Applicability of graded prognostic assessment of lung cancer using molecular markers to lung adenocarcinoma patients with brain metastases

Short-term predictors of stereotactic radiosurgery outcome for untreated single non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases: a restrospective cohort study

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an option for brain metastases (BM) not eligible for surgical resection, however, predictors of SRS outcomes are poorly known. The aim of this study is to investigate predictors of SRS outcome in patients with BM secondary to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The secondary objective is to analyze the value of volumetric criteria in identifying BM progression. This retrospective cohort study included patients >18 years of age with a single untreated BM secondary to NSCLC. Demographic, clinical, and radiological data were assessed. The primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as a BM volumetric increase 12 months after SRS. The unidimensional measurement of the BM at follow-up was also assessed. One hundred thirty-five patients were included, with a median BM volume at baseline of 1.1 cm3 (IQR 0.4-2.3). Fifty-two (38.5%) patients had SRS failure at follow-up. Only right BM laterality was associated with SRS failure (p=0.039). Using the volumetric definition of SRS failure, the unidimensional criteria demonstrated a sensibility of 60.78% (46.11%-74.16%), specificity of 89.02% (80.18%-94.86%), positive LR of 5.54 (2.88-10.66) and negative LR of 0.44 (0.31-0.63). SRS demonstrated a 61.5% local control rate 12 months after treatment. Among the potential predictors of treatment outcome analyzed, only the right BM laterality had a significant association with SRS failure. The volumetric criteria were able to identify more subtle signs of BM increase than the unidimensional criteria, which may allow earlier diagnosis of disease progression and use of appropriate therapies.

Validation of the Lung-Mol Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) System for the Prognosis of Patients Receiving Radiotherapy for Brain Metastasis From Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

The Lung-mol graded prognostic assessment (GPA) system predicts the prognosis of patients with brain metastases (BM) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) separately for adenocarcinoma and non-adenocarcinoma. This study aimed to validate the Lung-molGPA system using a cohort of patients in our institution who received radiotherapy for BM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three hundred and thirty-nine patients with NSCLC who received their first course of radiotherapy for BM were included in the analysis. Among them, 65 received their second course of radiotherapy for BM. Data on sex, age, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), extracranial metastases (ECM), number of BM, histological type, and gene mutations were collected according to the Lung-molGPA system. We examined the validity of the scores assigned to the factors included in the Lung-molGPA system, separately for adenocarcinoma and non-adenocarcinoma. In addition, we validated the Lung-molGPA system to predict survival during both the first and second courses of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

The factors in the Lung-molGPA were significantly associated with survival, except for age in non-adenocarcinoma with marginal significance. Regarding discrimination ability, the C-indices were 0.65 and 0.69 for adenocarcinoma and non-adenocarcinoma, respectively, in the first course of radiotherapy for BM, while those in the second course were 0.62 and 0.74, respectively. Survival prediction by Lung-molGPA was almost consistent with actual survival in the first course of radiotherapy, except for the score of 0-1.0 in both histologies and 2.5-3.0 in non-adenocarcinoma. In the second course of radiotherapy, median survival could be predicted for some patients with adenocarcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms the validity of Lung-molGPA for the estimation of median survival based on patient characteristics at the time of initiation of radiotherapy for patients in the first course of radiotherapy and shows that it may be applicable to patients with adenocarcinoma in the second course of radiotherapy.

Predictors of Survival After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Untreated Single Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Brain Metastases: 5- and 10-year Results

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) presents as a good treatment option for smaller, deep-seated brain metastases (BMs). This study aims to determine predictors of SRS failure for patients with non-small cell lung cancer BMs.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of single non-small cell lung cancer BMs treated using SRS. We included patients >18 years with a single, previously untreated lesion. Primary outcome was treatment failure, defined as BMs dimension increase above the initial values. Demographic, clinical, and radiological data were collected to study potential predictors of treatment failure.

RESULTS

Worse rates of progression-free survival (PFS) were associated with heterogeneous contrast enhancement (18.1 ± 4.1 vs. 41.9 ± 4 months; P < 0.001). Better rates of PFS were associated with volumes <1.06 cm3 (log-rank; P = 0.001). Graded prognostic assessment was significantly associated with survival at 120 months (log-rank; P < 0.001). Karnofsky Performance Scale was evaluated in 3 strata: 90-100, 80, and ≤70. Mean survival rates for these strata were 31.8 ± 3.9, 10.6 ± 2.2, and 9.8 ± 2.3 months, respectively (log-rank; P < 0.001). There were no differences regarding presence of extracranial metastases, age, or lesion location. A multivariable logistic regression found that volume <1.06 cm3 was associated with higher survival rates at 10 years (odds ratio: 3.2, 95% confidence interval: 1.3-8.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast-homogeneous metastases and lesions <1.06 cm3 are associated with better rates of PFS. Karnofsky Performance Scale and graded prognostic assessment were associated with more favorable survival rates after 10 years. Volume <1.06 cm3 was the only significant predictor of survival in the multivariable analysis.

Effect of brain radiotherapy strategies on prognosis of patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma with brain metastasis

Purpose

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung cancers have a high risk of developing brain metastases (BM). Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), local radiotherapy, and WBRT + Boost are frequently used for treatment of BM. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the difference in efficacy of these radiotherapy modes in patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma with BMs. Further, we determined the optimal radiotherapy regimen for patients based on Lung-molGPA.

Methods and materials

We retrospectively enrolled 232 patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma with BMs. Patients were divided into three groups based on the different modes of brain radiotherapy: WBRT group, local radiotherapy group, and WBRT + Boost group. Graded prognostic assessment for lung cancer using molecular markers (Lung molGPA), overall survival (OS), and intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) were calculated. Kaplan–Meier was used to compare iPFS and OS in different groups.

Results

The median OS for the WBRT (n = 84), local radiotherapy (n = 65), and WBRT + Boost (n = 83) cohorts was 32.8, 59.1, and 41.7 months, respectively (P = 0.0002). After stratification according to the Lung-molGPA score, the median OS for the WBRT (n = 56), local radiotherapy (n = 19), and WBRT + Boost (n = 28) cohorts was 32.5, 30.9, and 30.8 months, respectively, in subgroup with score 1–2 (P = 0.5097). In subgroup with score 2.5–4, the median OS for the WBRT (n = 26), local radiotherapy (n = 45), and WBRT + Boost (n = 54) cohorts was 32, 68.4, and 51 months, respectively (P = 0.0041).

Conclusion

The present study showed that in patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma with BM, local radiotherapy and WBRT + Boost perform similarly well both in the subgroups with low and high scores of Lung-molGPA. Considering the side effect caused by whole brain radiotherapy, we recommended local radiotherapy as optimal brain radiation mode for those subtype lung cancer patients.

Applicability of the adjusted graded prognostic assessment for lung cancer with brain metastases using molecular markers (Lung-molGPA) in a Chinese cohort: A retrospective study of multiple institutions

Background

In this era of precision medicine, prognostic heterogeneity is an important feature of patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastases (BM). This multi‐institutional study is aimed to verify the applicability of the adjusted Lung‐molGPA model for NSCLC with BM in a Chinese cohort.

Methods

This retrospective study included 1903 patients at three hospitals in Southwest China. The performance of the Lung‐molGPA model was compared with that of the adjusted DS‐GPA model in terms of estimating the survival of NSCLC with BM.

Results

The median OS of this patient cohort was 27.0 months, and the adenocarcinoma survived longer than the non‐adenocarcinoma (28.0 months vs 18.7 months, p < 0.001). The adjusted Lung‐molGPA model was more accurate in predicting survival of adenocarcinoma patients than the adjusted DS‐GPA model (C‐index: 0.615 vs 0.571), and it was not suitable for predicting survival of non‐adenocarcinoma patients (p = 0.286, 1.5‐2.0 vs 2.5‐3.0; p = 0.410, 2.5‐3.0 vs 3.5‐4.0).

Conclusions

The adjusted Lung‐molGPA model is better than the DS‐GPA model in predicting the prognosis of adenocarcinoma patients. However, it failed to estimate the prognosis for non‐adenocarcinoma patients.

ALK-Brain Prognostic Index-Preliminary Study of a Prognostic Tool for Patients with ALK-Rearranged, Non-small Cell Lung Cancer and Brain Metastases

Background: Disease-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (DS-GPA) is the most validated prognostic tool for patients with brain metastasized lung cancer. The Lung-molGPA scoring system was recently introduced for oncogenic-driven brain metastasized lung cancer, but has not yet been validated in cohorts including only ALK-translocated tumors. Methods: We designed a retrospective cohort study consisting of 44 patients with brain metastasized ALK-positive, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were treated between January 2009 and November 2019 at Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm, Sweden. Information about demographics and clinicopathological parameters were collected. Predictors of overall survival (OS) were identified by Cox regression analyses. A bootstrap validation with 1000 samples was performed in order to compare the different prognostic scores. Results: The variables found to independently influence OS in the multivariate analysis, i.e., PS, sex and brain metastases at diagnosis, were used as prognostic variables in our new prognostic index (ALK-BPI). Patients were divided into two prognostic groups. The median OS was 65.7 months for the good prognostic group and 22.7 months for the poor prognostic group (p = 0.0068). In the univariate analysis of the different prognostic scores, ALK-BPI performed better than the others (HR = 3.6; 95% CI: 1.3–9.9). The mean C-statistics of the different prognostic scores were compared to each other, and no significant difference was observed. Conclusion: We propose the ALK-BPI score as a new prognostic tool that can easily be applied for ALK-positive lung cancer patients with brain metastases in daily clinical practice, as it has at least the same prognostic value as Lung-molGPA.

