Intrinsic molecular subtypes of HER2+ breast cancer

Breast cancer and its therapeutic targets: A comprehensive review

Breast cancer is a common and deadly disease, so there is a constant need for research to find efficient targets and therapeutic approaches. Breast cancer can be classified on a molecular and histological base. Breast cancer can be divided into ER (estrogen receptor)-positive and ER-negative, HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor2)-positive and HER2-negative subtypes based on the presence of specific biomarkers. Targeting hormone receptors, such as the HER2, progesterone receptor (PR), and ER, is very significant and plays a vital role in the onset and progression of breast cancer. Endocrine treatments and HER2-targeted drugs are examples of targeted therapies now being used against these receptors. Emerging immune-based medicines with promising outcomes in the treatment of breast cancer include immune checkpoint inhibitors, cancer vaccines, and adoptive T-cell therapy. It is also explored how immune cells and the tumor microenvironment affect breast cancer development and treatment response. The major biochemical pathways, signaling cascades, and DNA repair mechanisms that are involved in the development and progression of breast cancer, include the PI3K/AKT/mTOR system, the MAPK pathway, and others. These pathways are intended to be inhibited by a variety of targeted drugs, which are then delivered with the goal of restoring normal cellular function. This review aims to shed light on types of breast cancer with the summarization of different therapeutic approaches which can target different pathways for tailored medicines and better patient outcomes.

Association of genetic ancestry with HER2, GRB7 AND estrogen receptor expression among Colombian women with breast cancer

Background

Our previous study reported higher mRNA levels of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-amplicon genes ERBB2 and GRB7 in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer patients with relatively high Indigenous American (IA) ancestry from Colombia. Even though the protein expression of HER2 and GRB7 is highly correlated, they may also express independently, an event that could change the patients' prognosis. In this study, we aimed to explore the differences in ER, HER2 and GRB7 protein expression according to genetic ancestry, to further assess the clinical implications of this association.

Methods

We estimated genetic ancestry from non-tumoral breast tissue DNA and assessed tumoral protein expression of ER, HER2, and GRB7 by immunohistochemistry in a cohort of Colombian patients from different health institutions. We used binomial and multinomial logistic regression models to test the association between genetic ancestry and protein expression. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used to evaluate the effect of HER2/GRB7 co-expression on patients' survival.

Results

Our results show that patients with higher IA ancestry have higher odds of having HER2+/GRB7- breast tumors, compared to the HER2-/GRB7- subtype, and this association seems to be stronger among ER-positive tumors (ER+/HER2+/GRB7-: OR=3.04, 95% CI, 1.47-6.37, p<0.05). However, in the multivariate model this association was attenuated (OR=1.80, 95% CI, 0.72-4.44, p=0.19). On the other hand, it was observed that having a higher European ancestry patients presented lower odds of ER+/HER2+/GRB7- breast tumors, this association remained significant in the multivariate model (OR=0.36, 95% CI, 0.13 - 0.93, p= 0.0395). The survival analysis according to HER2/GRB7 co-expression did not show statistically significant differences in the overall survival and recurrence-free survival.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that Colombian patients with higher IA ancestry and a lower European fraction have higher odds of ER+/HER2+/GRB7- tumors compared to ER+/HER2-/GRB7- disease. However, this association does not seem to be associated with patients' overall or recurrence-free survival.

Loss of HER2 in breast cancer: biological mechanisms and technical pitfalls

Loss of HER2 in previously HER2-positive breast tumors is not rare, occurring in up to 50% of breast cancers; however, clinical research and practice underestimate this issue. Many studies have reported the loss of HER2 after neoadjuvant therapy and at metastatic relapse and identified clinicopathological variables more frequently associated with this event. Nevertheless, the biological mechanisms underlying HER2 loss are still poorly understood. HER2 downregulation, intratumoral heterogeneity, clonal selection, and true subtype switch have been suggested as potential causes of HER2 loss, but translational studies specifically investigating the biology behind HER2 loss are virtually absent. On the other side, technical pitfalls may justify HER2 loss in some of these samples. The best treatment strategy for patients with HER2 loss is currently unknown. Considering the prevalence of this phenomenon and its apparent correlation with worse outcomes, we believe that correlative studies specifically addressing HER2 loss are warranted.

