Nomograms for prognostic factors of spinal giant cell tumor combining traditional clinical characteristics with inflammatory biomarkers after gross total resection

Comparison of En Bloc Resection and Intralesional Excision for Re-resection of Giant Cell Tumors of the Spine

OBJECTIVE

Re-resection of spinal giant cell tumors is an exceedingly difficult procedure. Moreover, the prognosis of patients with en bloc resection or intralesional excision for re-resection has rarely been reported. This study aimed to compare the prognostic value of en bloc resection with that of intralesional excision in patients undergoing re-resection for giant cell tumors of the spine.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis evaluated patients who underwent revision surgeries for relapse of giant cell tumors of the spine at our center between January 2005 and January 2021. Local progression-free survival represents the duration between en bloc resection or intralesional excision and tumor recurrence. Neurological recovery, survival rates, local control, and complications were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier estimator was used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients (nine men and 13 women) with a mean age of 34.1 (range 19-63) years were included. Significant statistical differences were found in the local tumor recurrence rate between patients treated with en bloc resection and those treated with intralesional excision (p < 0.05). The 5- and 10-year local progression-free survival rates were both 90% in the en bloc resection group, while in the intralesional excision group, the 5-year local progression-free survival rate was 80% with a 10-year rate of 45.7%. The en bloc resection group had a lower local tumor recurrence rate than that of the intralesional excision group (p < 0.05), but the former had a higher rate of complications (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed a low local recurrence rate in patients who underwent en bloc resection for giant cell tumors, while the perioperative complication rate was high.

The prognostic utility of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in spinal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is reportedly an effective prognostic tool across various medical and surgical fields, but its value in spinal surgery is unestablished. We aim to investigate the relationship between elevated baseline/postoperative NLR and patient outcomes in spinal surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a systematic search in PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases for studies investigating the prognostic value of NLR in spine patients.Odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were analysed on the RevMan 5.4 software. Where meta-analysis was not possible, we vote-counted the direction of the effect of elevated NLR. The GRADE framework for prognostic factor research was utilised to assess the certainty of the evidence for each outcome measure.

RESULTS

Five outcome measures (overall survival, mortality, disease-free survival, functional recovery and complications) were assessed across 16 studies involving 5471 patients. Elevated baseline NLR was associated with reduced overall survival (HR: 1.63, 95 % CI: 1.05 - 2.54) (GRADE: low) and worsened functional recovery (OR: 0.93, 95 % CI: 0.87 - 0.98) (GRADE: low). There was no association between baseline NLR and disease-free survival (HR: 2.42, 95 % CI: 0.49 - 11.83) (GRADE: very low) or mortality (OR: 1.39, 95 % CI: 0.41 - 4.75) (GRADE: very low). Elevated NLR levels measured on days 3-4 and days 6-7 postoperatively, but not NLR measured at baseline or on days 1-2 postoperatively, were associated with greater risks of complications (GRADE: low).

CONCLUSIONS

NLR is an objective tool with the potential to identify the patients that would benefit from surgery and facilitate shared decision-making.

Association between Inflammatory Markers and Local Recurrence in Patients with Giant Cell Tumor of Bone: A Preliminary Result

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) has a high local recurrence rate of approximately 20%. Systemic inflammatory markers, such as neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), hemoglobin (Hb), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), have been reported as prognostic markers in patients with malignant tumors. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between these markers and the local recurrence rate of GCTB. In total, 103 patients with GCTB who underwent surgery at the authors' institutions between 1993 and 2021 were included. Thirty patients experienced local recurrence. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that tumor site, preoperative and postoperative denosumab treatment, and surgery were significantly associated with local recurrence-free survival. LDH was associated with local recurrence-free survival on univariate analysis only. NLR, mGPS, PNI, LMR, and PLR score did not correlate with the local recurrence rate. In conclusion, NLR, mGPS, PNI, LMR, PLR score, Hb, ALP, and LDH levels are not correlated with the local recurrence rate of GCTB. However, due to the small number of patients included in this study, this result should be re-evaluated in a multicenter study with a larger sample size.

Prognostic Significance of a Novel Score Model Based on Preoperative Indicators in Patients with Breast Cancer Spine Metastases (BCSM)

Background

Surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for breast cancer spinal metastasis (BCSM) to relieve symptoms and improve the quality of life of BCSM patients. Therefore, it is important to effectively predict the prognosis of patients to determine whether they can undergo surgical operation. However, the prevalent methods for prognosis evaluation lack specificity and sensitivity for indicated malignancies like breast cancer because they are built on a relatively small number of heterogeneous types of primary tumors. The aim of the present study was to explore a novel predictive model based on the clinical, pathological and blood parameters obtained from BCSM patients before they received surgical intervention.

Methods

Altogether, 144 patients were included in this study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the significance of preoperative parameters and identify independent factors for prognostic prediction of BCSM. A nomogram for survival prediction was then established and validated. Time-dependent ROC (TDROC) curves were graphed to evaluate the accuracy of the novel model vs other scoring systems including Tomita Score, revised Tokuhashi Score, modified Bauer Score and New England Spinal Metastasis Score. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Independent factors, including preoperative postmenopausal (P=0.034), visceral metastasIs (P=0.021), preoperative Frankel Score (P=0.001), estrogen receptor status (P=0.014), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (P=0.012), lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (P<0.001) and albumin-globulin ratio (P=0.017), were selected into the nomogram model with the C-index of 0.834 (95% CI, 0.789–0.890). TDROC curves showed that the Changzheng Hospital (CZ) Score system had the best performance and exhibited the largest IAUC value in comparison with the other scoring systems.

Conclusion

We constructed a nomogram model known as CZ Score based on the significant factors to predict the prognosis for BCSM patients. The result showed that CZ Score had a better value for prognostic evaluation and surgical decision-making as compared with the other scoring systems.

Incidence, Management, and Outcomes of Spinal Giant Cell Tumor of Bone in Adult Patients: A National Cancer Database Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Giant cell tumors (GCTs) constitute 5% of all primary bone tumors with spinal GCTs (SGCTs) accounting for 2%-15% of all GCTs. The standard of care for SGCT has been maximal surgical resection. However, many adjuvant therapies have been used owing to the difficulty in achieving gross total resection combined with the high local recurrence rate. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the incidence, management, and outcomes of SGCT.

METHODS

Patients with diagnosis codes specific for SGCT were queried from the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2016. The outcomes were investigated using Cox univariate and multivariate regression analyses, and survival curves were generated for comparative visualization.

RESULTS

The search criteria identified 92 patients in the NCDB dataset from 2004 to 2016 with a diagnosis of SGCT. Of the 92 patients, 64.1% had undergone surgical intervention, 24.8% had received radiotherapy, and 15.2% had received immunotherapy. Univariate analysis revealed that age ≥55 years and tumor location in the sacrum/coccyx were associated with worsened overall survival (OS) and that surgical resection was associated with improved OS. On multivariate analysis, age 55-64 years was associated with worsened OS, and radical surgical resection was associated with improved OS. The survival analysis revealed improved OS with surgery but not with radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or immunotherapy.

CONCLUSION

SGCT is a rare primary bone tumor of the vertebral column. The standard of care has been surgical resection with the goal of gross total resection; however, adjuvant therapies have often been used. Our study found that surgical resection significantly improved OS and that immunotherapy neared significance in improving OS.

Clinical significance of traditional clinical parameters and inflammatory biomarkers for the prognosis of patients with spinal chondrosarcoma: a retrospective study of 150 patients in a single center

BACKGROUND

To investigate the clinical significance of five inflammatory biomarkers and conventional clinical parameters in prognostic prediction of spinal chondrosarcoma.

METHODS

Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate independent prognostic factors for recurrence and death of patients with spinal chondrosarcoma. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier curve, and differences were analyzed by log-rank test. The optimal cutoff values for NLR, PLR, LMR, and CAR were determined by X-tile program.

