Prognostic and predictive value of serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with epidermal growth factor receptor sensitive mutations and receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Serum tumor markers for response prediction and monitoring of advanced lung cancer: A review focusing on immunotherapy and targeted therapies

BACKGROUND

The value of serum tumor markers (STMs) in the current therapeutic landscape of lung cancer is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review gathered evidence of the predictive, prognostic, and monitoring value of STMs for patients with advanced lung cancer receiving immunotherapy (IT) or targeted therapy (TT).

METHODS

Literature searches were conducted (cut-off: May 2022) using PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Medical professionals advised on the search strategies.

RESULTS

Study heterogeneity limited the evidence and inferences from the 36 publications reviewed. While increased baseline levels of serum cytokeratin 19 fragment antigen (CYFRA21-1) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) may predict IT response, results for TT were less clear. For monitoring IT-treated patients, STM panels (including CYFRA21-1, CEA, and neuron-specific enolase) may surpass the power of single analyses to predict non-response. CYFRA21-1 measurement could aid in monitoring TT-treated patients, but the value of CEA in this context requires further investigation. Overall, baseline and dynamic changes in individual or combined STM levels have potential utility to predict treatment outcome and for monitoring of patients with advanced lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

In advanced lung cancer, STMs provide additional relevant clinical information by predicting treatment outcome, but further standardization and validation is warranted.

Prognostic value of blood-based protein biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer: A critical review and 2008-2022 update

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic possibilities for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have considerably increased during recent decades.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the prognostic relevance of serum tumor markers (STM) for early and late-stage NSCLC patients treated with classical chemotherapies, novel targeted and immune therapies.

METHODS

A PubMed database search was conducted for prognostic studies on carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin-19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1), neuron-specific enolase, squamous-cell carcinoma antigen, progastrin-releasing-peptide, CA125, CA 19-9 and CA 15-3 STMs in NSCLC patients published from 2008 until June 2022.

RESULTS

Out of 1069 studies, 141 were identified as meeting the inclusion criteria. A considerable heterogeneity regarding design, patient number, analytical and statistical methods was observed. High pretherapeutic CYFRA 21-1 levels and insufficient decreases indicated unfavorable prognosis in many studies on NSCLC patients treated with chemo-, targeted and immunotherapies or their combinations in early and advanced stages. Similar results were seen for CEA in chemotherapy, however, high pretherapeutic levels were sometimes favorable in targeted therapies. CA125 is a promising prognostic marker in patients treated with immunotherapies. Combinations of STMs further increased the prognostic value over single markers.

CONCLUSION

Protein STMs, especially CYFRA 21-1, have prognostic potential in early and advanced stage NSCLC. For future STM investigations, better adherence to comparable study designs, analytical methods, outcome measures and statistical evaluation standards is recommended.

Efficacy and safety of alectinib in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer and blood markers for prognosis and efficacy: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Alectinib is a second generation of ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs), which has attracted much attention in the treatment of ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). At present, there are few reports on the efficacy and safety of alectinib in Chinese population. Moreover, biomarkers reflecting prognosis and efficacy are exceedingly needed. This study assessed the efficacy of alectinib in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC and analyzed the prognostic factors.

Methods

Patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who were confirmed by histopathology or cytology at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between October 2018 and October 2021 were enrolled. All patients were treated with alectinib. The clinical characteristics and circulating tumor biomarkers before and after treatment were collected. Kaplan-Meier test was used to calculate the progression-free survival (PFS). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to explore the influencing factors on PFS. Incidence of adverse events was observed.

Results

Twenty patients progressed after first-line treatment (n=59) with alectinib, and 21 patients progressed following second-line treatment (n=36) with alectinib. The median PFS of first-line treatment patients was not achieved, and the median PFS of patients undergoing second-line treatment was 15.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.00-32.23]. The most common adverse reactions were liver dysfunction (37.50%), anemia (37.50%), and constipation (20.83%). The incidence of grade III and above adverse reactions was 6.25%. Univariate analysis showed that neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR; hazard ratio (HR) =0.424, P=0.005] carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA; HR =0.482, P=0.029), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; HR =0.327, P<0.001), carbohydrate antigen (CA)199 (HR =0.313, P=0.002), and circulating cell free DNA (cfDNA; HR =0.229, P=0.008) concentration levels were associated with PFS, and multivariate analysis showed that NLR (HR =3.058, P=0.034) was independent prognostic factor. After three months of treatment, CEA, CA199, NLR, and LDH, could further predict the prognosis of alectinib treatment.

Conclusions

The efficacy and safety of alectinib as a first-line or second-line treatment for ALK-positive NSCLC in keeping with published prospective studies. CEA, CA199, NLR, and LDH within the normal range after three months of treatment were associated with good prognosis. Detection of serum tumor markers can indicate therapeutic success in patients treated with alectinib.

Worldwide Prevalence of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Identification of variable epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is important for the selection of appropriate targeted therapies. This meta-analysis was conducted to provide a worldwide overview of EGFR mutation and submutation (specifically exon 19 deletions, exon 21 L858R substitutions, and others) prevalence, and identify important covariates that influence EGFR mutation status in patients with advanced NSCLC to address this clinical data gap.