Transcription profiling of feline mammary carcinomas and derived cell lines reveals biomarkers and drug targets associated with metabolic and cell cycle pathways

The molecular heterogeneity of feline mammary carcinomas (FMCs) represents a prognostic and therapeutic challenge. RNA-Seq-based comparative transcriptomic profiling serves to identify recurrent and exclusive differentially expressed genes (DEGs) across sample types and molecular subtypes. Using mass-parallel RNA-Seq, we identified DEGs and performed comparative function-based analysis across 15 tumours (four basal-like triple-negative [TN], eight normal-like TN, and three luminal B fHER2 negative [LB fHER2-]), two cell lines (CL, TiHo-0906, and TiHo-1403) isolated from the primary tumours (LB fHER2-) of two cats included in this study, and 13 healthy mammary tissue controls. DEGs in tumours were predominantly upregulated; dysregulation of CLs transcriptome was more extensive, including mostly downregulated genes. Cell-cycle and metabolic-related DEGs were upregulated in both tumours and CLs, including therapeutically-targetable cell cycle regulators (e.g. CCNB1, CCNB2, CDK1, CDK4, GTSE1, MCM4, and MCM5), metabolic-related genes (e.g. FADS2 and SLC16A3), heat-shock proteins (e.g. HSPH1, HSP90B1, and HSPA5), genes controlling centrosome disjunction (e.g. RACGAP1 and NEK2), and collagen molecules (e.g. COL2A1). DEGs specifically upregulated in basal-like TN tumours were involved in antigen processing and presentation, in normal-like TN tumours encoded G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), and in LB fHER2- tumours were associated with lysosomes, phagosomes, and endosomes formation. Downregulated DEGs in CLs were associated with structural and signalling cell surface components. Hence, our results suggest that upregulation of genes enhancing proliferation and metabolism is a common feature among FMCs and derived CLs. In contrast, the dissimilarities observed in dysregulation of membrane components highlight CLs' disconnection with the tumour microenvironment. Furthermore, recurrent and exclusive DEGs associated with dysregulated pathways might be useful for the development of prognostically and therapeutically-relevant targeted panels.

HER2-positive/ER-low breast carcinoma shows a response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy similar to that of HER2-positive/ER-negative breast carcinoma

Negative expression of estrogen receptor (ER) predicts response to chemotherapy in breast cancers (BCs). ER negative cancers are those with less than 1 % of nuclear staining. Tumors with 1-10 % staining are sub-classified as "low-positive" (ER-low). HER2 negative tumors with ER low staining are considered biologically and clinically equivalent to ER negative tumors. This study investigates whether ER low expression in HER2-positive (HER2+) BCs has different clinical behavior than ER negative HER2-positive tumors. We used a sample of 171 patients with HER2+ BCs to compare risk of residual cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy by different ER expression strength. Patients were classified into 3 groups: ER-negative (ER <1 %); ER-low (ER <10 %, any intensity or <33 % staining, weak intensity); and ER-high (ER = 10-33 %, moderate to strong intensity or >33 %, any intensity). The risk of residual cancer in patients with ER-low tumors was similar to the risk in patients with ER-negative tumors (RR = 0.76, 95 % CI: 0.30-1.93). Conversely, patients with ER-high tumors had twice the risk of residual cancer than patients with ER-negative tumors (RR = 2.20, 95 % CI: 1.46-3.31). These findings persisted after adjusting for tumor grade, clinical tumor and lymph node stage, chemotherapy regimen, and progesterone receptor status. In this cohort of patients with HER2+ BCs, ER-low tumors had a similar pathologic response to chemotherapy as ER-negative tumors suggesting similar clinical behavior. Future research should address biological explanations to these similarities between ER negative and ER low breast cancers such as HER2 enriched phenomenon.

Fatty acid synthase: A druggable driver of breast cancer brain metastasis

INTRODUCTION

Brain metastasis (BrM) is a key contributor to morbidity and mortality in breast cancer patients, especially among high-risk epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) and triple-negative/basal-like molecular subtypes. Optimal management of BrM is focused on characterizing a "BrM dependency map" to prioritize targetable therapeutic vulnerabilities.

AREAS COVERED

We review recent studies addressing the targeting of BrM in the lipid-deprived brain environment, which selects for brain-tropic breast cancer cells capable of cell-autonomously generating fatty acids by upregulating de novo lipogenesis via fatty acid synthase (FASN). Disruption of FASN activity impairs breast cancer growth in the brain, but not extracranially, and mapping of the molecular causes of organ-specific patterns of metastasis has uncovered an enrichment of lipid metabolism signatures in brain metastasizing cells. Targeting SREBP1-the master regulator of lipogenic gene transcription-curtails the ability of breast cancer cells to survive in the brain microenvironment.

EXPERT OPINION

Targeting FASN represents a new therapeutic opportunity for patients with breast cancer and BrM. Delivery of brain-permeable FASN inhibitors and identifying strategies to target metabolic plasticity that might compensate for impaired brain FASN activity are two potential roadblocks that may hinder FASN-centered strategies against BrM.

Triple Targeting of Breast Tumors Driven by Hormonal Receptors and HER2

Breast cancers that express hormonal receptors (HR) and HER2 display resistance to targeted therapy. Tumor-promotional signaling from the HER2 and estrogen receptor (ER) pathways converges at the cyclin D1 and cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) 4 and 6 complex, which drives cell-cycle progression and development of therapeutic resistance. Therefore, we hypothesized that co-targeting of ER, HER2, and CDK4/6 may result in improved tumoricidal activity and suppress drug-resistant subclones that arise on therapy. We tested the activity of the triple targeted combination therapy with tucatinib (HER2 small-molecule inhibitor), palbociclib (CKD4/6 inhibitor), and fulvestrant (selective ER degrader) in HR⁺/HER2⁺ human breast tumor cell lines and xenograft models. In addition, we evaluated whether triple targeted combination prevents growth of tucatinib or palbociclib-resistant subclones in vitro and in vivo Triple targeted combination significantly reduced HR⁺/HER2⁺ tumor cell viability, clonogenic survival, and in vivo growth. Moreover, survival of HR⁺/HER2⁺ cells that were resistant to the third drug in the regimen was reduced by the other two drugs in combination. We propose that a targeted triple combination approach will be clinically effective in the treatment of otherwise drug-resistant tumors, inducing robust responses in patients.

A HER2 target antibody drug conjugate combined with anti-PD-(L)1 treatment eliminates hHER2+ tumors in hPD-1 transgenic mouse model and contributes immune memory formation

PURPOSE

Disitamab vedotin (RC48) is an HER2-directed antibody-drug conjugate, emerging as an effective strategy for cancer therapy, which not only enhances antitumor immunity in previous animal models but also improves clinical outcomes for patients such as with gastric cancer, urothelium carcinoma, and HER2 low-expressing breast cancer. Here, we explore the combination therapeutic efficacy of this novel HER2-targeting ADC with immune checkpoint inhibitors in a human HER2-expressing syngeneic breast cancer model.

METHODS

The human HER2+ cancer cell line is constructed by stable transfection and individual clones were isolated by single-cell sorting. Flow cytometry was performed to determine its binding activity. Cytotoxic effect was determined using an MTT assay with the supplement of RC48. Human PD-1 transgenic mice were used to analyze the in vivo antitumor effects of the ADC and its combination therapy with PD-1/PD-L1 antibody.

RESULTS

The combination of RC48 and PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibition significantly enhanced tumor suppression and antitumor immunity. Tumor rejection in the synergistic groups was accompanied by massive T cell infiltration and immune marker activation. Furthermore, the combination therapy promoted immunological memory formation in the tumor eradication animals, protecting them from tumor rechallenge.

CONCLUSION

A novel HER2-targeting ADC combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors can achieve remarkable effects in mice and elicit long-lasting immune protection in a hHER2+ murine breast cancer model. This study provides insights into the efficacy of RC48 therapeutic activity and a rationale for potential therapeutic combination strategies with immunotherapy.

Meta-Analysis of HER2-Enriched Subtype Predicting the Pathological Complete Response Within HER2-Positive Breast Cancer in Patients Who Received Neoadjuvant Treatment

Background

This meta-analysis aimed to better elucidate the predictive value of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched subtype of pathological complete response (pCR) rate within HER2-positive breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment.

Methods

We identified prospective trials that evaluated the correlation between an HER2-enriched subtype and pCR rate in HER2-positive breast cancer. Pooled odds ratio (OR) values with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed.

Results

Fifteen studies comprising 2,190 patients met the inclusion criteria. The HER2-enriched subtype was associated with increased odds of achieving a pCR (OR = 4.12, 95% CI = 3.38 to 5.03, P < 0.001) in patients overall. Moreover, it was correlated with improved pCR when single or dual HER2-targeted agent-based therapy was employed (OR = 3.36, 95% CI = 2.25 to 5.02, P < 0.001; OR = 4.66, 95% CI = 3.56 to 6.10, P < 0.001, respectively), but not when HER2-targeted agent-free chemotherapy was used (OR = 2.52, 95% CI = 0.98 to 6.49, P = 0.05). Moreover, an HER2-enriched subtype predicted higher pCR rates irrespective of HER2-targeted agents (trastuzumab, lapatinib, pertuzumab, or T-DM1); chemotherapy agents (taxane-based, or anthracyclines plus taxane-based); endocrine therapy and hormone receptor [all the differences were statistically significant (P all ≤ 0.001)].

Conclusions

The HER2-enriched subtype can more effectively and specifically predict pCR for HER2-targeted agent-based neoadjuvant treatment, irrespective of the number (single or dual) or category of HER2-targeted agent, including chemotherapy and endocrine therapy, or hormone receptor in cases of HER2-positive breast cancer.

HER2 Isoforms Uniquely Program Intratumor Heterogeneity and Predetermine Breast Cancer Trajectories During the Occult Tumorigenic Phase

HER2-positive breast cancers are among the most heterogeneous breast cancer subtypes. The early amplification of HER2 and its known oncogenic isoforms provide a plausible mechanism in which distinct programs of tumor heterogeneity could be traced to the initial oncogenic event. Here a Cancer rainbow mouse simultaneously expressing fluorescently barcoded wildtype (^WTHER2), exon-16 null (^d16HER2), and N-terminally truncated (^p95HER2) HER2 isoforms is used to trace tumorigenesis from initiation to invasion. Tumorigenesis was visualized using whole-gland fluorescent lineage tracing and single-cell molecular pathology. We demonstrate that within weeks of expression, morphologic aberrations were already present and unique to each HER2 isoform. Although ^WTHER2 cells were abundant throughout the mammary ducts, detectable lesions were exceptionally rare. In contrast, ^d16HER2 and ^p95HER2 induced rapid tumor development. ^d16HER2 incited homogenous and proliferative luminal-like lesions which infrequently progressed to invasive phenotypes whereas ^p95HER2 lesions were heterogenous and invasive at the smallest detectable stage. Distinct cancer trajectories were observed for ^d16HER2 and ^p95HER2 tumors as evidenced by oncogene-dependent changes in epithelial specification and the tumor microenvironment. These data provide direct experimental evidence that intratumor heterogeneity programs begin very early and well in advance of screen or clinically detectable breast cancer. IMPLICATIONS: Although all HER2 breast cancers are treated equally, we show a mechanism by which clinically undetected HER2 isoforms program heterogenous cancer phenotypes through biased epithelial specification and adaptations within the tumor microenvironment.

Targeting mTOR and Glycolysis in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Up to one third of all breast cancers are classified as the aggressive HER2-positive subtype, which is associated with a higher risk of recurrence compared to HER2-negative breast cancers. The HER2 hyperactivity associated with this subtype drives tumor growth by up-regulation of mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway activity and a metabolic shift to glycolysis. Although inhibitors targeting the HER2 receptor have been successful in treating HER2-positive breast cancer, anti-HER2 therapy is associated with a high risk of recurrence and drug resistance due to stimulation of the PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling pathway and glycolysis. Combination therapies against HER2 with inhibition of mTOR improve clinical outcomes compared to HER2 inhibition alone. Here, we review the role of the HER2 receptor, mTOR pathway, and glycolysis in HER2-positive breast cancer, along with signaling mechanisms and the efficacy of treatment strategies of HER2-positive breast cancer.

Third-line treatment of HER2-positive advanced breast cancer: From no standard to a Pandora's box

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) advanced breast cancer (ABC) accounts for about 15-20% of all ABC cases. Large randomized trials have determined the standard first- and second-line treatments for this subgroup of patients, namely dual blockade plus chemotherapy and TDM1. However, no standard treatment is specifically recommended after TDM1, and most of the subsequent therapeutic choices commonly rely on old trials not optimally reflecting the current patient population. The recent FDA-approval of three novel anti-HER2 compounds is revolutionizing the field. In particular, trastuzumab deruxtecan was approved after showing unprecedented activity in a phase 2 trial for highly pretreated HER2+ ABC patients; tucatinib and neratinib were approved based on the results of the randomized HER2CLIMB and NALA trial, respectively. With an increasing arsenal of treatment options, clinical decision-making will need to take into account a variety of aspects, including differences in clinical trial designs, outcomes and toxicity profile of each drug, patient's characteristics and preferences.

Modelling the structural and reactivity landscapes of tucatinib with special reference to its wavefunction-dependent properties and screening for potential antiviral activity

HER-2 type breast cancer is one of the most aggressive malignancies found in women. Tucatinib is recently developed and approved as a potential medicine to fight this disease. In this manuscript, we present the gross structural features of this compound and its reactivity and wave function properties using computational simulations. Density functional theory was used to optimise the ground state geometry of the molecule and molecular docking was used to predict biological activity. As the electrons interact with electromagnetic radiations, electronic excitations between different energy levels are analysed in detail using time-dependent density functional theory. Various intermolecular and intermolecular interactions are analysed and reaction sites for attacking electrophiles and nucleophiles identified. Information entropy calculations show that the compound is inherently stable. Docking with COVID-19 proteins show docking score of - 9.42, - 8.93, - 8.45 and - 8.32 kcal/mol respectively indicating high interaction between the drug and proteins. Hence, this is an ideal candidate to study repurposing of existing drugs to combat the pandemic.

Evolving standards of care and new challenges in the management of HER2-positive breast cancer

The management of human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC) has rapidly evolved over the last 20 years. Major advances have led to US Food and Drug Administration approval of 7 HER2-targeted therapies for the treatment of early-stage and/or advanced-stage disease. Although oncologic outcomes continue to improve, most patients with advanced HER2-positive BC ultimately die of their disease because of primary or acquired resistance to therapy, and patients with HER2-positive early BC who have residual invasive disease after preoperative systemic therapy are at a higher risk of distant recurrence and death. The concept of treatment de-escalation and escalation is increasingly important to optimally tailor therapy for patients with HER2-positive BC and is a major focus of the current review. Research efforts in this regard are discussed as well as updates regarding the evolving standard of care in the (neo)adjuvant and metastatic settings, including the use of novel combination therapies. The authors also briefly discuss ongoing challenges in the management of HER2-positive BC (eg, intrinsic vs acquired drug resistance, the identification of predictive biomarkers, the integration of imaging techniques to guide clinical practice), and the treatment of HER2-positive brain metastases. Research aimed at superseding these challenges will be imperative to ensure continued progress in the management of HER2-positive BC going forward.

Variability in hospital treatment costs: a time-driven activity-based costing approach for early-stage invasive breast cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

Using a standardised diagnostic and generic treatment path for breast cancer, and the molecular subtype perspective, we aim to measure the impact of several patient and disease characteristics on the overall treatment cost for patients. Additionally, we aim to generate insights into the drivers of cost variability within one medical domain.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We conducted a retrospective study at a breast clinic in Belgium. We used 14 anonymous patient files for conducting our analysis.

RESULTS

Significant cost variations within each molecular subtype and across molecular subtypes were found. For the luminal A classification, the cost differential amounts to roughly 166%, with the greatest treatment cost amounting to US$29 780 relative to US$11 208 for a patient requiring fewer medical activities. The major driver for these cost variations relates to disease characteristics. For the luminal B classification, a cost difference of roughly 242% exists due to both disease-related and patient-related factors. The average treatment cost for triple negative patients amounted to US$26 923, this is considered to be a more aggressive type of cancer. The overall cost for HER2-enriched is driven by the inclusion of Herceptin, thus this subtype is impacted by disease characteristics. Cost variability across molecular classifications is impacted by the severity of the disease, thus disease-related factors are the major drivers of cost.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the cost challenge in healthcare, the need for greater cost transparency has become imperative. Through our analysis, we generate initial insights into the drivers of cost variability for breast cancer. We found evidence that disease characteristics such as severity and more aggressive cancer forms such as HER2-enriched and triple negative have a significant impact on treatment cost across the different subtypes. Similarly, patient factors such as age and presence of gene mutation contribute to differences in treatment cost variability within molecular subtypes.

Use of HER2-Directed Therapy in Metastatic Breast Cancer and How Community Physicians Collaborate to Improve Care

The development of new HER2-directed therapies has resulted in a significant prolongation of survival for women with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Discoveries in the laboratory inform clinical trials which are the basis for improving the standard of care and are also the backbone for quality improvement. Clinical trials can be completed more rapidly by expanding trial enrollment to community sites. In this article we review some of the challenges in treating metastatic breast cancer with HER2-directed therapies and our strategies for incorporating our community partners into the research network.

Hormone Receptor-Status Prediction in Breast Cancer Using Gene Expression Profiles and Their Macroscopic Landscape

The cost of next-generation sequencing technologies is rapidly declining, making RNA-seq-based gene expression profiling (GEP) an affordable technique for predicting receptor expression status and intrinsic subtypes in breast cancer patients. Based on the expression levels of co-expressed genes, GEP-based receptor-status prediction can classify clinical subtypes more accurately than can immunohistochemistry (IHC). Using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas Breast Invasive Carcinoma (TCGA BRCA) and Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC) datasets, we identified common predictor genes found in both datasets and performed receptor-status prediction based on these genes. By assessing the survival outcomes of patients classified using GEP- or IHC-based receptor status, we compared the prognostic value of the two methods. We found that GEP-based HR prediction provided higher concordance with the intrinsic subtypes and a stronger association with treatment outcomes than did IHC-based hormone receptor (HR) status. GEP-based prediction improved the identification of patients who could benefit from hormone therapy, even in patients with non-luminal breast cancer. We also confirmed that non-matching subgroup classification affected the survival of breast cancer patients and that this could be largely overcome by GEP-based receptor-status prediction. In conclusion, GEP-based prediction provides more reliable classification of HR status, improving therapeutic decision making for breast cancer patients.

Best Foot Forward: Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy as Standard of Care in Triple-Negative and HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Neoadjuvant systemic treatment of early-stage breast cancer has been used to improve resectability and reduce the extent of breast and axillary surgery. More recently, several other merits of neoadjuvant systemic treatment have emerged, including the ability to tailor clinically available adjuvant systemic therapy options based on pathologic response and to serve as a platform for early assessment of novel agents and response biomarkers and as an avenue for treatment optimization investigations (local and systemic therapy escalation and de-escalation trials guided by pathologic response). Attainment of a pathologic complete response (pCR) is associated with excellent long-term outcomes; conversely, the presence of residual disease is associated with a high risk of recurrence for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Treatment strategies in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer include regimens incorporating trastuzumab, pertuzumab, ado-trastuzumab emtansine, and neratinib, resulting in high pCR rates and overall excellent long-term outcomes. Currently available cytotoxic regimens yield pCR for 35% to 55% of patients with TNBC, and immune checkpoint inhibition is showing early promise for this subtype. New drug and predictive biomarker evaluations in the neoadjuvant setting aim to develop optimal treatment strategies for the individual patient, with the ultimate goal of maximizing efficacy and minimizing toxicity. Research efforts involving novel agents are being undertaken to address the high risk of recurrence for patients with residual disease. Omission of breast surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy requires further development of imaging and biopsy techniques to accurately assess the extent of residual disease before clinical application.

Phenotypic changes of HER2-positive breast cancer during and after dual HER2 blockade

The HER2-enriched (HER2-E) subtype within HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer is highly addicted to the HER2 pathway. However, ∼20-60% of HER2+/HER2-E tumors do not achieve a complete response following anti-HER2 therapies. Here we evaluate gene expression data before, during and after neoadjuvant treatment with lapatinib and trastuzumab in HER2+/HER2-E tumors of the PAMELA trial and breast cancer cell lines. Our results reveal that dual HER2 blockade in HER2-E disease induces a low-proliferative Luminal A phenotype both in patient's tumors and in vitro models. These biological changes are more evident in hormone receptor-positive (HR+) disease compared to HR-negative disease. Interestingly, increasing the luminal phenotype with anti-HER2 therapy increased sensitivity to CDK4/6 inhibition. Finally, discontinuation of HER2-targeted therapy in vitro, or acquired resistance to anti-HER2 therapy, leads to restoration of the original HER2-E phenotype. Our findings support the use of maintenance anti-HER2 therapy and the therapeutic exploitation of subtype switching with CDK4/6 inhibition.

The Ongoing Search for Biomarkers of CDK4/6 Inhibitor Responsiveness in Breast Cancer

CDK4 inhibitors (CDK4/6i), such as palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib, are approved in combination with hormonal therapy as a front-line treatment for metastatic HR+, HER2- breast cancer. Their targets, CDK4 and CDK6, are cell-cycle regulatory proteins governing the G1-S phase transition across many tissue types. A key challenge remains to uncover biomarkers to identify those patients that may benefit from this class of drugs. Although CDK4/6i addition to estrogen modulation therapy essentially doubles the median progression-free survival, overall survival is not significantly increased. However, in reality only a subset of treated patients respond. Many patients exhibit primary resistance to CDK4/6 inhibition and do not derive any benefit from these agents, often switching to chemotherapy within 6 months. Some patients initially benefit from treatment, but later develop secondary resistance. This highlights the need for complementary or companion diagnostics to pinpoint patients who would respond. In addition, because CDK4 is a bona fide target in other tumor types where CDK4/6i therapy is currently in clinical trials, the lack of target identification may obscure benefit to a subset of patients there as well. This review summarizes the current status of CDK4/6i biomarker test development, both in clinical trials and at the bench, with particular attention paid to those which have a strong biological basis as well as supportive clinical data.

NSABP FB-7: a phase II randomized neoadjuvant trial with paclitaxel + trastuzumab and/or neratinib followed by chemotherapy and postoperative trastuzumab in HER2+ breast cancer

PURPOSE

The primary aim of NSABP FB-7 was to determine the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in locally advanced HER2-positive (HER2⁺) breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant trastuzumab or neratinib or the combination and weekly paclitaxel followed by standard doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide. The secondary aims include biomarker analyses.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

pCR was tested for association with treatment, gene expression, and a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the Fc fragment of the IgG receptor IIIa-158V/F (FCGR3A). Pre-treatment biopsies and residual tumors were also compared to identify molecular changes.

RESULTS

The numerical pCR rate in the trastuzumab plus neratinib arm (50% [95%CI 34-66%]) was greater than that for single-targeted therapies with trastuzumab (38% [95%CI 24-54]) or neratinib (33% [95%CI 20-50]) in the overall cohort but was not statistically significant. Hormone receptor-negative (HR^-) tumors had a higher pCR rate than HR⁺ tumors in all three treatment arms, with the highest pCR rate in the combination arm. Diarrhea was the most frequent adverse event and occurred in virtually all patients who received neratinib-based therapy. Grade 3 diarrhea was reported in 31% of patients; there were no grade 4 events. Our 8-gene signature, previously validated for trastuzumab benefit in two different clinical trials in the adjuvant setting, was correlated with pCR across all arms of NSABP FB-7. Specifically, patients predicted to receive no trastuzumab benefit had a significantly lower pCR rate than did patients predicted to receive the most benefit (P = 0.03). FCGR genotyping showed that patients who were homozygous for the Fc low-binding phenylalanine (F) allele for FCGR3A-158V/F were less likely to achieve pCR.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining trastuzumab plus neratinib with paclitaxel increased the absolute pCR rate in the overall cohort and in HR^- patients. The 8-gene signature, which is validated for predicting trastuzumab benefit in the adjuvant setting, was associated with pCR in the neoadjuvant setting, but remains to be validated as a predictive marker in a larger neoadjuvant clinical trial. HR status, and the FCGR3A-158V/F genotype, also warrant further investigation to identify HER2⁺ patients who may benefit from additional anti-HER2 therapies beyond trastuzumab. All of these markers will require further validation in the neoadjuvant setting.

TRIALS REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01008150. Retrospectively registered on October 5, 2010.

Distinct HR expression patterns significantly affect the clinical behavior of metastatic HER2+ breast cancer and degree of benefit from novel anti-HER2 agents in the real world setting

We analyzed data from 738 HER2‐positive metastatic breast cancer (mbc) patients treated with pertuzumab‐based regimens and/or T‐DM1 at 45 Italian centers. Outcomes were explored in relation to tumor subtype assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The median progression‐free survival at first‐line (mPFS1) was 12 months. Pertuzumab as first‐line conferred longer mPFS1 compared to other first‐line treatments (16 vs. 9 months, p = 0.0001), regardless of IHC subtype. Median PFS in second‐line (mPFS2) was 7 months, with no difference by IHC subtype, but it was more favorable with T‐DM1 compared to other agents (7 vs. 6 months, p = 0.03). There was no PFS2 gain in patients with tumors expressing both hormonal receptors (HRs; p = 0.17), while a trend emerged for tumors with one HR (p = 0.05). Conversely, PFS2 gain was significant in HRs‐negative tumors (p = 0.04). Median overall survival (mOS) was 74 months, with no significant differences by IHC subtypes. Survival rates at 2 and 3 years in patients treated with T‐DM1 in second‐line after pertuzumab were significantly lower compared to pertuzumab‐naïve patients (p = 0.01). When analyzed by IHC subtype, the outcome was confirmed if both HRs or no HRs were expressed (p = 0.02 and p = 0.006, respectively). Our results confirm that HRs expression impacts the clinical behavior and novel treatment‐related outcomes of HER2‐positive tumors when treatment sequences are considered. Moreover, multivariate analysis showed that HRs expression had no effect on PFS and OS. Further studies are warranted to confirm our findings and clarify the interplay between HER2 and estrogen receptor pathways in HER2‐positive (mbc) patients.

What's new?

About half of breast cancers positive for human epidermal growth factor (HER2) also express hormone receptors but the impact of hormone receptor status on the success of HER2‐directed treatments is not fully explored. Here the authors retrospectively assessed tumor behavior and treatment outcomes in 738 women with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer treated with new generation anti‐HER2 agents. Distinct hormone receptor expression patterns significantly affected the progression free and overall survival, justifying further studies to define optimal treatment regimens and the interplay between hormone receptor and HER2 signaling.

Overcoming Therapeutic Resistance of Triple Positive Breast Cancer with CDK4/6 Inhibition

Triple positive breast cancers overexpress both the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) oncogene and the hormonal receptors (HR) to estrogen and progesterone. These cancers represent a unique therapeutic challenge because of a bidirectional cross-talk between the estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and HER2 pathways leading to tumor progression and resistance to targeted therapy. Attempts to combine standard of care HER2-targeted drugs with antihormonal agents for the treatment of HR+/HER2+ breast cancer yielded encouraging results in preclinical experiments but did improve overall survival in clinical trial. In this review, we dissect multiple mechanisms of therapeutic resistance typical of HR+/HER2+ breast cancer, summarize prior clinical trials of targeted agents, and describe novel rational drug combinations that include antihormonal agents, HER2-targeted drugs, and CDK4/6 inhibitors for treatment of the HR+/HER2+ breast cancer subtype.

Clinical implications of the non-luminal intrinsic subtypes in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

Gene expression profiling has had a considerable impact on our understanding ofbreastcancer biology. Duringthelast decade, 4 intrinsic molecular subtypes of breast cancer (Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-enriched [HER2-E] and Basal-like) have been identified and intensively studied. In this article, we review and discuss the clinical implications of the 2 non-luminal subtypes (i.e. HER2-E and Basal-like) identified within hormone receptor (HR)-positive disease. After reviewing 32 studies for a total of 13,091 samples, ∼8% and ∼ 15% of early and metastatic HR+/HER2-negative breast cancer, respectively, were found to be non-luminal. Clinically, HR+/HER2-negative/non-luminal subtypes have been associated with estrogen independence, chemo-sensitivity, resistance to CDK4/6 inhibition and poor outcome. Interestingly, EGFR/HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibition might be of value in the HR+/HER2-negative/HER2-E subtype. Finally, the HER2-E subtype within HR+/HER2 + disease represents ∼ 30% and has been associated with anti-HER2 sensitivity, chemo-sensitivity and resistance to CDK4/6 inhibition. In the upcoming years, retrospective and prospective clinical trials evaluating both biomarkers should lead to improvements in patient outcomes.

Transductal fluxes of water and monovalent ions in ferret salivary glands

The net transductal fluxes of water and monovalent ions were measured in the parotid and submandibular salivary glands of the ferret, Mustela putorius furo, during stimulation of secretion with pilocarpine. The duct systems of these glands were found to be impermeable to water using the split-oil droplet method for stationary microperfusion of lobular and main ducts. The net transductal fluxes of Na+, K+, Cl-, and HCO3- were characterized by analysis of ductal fluid samples obtained simultaneously from the intercalated, lobular, and main ducts of these glands.