Peritoneal recurrence in gastric cancer following curative resection can be predicted by postoperative but not preoperative biomarkers: a single-institution study of 320 cases

Predicting peritoneal recurrence after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Validation of a prediction model (PERI-Gastric 1 and PERI-Gastric 2) on a Korean database

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal recurrence is a significant cause of treatment failure after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. The prediction of metachronous peritoneal recurrence would have a significantly impact risk stratification and tailored treatment planning. This study aimed to externally validate the previously established PERI-Gastric 1 and 2 models to assess their generalizability in an independent population.

METHODS

Retrospective external validation was conducted on a cohort of 8564 patients who underwent elective gastrectomy for stage Ib-IIIc gastric cancer between 1998 and 2018 at the Yonsei Cancer Center. Discrimination was tested using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC). Accuracy was tested by plotting observations against the predicted risk of peritoneal recurrence and analyzing the resulting calibration plots. Clinical usefulness was tested with a decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

In the validation cohort, PERI-Gastric 1 and PERI-Gastric 2 exhibited an AUROC of 0.766 (95 % C.I. 0.752-0.778) and 0.767 (95 % C.I. 0.755-0.780), a calibration-in-the-large of 0.935 and 0.700, a calibration belt with a 95 % C.I. over the bisector in the risk range of 24%-33 % and 35%-47 %. The decision curve analysis revealed a positive net benefit in the risk range of 10%-42 % and 15%-45 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents the external validation of the PERI-Gastric 1 and 2 scores in an Eastern population. The models demonstrated fair discrimination and satisfactory calibration for predicting the risk of peritoneal recurrence after radical gastrectomy, even in Eastern patients. PERI-Gastric 1 and 2 scores could also be applied to predict the risk of metachronous peritoneal recurrence in Eastern populations.

Prognostic value of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in gastric cancer with synchronous peritoneal metastases: a real-world retrospective study

PURPOSE

Peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer (GC) is a late-stage condition with a poor prognosis. Cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a popular treatment for peritoneal metastases. Here, we aim to investigate the real-world application and efficacy of HIPEC alone for GC patients with synchronous peritoneal metastases.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis on GC patients with synchronous peritoneal metastasis at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between January 2011 and December 2022. Survival analyses and Cox regression models were performed based on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS), and subgroup analysis was used to determine the prognostic value of HIPEC across different treatment.

RESULTS

We enrolled 250 patients, of whom 120 (48%) received HIPEC while 130 (52%) did not. HIPEC showed no survival benefit for GC patients (P = 0.220 for OS and P = 0.370 for CSS). However, subgroup analysis found that HIPEC can only improve OS and CSS when combined with primary tumor resection (P = 0.034 for OS and P = 0.036 for CSS). Moreover, survival analyses also demonstrated that HIPEC independently improved OS (HR for OS = 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.92, P = 0.020) and CSS (HR for CSS = 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.93, P = 0.024) for patients who underwent primary site resection, but not for those who did not.

CONCLUSION

HIPEC can improve survival in GC patients with synchronous peritoneal metastases who have primary tumor resection, but not in those without primary tumor resection.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for management of gastrointestinal and biliary tract malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Background

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) promised to transform the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Forty years since the introduction of the technique, published data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remain scarce. We assessed the cumulative comprehensive available evidence on the use of HIPEC in gastrointestinal (GI) and biliary tract malignancies and established the current benchmark for GI HIPEC research in both the prevention and treatment of peritoneal metastases.

Methods

RCTs were identified through a systematic search of Medline, Cochrane and Embase databases. Overall survival and progression-free survival were the outcomes of interest.

Results

The search resulted in 13 RCTs for gastric cancer (10 on prophylactic and 3 on therapeutic HIPEC), 4 for colorectal cancer (2 on prophylactic and 2 on therapeutic HIPEC), and 1 for pancreatic cancer. No RCTs were identified that included other types of GI or biliary tract cancers. Current randomized evidence does not support any overall survival benefit from the use of HIPEC in the adjuvant setting for gastric cancer or for colorectal cancer in any setting. Despite the survival benefit noticed in the treatment of PC from gastric cancer (risk ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.77-0.93; P<0.001), the results were derived from only 190 patients.

Conclusions

The current evidence from RCTs does not support the use of HIPEC in the treatment/prevention of PC in GI and biliary tract malignancies. HIPEC should continue to be considered experimental until level 1 evidence from properly designed international multicenter studies becomes available.

Gastrectomy with or without omentectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Omentectomy is conventionally performed in the procedure of gastrectomy for gastric cancer. However, the clinical value and importance of omentectomy remain unclear. This meta-analysis investigated the benefits and safety of gastrectomy with or without omentectomy for patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies comparing complete omentectomy with omentum preservation or partial omentectomy. Primary outcomes were overall survival, relapse-free survival, and incidences of recurrence and complications, whereas secondary outcomes were the total length of operation and the amount of blood loss.