RESULTS

The optimal cutoff value for NLR, PLR, LMR, AGR, and CAR was 2.7, 200, 3.0, 1.5, and 0.2, respectively. Of the 150 patients included, recurrence was detected in 105 patients, and death occurred in 78 patients. Multivariate analysis indicated that Tomita I-III, total resection, and CAR < 0.2 were significantly associated with longer DFS. Meanwhile, preoperative Frankel score D-E, total resection, and CAR < 0.2 were favorable prognostic factors for OS. Subtype analysis showed that only total resection was an independent prognostic factor for DFS of recurrent spinal chondrosarcoma.

CONCLUSION

Total resection could significantly reduce the recurrence rate of spinal chondrosarcoma and improve OS of chondrosarcoma patients. Tomita classification I-III was a favorable factor for DFS, and preoperative Frankel score A-C was an adverse prognostic factor for OS. CAR was the most robust prognostic indicator with a discriminatory ability as compared with other inflammatory indicators. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Do routine blood test results help in the diagnosis of spine tumors? A retrospective study of the significance of pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios from 503 spine tumor patients

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) are not fully evaluated for the diagnosis of musculoskeletal tumors, especially spine tumors. The objective of our study was to assess the feasibility of NLR and PLR as indicators for pretreatment diagnosis of spine tumors.Patients who underwent surgical treatment in our hospital for spine tumors were retrospectively analyzed. Blood test results (neutrophil, lymphocyte, and platelet counts) and final pathological results from surgery or biopsy specimen were collected. Spine tumors were divided into 4 groups. Diagnostic values of NLR and PLR were analyzed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC).There were 503 patients included. The average age of all patients was 46.3 years. Age, NLR, and PLR were significantly different between benign and malignant tumors groups (P < .05), and ROC analysis showed that the AUC was 0.704 and 0.637 for NLR and PLR. Age, location, NLR, and PLR were significantly different between primary and nonprimary tumor groups (P < .05), and ROC analysis showed that the AUC was 0.713 and 0.647 for NLR and PLR. Age, location, NLR, and PLR were significantly different between primary benign and primary malignant tumor groups (P < .05), and ROC analysis showed that the AUC was 0.624 and 0.577 for NLR and PLR.Pretreatment NLR and PLR had clinical significance in the identification and pretreatment diagnosis of spine tumors. Additionally, NLR and PLR were significantly different between benign and malignant tumors, primary and nonprimary tumors, and primary benign and primary malignant tumors.

Establishment of a Nomogram-Based Model for Predicting the Prognostic Value of Inflammatory Biomarkers and Preoperative D-Dimer Level in Spinal Ewing's Sarcoma Family Tumors: A Retrospective Study of 83 Patients

BACKGROUND

Ewing's sarcoma family tumors (ESFTs) are the second most common malignancy in children and adolescents. The purpose of the present retrospective study was to evaluate the prognostic role of inflammatory biomarkers and preoperative D-dimer levels in patients with spinal ESFTs.

METHODS

The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, platelet/lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte/monocyte ratio, albumin/globulin ratio, C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR), preoperative D-dimer level, and clinical parameters were evaluated and analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were performed using the log-rank test and Cox regression analysis, respectively. The DFS and OS rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Nomograms were established to predict DFS and OS quantitatively.

RESULTS

The optimal cutoff values for D-dimer, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, platelet/lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte/monocyte ratio, CAR, and albumin/globulin ratio were 0.3, 3.2, 168, 2.2, 1.5, and 1.4, respectively. The patients were stratified into 2 groups according to the cutoff values. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, resection mode, and D-dimer level were favorable prognostic factors for DFS and OS (P < 0.05). Metastasis and CAR <1.5 were significantly associated with OS (P < 0.05). Nomograms with all significant factors were established to predict DFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results have indicated that the preoperative D-dimer level is an effective prognostic factor with discriminatory ability for DFS and OS, superior to other indicators. Also, CAR was favorable prognostic factor for OS. Nomograms of DFS and OS can be recommended as practical models to evaluate the prognosis for patients with spinal ESFTs.