The impacts of surgery of the primary cancer and radiotherapy on the survival of patients with metastatic rectal cancer

Relationship between prognostic nutritional index and neutrophil lymphocyte ratio with overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving regorafenib

Aim

In this study, we aimed to analyze the effect of prognostic nutritional index and neutrophile lymphocyte ratio on the overall survival (OS) in patients treated with regorafenib.

Materials and Methods

Metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who treated with regorafenib between 2016 and 2020 in a single center were evaluated retrospectively. ROC analysis was used for neutrophile lymphocyte ratio (NLR's) and prognostic nutritional index (PNI's) optimum cut-off value. The relationship between OS with PNI and NLR was investigated.

Results

Fifty-two patient's data were analyzed. The median age was 57 years, 22 (41.5%) of the patients were female. The optimal cut-off value of PNI for OS was 45.7 according to ROC curve analysis. The median NLR value was accepted as 2.7. Median OS was 8.3 months. Patients who have high PNI value than 45.7 had longer OS (12.09 months vs. 6.31 months hazard ratio [HR]: 0.37 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19-0.73 P = 0.003) and there was a tendency for longer OS with low NLR value then median (12.05 months vs. 6.14 months HR: 0.54 95% CI: 0.29-1.23 P = 0.057). Primary tumor resected patients had longer OS than nonresected patients (12.05 months vs. 6.30 months HR: 0.34 95% CI: 0.17-0.66 P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, high PNI value more than 45.7 (HR: 0.40 95% CI: 0.18-0.88 P = 0.02) and resection of the primary tumor (HR: 0.40 95% CI: 0.21-0.80 P = 0.01) were the only independent factors for longer OS.

Conclusion

Metastatic CRC patients with high pretreatment PNI and primary tumor resected are more likely to have longer OS with regorafenib. PNI is more reliable index than NLR to predict OS in metastatic CRC patients treated with regorafenib.

Bevacizumab improves survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with primary tumor resection: A meta-analysis

It is not well determined whether primary tumor resection is associated with better outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with bevacizumab. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the prognostic role of primary tumor resection in mCRC treated with bevacizumab. Electronic databases including the Cochrane library, Embase, and Pubmed were searched until April 2018. Clinical studies assessing the influence of primary tumor resection on the efficacy of bevacizumab in patients with mCRC were identified. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Seven studies including 2760 mCRC patients were finally included. The results of the meta-analysis were in favor of bevacizumab to patients with resected primary tumor in terms of OS (HR = 0.50, 95%CI: 0.39–0.64; p < 0.01), and PFS (HR = 0.65, 95%CI: 0.51–0.81; p < 0.01). Administration of bevacizumab in mCRC patients with resected primary tumor had a better OS (HR = 0.65, 95%CI: 0.56–0.74; p < 0.01), when compared to chemotherapy(CT). Adding bevacizumab to mCRC patients without resection of primary tumor also had a better OS (HR = 0.78, 95%CI: 0.65–0.94; p < 0.01) and PFS (HR = 0.71, 95%CI: 0.57–0.88; p < 0.01) compared to chemotherapy alone. In conclusion, mCRC patients with resected primary tumor have better survival than those without surgery of primary tumor when treated with bevacizumab. Primary tumor resection status should be taken into consideration when using bevacizumab in mCRC.

Survival Benefit of Preoperative Versus Postoperative Radiotherapy in Metastatic Rectal Cancer Treated With Definitive Surgical Resection of Primary Tumor: A Population Based, Propensity Score-Matched Study

Preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery has been recommended as a standard treatment for patients with stage II/III rectal cancer. However, the optimal sequencing of radiotherapy for metastatic rectal cancer remains unclear. Between 2004 and 2014, patients diagnosed with metastatic rectal cancer who underwent the resection of primary site and received radiotherapy were retrospectively selected using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The propensity score matching analyses were used to lessen the effects of confounding factors including age, sex, race, marital status, serum carcinoembryonic antigen level, histologic type, differentiation status, tumor size, T stage, N stage and resection of the distant lesions. The cancer-specific survival (CSS) were compared based on the sequencing of radiotherapy. Ultimately, 686 matched pairs were formed for comparison of preoperative versus postoperative radiotherapy. The 5-year CSS estimates were 33.4% (95% CI: 28.9%-37.9%) and 26.8% (95% CI: 22.7%-30.9%) for patients underwent preoperative radiotherapy followed by resection of primary lesion and postoperative radiotherapy after surgery, respectively. Patients underwent preoperative radiotherapy had better CSS as compared to patients received postoperative radiotherapy (p<0.001 for log-rank test). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that preoperative radiotherapy group was associated with significantly decreased risk for cancer death (HR=0.820, 95% CI: 0.712-0.945, p=0.006). Preoperative radiotherapy was superior to postoperative radiotherapy in patients with metastatic rectal cancer. Therapeutic strategy for these patients should be further explored.

Validation of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Short Form Among Cancer Patients

CONTEXT

Comprehensive symptom assessment is crucial for symptom management. The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Short Form (MSAS-SF) has been validated for symptom assessment in cancer patients, but there is no simplified Chinese version.

OBJECTIVES

To present the validation procedures and results for the simplified Chinese version of the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Short Form (MSAS-SF-SC) among cancer patients in mainland China.

METHODS

The MSAS-SF was translated and culturally adapted into simplified Chinese. About 359 cancer patients completed the MSAS-SF-SC, the Chinese Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General, the Chinese Brief Fatigue Inventory, the Chinese Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Chinese Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey. Reliability was assessed by internal consistency and test-retest coefficients. Convergent and divergent validity were analyzed by Pearson's correlation coefficients between MSAS-SF-SC subscales and the other instruments. Known-groups validity used Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status, hemoglobin level, and primary site.

RESULTS

The MSAS-SF-SC was reliable with Cronbach's alpha coefficients for subscales ranging from 0.782 to 0.874 and test-retest coefficients ranging from 0.819 to 0.872. MSAS-SF-SC subscales correlated with corresponding Chinese Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General subscales (-0.557 to -0.680; P < 0.001), Chinese Brief Fatigue Inventory (0.620; P < 0.001), and Chinese Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (0.663; P < 0.001) indicating convergent validity. MSAS-SF-SC subscales showed low or no correlations with the Chinese Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (-0.146 to -0.165; P < 0.01), indicating divergent validity. MSAS-SF-SC subscales showed appropriate differences by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status, hemoglobin level, and primary site.

CONCLUSION

The MSAS-SF-SC demonstrated good psychometric properties and is culturally adapted. The instrument could be a valuable tool for Chinese health care professionals and researchers.