Methods

Embase^® and MEDLINE^® in Ovid were searched for studies published between 2004 and 2019 with cohorts of ≥ 50 adults with EGFR mutations, focusing on stage III/IV NSCLC (≤ 20% of patients with stage I/II NSCLC). Linear mixed-effects models were fitted to EGFR mutation endpoints using logistic transformation (logit), assuming a binomial distribution. The model included terms for an intercept reflecting European studies and further additive terms for other continents. EGFR submutations examined were exon 19 deletions, exon 21 L858R substitutions, and others.

Results

Of 3969 abstracts screened, 57 studies were included in the overall EGFR mutation analysis and 74 were included in the submutation analysis relative to the overall EGFR mutation population (Europe, n = 12; Asia, n = 51; North America, n = 5; Central America, n = 1; South America, n = 1; Oceania, n = 1; Global, n = 3). The final overall EGFR mutations model estimated Asian and European prevalence of 49.1% and 12.8%, respectively, and included an additive covariate for the proportion of male patients in a study. There were no significant covariates in the submutation analyses. Most submutations were actionable: exon 19 deletions (49.2% [Asia]; 48.4% [Europe]); exon 21 L858R substitutions (41.1% [Asia]; 29.9% [Europe]).

Conclusions

Although EGFR mutation prevalence was higher in Asian than Western countries, data support worldwide testing for EGFR overall and submutations to inform appropriate targeted treatment decisions.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40291-021-00563-1.

Salvage surgery for non-small cell lung cancer after tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment

OBJECTIVES

The prognostic impact of surgical intervention for recurrent or residual non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement after tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment remains unclear. We aimed to describe the characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing salvage surgery in this setting.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected and analyzed nationwide Japanese data on perioperative and postoperative outcomes of patients who underwent salvage surgery after EGFR or ALK-TKI during 2010-2015. The primary endpoint was a 3-year overall survival (OS) rate and secondary endpoints were the rate of adverse events, perioperative mortality rate, 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate, and median survival time after salvage lung resection. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors of OS and RFS.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were included (EGFR-TKI: 33, ALK-TKI: 3). The 3-year OS and RFS after the surgery were 75.1 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 55.9-86.9 %) and 22.2 % (95 % CI 8.6-39.7 %), respectively. Of clinicopathological factors, the progression of disease while on TKI and preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels (≥5 ng/mL) were shown to be worse independent prognosticators of OS (hazard ratio [HR] 9.38, 95 % CI 1.57-55.88, P = .014; HR 4.84, 95 % CI 1.62-14.46, P = .005, respectively). Older age at initial treatment (≥70 years) and advanced pathological T stage (T2-T4) were the worse prognosticators for RFS (HR 12.58, 95 % CI 2.51-62.97, P = .002; HR 3.06, 95 % CI 1.04-9.03, P = .043, respectively). Grade 3 adverse events occurred in 5.6 % (2/36) patients, but no deaths were reported within 90 days after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that salvage surgery after TKI treatment was safe and feasible and may contribute to prolonged OS time by reducing the local tumor burden.

Association of Divergent Carcinoembryonic Antigen Patterns and Lung Cancer Progression

Changes in expression patterns of serum carcinoembryonic antigen at initial diagnosis (CEA^In) and disease progression (CEA^Pd) in lung cancer patients under EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) treatment may reflect different tumor progression profiles. Of the 1736 lung cancer patients identified from the cancer registry group between 2011 to 2016, we selected 517 patients with advanced stage adenocarcinoma, data on EGFR mutation status and CEA^In, among whom were 288 patients with data on CEA^Pd, eligible for inclusion in the correlation analysis of clinical characteristics and survival. Multivariable analysis revealed that CEA^In expression was associated with poor progression-free survival in patients harboring mutant EGFR. Moreover, CEA^In and CEA^Pd were associated with the good and poor post-progression survival, respectively, in the EGFR-mutant group. Cell line experiments revealed that CEA expression and cancer dissemination can be affected by EGFR-TKI selection. EGFR-mutant patients, exhibiting high CEA^In (≥5 ng/mL) and low CEA^Pd (<5 ng/mL), showed a potential toward displaying new metastasis. Taken together, these findings support the conclusion that EGFR mutation status is a critical factor in determining prognostic potential of CEA^In and CEA^Pd in patients under EGFR-TKI treatment, and CEA^In and CEA^Pd are associated with distinct cancer progression profiles.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is superior to platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic predictor in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy

Aim: We aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and determine which of the two was a better predictor of prognosis. Materials & methods: We conducted multivariate Cox regression analysis to assess the independent effects of the NLR and PLR on patient survival. Results: In multivariate Cox regression analysis, the NLR was an independent risk factor predicting poor prognostic factor (HR: 2.464; 95% CI: 1.305–4.652; p = 0.005) and overall survival (HR: 1.954; 95% CI: 1.172–3.257; p = 0.01); however, the PLR was not a prognostic factor (progression-free survival; p = 0.105; overall survival; p = 0.239). Conclusion: The NLR was a better prognostic indicator than the PLR for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy.