Portal vein resection and reconstruction with artificial blood vessels is safe and feasible for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients with portal vein involvement: Chinese center experience

Recurrence scoring system predicting early recurrence for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing pancreatectomy and portomesenteric vein resection

BACKGROUND

Pancreatectomy with concomitant portomesenteric vein resection (PVR) enables patients with portomesenteric vein (PV) involvement to achieve radical resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, however, early recurrence (ER) is frequently observed.

AIM

To predict ER and identify patients at high risk of ER for individualized therapy.

METHODS

Totally 238 patients undergoing pancreatectomy and PVR were retrospectively enrolled and were allocated to the training or validating cohort. Univariate Cox and LASSO regression analyses were performed to construct serum recurrence score (SRS) based on 26 serum-derived parameters. Uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses of SRS and 18 clinicopathological variables were performed to establish a Nomogram. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive accuracy. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.

RESULTS

Independent serum-derived recurrence-relevant factors of LASSO regression model, including postoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9, postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen, postoperative carbohydrate antigen 125, preoperative albumin (ALB), preoperative platelet to ALB ratio, and postoperative platelets to lymphocytes ratio, were used to construct SRS [area under the curve (AUC): 0.855, 95%CI: 0.786–0.924]. Independent risk factors of recurrence, including SRS [hazard ratio (HR): 1.688, 95%CI: 1.075-2.652], pain (HR: 1.653, 95%CI: 1.052-2.598), perineural invasion (HR: 2.070, 95%CI: 0.827-5.182), and PV invasion (HR: 1.603, 95%CI: 1.063-2.417), were used to establish the recurrence nomogram (AUC: 0.869, 95%CI: 0.803-0.934). Patients with either SRS > 0.53 or recurrence nomogram score > 4.23 were considered at high risk for ER, and had poor long-term outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The recurrence scoring system unique for pancreatectomy and PVR, will help clinicians in predicting recurrence efficiently and identifying patients at high risk of ER for individualized therapy.

Controlling Nutritional Status score is superior to Prognostic Nutritional Index score in predicting survival and complications in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a Chinese propensity score matching study

Preoperative nutritional status plays an important role in predicting postoperative outcomes. Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) and Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) are good tools to assess patients' nutritional status. They have been used in predicting outcomes in various malignancies, but few studies have focused on pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. Totally, 306 PDAC patients were enrolled. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was introduced to eliminate the baseline inequivalence. Patients with different PNI (or CONUT) scores showed inequivalence baseline characteristics, and patients with compromised nutritional status were related with a more advanced tumour stage. After PSM, the baseline characteristics were well balanced. Both low PNI (≤45) and high CONUT (≥3) were independent risk factors for poor overall survival (P < 0·05), and the result remained the same after PSM. Survival analysis demonstrated both patients with low PNI and high CONUT score were associated with poorer survival, and the result remained the same after PSM. The results of AUC indicated that CONUT might have a higher sensitivity and specificity in predicting complications and survival. Preoperative low PNI (≤45) and high CONUT (≥3) scores might be reliable predictors of prognosis and surgical complications in PDAC patients. Compared with PNI, CONUT might be more effective.

Pancreatoduodenectomy with portal vein resection favors the survival time of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A propensity score matching analysis

Portal vein (PV) involvement is common in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). To the best of our knowledge, pancreatectomy combined with PV resection (PVR) is the only radical therapy for patients with PV involvement. However, there remains a debate on whether patients with PV involvement could benefit from PVR or not. The present study aimed to compare the survival outcomes between patients receiving pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) with PVR and those receiving PD alone. A total of 377 patients with PDAC were enrolled, 138 patients with PV involvement were placed in the PVR group, while the other 239 patients were in the non-PVR group. To reduce selection bias and estimate the causal effect, 123 pairs of propensity score matched (PSM) patients were selected and compared for the survival outcomes. Before PSM, the survival of patients in the PVR group was worse compared with those in the non-PVR group (mean survival, 25.1 vs. 29.3 months; P=0.038). After balancing the baseline characteristics using the PSM method, the significant survival difference between the two groups was insignificant (mean survival, 25.9 vs. 31.2 months; P=0.364). Tumor stage, body mass index, serum albumin, R1 resection, lymph node metastasis, carbohydrate antigen (CA)125 and CA19-9 were significant independent prognostic factors. The incidence of serious postoperative complications was similar between the two groups. PVR is safe and effective for patients with PDAC. Patients with PV involvement could achieve the similar survival outcome as patients without PV involvement, through radical resection combined with PVR, without increasing the risk of serious complications.

What to expect with major vascular reconstruction during Whipple procedures: a single institution experience and literature review

Background

Major vascular reconstruction during a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), also known as a Whipple procedure, leads to controversial postoperative outcomes compared to conventional Whipple. Discussion with the patient regarding postoperative expectations is a crucial component of holistic surgical healthcare. The aim of this study was to report our 8-year experience of Whipple procedures involving vascular reconstruction and to review relevant literature to further evaluate expectant outcomes, therefore leading to more accurate discussion.

Methods

A retrospective review of patients undergoing Whipple procedures from January 2010, through December 2017 was performed. Patch, graft, and primary anastomosis during Whipple procedures were considered major vascular reconstruction. Literature on the current understanding of the outcomes associated with vascular reconstruction during Whipple procedures was reviewed.

Results

Twenty-nine from a total of 405 patients that met inclusion criteria had a Whipple procedure that involved major vascular reconstruction. Twelve patients were male and 17 were female (mean age, 65.2 years). Median hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay [range] of patients with vascular reconstruction was 12 [5-92] days and 3 [0-59] days, respectively. Thirty-day survival and 1-year survival of patients with vascular reconstruction was 93.1% and 55.2%, respectively, compared to non-vascular reconstruction patients 96.0% and 83.5%, respectively (P=0.35, P<0.001). Ninety-day readmission for vascular reconstruction patients was 31.0% compared to 14.6% in non-vascular reconstruction patients (P=0.03). The 1-year survival of those who had patch reconstruction, graft reconstruction, and primary anastomosis was 50.0%, 62.5%, 53.8%, respectively.

Conclusions

Compared to conventional Whipple procedures, those requiring major vascular reconstruction are associated with decreased survival. When vascular reconstruction is a valid option patients should be well aware of the associated outcomes.

Total pancreatectomy for pancreatic malignancy with preservation of the spleen

BACKGROUND

Total pancreatectomy may be necessary to achieve margin-negative resection for pancreatic cancer. However, despite the desirability of saving the spleen, the feasibility, safety, and oncological outcomes of spleen-preserving total pancreatectomy have not been studied in patients with malignancy involving the pancreatic neck or proximal body. The aim of this study was to report the efficacy of spleen-preserving total pancreatectomy using the Warshaw technique for patients with pancreatic malignancies.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent total pancreatectomy for malignant pancreatic diseases between December 2006 and January 2018 focused on comparing the clinical outcomes between conventional operations with splenectomy and spleen-preserving total pancreatectomy using the Warshaw technique.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients among a total of 59 total pancreatectomies had the spleen preservation by the Warshaw operation. In this series, the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas resected with the Warshaw technique were of smaller tumor size but had greater rates of vascular invasion, resulting in the more frequent vascular resection. No patients had splenic complications requiring splenectomy, but two patients intended to have the Warshaw operation were converted to splenectomy because of splenic malperfusion. Asymptomatic perigastric varices were noted in 4 patients. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were comparable between the Warshaw and conventional operation groups. Recurrence-free and overall survival was similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

In patients with pancreatic malignancy, total pancreatectomy with preservation of the spleen using the Warshaw technique achieves outcomes comparable with conventional total pancreatectomy with splenectomy in selected patients.

Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy combined with portal-superior mesenteric vein resection and reconstruction with interposition graft: Case series

RATIONALE

With the development of laparoscopic techniques, laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy was applied in various indications including pancreatic cancer. Here, we share our experience of venous resection and reconstruction with interposition graft in laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in these patients.

PATIENT CONCERNS

We reviewed data of laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy with venous resection and reconstruction in patients with pancreatic cancer between the dates of October 2010 and November 2017.

OUTCOMES

Ten patients underwent laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy with portal-superior mesenteric vein resection and reconstruction with interposition graft. The mean operative time was 547 min. The mean blood loss was 435 ml. The mean length of venous defect after resection was 5.4 cm. R0 resection was achieved in nine patients (90%). There was one patient who suffered from severe postoperative complication. There was no 30-day mortality in this study. The long-term patency was achieved in all patients.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we demonstrate the initial experience of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with long venous resection and reconstruction. Although applied in small number of patients, it could be another option for well-selected patients with reasonable morbidity and mortality as well as long-term outcomes in experienced minimally invasive surgical team.