and 11 used data on patients diagnosed before 2010. Most tools excluded key prognostic factors such as age and sex. Tumor stage and grade were the most commonly, but not universally, included factors. Twelve tools were designed to predict overall survival; 5 predicted cancer-specific survival. Bootstrap internal validation was performed for most tools; c-statistics ranged from 0.63 to 0.77 and graphically evaluated calibration was "good." Five tools were externally validated; c-statistics ranged from 0.70 to 0.77. CONCLUSIONS Existing tools cannot be confidently used for esophageal cancer prognostication in current clinical practice. Better-quality tools might help to more individually and accurately estimate disease course, select further treatments, and risk-stratify for future clinical trials.
Collapse
|