Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients without indications of lymph node metastasis not benefit from lymph node dissection

Is routine lymph node dissection recommended for liver resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

This meta-analysis aimed to elucidate the therapeutic effects of routine lymph node dissection (LND) with liver resection on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

METHODS

Databases, including MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched to identify studies comparing LND and non-LND for ICC liver resection. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS), in-hospital morbidity, blood loss, and R0 rate.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies involving 4407 patients were included. The OS did not differ between the LND (n = 2158) and non-LND (n = 2249) groups (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.83-1.32). The secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups. Subgroup analyses stratified by the risk of bias showed a significant difference in OS between the high- and low-risk groups (P = 0.0008). In the low-risk group, LND (vs. non-LND) was associated with superior OS (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.98). Most studies in low-risk groups involved patients who were clinically node-negative.

CONCLUSIONS

The therapeutic effects of routine LND for ICC have not been demonstrated. However, LND had a positive impact on OS in studies with a low risk of bias, thus suggesting that there may be a subset of ICC patients who would benefit from LND.

A case of rapidly progressing sarcomatous intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with suddenly appearing lymph node metastasis

BACKGROUND

The sarcomatous variant of carcinoma is relatively rare in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Sarcomatous ICC (SICC) is associated with a poorer prognosis compared with ICC. SICC is rarely diagnosed before surgery due to non-descriptive findings; it progresses rapidly, resulting in miserable prognosis. Here, we report a case of rapidly progressing SICC that showed a clinically significant tumor growth rate.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 77-year-old woman who had undergone ileocecal resection for cecal cancer 5 years previously was found to have elevated levels of the tumor marker carbohydrate antigen 19-9. Although an abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan did not detect any liver mass lesions until 3 months before this serum examination, the subsequent CT scan revealed a hypodensity 20 mm mass lesion in the right anterior section. Contrast-enhanced CT and magnetic resonance imaging revealed peripheral enhancement in the arterial-to-equilibrium phase. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography revealed uptake in the lesion. None of the imaging modalities showed lymph node swelling or distant metastases. She underwent hepatectomy under the diagnosis of ICC or an atypical metastasis from previous cecal cancer. Although preoperative images showed no suspicious lymph node metastasis 3 weeks prior, the hilar lymph node swelled 3 cm and contained adenocarcinoma. Consequently, the patient underwent right anterior sectionectomy and lymph node dissection of the hepatoduodenal ligament. Histopathological examination revealed that the liver tumor was a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with sarcomatous pattern. While the patient received adjuvant gemcitabine and S-1 therapy, lymph node metastasis appeared in the mediastinum 13 months after the surgery. She received gemcitabine + cisplatin + S-1 therapy but died 20 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

SICC and lymph node metastasis clinically appeared within 3 months and 3 weeks, respectively. Suspected ICC that rapidly progresses should be considered SICC and treated with early resection. SICC is often missed in clinical diagnosis and has a poor prognosis, even after curative resection. While an alternative strategy involving preoperative biopsy and neoadjuvant therapy may be beneficial, it should be approached with discretion due to the potential risks of tumor progression and peritoneal dissemination.

Role of routine lymph node dissection alongside resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The global incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA) is soaring. Due to often delayed presentation, only a narrow spectrum of the disease is usually surgically resectable. To more accurately stage the disease, reduce recurrence, and improve overall survival, surgical teams are increasingly performing intraoperative lymph node dissection (LND) as well. This procedure has its associated morbidity, while there is no consensus or formal guidelines on its role in this setting. Hence, there is a need to better delineate the evidence for performing LND alongside surgical resection of the ICCA.

