1
|
Monteiro FSM, Alencar Junior AM, da Trindade KM, Rebelatto TF, Maluf FC, Gazzola AA, Barrios PM, Bellmunt J, de Jesus RG, Silva GEB, Teixeira Junior AAL, Spiess PE, Fay AP. Molecular characterization of metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma in developing countries and its impact on clinical outcomes: LACOG 2018 translational study. Oncologist 2024:oyae220. [PMID: 39222919 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 07/17/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is a rare malignancy. However, in developing countries the incidence rate is higher. The understanding of molecular alterations is essential for evaluating possible targets for more effective systemic therapies. METHODS We retrospectively collected clinical data of metastatic PSCC (mPSCC) patients who had received at least one prior systemic treatment from 3 Brazilian hospitals. Tumor samples were evaluated using the next-generation sequencing (NGS) Foundation One DX and immunohistochemistry (IHC). The objective was to identify and describe somatic genomic alterations known to be functional or pathogenic and their association with survival outcomes. RESULTS Twenty-three patients were identified, 22 and 18 patients had tumor samples analyzed by IHC and NGS, respectively. PD-L1 expression (CPS ≥ 1%) was positive in 14 patients (63.6%). Regarding the genomic alterations, 16 patients (88.9%) had some clinically relevant genomic alterations. TP53, TERT, CDKN2A, PIK3CA, NOTCH1, and CDKN2B loss were identified in 66.7%, 50%, 50%, 33.3%, 27.8%, and 22.2% of the patients, respectively. No MSI or TMB high (≥10 mutations/MB) cases were identified. NOTCH1 mutation was identified only in HPV-negative patients and it was associated with worse OS (yes: 5.5 vs no: 12.8 months, P = .049) and progression-free survival (yes: 5.5 vs no: 11.7 months, P = .032). CONCLUSION This study demonstrated that molecular alterations in mPSCC from developing countries are similar to those from developed countries. Predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy response such as TMB high or MSI were not identified. Specific gene mutations may identify patients with worse prognoses and open new avenues for therapeutic development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Sabino Marques Monteiro
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Hospital Sírio Libanês, Oncology and Hematology Department, Brasilia, Brazil
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), School of Medicine, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Antonio Machado Alencar Junior
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Oncology Department, São Luis, Brazil
| | - Karine Martins da Trindade
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil
| | | | - Fernando C Maluf
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Oncology and Hematology Department, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Antonia A Gazzola
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), School of Medicine, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Pablo M Barrios
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute and IMIM Research Lab, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
| | | | - Gyl Eanes Barros Silva
- Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal do Maranhão, Oncology Department, São Luis, Brazil
| | | | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of GU Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States
| | - Andre P Fay
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG), Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS), School of Medicine, Porto Alegre, Brazil
- Hospital Nora Teixeira, Oncology and Hematology Department, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mercinelli C, Al Assaad M, Safa H, Spiess PE, Chahoud J, Necchi A. Overview of Systemic Therapies in Penile Cancer. Urol Clin North Am 2024; 51:347-354. [PMID: 38925737 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2024.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
Penile cancer (PC), although rare, poses significant challenges in both diagnosis and treatment. Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) represents the most common histologic subtype of PC, accounting for approximately 95% of cases. With limited therapeutic options available, systemic therapies have emerged as critical components in the management of advanced PSCC. Recent developments in clinical research have revealed the effectiveness of new therapeutic strategies. By elucidating the mechanism of action and clinical evidence supporting these treatments, we strive to offer insights into optimizing treatment strategies and enhancing the quality of care for patients affected by this complex disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Mercinelli
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 60, Milan 20132, Italy.
| | - Majd Al Assaad
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, 413 East 69th Street, Belfer Research Building, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - Houssein Safa
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive Office 12538, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Jad Chahoud
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive Office 12538, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 60, Milan 20132, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mollica V, Massari F, Maruzzo M, Bimbatti D, Claps M, Maiorano BA, Vitale MG, Iacovelli R, Ermacora P, Roviello G, Calabrò F, Caffo O, Vignani F, Grillone F, Pierantoni F, Di Napoli M, Mennitto A, Marchetti A, Mattana A, Cavo A, Bassanelli M, Formisano L, Prati V, Giudice GC, Buti S. Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Patients With Penile Carcinoma: A Sub-Analysis From Meet-URO 23 (I-RARE) Registry Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024:102074. [PMID: 38616147 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is a rare tumor with an aggressive behavior. The Meet-URO 23/I-RARE registry includes rare genitourinary malignancies. We extracted patients with PSCC to conduct a retrospective study aimed at assessing clinical outcomes and prognostic factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS Primary endpoints were overall survival and progression-free survival. Prognostic factors for OS and PFS were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis. From the Meet-URO 23/I-RARE database, we extracted 128 patients with diagnosis of PSCC. About 48% of patients underwent first-line of therapy. RESULTS In the overall population, median OS from diagnosis was 34.6 months. Significant differences in median OS were observed according to ECOG PS at diagnosis (57.3 months vs. 8.3 months; P < .001), and median age (≤77y 88.8 months vs. >77y 26 months; P = .013). At multivariate analysis, ECOG PS 2-4 at diagnosis (HR 3.04) and lymph node metastases (HR 2.49) were independently associated with a higher risk of death. Among patients undergoing first-line therapy (n = 61), median OS was 12.3 months, and a statistically significant difference was found according to type of response to first-line (DCR 24.4 months vs. PD 7.1 months; P < .001). Multivariate analysis showed that only age >77 years was associated with a worse OS (HR 2.16). A statistically significant difference in PFS was found according to platinum plus 5-fluorouracil versus platinum plus taxane (4.9 vs. 3.4 months; P = .036) and regimens with 2 versus 3 drugs (3.4 vs. 8.6 months; P = .019). At the multivariate analysis only regimens with platinum plus taxane were associated with worse PFS (HR 2.83). CONCLUSION In our registry study, PSCC is confirmed to be an aggressive disease. Poor ECOG PS, presence of lymph node metastases, and higher age at diagnosis appear to be associated with worse survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronica Mollica
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni - 15, Bologna - Italia; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Francesco Massari
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni - 15, Bologna - Italia; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Maruzzo
- Oncology 1 Unit, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Davide Bimbatti
- Oncology 1 Unit, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Melanie Claps
- Dipartimento di Oncologia Medica ed Ematologia, SSD Oncologia Medica Genitourinaria, Programma Prostata, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano
| | | | - Maria Giuseppa Vitale
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41100 Modena, Italy
| | - Roberto Iacovelli
- Oncologia Medica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Ermacora
- Dipartimento di Oncologia, Presidio Ospedaliero Universitario Santa Maria della Misericordia, Azienda sanitaria universitaria integrata Friuli Centrale, Udine, Italy
| | - Giandomenico Roviello
- Department of Health Sciences, Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, University of Firenze, Firenze, Italy
| | - Fabio Calabrò
- Department of Oncology, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Orazio Caffo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy
| | - Francesca Vignani
- Division of Medical Oncology, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Francesco Grillone
- UO Oncologia - Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Renato Dulbecco, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Francesco Pierantoni
- Oncology 3 Unit, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Marilena Di Napoli
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Alessia Mennitto
- SCDU Oncologia, "Maggiore della Carità" University Hospital, 28100 Novara, Italy
| | - Andrea Marchetti
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Via Albertoni - 15, Bologna - Italia; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alvise Mattana
- Oncology 1 Unit, Department of Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Alessia Cavo
- Oncology Unit, Villa Scassi Hospital, Genova, Italy
| | - Maria Bassanelli
- Medical Oncology, 1-IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Luigi Formisano
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Veronica Prati
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ospedale Michele e Pietro Ferrero, Verduno-Azienda Sanitaria Locale CN2, Alba-Bra, 12060 Cuneo, Italy
| | - Giulia Claire Giudice
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma - Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Sebastiano Buti
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma - Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sachdeva A, McGuinness L, Zapala Ł, Greco I, Garcia-Perdomo HA, Kailavasan M, Antunes-Lopes T, Ayres B, Barreto L, Campi R, Crook J, Johnstone P, Kumar V, Manzie K, Marcus JD, Necchi A, Oliveira P, Osborne J, Pagliaro LC, Protzel C, Bryan Rumble R, Sánchez Martínez DF, Spiess PE, Tagawa ST, van der Heijden MS, Parnham AS, Pettaway CA, Albersen M, Sangar VK, Brouwer OR, Sakalis VI. Management of Lymph Node-positive Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol 2024; 85:257-273. [PMID: 37208237 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Lymph node (LN) involvement in penile cancer is associated with poor survival. Early diagnosis and management significantly impact survival, with multimodal treatment approaches often considered in advanced disease. OBJECTIVE To assess the clinical effectiveness of treatment options available for the management of inguinal and pelvic lymphadenopathy in men with penile cancer. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and other databases were searched from 1990 to July 2022. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), nonrandomised comparative studies (NRCSs), and case series (CSs) were included. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS We identified 107 studies, involving 9582 patients from two RCTs, 28 NRCSs, and 77 CSs. The quality of evidence is considered poor. Surgery is the mainstay of LN disease management, with early inguinal LN dissection (ILND) associated with better outcomes. Videoendoscopic ILND may offer comparable survival outcomes to open ILND with lower wound-related morbidity. Ipsilateral pelvic LN dissection (PLND) in N2-3 cases improves overall survival in comparison to no pelvic surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in N2-3 disease showed a pathological complete response rate of 13% and an objective response rate of 51%. Adjuvant radiotherapy may benefit pN2-3 but not pN1 disease. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy may provide a small survival benefit in N3 disease. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy improve outcomes after PLND for pelvic LN metastases. CONCLUSIONS Early LND improves survival in nodal disease in penile cancer. Multimodal treatments may provide additional benefit in pN2-3 cases; however, data are limited. Therefore, individualised management of patients with nodal disease should be discussed in a multidisciplinary team setting. PATIENT SUMMARY Spread of penile cancer to the lymph nodes is best managed with surgery, which improves survival and has curative potential. Supplementary treatment, including the use of chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, may further improve survival in advanced disease. Patients with penile cancer with lymph node involvement should be treated by a multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashwin Sachdeva
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Urology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
| | - Luke McGuinness
- Department of Urology, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK
| | - Łukasz Zapala
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Isabella Greco
- Department of Urological Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Herney Andres Garcia-Perdomo
- Division of Urology/Uro-oncology, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Universidad Del Valle, Cali, Colombia
| | | | | | - Benjamin Ayres
- Department of Urology, St. George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Lenka Barreto
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Nitra, Nitra, Slovakia
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Juanita Crook
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, Kelowna, Canada
| | - Peter Johnstone
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Vivek Kumar
- Department of Urology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | | | | | - Andrea Necchi
- Department of Urology and Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Pedro Oliveira
- Department of Pathology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Centre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Trásos-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal; Veterinary Sciences Department, University of Trásos-Montes and Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal
| | | | | | | | - R Bryan Rumble
- American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA, USA
| | | | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Scott T Tagawa
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Arie S Parnham
- Department of Urology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Maarten Albersen
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Vijay K Sangar
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Urology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Oscar R Brouwer
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Brouwer OR, Rumble RB, Ayres B, Sánchez Martínez DF, Oliveira P, Spiess PE, Johnstone PAS, Crook J, Pettaway CA, Tagawa ST. Penile Cancer: EAU-ASCO Collaborative Guidelines Update Q and A. JCO Oncol Pract 2024; 20:33-37. [PMID: 37956391 DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Oscar R Brouwer
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Benjamin Ayres
- Department of Urology, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Pedro Oliveira
- Department of Pathology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | - Peter A S Johnstone
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Juanita Crook
- University of British Columbia, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Curtis A Pettaway
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Houston, TX
| | - Scott T Tagawa
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
European Association of Urology-American Society of Clinical Oncology Collaborative Guideline on Penile Cancer: 2023 Update. Eur Urol 2023; 83:548-560. [PMID: 36906413 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.02.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Penile cancer is a rare disease but has a significant impact on quality of life. Its incidence is increasing, so it is important to include new and relevant evidence in clinical practice guidelines. OBJECTIVE To provide a collaborative guideline that offers worldwide physician and patient guidance for the management of penile cancer. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Comprehensive literature searches were performed for each section topic. In addition, three systematic reviews were conducted. Levels of evidence were assessed, and a strength rating for each recommendation was assigned according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) methodology. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Penile cancer is a rare disease but its global incidence is increasing. Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the main risk factor for penile cancer and pathology should include an assessment of HPV status. The main aim of primary tumour treatment is complete tumour eradication, which has to be balanced against optimal organ preservation without compromising oncological control. Early detection and treatment of lymph node (LN) metastasis is the main determinant of survival. Surgical LN staging with sentinel node biopsy is recommended for patients with a high-risk (≥pT1b) tumour with cN0 status. While (inguinal) LN dissection remains the standard for node-positive disease, multimodal treatment is needed in patients with advanced disease. Owing to a lack of controlled trials and large series, the levels of evidence and grades of recommendation are low in comparison to those for more common diseases. CONCLUSIONS This collaborative penile cancer guideline provides updated information on the diagnosis and treatment of penile cancer for use in clinical practice. Organ-preserving surgery should be offered for treatment of the primary tumour when feasible. Adequate and timely LN management remains a challenge, especially in advanced disease stages. Referral to centres of expertise is recommended. PATIENT SUMMARY Penile cancer is a rare disease that significantly impacts quality of life. While the disease can be cured in most cases without lymph node involvement, management of advanced disease remains challenging. Many unmet needs and unanswered questions remain, underlining the importance of research collaborations and centralisation of penile cancer services.
Collapse
|
7
|
Savoie PH, Murez T, Neuville P, Ferretti L, Rocher L, Van Hove A, Camparo P, Fléchon A, Branger N, Rouprêt M. French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022-2024: penile cancer. Prog Urol 2022; 32:1010-1039. [PMID: 36400476 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 07/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To update French oncology guidelines concerning penile cancer. METHODS Comprehensive Medline search between 2020 and 2022 upon diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of testicular germ cell cancer to update previous guidelines. Level of evidence was evaluated according to AGREE-II. RESULTS Epidermoid carcinoma is the most common penile cancer histology. Physical examination is mandatory to define local and inguinal nodal cancer stage. MRI with artificial erection can help to assess deep infiltration in cases of organsparing intention. Node negative patients (defined by palpation and imaging) will present micro nodal metastases in up to 25% of cases. Invasive lymph node assessment is thus advocated except for low risk patients. Sentinel node dynamic biopsy is the first line technique. Modified bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy is an option with higher morbidity. 18-FDG-PET is recommended in patients with palpable nodes. Chest, abdominal and pelvis computerized tomography is an option. Fine needle aspiration (when positive) is an easy way to assess inguinal palpable node pathological involvement. Its results determine the type of lymphadenectomy to be performed (for diagnostic or curative purposes). Treatment is mostly surgical. Free margins status is essential, but it also has to be organ-sparing when possible. Brachytherapy and topic agents can cure in selected cases. Lymph node assessment should be synchronous to the removal of the tumour when possible. Limited inguinal lymph node involvement (pN1 stage) can be cured with the only lymphadenectomy. In case of larger lymph node stage, one should consider multidisciplinary treatment including chemotherapy and inclusion in a trial. CONCLUSIONS Penile cancer needs demanding surgery to be cured, surrounded by chemotherapy in node positive patients. Lymph nodes involvement is a major prognostic factor. Thus, inguinal node assessment cannot be neglected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P H Savoie
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service de chirurgie urologique, hôpital d'instruction des armées Sainte-Anne, 2, boulevard Sainte-Anne, BP 600, 83800 Toulon Cedex 09, France.
| | - T Murez
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et de transplantation rénale, CHU de Montpellier, 371 avenue du Doyen-Gaston-Giraud, 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
| | - P Neuville
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, CHU de Lyon, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69310 Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - L Ferretti
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; MSP Bordeaux Bagatelle, 203, route de Toulouse, 33401 Talence, France
| | - L Rocher
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service de radiologie, hôpital Antoine-Béclère, APHP, 157, rue de la Porte-de-Trivaux, 92140 Clamart, France; Université Paris-Saclay, BIOMAPS, 63, avenue Gabriel-Péri, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - A Van Hove
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Hôpital Européen, 6, rue Désirée-Clary, 13003 Marseille, France
| | - P Camparo
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Institut de pathologie des Hauts-de-France, 51, rue Jeanne-d'Arc, 80000 Amiens, France
| | - A Fléchon
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Centre Léon-Bérard, 28, rue Laennec, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - N Branger
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232, Boulevard Sainte Marguerite, 13273 Marseille, France
| | - M Rouprêt
- Comité de Cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation rénale, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chadha J, Chahoud J, Spiess PE. An update on treatment of penile cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2022; 14:17588359221127254. [PMID: 36172172 PMCID: PMC9511530 DOI: 10.1177/17588359221127254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Penile cancer is a rare malignancy, particularly in industrialized nations. In the United States, rates are approximately less than 1 per 100,000 men per year with just over 2000 new cases per year. However, there is significantly increased prevalence in developing nations, with limited treatment expertise and reduced access to care, further driving an unmet clinical need. The most noteworthy risk factor for penile cancer is the association with human papillomavirus infection, which may be present in up to 50% of all penile carcinomas. In addition to local primary tumor approaches, multimodality treatment strategies are vital to patients with clinical regional nodal disease, locally advanced disease. Presence and degree of lymph node involvement remains the most important prognostic factor and patients may benefit from multiple treatment strategies. Interim analysis data from the first randomized clinical trial is expected to yield results in mid/late 2024–early 2025. These treatment approaches include neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant therapy, including chemotherapy and radiation. Systemic therapy for distant recurrent or metastatic disease is primarily a platinum-based chemotherapy, however with poor overall response. As poor outcomes remain high, particularly in indigent populations, there remains an unmet need for these patients, particularly for high level randomized trials and novel therapeutics. In this review, we will highlight treatment updates for penile cancer. In addition to standard of care, we will review novel lines of therapies including immunotherapies and targeted therapies as well as sequencing approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juskaran Chadha
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jad Chahoud
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Alencar AM, Sonpavde G. Emerging Therapies in Penile Cancer. Front Oncol 2022; 12:910335. [PMID: 35800050 PMCID: PMC9253417 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.910335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in the treatment of rare tumors like penile cancer were always hampered by the lack of deep comprehension of the molecular biology and genomic and epigenomic alterations involved in carcinogenesis and tumor progression, as well as by the difficulty in recruitment of patients for prospective clinical trials. Despite the high rates of cure in early localized penile cancers with surgery or other local procedures, locally advanced and metastatic tumors require systemic treatment, with chemotherapy being the current standard, but with high toxicity and no proven real impact on survival. Recent important findings of frequent genomic alterations and mutation signatures in penile cancer have motivated several trials in new modalities of systemic treatments, especially immunotherapy. This review aims to present the most recent advances and the prospect of new modalities of systemic therapies with ongoing studies in penile cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Machado Alencar
- Grupo de Estudos em Patologia Molecular, Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal do Maranhão, São Luís, Brazil
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Hospital São Domingos/Dasa, São Luís, Brazil
| | - Guru Sonpavde
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States
- *Correspondence: Guru Sonpavde,
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Joshi VB, Chadha J, Chahoud J. Penile cancer: Updates in systemic therapy. Asian J Urol 2022; 9:374-388. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
11
|
Paz Rojas JF, Ballestas Almario CA, García-Perdomo HA. Effectiveness and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with penile cancer and positive lymph nodes regarding overall survival and free disease survival: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:200.e11-200.e18. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.02.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
12
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to look at recent advancements and treatment options of systemic therapies to treat penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC). PSCC is a rare cancer that remains with limited funding for research and systemic therapy development. This review aims to discuss the most recent advancements in systemic treatments and our understanding of PSCC. RECENT FINDINGS Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and adjuvant therapy remain integral parts of treatment in locally advanced PSCC. New potential drug regimens are being studied to expand on the availability of first-line regimen options. There has been a large development in discoveries of cellular pathways and immune system targets as potential treatment options but these therapies as of today have limited trial evidence and currently have no support to be used in a clinical setting. SUMMARY PSCC is a rare genitourinary cancer with limited treatment options for patients with advanced disease that is refractory to chemotherapy. Although many new therapies targeting the immune system and cellular pathways are being developed for other studies, clinical and translational research for PSCC are still understudied and underfunded.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jad Chahoud
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Rachel Pham
- McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Guru Sonpavde
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Thomas A, do Canto Alvim LM, Rainho CA, Juengel E, Blaheta RA, Spiess PE, Rogatto SR, Tsaur I. Systemic treatment of penile squamous cell carcinoma-hurdles and hopes of preclinical models and clinical regimens: a narrative review. Transl Androl Urol 2021; 10:4085-4098. [PMID: 34804850 PMCID: PMC8575571 DOI: 10.21037/tau-20-945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite contemporary research efforts, the prognosis of penile squamous cell carcinoma (PeSCC) has not significantly improved over the past decade. Despite frequently encountered patient-related delayed medical consultations impairing outcomes, several other aspects contribute to the lack of advancement in the treatment of this condition. One essential reason is that translational research, a prerequisite for the clinically successful disease management, is still at an early stage in PeSCC as compared to many other malignancies. Preclinical experimental models are indispensable for the evaluation of tumor biology and identification of genomic alterations. However, since neither commercial PeSCC cell lines are available nor xenograft models sustainably established, such analyses are challenging in this field of research. In addition, systemic therapies are less effective and toxic without decisive breakthroughs over recent years. Current systemic management of PeSCC is based on protocols that have been investigated in small series of only up to 30 patients. Thus, there is an unmet medical need for new approaches necessitating research efforts to develop more efficacious systemic strategies. This review aims to highlight the current state of knowledge in the molecular alterations involved in the etiology and ensuing steps for cancer progression, existing preclinical models of translational research, clinically relevant systemic protocols, and ongoing clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Thomas
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medicine Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Luisa Matos do Canto Alvim
- Department of Clinical Genetics, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Claudia Aparecida Rainho
- Department of Chemical and Biological Sciences, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Eva Juengel
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medicine Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Silvia Regina Rogatto
- Department of Clinical Genetics, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Igor Tsaur
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University Medicine Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Savoie PH, Morel-Journel N, Murez T, Ferretti L, Rocher L, Fléchon A, Camparo P, Méjean A. [French ccAFU guidelines - update 2020-2022: penile cancer]. Prog Urol 2021; 30:S252-S279. [PMID: 33349426 DOI: 10.1016/s1166-7087(20)30753-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE - To update French oncology guidelines concerning penile cancer. METHODS - Comprehensive Medline search between 2018 and 2020 upon diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of testicular germ cell cancer to update previous guidelines. Level of evidence was evaluated according to AGREE-II. RESULTS - Epidermoid carcinoma is the most common penile cancer histology. Physical examination is mandatory to define local and inguinal nodal cancer stage. MRI with artificial erection can help to assess deep infiltration in cases of organ-sparing intention. Node negative patients (defined by palpation and imaging) will present micro nodal metastases in up to 25% of cases. Invasive lymph node assessment is thus advocated except for low risk patients. Sentinel node dynamic biopsy is the first line technique. Modified bilateral inguinal lymphadenectomy is an option with higher morbidity. 18-FDG-PET is recommended in patients with palpable nodes. Chest, abdominal and pelvis computerized tomography is an option. Fine needle aspiration (when positive) is an easy way to assess inguinal palpable node pathological involvement. Its results determine the type of lymphadenectomy to be performed (for diagnostic or curative purposes). Treatment is mostly surgical. Free margins status is essential, but it also has to be organ-sparing when possible. Brachytherapy and topic agents can cure in selected cases. Lymph node assessment should be synchronous to the removal of the tumour when possible. Limited inguinal lymph node involvement (pN1 stage) can be cured with the only lymphadenectomy. In case of larger lymph node stage, one should consider multidisciplinary treatment including chemotherapy and inclusion in a trial. CONCLUSIONS - Penile cancer needs demanding surgery to be cured, surrounded by chemotherapy in node positive patients. Lymph nodes involvement is a major prognostic factor. Thus, inguinal node assessment cannot be neglected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P-H Savoie
- Comité de Ccancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service de chirurgie urologique, hôpital d'instruction des armées Sainte-Anne, 2, boulevard Sainte-Anne, BP 600, 83800 Toulon, Cedex 09, France.
| | - N Morel-Journel
- Comité de Ccancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, CHU de Lyon, 165 chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69310 Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - T Murez
- Comité de Ccancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et de transplantation rénale, CHU de Montpellier, 371 avenue du Doyen-Gaston-Giraud, 34295 Montpellier, Cedex 5, France
| | - L Ferretti
- Comité de Ccancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; MSP Bordeaux Bagatelle, 203, route de Toulouse, 33401 Talence, France
| | - L Rocher
- Comité de Ccancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service de radiologie, hôpital Antoine-Béclère, APHP, 157 rue de la Porte-de-Trivaux, 92140 Clamart, France; Université Paris-Saclay, BIOMAPS, 63, avenue Gabriel-Péri, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - A Fléchon
- Comité de Ccancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Centre Léon-Bérard, 28, rue Laennec, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - P Camparo
- Comité de Ccancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Institut de pathologie des Hauts-de-France, 51, rue Jeanne-d'Arc, 80000 Amiens, France
| | - A Méjean
- Comité de Ccancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe organes génitaux externes, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie et transplantation rénale, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP, 20, rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Denis C, Sakalihasan S, Frères P, Withofs N, Sautois B. Cemiplimab for Cisplatin Resistant Metastatic Penile Cancer. Case Rep Oncol 2021; 14:972-976. [PMID: 34267641 PMCID: PMC8261263 DOI: 10.1159/000517008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We report on a 75-year old man who presented with metastatic, squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC) of the penis whose disease had progressed after radiotherapy (RT) and cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CT). A strong PD-L1 expression as well as a CDKN2A mutation was documented, and he was given cemiplimab every 3 weeks at time of disease progression. Complete response (CR) was demonstrated after 10 cycles, and no toxicity was reported. However, this treatment was stopped after 13 cycles when the patient developed moderate severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonitis which required a 2-week hospitalization for oxygen support. Six months later, he remains in CR. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration of a CR with cemiplimab in a metastatic penile SCC patient previously treated with CT and RT for relapse. Furthermore, the patient remains disease-free despite cemiplimab was withdrawn due to SARS-CoV-2 pneumonitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloé Denis
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Liege, CHU Sart Tilman, Liège, Belgium
| | - Sarah Sakalihasan
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Liege, CHU Sart Tilman, Liège, Belgium
| | - Pierre Frères
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Liege, CHU Sart Tilman, Liège, Belgium
| | - Nadia Withofs
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, Department of Medical Physics, University Hospital of Liege, CHU Sart Tilman, Liège, Belgium
| | - Brieuc Sautois
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Liege, CHU Sart Tilman, Liège, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Thomas A, Kölling F, Haferkamp A, Tsaur I. [Quality of care criteria in the treatment of penile cancer]. Urologe A 2021; 60:186-192. [PMID: 33452551 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-020-01429-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Penile cancer is a rare malignancy and the wide range of quality of care associated with it often results in inferior oncologic and functional treatment outcomes. OBJECTIVES Assessment of the current healthcare situation in clinical routine and identification of the relevant key features and reference values for quality of care. MATERIALS AND METHODS Search for relevant peer-reviewed articles and published congress abstracts in Medline, Embase and other databases as well as Google web search engine. RESULTS Key quality features of penile cancer management include organ-sparing surgery of the primary tumor, invasive inguinal lymph node staging and systemic treatment. Adherence to treatment guidelines is currently low. Centralization of care has already led to a considerable improvement in the quality of care in some areas and increasing conformity with the guidelines' recommendations. CONCLUSION Centralization of care and networks based on this can significantly improve patient outcomes. Thus, reference values for core parameters of quality cancer care can be generated and validated. Moreover, organ-sparing surgery, invasive lymph node staging and systemic therapy should be increasingly utilized. As a reference value, 90% adherence to the guidelines for these three features is recommended. However, before centralization of care can be introduced, aspects relevant to practical implementation must be addressed, such as the reimbursement of travel costs for those affected, infrastructure costs and instruments to measure quality of life and patient satisfaction after centralization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Thomas
- Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
| | - F Kölling
- Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland
| | - A Haferkamp
- Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland
| | - I Tsaur
- Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Resch I, Abufaraj M, Hübner NA, Shariat SF. An update on systemic therapy for penile cancer. Curr Opin Urol 2020; 30:229-233. [PMID: 31972637 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Whereas substantial advances have been made in systemic tumour therapy in the past decade, the prognosis of advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the penis remains disproportionally poor. In this review, we aimed to present an update on systemic therapy of penile SCC highlighting the most recent data and future perspectives. RECENT FINDINGS Lymph node metastases play a key role in treating and assessing the prognosis of patients with penile SCC. Data show longer overall survival with the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pelvic lymph node metastases and recent analyses lead to the development of a nomogramm predicting overall survival in connection with the use of perioperative chemotherapy. There are two pathways in the pathogenesis of penile cancer, including human papilloma virus related and unrelated, leading to many possible novel therapeutic targets. Other targeted therapies have been evaluated, which show promising results with the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors. SUMMARY Chemotherapy has shown moderate activity in advanced stages of the disease, however, the ideal timing of chemotherapy in patients with lymph node metastases is not entirely clear. Potential targets for future therapies exist, and are already being tested in other malignancies. Owing to the rarity of this condition, a robust evidence is lacking and it is of great importance to pursue further research to unveil several aspects of this disease, particularly in patients with recurrence, lymph node metastases or metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Resch
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.,The National Center for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Genetics, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Nicolai A Hübner
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.,Department of Urology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.,European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnheim, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Buonerba C, Di Lorenzo G, Pond G, Cartenì G, Scagliarini S, Rozzi A, Quevedo FJ, Dorff T, Nappi L, Lanzetta G, Pagliaro L, Eigl BJ, Naik G, Ferro M, Galdiero M, De Placido S, Sonpavde G. Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Patients with Advanced Penile Cancer Receiving Salvage (2nd or Later Line) Systemic Treatment: A Retrospective, Multi-Center Study. Front Pharmacol 2016; 7:487. [PMID: 28066240 PMCID: PMC5168461 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2016.00487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2016] [Accepted: 11/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction and objectives: Metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC) is associated with dismal outcomes with median overall survival (OS) of 6–12 months in the first-line and <6 months in the salvage setting. Given the rarity of this disease, randomized trials are difficult. Prognostic risk models may assist in rational drug development by comparing observed outcomes in nonrandomized phase II studies and retrospective data vs. predicted outcomes based on baseline prognostic factors in the context of historically used agents. In this retrospective study, we constructed a prognostic model in the salvage setting of PSCC patients receiving second or later line systemic treatment, and also explored differences in outcomes based on type of treatment. Materials and methods: We performed a chart review to identify patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic PSCC who received second or later line systemic treatment in centers from North America and Europe. The primary outcome was OS from initiation of treatment, with secondary outcomes being progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate (RR). OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify prognostic factors for outcomes using univariable and multivariable models. Results: Sixty-five patients were eligible. Seventeen of 63 evaluable patients had a response (27.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 16.6–39.7%) and median OS and PFS were 20 (95% CI = 20–21) and 12 (95% CI = 12, 16) weeks, respectively. Visceral metastasis (VM) and hemoglobin (Hb) ≤ 10 gm/dl were consistently significant poor prognostic factors for both OS and PFS, and Hb was also prognostic for response. The 28 patients with neither risk factor had a median OS (95% CI) of 24 (20–40) weeks and 1-year (95% CI) OS of 13.7% (4.4–42.7%), while the 37 patients with 1 or 2 risk factors had median OS (95% CI) of 20 (16–20) weeks and 1-year (95% CI) OS of 6.7% (1.8–24.9%). Cetuximab-including regimens were associated with a trend for improved RR compared to other agents (Odds ratio = 5.05, 95% CI = 0.84–30.37, p = 0.077). Taxanes vs. non-taxane, and combination vs. single agent therapy was not associated with improved outcomes. The study is limited by its modest sample size. Conclusion: This is the first prognostic classification proposed for patients receiving salvage systemic therapy for advanced PSCC. The presence of VM and Hb ≤ 10 gm/dl was associated with poor OS and PFS. Cetuximab appeared to be associated with better RR. This prognostic model may assist in salvage therapy drug development for this orphan disease by improving interpretation of outcomes seen in nonrandomized data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Buonerba
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II of NaplesNaples, Italy; Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del MezzogiornoPortici, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Di Lorenzo
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II of Naples Naples, Italy
| | - Gregory Pond
- Department of Oncology, McMaster University Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Giacomo Cartenì
- Unità Operativa Sperimentazioni Cliniche Oncologia, Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale 'Antonio Cardarelli' Naples, Italy
| | - Sarah Scagliarini
- Unità Operativa Sperimentazioni Cliniche Oncologia, Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale 'Antonio Cardarelli' Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Rozzi
- Dipartimento di Oncologia, Istituto Neurotraumatologico Italiano Grottaferrata, Italy
| | - Fernando J Quevedo
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Tanya Dorff
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lucia Nappi
- Division of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver Cancer Center, University of British ColumbiaVancouver, BC, Canada; Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British ColumbiaVancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gaetano Lanzetta
- Dipartimento di Oncologia, Istituto Neurotraumatologico Italiano Grottaferrata, Italy
| | - Lance Pagliaro
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Bernhard J Eigl
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gurudatta Naik
- Section of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II of NaplesNaples, Italy; Department of Urology, European Institute of OncologyMilan, Italy
| | | | - Sabino De Placido
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II of Naples Naples, Italy
| | - Guru Sonpavde
- Section of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|