Survival and intracranial control outcomes of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone versus WBRT plus a radiotherapy boost in non-small-cell lung cancer with brain metastases: a single-institution retrospective analysis

Purpose: To compare the differences in survival and intracranial local control between patients treated with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and WBRT plus a radiotherapy boost (RTB) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases (BMs).

Patients and methods: Between May 2010 and October 2017, 206 NSCLC patients with BMs were treated with brain radiotherapy; among these patients, 140 patients underwent WBRT alone (group A) and 66 patients underwent WBRT plus RTB (group B). The endpoints included intracranial local progression-free survival and regional progression-free survival time (iLPFS and iRPFS, respectively) and overall survival (OS).

Results: Between the two groups, not all baseline clinical factors were well-balanced. The median iLPFS was 17.9 months in group A and 22.3 months in group B. The 2-year iLPFS rates were significantly lower in group A than in group B (34.5% vs 49.3%, P=0.041); however, no significant differences were observed in OS or iRPFS. Multivariate analyses revealed that epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) therapy was significantly associated with good OS, iLPFS, and iRPFS. Among the patients treated with TKIs (n=62), there were no differences in OS (P=0.190), iLPFS (P=0.334), or iRPFS (P=0.338) between groups A and B. In the patients without TKI treatment (n=102), the median iLPFS was significantly longer in group B than in group A (16.7 vs 12.0 months, P=0.032), but no significant differences were found in OS (p=0.182) or iRPFS (P=0.837) between the two groups.

Conclusion: WBRT plus RTB significantly improved iLPFS compared with WBRT alone, especially in patients without EGFR-TKI treatment. However,there were no significant differences in iRPFS or OS between the two groups. Patients treated with EGFR-TKIs may not benefit from WBRT plus RTB.

Applicability of the lung-molGPA index in non-small cell lung cancer patients with different gene alterations and brain metastases

OBJECTIVES

The Lung-molGPA index is based on the original diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (DS-GPA) and incorporates recently reported gene alteration data, predicting the outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases (BM). However, the prognostic values of both DS-GPA and Lung-molGPA remain undetermined, especially for patients with different molecular types.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 1184 NSCLC patients with BM were analyzed for clinical factors and outcomes at Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, China. All prognostic factors were weighted for significance by hazard ratios. The applicability of DS-GPA and Lung-molGPA were reappraised in NSCLC patients with BM and various genetic profiles. Additionally, a modified Lung-molGPA was newly developed for NSCLC patients with gene variations.

RESULTS

NSCLC patients in the present study had a median survival time of 14.0 months from BM diagnosis. Both the DS-GPA and Lung-molGPA models could effectively predict the outcomes of NSCLC patients with BM (P < 0.001), and the Lung-molGPA model appeared to deliver more accurate predictions. Furthermore, Lung-molGPA scores demonstrated discriminatory capability in patients with gene variations (P < 0.001), and no significant difference was reached in wild-type patients (P = 0.133). Regarding oncogene-positive NSCLC patients with BM, a modified Lung-molGPA index was established based on the prognostic factors with a C-index of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.68-0.80) to accurately calculate survival probability (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In the era of precision medicine, Lung-molGPA accurately predicted the prognosis of NSCLC patients with mutant genotypes and BM, although it did not perform well in wild-type patients. Thus, it is worthwhile to explore the prognostic model for patients with positive driving genes.

EGFR T790M-Positive Lung Adenocarcinoma Metastases to the Pituitary Gland Causing Adrenal Insufficiency: A Case Report

A 64-year-old man, with history of micropapillary thyroid cancer and epidermal growth factor receptor-positive lung adenocarcinoma with no evidence of active disease for 3 years after chemotherapy and radiation on erlotinib, presented with fatigue, nausea, lack of appetite, and xeroderma. A screening magnetic resonance image of the patient's head demonstrated a new bilateral pituitary mass. Initial evaluation revealed low morning cortisol, and the patient was diagnosed with adrenal insufficiency. His symptoms rapidly improved with maintenance glucocorticoids. Soon thereafter, the patient developed an acute visual deficit secondary to enlargement of the pituitary mass, and biopsy revealed EGFR T790M positive metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. Hence, we present a rare case of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma to the pituitary causing secondary adrenal insufficiency.