AIM

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the role of LND in improving prognostication and survival post-resection of ICCA.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search using Pubmed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, for all studies involving LND, ICCA, and surgical resection using several keywords, Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) tags, and appropriate synonyms. All clinical studies comparing curative intent resection of ICCA with LND vs resection without LND were included, while single-arm case series, studies with insufficient data, and duplicates were excluded. We included all English-language studies from the different academic databases up till early December 2022. The primary outcome measures were set for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

This systematic review and meta-analysis included 15 studies that fulfilled the selection criteria comprising 11413 patients with surgically-resectable ICCA, of whom 6424 (56.3%) underwent hepatectomy with LND while the remainder underwent hepatectomy only. In patients who underwent LND, on average, 27.7% of the resected lymph nodes were positive for metastatic disease. Overall, the results showed that performing LND did not significantly improve OS or DFS. However, the effect of LND on OS showed a degree of variability by geographical region, in Eastern and Western countries. As LND is increasingly being performed, further time-based analysis was undertaken to identify time-dependent changes in the role of LND. An increasing adoption of LND was not associated with improved OS. Furthermore, no roles were identified for neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy or increasing lymph node retrieval in improving OS either.

CONCLUSION

LND might aid in staging, prognosticating, and deciding further management of resected ICCA, but does not improve OS and DFS and is unsuitable for high-risk patients unlikely to benefit from further treatments.

Survival benefit of adequate lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing liver resection for clinically node-negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Lymph-nodal status is an important predictor of survival in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA), but the need to perform lymphadenectomy in patients with clinically node-negative (cN0) iCCA is still under debate. The aim of this study was to determine whether adequate lymphadenectomy improves long-term outcomes in patients undergoing liver resection for cN0 iCCA.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study on consecutive patients who underwent radical liver resection for cN0 iCCA at five tertiary referral centers. A propensity score based on preoperative data was calculated and used to generate stabilized inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW). Overall and recurrence-free survival of patients undergoing adequate (≥6 retrieved lymph nodes) vs. inadequate lymphadenectomy were compared. Interactions between adequacy of lymphadenectomy and clinical variables of interest were explored through Cox IPTW regression.

RESULTS

The study includes 706 patients who underwent curative surgery for cN0 iCCA. Four-hundred and seventeen (59.1%) received adequate lymphadenectomy. After a median follow-up of 33 months (IQR 18-77), median overall survival was 39 months (IQR 23-109) and median recurrence-free survival was 23 months (IQR 8-74). After stratification according to nodal status at final pathology, node-positive patients had longer overall survival (28 vs. 23 months; hazard ratio 1.82; 95% CI 1.14-2.90; p = 0.023) and disease-free survival (13 vs. 9 months; hazard ratio 1.35; 95% CI 1.14-1.59; p = 0.008) after adequate lymphadenectomy. Adequate lymphadenectomy significantly improved survival outcomes in patients without chronic liver disease, and in patients with less-advanced tumors (solitary tumors, tumor size <5 cm, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 <200 U/ml).

CONCLUSIONS

Adequate lymphadenectomy provided better survival outcomes for patients with cN0 iCCA who were found to be node-positive at pathology, supporting the routine use of adequate lymphadenectomy for cN0 iCCA.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

Lymphadenectomy is essential for the surgical staging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). While its role in patients with preoperative suspicion of nodal metastases is implicit, the impact of lymphadenectomy on survival of patients with clinically node-negative (cN0) disease is still under debate. In this large retrospective study on patients who underwent surgical resection for cN0 iCCA, we show that adequate lymphadenectomy (i.e. retrieving ≥6 lymph nodes) significantly improves survival and lowers the risk of tumor recurrence. Lymphadenectomy during surgical resection of iCCA is actually underperformed by the surgical community, resulting in inadequate staging and possibly worse long-term outcomes. The results of this study should empower surgeons and clinicians to push for adequate lymphadenectomy even for cN0 iCCA. Since patients with no chronic liver disease and with less-advanced tumors receive a significant benefit from lymphadenectomy, our results might guide decision making in patients at high-risk of postoperative complications.

Dynamic evaluation of postoperative survival in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients who did not undergo lymphadenectomy: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients who did not undergo lymphadenectomy is difficult to assess. This study aims to have a dynamic evaluation on the postoperative survival of ICC patients by calculating conditional survival.

METHODS

Relevant data were from patients treated in 12 large-scale hospitals from December 2011 to December 2017. The influence of relevant clinical baseline data on the prognosis of ICC patients was analyzed by Cox regression. Conditional survival (CS) is a method that may predict the prognostic probability dynamically. For a patient with x years of survival, the 1-year CS (CS1) may be calculated as CS1= OS(x + 1)/OS(x).

RESULT

A total of 361 patients who met the criteria were included in the study. Conditional survival (CS) means that the patients' prognosis varies with survival time, meanwhile, relevant factors affecting the prognosis have a time-varying effect. The probability of survival assessed by CS1 increased year by year and the 1,2,3-year survival improved from 68.4% to 87.8%, while the postoperative actuarial OS decreased from 69.4% at 1 years to 36.9% at 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of CS, the estimated survival for ICC varies with the increase of survival time after excision. Patients who live longer were likely to live longer. At the same time, with the passage of time, the role of the original adverse factors of the tumor would gradually decrease. Conditional survival allows a more accurate assessment of ICC patients who did not undergo lymphadenectomy.

Effect of lymph node resection on prognosis of resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of lymph node dissection in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

Methods

The literature from January 2009 to December 2021 was searched to determine the comparative study of lymph node dissection and non-lymph node dissection in patients with ICC.

Results

Seventeen studies were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OR = 0.80, p = 0.10; OR = 0.93, p = 0.71; OR = 0.80, p = 0.21) and 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival (OR = 0.89, p = 0.73; OR = 0.92, p = 0.81; OR = 0.85, p = 0.62).

Conclusions

Lymph node dissection does not seem to have a positive effect on the overall survival and disease-free survival.

Predicting prognosis and evaluating the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy depending on the tumor location in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: focusing on the involvement of below 2nd bile duct confluence

Purpose

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) has various characteristics according to anatomical, histologic classifications, and its prognoses are different. This study aimed to compare oncologic outcomes according to tumor location (second bile duct confluence) and evaluate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

Clinical data of 318 patients who underwent curative resection for ICC was reviewed. Central type ICC (C-ICC) and peripheral type ICC (P-ICC) were defined when the tumor invades the intrahepatic secondary biliary confluence and when located more peripherally, respectively.

Results

A larger tumor size, higher rate of elevated CA 19-9 level, vascular invasion, R1 resection, advanced T stage, and lymph node metastasis were found in C-ICC. C-ICC had poorer overall survival (median, 33 months vs. 58 months; P = 0.001), and the difference was more prominent in the early stage. C-ICC had a higher recurrence rate (68.7% vs. 55.1%, P = 0.014); otherwise, there was no difference in the recurrence patterns. There were no survival benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy in the entire cohort, but there were benefits in advanced stages (T3–4, N1 stage), especially in C-ICC.

Conclusion

C-ICC has more aggressive tumor characteristics and poor survival compared to P-ICC. Adjuvant chemotherapy seems to have survival benefits in the advanced stages, especially in the central type.

The new insight of treatment in Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a relatively rare malignant tumor originating from the bile duct epithelial cells, and it is one of the malignant tumors with fast growth in incidence and death rate in recent years. CCA carries a very poor prognosis due to a typically late clinical presentation and a poor response to current therapeutics. Currently, surgery is the only possible curative treatment, radiotherapy and chemotherapy also play an important role in slowing down disease progression, while targeted therapy and immunotherapy are changing with each passing day and their combined effect may have great potential for the treatment of CCA; Clinical trials of various treatment options for CCA are also being conducted. This article reviews the different treatment options for CCA and explores the adjuvant treatment for it from a new perspective. In the future, the goal of treatment should be multiple and combined for different CCA patients to achieve individualized programs and improve overall survival.

The role of lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A review

Cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary tumor of the liver. The incidence and mortality of its intrahepatic form has been increasing over the past 2 decades. Currently, the only available curative treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is surgical resection. There is still no prospective evidence to support neoadjuvant systemic treatments in resectable disease, while adjuvant chemotherapy with Capecitabine is currently the only recommended systemic treatment after liver resection based on the results of randomised trial. Despite the implementation of perioperative treatments and improvements in resective surgery, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma remains a disease characterized by high incidence of recurrence and poor long-term survival. Lymph node metastases can be found in 45-65% of patients and are one of the most impacting prognostic factors after surgical resection. Preoperative imaging is not always sufficient in assessing lymph node status, thus hepatic pedicle lymphadenectomy can be important to ensure precise staging in surgical patients. An increasing trend in performing lymph node dissection during liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma has been observed in the last 20 years, although its actual efficacy compared to the potential complications remains debated. The current evidence on the prognostic role of the lymph node status, its preoperative predictability, the basis for a correct hepatic pedicle lymphadenectomy and its prognostic role in the surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma are presented.

The clinical value of regional lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore the clinical value of lymph node dissection (LND) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

METHODS

Clinical and pathological data were collected from 147 ICC patients who attended two tertiary centers over the past 5 years. The patients were classified into two groups: the LND group (group A) and the no-performance LND (NLND) group (group B). Clinical and pathological parameters were compared between the two groups to analyze the impact of LND on the long-term survival time of ICC patients.

RESULTS

Of the 147 patients, 54.4% (80) received LND and 42.5% (34/80) of these were found to have lymph node metastasis (LNM). LND did not increase postoperative complications (27.5%, P = 0.354), but postoperative hospital stays were longer (12.2 ± 6.3 d, P = 0.005) in group A compared with group B (20.9%, 9.5 ± 3.5 d). The 5-year survival rates of groups A and B are almost similar (21% vs 29%, P = 0.905). The overall survival rate of cN0 (diagnosis obtained by imaging) is better than pN1 (diagnosis obtained by histopathology), but lower than pN0 (all P < 0.05). Compared with NLND, the median survival time of LND patients with T1 has not significantly improved (29.3 vs 35.1 months, P = 0.762), but the patients with T2-4 has been significantly increased (29.0 vs 17.1 months, P = 0.040). Elevated CA19-9 level (HR = 1.764, 95% CI: 1.113-2.795, P = 0.016), vascular invasion (HR = 2.697, 95% CI: 1.103-6.599, P = 0.030), and T category (HR = 1.848, 95% CI: 1.059-3.224, P = 0.031) were independent risk factors for poor long-term survival time of the ICC patients (all P values < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ICC patients with cN0 may have LNM, and the long-term survival time of LNM patients is usually poor. We suggest that patients with ICC may require routine LND, especially those with T2-4 category.

Current Surgical Management of Peri-Hilar and Intra-Hepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma accounts for approximately 10% of all hepatobiliary tumors and represents 3% of all new-diagnosed malignancies worldwide. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (i-CCA) accounts for 10% of all cases, perihilar (h-CCA) cholangiocarcinoma represents two-thirds of the cases, while distal cholangiocarcinoma accounts for the remaining quarter. Originally described by Klatskin in 1965, h-CCA represents one of the most challenging tumors for hepatobiliary surgeons, mainly because of the anatomical vascular relationships of the biliary confluence at the hepatic hilum. Surgery is the only curative option, with the goal of a radical, margin-negative (R0) tumor resection. Continuous efforts have been made by hepatobiliary surgeons in order to achieve R0 resections, leading to the progressive development of aggressive approaches that include extended hepatectomies, associating liver partition, and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy, pre-operative portal vein embolization, and vascular resections. i-CCA is an aggressive biliary cancer that arises from the biliary epithelium proximal to the second-degree bile ducts. The incidence of i-CCA is dramatically increasing worldwide, and surgical resection is the only potentially curative therapy. An aggressive surgical approach, including extended liver resection and vascular reconstruction, and a greater application of systemic therapy and locoregional treatments could lead to an increase in the resection rate and the overall survival in selected i-CCA patients. Improvements achieved over the last two decades and the encouraging results recently reported have led to liver transplantation now being considered an appropriate indication for CCA patients.

Comparison of ICC patients with hepatitis B infection to those with no major risk factors for HCC

BACKGROUND

There has been renewed interest in HBV-associated ICC, because it could share a common carcinogenesis disease process with HCC. We investigated whether there is a difference in clinical outcome between ICC patients with HBV infection and those without any major risk factors for HCC.

METHODS

A total of 253 curatively resected, surgically diagnosed ICC patients were analyzed and divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of major risk factors for HCC: an HBV group (n = 45) and a non-HCC-risk (NHR) group (n = 208).

RESULTS

Lymph node metastasis was more frequently observed in the NHR group (HBV vs. NHR: 8.89% vs. 24.52%, P = 0.027). Patients in the HBV group demonstrated more favorable survival than those in the NHR group. However, this difference was not statistically significant (5-year survival rate, 54.7% vs. 42.3%, P = 0.128). Cumulative recurrence rate in the HBV group was 62.2%, which was not significantly different from 63.0% in the NHR group (P = 1.000).

CONCLUSION

This study found that while ICC patients with HBV infection showed some favorable tumor characteristics, patients' stage-specific survival and recurrence rates were not significantly different compared to those without any major risk factors for HCC.

Recommended Minimal Number of Harvested Lymph Nodes for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lymph node (LN) metastasis is one factor indicating a poor prognosis after radical surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Although several guidelines have recommended that LN dissection be strongly considered at the time of ICC surgery, no clear evidence regarding the appropriate number of harvested LNs has been established. Thus, we aimed to identify the minimum number of harvested LNs required for ICC by using a Bayesian Weibull model.

METHODS

Data from 142 patients who underwent radical hepatectomy (R0) for ICC from January 2000 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. A Bayesian Weibull model was developed to analyze the effect of number of harvested LNs on survival of patients without (N0; n = 71) and with (N1; n = 71) metastatic nodes. We also compared the percentage of N1 patients (i.e., the N1 rate) in each of the five subgroups categorized according to the number of harvested LNs (1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16, and ≥ 17).

RESULTS

In patients with 5 or more harvested LNs, the hazard ratio (HR) for LN metastasis was above the reference line (the HR with 5 harvested LNs, 1.95 (1.09-3.45)). The N1 rate of the 1-4 harvested LNs subgroup was lower than that of the other subgroups (e.g., 1-4 vs. 5-8; 16.1% vs. 39.4%, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that at least 5 LNs should be harvested in patients who undergo radical surgery for ICC to promote accurate staging.

Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Dissection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Patients With Clinically Negative Lymph Node Metastasis: A Multi-Center Study From China

Background

The clinical value of lymph-node dissection (LND) for intrahepatic carcinoma (ICC) patients with clinically negative lymph node metastasis (LNM) remains unclear; hence we conducted a multi-center study to explore it.

Methods

Patients who were diagnosed ICC with clinically negative LNM and underwent hepatectomy with or without LND from December 2012 to December 2015 were retrospectively collected from 12 hepatobiliary centers in China. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method, and then subgroup analysis was conducted stratified by variables related to the prognosis.

Results

A total of 380 patients were eligible including 106 (27.9%) in the LND group and 274 (72.1%) in the non-LND group. Median OS in the LND group was slightly longer than that in the non-LND group (24.0 vs. 18.0 months, P = 0.30), but a significant difference was observed between the two groups (24.0 vs. 14.0 months, P = 0.02) after a well-designed 1:1 propensity score matching without increased severe complications. And, LND was identified to be one of the independent risk factors of OS (HR = 0.66, 95%CI = 0.46–0.95, P = 0.025). Subgroup analysis in the matched cohort showed that patients could benefit more from LND if they were male, age <60 years, had no HBV infection, with ECOG score <2, CEA ≤5 ug/L, blood loss ≤400 ml, transfusion, major hepatectomy, resection margin ≥1 cm, tumor size >5 cm, single tumor, mass-forming, no satellite, no MVI, and no perineural invasion (all P < 0.05). Furthermore, only patients with pathologically confirmed positive LNM were found to benefit from postoperative adjuvant therapy (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

With the current data, we concluded that LND would benefit the selected ICC patients with clinically negative LNM and might guide the postoperative management.

Abdominal and pelvic 18F-FDG PET/MR: a review of current and emerging oncologic applications

Positron emission tomography (PET) using fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MR) is an emerging hybrid modality that has shown utility in evaluating abdominal and pelvic disease entities. Together, the high soft tissue contrast and metabolic/functional imaging capabilities make this modality ideal for oncologic imaging in many organ systems. Its clinical utility continues to evolve and future research will help solidify its role in oncologic imaging. In this manuscript, we aim to (1) provide an overview of the various PET/MR systems, describing the strengths and weaknesses of each system, and (2) review the oncologic applications for ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR in the abdomen and pelvis.

Hybrid imaging of the abdomen and pelvis

Accurate imaging is crucial for lesion detection in abdominal organs, for the noninvasive characterization of focal and diffuse abnormalities, and for surgical planning. To accomplish these tasks, several imaging modalities such as multidetector computer tomography (MDCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) are used for abdominal imaging, providing important morphological, functional or metabolic information. More recently, PET/MRI has been gaining attention due to the possibility of combining high-resolution imaging with metabolic imaging. PET/MRI is a novel hybrid imaging technology that in the near future might play a pivotal role in the clinical management of oncologic and inflammatory abdominopelvic diseases. Despite the still limited number of published clinical studies, PET/MRI has been proven to be at least equivalent to PET/CT and to standalone MRI in a variety of oncologic disease. Moreover, in selected and focused clinical studies, it has been proven to outperform current standard of care imaging, for example, in evaluating cholangiocarcinomas, liver metastases, untreated and treated rectal cancer. This has also had an impact on therapeuticmanagement in some studies. Therefore in some institutions, including those of the authors, PET/MRI is becoming the new standard imaging modality in staging treatment-naïve intrahepatic massforming cholangiocarcinomas and prior to complicated hepatic surgery.

[Hybrid imaging of the abdomen and pelvis. German version]

Accurate imaging is crucial for lesion detection in abdominal organs, for the noninvasive characterization of focal and diffuse abnormalities, and for surgical planning. To accomplish these tasks, several imaging modalities such as multidetector computer tomography (MDCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) are used for abdominal imaging, providing important morphological, functional or metabolic information. More recently, PET/MRI has been gaining attention due to the possibility of combining high-resolution imaging with metabolic imaging. PET/MRI is a novel hybrid imaging technology that in the near future might play a pivotal role in the clinical management of oncologic and inflammatory abdominopelvic diseases. Despite the still limited number of published clinical studies, PET/MRI has been proven to be at least equivalent to PET/CT and to stand-alone MRI in a variety of oncologic disease. Moreover, in selected and focused clinical studies, it has been proven to outperform current standard of care imaging, for example, in evaluating cholangiocarcinomas, liver metastases, untreated and treated rectal cancer. This has also had an impact on therapeutic management in some studies. Therefore in some institutions, including those of the authors, PET/MRI is becoming the new standard imaging modality in staging treatment-naïve intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinomas and prior to complicated hepatic surgery.

The Relationship Between Lymphangiogenesis and Liver Regeneration After Partial Hepatectomy in Cholestatic Mice

Background: The mechanisms of lymphangiogenesis in the cholestatic liver after partial hepatectomy (PH) remain unclear. We aimed to demonstrate the relationship between lymphangiogenesis and liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy in the cholestatic liver. Methods and Results: C57BL/6 mice were subjected to 70% partial hepatectomy only (PH group, n = 20) and 70% partial hepatectomy with temporary common bile duct (BD) obstruction by clipping (BD+PH group, n = 20). Five mice per group were sacrificed at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days after the procedure. The liver function was examined by blood tests, and the liver regeneration rate was assessed by body weight and liver weight. Immunohistochemical staining of lymphatic vessel endothelial hyaluronan receptor-1 (LYVE-1) showed liver lymphangiogenesis. The gene expression of lymphangiogenesis-associated factors (e.g., vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 [VEGFR-3]) was examined by a real-time polymerase chain reaction. The liver function in the BD+PH group was worse than that in the PH group on postoperative day 1 (POD1) (aspartate aminotransferase: 6528 ± 1641 U/L vs. 2741 ± 368 U/L, p < 0.05, alanine aminotransferase: 4160 ± 1255 U/L vs. 2315 ± 357 U/L, total bilirubin: 1.36 ± 1.16 mg/dL vs. 0.09 ± 0.01 mg/dL), and the liver regeneration rate in the BD+PH group was worse on POD7 (4.57% vs. 5.91%, p < 0.05). The LYVE-1 expression in Glisson's capsule peaked on POD5 and POD7 in the PH and BD+PH groups, respectively. The peak gene expression of VEGFR-3 in the BD+PH group was delayed in comparison with the PH group. Conclusions: Lymphangiogenesis after partial hepatectomy in the cholestatic liver was suggested to be delayed due to impaired liver regeneration and the late expression of VEGFR-3.

Postoperative adjuvant therapy following radical resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A multicenter retrospective study

Background and Aims

The prognosis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) after radical resection is far from satisfactory; however, the clinical value of adjuvant therapy (AT) remains controversial. This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of AT and identify potential patients who would be benefited from AT.

Methods

Data from ICC patients who underwent radical resection were retrospectively collected from 12 hepatobiliary centers in China between December 2012 and December 2015. Patients were divided into AT and non‐AT groups based on whether AT was administered or not. Overall survival (OS) and disease‐free survival (DFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan‐Meier method before and after 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM). Subgroup analyses were conducted based on the established staging systems.

Results

A total of 412 patients were enrolled in this study, and 77 patients (18.9%) received AT, including 32 (7.8%) patients who received transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), 21 (5.1%) patients who received chemotherapy, 10 (2.4%) patients who received radiotherapy, and 14 (3.4%) patients who received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The median OS and DFS were both longer in the AT group than in the non‐AT group (43.0 months vs 21.0 months, P = .015; 16.0 months vs 11.0 months, P = .045, respectively), and the advantage of AT was confirmed for both the OS and DFS (P = .023; P = .046, respectively) after 1:2 PSM. Furthermore, based on the established nomogram, only “middle‐risk” patients receiving AT cherished a longer median OS (43.0 months vs 20.0 months, P = .033). In subgroup analyses that were stratified by different AT strategies, patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy had a longer median OS (37.0 months vs 21.0 months, P = .039), while patients receiving postoperative TACE had a longer median DFS (50.0 months vs 11.0 months, P = .007).

Conclusion

With the current data, we conclude that AT benefits ICC patients following radical resection, especially those “middle‐risk” patients, as evaluated by the established nomogram. However, exactly which patients are the most suitable for AT requires further study and validation.

Liver resection and transplantation for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

The incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is increasing worldwide. Although several advances have been made in the past decades to better understand this complex malignancy and to develop new treatment strategies, the prognosis of iCCA remains dismal. Liver resection (LR) is the mainstay of treatment but only a minority of patients are amenable to surgery. In most cases, patients with iCCA will require a major hepatectomy for complete resection of the tumour. This may be contraindicated or increase the surgical burden in patients with chronic liver disease and small remnant liver volume. Lymphadenectomy with a minimal harvest of 6 lymph nodes is considered adequate, as microscopic nodal metastases have been shown in more than 40% of patients. Current 5-year overall survival following LR is in the range of 25%-40%. For locally advanced disease not amenable to upfront LR, neoadjuvant locoregional therapies may be used with the aim of converting these patients to resectability or even to transplantation in well-selected cases. Recent studies have shown that liver transplantation (LT) might be a treatment option for patients with unresectable very-early iCCA (i.e. ≤2 cm), with survival outcomes comparable to those of hepatocellular carcinoma. In patients with unresectable, advanced tumours, confined to the liver who achieve sustained response to neoadjuvant treatment, LT may be considered an option within prospective protocols. The role of adjuvant therapies in iCCA is still under debate. Herein, we review the recent advances in the surgical treatment of iCCA and examine its correlation with locoregional therapies, adjuvant and neo-adjuvant strategies.

Redefining the T1 category of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A SEER database analysis

The T1 tumor category is further divided into T1a (≤5 cm) and T1b (>5 cm) by tumor size in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between tumor size and prognosis in patients with T1 ICC. The data regarding patients with ICC was downloaded from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between January 2004 and December 2013, at the time of first diagnosis and entered into the database. Demographic and pathological characteristics of patients were analyzed using an independent t-test and χ² test. Overall survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis; the cut-off point for tumor size was determined using the X-tile software. A total of 407 patients with ICC were selected from the analysis, including 199 cases with stage IA and 208 cases with stage IB tumors. The independent prognostic factors for patients with stage IA ICC were age and surgery. Independent prognostic factors for patients with stage IB ICC included age, surgery (yes vs. no) and tumor size (5-7 vs. ≥7 cm). The optimal cut-off value for tumor size was determined to be ~7 cm using X-tile software. Tumor size with a cut-off value of 7 cm could stratify patients by risk better than a value of 5 cm [hazard ratio (HR), 1.775; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.356-2.323 and; HR, 1.402; 95% CI, 1.078-1.824, respectively]. This suggests that the T1 tumor category should be subclassified into T1a and T1b with a cut-off of 7 cm rather than 5 cm. The next edition of the AJCC staging system may take the present evidence into consideration for improvement regarding the accurate staging of ICC.

Prognostic value of lymphadenectomy for long-term outcomes in node-negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Lymphadenectomy ensures accurate staging for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, especially for those without preoperatively suspected positive lymph nodes (clinically node-negative); however, its prognostic value has been poorly documented. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of lymphadenectomy on long-term outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for clinically node-negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

Data from all patients who underwent liver resection with or without lymphadenectomy for preoperatively diagnosed intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma between 2000 and 2016 at 3 tertiary hepatobiliary centers were analyzed retrospectively. Propensity score matching in a 1:1 ratio was conducted based on clinically relevant covariates between patients with clinically node-negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who underwent liver resection with (LND group) and without (NLND group) lymphadenectomy. Overall survival and disease-free survival were compared in the matched cohort.

RESULTS

Among 350 patients who underwent surgery during the study period, 192 (55%) with clinically node-negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma met the inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching, 2 well-balanced groups of 56 patients each were analyzed. There was no significant difference regarding postoperative variables among these 112 matched patients. Patients who underwent a liver resection with lymphadenectomy achieved better 3- and 5-year overall survival (78% and 65% vs 52% and 46%, P = .017) and disease-free survival (46% and 34% vs 31% and 31%; P = .042) compared with patients who underwent liver resection without lymphadenectomy.

CONCLUSION

Lymphadenectomy can be associated with better long-term outcomes in patients with node-negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Our data may support routine lymphadenectomy for node-negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with the objective of achieving better long-term outcomes.

Enhanced plasma miR-142-5p promotes the progression of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma via targeting PTEN

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the expression and specific role of microRNA (miR)-142-5p in the progression of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction was performed to evaluate miR-142-5p expression in patients with ICC and healthy control subjects. The results revealed that plasma miR-142-5p was significantly increased in patients with ICC compared with the control group. Furthermore, miR-142-5p was also increased in ICC tissues compared with adjacent non-neoplastic tissues. Compared with patients with Ta-T1 stage ICC, miR-142-5p was significantly elevated in patients with ICC ≥T2 stage. Patients with ICC at G3 stage had much higher plasma miR-142-5p levels compared with those at G1/2 stage. Receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that miR-142-5p could be used as a biomarker to differentiate patients with ICC from healthy controls. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that plasma miR-142-5p was negatively correlated with survival in patients with ICC. A dual luciferase reporter assay indicated that miR-142-5p significantly suppressed the relative luciferase activity of pmirGLO-PTEN-3' untranslated region compared with the control group. In summary, the results of the present study provide novel data indicating that plasma miR-142-5p is significantly upregulated in patients with ICC. miR-142-5p may therefore have potential as a biomarker for screening patients with ICC from healthy controls.

The prognostic significance of pretreatment serum γ-glutamyltranspeptidase in primary liver cancer: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Aim: To assess the prognostic value of the pretreatment serum γ-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT) level in patients with primary liver cancer (PLC). Methods: Relevant studies were systematically searched online on Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase databases published until 9 October 2018. The end points were overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Meta-analysis was conducted using hazard ratio (HR), and its 95% confidence interval (CI) as effect measure. Results: A total of 33 eligible studies with 9238 patients with PLC were included in this meta-analysis. The synthesized analysis showed that that higher serum GGT level was significantly related to poorer OS (HR: 1.79, 95% CI: 1.66–1.93, P<0.01), RFS (HR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.46–1.77, P<0.01), and DFS (HR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.33–1.73, P<0.01) of patients with PLC. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that the negative prognostic impact of higher serum GGT level on OS and RFS was still of significance regardless of ethnicity, pathological type, sample size, cut-off value, first-line treatment, and analysis type. Conclusion: The pretreatment serum GGT might be a predictive factor of poor prognosis for PLC patients.