1
|
Friedemann M, Jandeck C, Tautz L, Gutewort K, von Rein L, Sukocheva O, Fuessel S, Menschikowski M. Blood-Based DNA Methylation Analysis by Multiplexed OBBPA-ddPCR to Verify Indications for Prostate Biopsies in Suspected Prostate Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1324. [PMID: 38611002 PMCID: PMC11010987 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Current prostate carcinoma (PCa) biomarkers, including total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA), have unsatisfactory diagnostic sensitivity and specificity resulting in overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Previously, we described an optimised bias-based preamplification-digital droplet PCR (OBBPA-ddPCR) technique, which detects tumour DNA in blood-derived cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of cancer patients. The current study investigated the performance of newly developed OBBPA-ddPCR-based biomarkers. Blood plasma samples from healthy individuals (n = 90, controls) and PCa (n = 39) and benign prostatic hyperplasia patients (BPH, n = 40) were analysed. PCa and BPH patients had tPSA values within a diagnostic grey area of 2-15 ng/mL, for whom further diagnostic validation is most crucial. Methylation levels of biomarkers RASSF1A, MIR129-2, NRIP3, and SOX8 were found significantly increased in PCa patients compared to controls. By combining classical PCa risk factors (percentage of free PSA compared to tPSA (QfPSA) and patient's age) with cfDNA-based biomarkers, we developed PCa risk scores with improved sensitivity and specificity compared to established tPSA and QfPSA single-marker analyses. The diagnostic specificity was increased to 70% with 100% sensitivity for clinically significant PCa patients. Thus, prostate biopsies could be avoided for 28 out of 40 BPH patients. In conclusion, the newly developed risk scores may help to confirm the clinical decision and prevent unnecessary prostate biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Friedemann
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (C.J.); (K.G.); (L.v.R.)
| | - Carsten Jandeck
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (C.J.); (K.G.); (L.v.R.)
| | - Lars Tautz
- Joint Practice of Urology “Am Blauen Wunder”, Schillerplatz 2, 01309 Dresden, Germany
| | - Katharina Gutewort
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (C.J.); (K.G.); (L.v.R.)
| | - Lisa von Rein
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (C.J.); (K.G.); (L.v.R.)
| | - Olga Sukocheva
- Department of Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Port Rd., Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia;
| | - Susanne Fuessel
- Clinic of Urology, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany;
| | - Mario Menschikowski
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (C.J.); (K.G.); (L.v.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sukocheva OA, Lukina E, Friedemann M, Menschikowski M, Hagelgans A, Aliev G. The crucial role of epigenetic regulation in breast cancer anti-estrogen resistance: Current findings and future perspectives. Semin Cancer Biol 2022; 82:35-59. [PMID: 33301860 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2020] [Revised: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) cell de-sensitization to Tamoxifen (TAM) or other selective estrogen receptor (ER) modulators (SERM) is a complex process associated with BC heterogeneity and the transformation of ER signalling. The most influential resistance-related mechanisms include modifications in ER expression and gene regulation patterns. During TAM/SERM treatment, epigenetic mechanisms can effectively silence ER expression and facilitate the development of endocrine resistance. ER status is efficiently regulated by specific epigenetic tools including hypermethylation of CpG islands within ER promoters, increased histone deacetylase activity in the ER promoter, and/or translational repression by miRNAs. Over-methylation of the ER α gene (ESR1) promoter by DNA methyltransferases was associated with poor prognosis and indicated the development of resistance. Moreover, BC progression and spreading were marked by transformed chromatin remodelling, post-translational histone modifications, and expression of specific miRNAs and/or long non-coding RNAs. Therefore, targeted inhibition of histone acetyltransferases (e.g. MYST3), deacetylases (e.g. HDAC1), and/or demethylases (e.g. lysine-specific demethylase LSD1) was shown to recover and increase BC sensitivity to anti-estrogens. Indicated as a powerful molecular instrument, the administration of epigenetic drugs can regain ER expression along with the activation of tumour suppressor genes, which can in turn prevent selection of resistant cells and cancer stem cell survival. This review examines recent advances in the epigenetic regulation of endocrine drug resistance and evaluates novel anti-resistance strategies. Underlying molecular mechanisms of epigenetic regulation will be discussed, emphasising the utilization of epigenetic enzymes and their inhibitors to re-program irresponsive BCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga A Sukocheva
- Discipline of Health Sciences, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042, Australia.
| | - Elena Lukina
- Discipline of Biology, College of Sciences, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, 5042, Australia
| | - Markus Friedemann
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital `Carl Gustav Carus`, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden 01307, Germany
| | - Mario Menschikowski
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital `Carl Gustav Carus`, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden 01307, Germany
| | - Albert Hagelgans
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Hospital `Carl Gustav Carus`, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden 01307, Germany
| | - Gjumrakch Aliev
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, 119991, Russia; Institute of Physiologically Active Compounds, Russian Academy of Sciences, Chernogolovka, 142432, Russia; Federal State Budgetary Institution «Research Institute of Human Morphology», 3, Tsyurupy Str., Moscow, 117418, Russian Federation; GALLY International Research Institute, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Challenges in promoter methylation analysis in the new era of translational oncology: a focus on liquid biopsy. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis 2022; 1868:166390. [PMID: 35296416 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2022.166390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Toward the discovery of novel reliable biomarkers, epigenetic alterations have been repeatedly proposed for the diagnosis and the development of therapeutic strategies against cancer. Indeed, for promoter methylation to actively become a tumor marker for clinical use, it must be combined with a highly informative technology evaluated in an appropriate biospecimen. Methodological standardization related to epigenetic research is, in fact, one of the most challenging tasks. Moreover, tissue-based biopsy is being complemented and, in some cases, replaced by liquid biopsy. This review will highlight the advancements made for both pre-analytical and analytical implementation for the prospective use of methylation biomarkers in clinical settings, with particular emphasis on liquid biopsy.
Collapse
|
4
|
Friedemann M, Horn F, Gutewort K, Tautz L, Jandeck C, Bechmann N, Sukocheva O, Wirth MP, Fuessel S, Menschikowski M. Increased Sensitivity of Detection of RASSF1A and GSTP1 DNA Fragments in Serum of Prostate Cancer Patients: Optimisation of Diagnostics Using OBBPA-ddPCR. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13174459. [PMID: 34503269 PMCID: PMC8431466 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13174459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Identification of aberrant DNA methylation is a promising tool in prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and treatment. In this study, we evaluated a two-step method named optimised bias-based preamplification followed by digital PCR (OBBPA-dPCR). The method was used to identify promoter hypermethylation of 2 tumour suppressor genes RASSF1A and GSTP1 in the circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from serum samples of PCa patients (n = 75), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, n = 58), and healthy individuals (controls, n = 155). The PCa cohort was further subdivided into subgroups comprising (I) patients with Gleason Scores (GS) ≤ 7 (n = 55), (II) GS ≥ 8 (n = 10), and (III) patients with metastatic PCa diagnosis (n = 10). We found that RASSF1A methylation levels were significantly increased in all 3 PCa subgroups compared to the controls and BPH cohorts (p < 0.01 for all comparisons). Fractional abundances of methylated GSTP1 DNA fragments were significantly increased in subgroup III of metastatic PCa patients (p < 0.001). RASSF1A methylation analysis was found to be beneficial as a complementary biomarker where further diagnostic validation is most crucial. In combination with free PSA, RASSF1A methylation status helps to identify PCa patients with GS ≥ 8 and grey-zone total PSA values between 2-10 ng/mL. In our study, PCR biases between 80-90% were sufficient to detect minute amounts of tumour DNA with high signal-to-noise ratios as well as high analytical sensitivity and specificity. Both RASSF1A and GSTP1 exhibited strongly increased DNA methylation levels in all metastatic PCa patients. Our data indicates a superior sensitivity of epigenetic biomarker analyses in early detection of PCa metastases that should also help to improve PCa therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Friedemann
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, D-01307 Dresden, Germany; (M.F.); (L.T.); (F.H.); (K.G.); (C.J.); (N.B.)
| | - Friederike Horn
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, D-01307 Dresden, Germany; (M.F.); (L.T.); (F.H.); (K.G.); (C.J.); (N.B.)
| | - Katharina Gutewort
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, D-01307 Dresden, Germany; (M.F.); (L.T.); (F.H.); (K.G.); (C.J.); (N.B.)
| | - Lars Tautz
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, D-01307 Dresden, Germany; (M.F.); (L.T.); (F.H.); (K.G.); (C.J.); (N.B.)
| | - Carsten Jandeck
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, D-01307 Dresden, Germany; (M.F.); (L.T.); (F.H.); (K.G.); (C.J.); (N.B.)
| | - Nicole Bechmann
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, D-01307 Dresden, Germany; (M.F.); (L.T.); (F.H.); (K.G.); (C.J.); (N.B.)
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- German Department of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke, Institute of Experimental Diabetology, 14558 Nuthetal, Germany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), 85764 München-Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Olga Sukocheva
- School of Health Sciences, Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia;
| | - Manfred P. Wirth
- Department of Urology, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, D-01307 Dresden, Germany; (M.P.W.); (S.F.)
| | - Susanne Fuessel
- Department of Urology, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, D-01307 Dresden, Germany; (M.P.W.); (S.F.)
| | - Mario Menschikowski
- Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, D-01307 Dresden, Germany; (M.F.); (L.T.); (F.H.); (K.G.); (C.J.); (N.B.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-35-1458-2634; Fax: +49-35-1458-4332
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tuaeva NO, Falzone L, Porozov YB, Nosyrev AE, Trukhan VM, Kovatsi L, Spandidos DA, Drakoulis N, Kalogeraki A, Mamoulakis C, Tzanakakis G, Libra M, Tsatsakis A. Translational Application of Circulating DNA in Oncology: Review of the Last Decades Achievements. Cells 2019; 8:E1251. [PMID: 31615102 PMCID: PMC6829588 DOI: 10.3390/cells8101251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2019] [Revised: 09/30/2019] [Accepted: 10/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, the introduction of new molecular techniques in experimental and clinical settings has allowed researchers and clinicians to propose circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis and liquid biopsy as novel promising strategies for the early diagnosis of cancer and for the definition of patients' prognosis. It was widely demonstrated that through the non-invasive analysis of ctDNA, it is possible to identify and characterize the mutational status of tumors while avoiding invasive diagnostic strategies. Although a number of studies on ctDNA in patients' samples significantly contributed to the improvement of oncology practice, some investigations generated conflicting data about the diagnostic and prognostic significance of ctDNA. Hence, to highlight the relevant achievements obtained so far in this field, a clearer description of the current methodologies used, as well as the obtained results, are strongly needed. On these bases, this review discusses the most relevant studies on ctDNA analysis in cancer, as well as the future directions and applications of liquid biopsy. In particular, special attention was paid to the early diagnosis of primary cancer, to the diagnosis of tumors with an unknown primary location, and finally to the prognosis of cancer patients. Furthermore, the current limitations of ctDNA-based approaches and possible strategies to overcome these limitations are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalia O Tuaeva
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119048 Moscow, Russia.
| | - Luca Falzone
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnlogical Sciences, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.
- Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori "Fondazione G. Pascale", 80131 Naples, Italy.
| | - Yuri B Porozov
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119048 Moscow, Russia.
- ITMO University, Saint Petersburg 197101, Russia.
| | - Alexander E Nosyrev
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119048 Moscow, Russia.
| | - Vladimir M Trukhan
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119048 Moscow, Russia.
| | - Leda Kovatsi
- Laboratory of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54248 Thessaloniki, Greece.
| | - Demetrios A Spandidos
- Laboratory of Clinical Virology, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, 70013 Crete, Greece.
| | - Nikolaos Drakoulis
- Research Group of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Faculty of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15771 Zografou, Greece.
| | - Alexandra Kalogeraki
- Department of Pathology-Cytopathology, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, 70013 Crete, Greece.
| | - Charalampos Mamoulakis
- Department of Urology, University General Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Medical School, Heraklion, 70013 Crete, Greece.
| | - George Tzanakakis
- Laboratory of Anatomy-Histology-Embryology, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion, 70013 Crete, Greece.
| | - Massimo Libra
- Department of Biomedical and Biotechnlogical Sciences, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.
- Research Center for Prevention, Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer, University of Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.
| | - Aristides Tsatsakis
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119048 Moscow, Russia.
- Department of Forensic Sciences and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, 71003 Crete, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|