RESULTS

Nine studies involving 3,561 patients were included. Our meta-analysis revealed no significant differences between omentectomy and omentum preservation in terms of the 5-year overall survival (risk ratio [RR] = 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.89-1.01), 5-year relapse free survival (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.89-1.03), incidence of recurrence in the peritoneum or other visceral organs (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.80-1.60 and RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.78-1.45, respectively), and incidence of complications (RR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.89-1.50). Moreover, omentum preservation significantly reduced the total length of operation (mean difference [MD] 25.70, 95% CI: 3.23-48.17) and the amount of blood loss (MD: 56.29, 95% CI: 14.02-98.56).

CONCLUSION

Omentectomy may not be necessary and can be omitted during gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Prognostic impact of CEA/CA19-9 at the time of recurrence in patients with gastric cancer

PURPOSE

We evaluated the clinical impact of the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) values at the time of recurrence in gastric cancer patients.

METHODS

Among 790 patients with R0 resected gastric cancer without neoadjuvant therapy between 2004 and 2017, 89 recurrence cases were retrospectively evaluated. The clinical impact of CEA and CA19-9 values on recurrence sites and post-recurrent prognosis were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

The positive rates of CEA and CA19-9 at recurrence were significantly higher than the preoperative positive rates (CEA, 56% vs 24%; CA19-9, 37% vs 15%). Although CA19-9-positive patients at recurrence exhibited a poor survival, the difference was not significant. The positive rates of CEA at liver or lymph node recurrence were significantly higher than the preoperative positive rates. The positive rate of CA19-9 at peritoneal recurrence was significantly higher than the preoperative positive rate. CA19-9-positive patients at recurrence exhibited worse prognosis than CA19-9-negative patients, although the difference was not significant. At lymph node recurrence, CA19-9-positive patients exhibited a significantly worse survival than CA19-9-negative patients.

CONCLUSION

In recurrent gastric cancer, the positive status of CA19-9 at recurrence might have a negative prognostic impact after recurrence; particularly, in patients with lymph node recurrence.

Gastrectomy with or without omentectomy for cT3–4 gastric cancer: a multicentre cohort study

Background

Omentectomy is performed widely for locally advanced gastric cancer to prevent disease recurrence. However, its clinical benefit is unknown.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study compared the outcome of gastrectomy with preservation of the omentum (GPO) and gastrectomy with resection of the omentum (GRO) among patients with cT3–T4 gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy between 2006 and 2012 in one of five participating institutions. A consensus conference identified 28 variables potentially associated with outcome after gastrectomy for the estimation of propensity scores, and propensity score matching (PSM) was undertaken to control for possible confounders. Postoperative surgical outcomes, overall survival and disease recurrence were compared between GPO and GRO.

Results

A total of 1758 patients were identified, of whom 526 remained after PSM, 263 in each group. Median follow-up was 4·9 (i.q.r. 3·1–5·9) years in the GRO group and 5·0 (2·5–6·8) years in the GPO group. The incidence of postoperative complications of Clavien–Dindo grade III or more was significantly higher in the GRO group (17·5 versus 10·3 per cent; P = 0·016). Five-year overall survival rates were 77·1 per cent in the GRO group and 79·4 per cent in the GPO group (P = 0·749). There were no significant differences in recurrence rate or pattern of recurrence between the groups.

Conclusion

Overall survival and disease recurrence were comparable in patients with cT3–4 gastric cancer who underwent GPO or GRO.

LXRα Promotes the Differentiation of Human Gastric Cancer Cells through Inactivation of Wnt/β-catenin Signaling

LXRα is a subtype of the liver X receptors (LXRs). There is accumulating evidence to support the involvement of LXRα in a variety of malignancies. However, the function and specific mechanism of LXRα in gastric cancer (GC) remain unclear. In this study, the expression of LXRα was significantly lower in poorly differentiated and undifferentiated GC tissues compared with well- and moderately differentiated GC tissues by immunohistochemistry analysis. The activation of LXRα leads to the decreased expression of β-catenin, CD44, and Cyclin D1, whereas the inhibition of LXRα has opposite effect. The same results were obtained in animal experiments. Furthermore, results showed that CD44 and Cyclin D1 expression significantly decreased when Wnt/β-catenin signaling was blocked in LXRα silent GC cells, whereas it was significantly increased when Wnt/β-catenin signaling was activated in LXRα over-expressed GC cells. CD44 and Cyclin D1, downstream targets of Wnt/β-catenin signaling, are specific markers for cell differentiation. Therefore, we conclude that LXRα may promote the differentiation of human GC cells through inactivation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling.