1
|
Song Y, Yu X, Wang Y, Dong Y, Yuan Z. Accuracy analysis of different dose calculation algorithms for locally advanced pancreatic cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy. J Cancer 2023; 14:2694-2699. [PMID: 37779867 PMCID: PMC10539394 DOI: 10.7150/jca.87596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The dose distribution in different optimization algorithm plans of stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) were compared and analyzed using monte carlo dose calculate algorithm (MC). Methods: A retrospective study analyzed 26 LAPC patients treated with SBRT. The SBRT plans were designed by raytracing (RT) and fine size pencil beam (FSPB) algorithms in the CyberKnife (CK) precision system, all of which met the requirements of clinical target dose and organ at risk (OAR). Keeping the original optimization parameters unchanged, the RT and FSPB algorithm plans were recalculated by MC algorithm. The accuracy of different algorithm plnas were compared and analyzed by using planning parameters and dose distribution. Results: There was no significant differences in the coverage and conformal index (CI) of the planned target volume (PTV) between RT and FSPB algorithm plans, but dose distribution of organ at risk (OAR) and the maximum dose outside the PTV boundary of 2 cm (D2cm) were lower in FSPB plans compared to RT plans, and this difference was statistically significant with p-values < 0.05. Compared to the MC algorithm, both RT algorithm and FSPB algorithm overestimated dose of the PTV and OAR. The RT algorithm was more consistent with the MC algorithm than the FSPB algorithm. The relative error of PTV coverage within the RT algorithm was 8.02% ± 1.53%, and the relative error range of OAR dose parameters was 3.32% -12.73%. Conclusion: Although the FSPB algorithm could achieve rapid dose drop-off around the PTV and lower dose distribution in the OAR for pancreatic cancer SBRT plans, the algorithm error were higher than the RT algorithm. RT and FSPB algorithm overestimated the dose in the target and OAR. That was important to evaluate the clinical plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yongchun Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Xuyao Yu
- Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300070, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuwen Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Tianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital, Tianjin, 300308, People's Republic of China
| | - Yang Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhiyong Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Erickson BG, Cui Y, Ackerson BG, Kelsey CR, Yin FF, Niedzwiecki D, Adamson J. Uncertainties in the dosimetric heterogeneity correction and its potential effect on local control in lung SBRT. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2023; 9. [PMID: 36827685 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/acbeae] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Abstract
Objective. Dose calculation in lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is challenging due to the low density of the lungs and small volumes. Here we assess uncertainties associated with tissue heterogeneities using different dose calculation algorithms and quantify potential associations with local failure for lung SBRT.Approach. 164 lung SBRT plans were used. The original plans were prepared using Pencil Beam Convolution (PBC, n = 8) or Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA, n = 156). Each plan was recalculated with AcurosXB (AXB) leaving all plan parameters unchanged. A subset (n = 89) was calculated with Monte Carlo to verify accuracy. Differences were calculated for the planning target volume (PTV) and internal target volume (ITV) Dmean[Gy], D99%[Gy], D95%[Gy], D1%[Gy], and V100%[%]. Dose metrics were converted to biologically effective doses (BED) usingα/β= 10Gy. Regression analysis was performed for AAA plans investigating the effects of various parameters on the extent of the dosimetric differences. Associations between the magnitude of the differences for all plans and outcome were investigated using sub-distribution hazards analysis.Main results. For AAA cases, higher energies increased the magnitude of the difference (ΔDmean of -3.6%, -5.9%, and -9.1% for 6X, 10X, and 15X, respectively), as did lung volume (ΔD99% of -1.6% per 500cc). Regarding outcome, significant hazard ratios (HR) were observed for the change in the PTV and ITV D1% BEDs upon univariate analysis (p = 0.042, 0.023, respectively). When adjusting for PTV volume and prescription, the HRs for the change in the ITV D1% BED remained significant (p = 0.039, 0.037, respectively).Significance. Large differences in dosimetric indices for lung SBRT can occur when transitioning to advanced algorithms. The majority of the differences were not associated with local failure, although differences in PTV and ITV D1% BEDs were associated upon univariate analysis. This shows uncertainty in near maximal tumor dose to potentially be predictive of treatment outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brett G Erickson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Yunfeng Cui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Bradley G Ackerson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Christopher R Kelsey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Fang-Fang Yin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Justus Adamson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Paoletti L, Ceccarelli C, Menichelli C, Aristei C, Borghesi S, Tucci E, Bastiani P, Cozzi S. Special stereotactic radiotherapy techniques: procedures and equipment for treatment simulation and dose delivery. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2022; 27:1-9. [PMID: 35402024 PMCID: PMC8989452 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2021.0129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 11/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT ) is a multi-step procedure with each step requiring extreme accuracy. Physician-dependent accuracy includes appropriate disease staging, multi-disciplinary discussion with shared decision-making, choice of morphological and functional imaging methods to identify and delineate the tumor target and organs at risk, an image-guided patient set-up, active or passive management of intra-fraction movement, clinical and instrumental follow-up. Medical physicist-dependent accuracy includes use of advanced software for treatment planning and more advanced Quality Assurance procedures than required for conventional radiotherapy. Consequently, all the professionals require appropriate training in skills for high-quality SRT. Thanks to the technological advances, SRT has moved from a “frame-based” technique, i.e. the use of stereotactic coordinates which are identified by means of rigid localization frames, to the modern “frame-less” SRT which localizes the target volume directly, or by means of anatomical surrogates or fiducial markers that have previously been placed within or near the target. This review describes all the SRT steps in depth, from target simulation and delineation procedures to treatment delivery and image-guided radiation therapy. Target movement assessment and management are also described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Paoletti
- Radiotherapy Unit, AUSL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Italy
| | - Simona Borghesi
- Radiation Oncology Unit of Arezzo-Valdarno, Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est, Italy
| | - Enrico Tucci
- Radiation Oncology Unit of Arezzo-Valdarno, Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est, Italy
| | | | - Salvatore Cozzi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Heng VJ, Renaud MA, Zerouali K, Doucet R, Diamant A, Bahig H, DeBlois F, Seuntjens J. Large-scale dosimetric assessment of Monte Carlo recalculated doses for lung robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy. Phys Med 2020; 76:7-15. [PMID: 32569954 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Revised: 04/11/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Owing to its short computation time and simplicity, the Ray-Tracing algorithm (RAT) has long been used to calculate dose distributions for the CyberKnife system. However, it is known that RAT fails to fully account for tissue heterogeneity and is therefore inaccurate in the lung. The aim of this study is to make a dosimetric assessment of 219 non-small cell lung cancer CyberKnife plans by recalculating their dose distributions using an independent Monte Carlo (MC) method. For plans initially calculated by RAT without heterogeneity corrections, target coverage was found to be significantly compromised when considering MC doses. Only 35.4% of plans were found to comply to their prescription doses. If the normal tissue dose limits were respected in the treatment planning dose, the MC recalculated dose did not exceed these limits in over 97% of the plans. Comparison of RAT and recalculated-MC doses confirmed the overestimation of RAT doses observed in previous studies. An inverse correlation between the RAT/MC dose ratio and the target size was also found to be statistically significant (p<10-4), consistent with other studies. In addition, the inaccuracy and variability in target coverage incurred from dose calculations using RAT without heterogeneity corrections was demonstrated. On average, no clinically relevant differences were observed between MC-calculated dose-to-water and dose-to-medium for all tissues investigated (⩽1%). Patients receiving a dose D95% larger than 119 Gy in EQD210 (or ≈52 Gy in 3 fractions) as recalculated by MC were observed to have significantly superior loco-regional progression-free survival rates (p=0.02) with a hazard ratio of 3.45 (95%CI: 1.14-10.5).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veng Jean Heng
- Medical Physics Unit, McGill University and Cedars Cancer Center, 1001 Boulevard Décarie, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada.
| | - Marc-André Renaud
- Medical Physics Unit, McGill University and Cedars Cancer Center, 1001 Boulevard Décarie, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Karim Zerouali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, 1051 Rue Sanguinet, Montréal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada
| | - Robert Doucet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, 1051 Rue Sanguinet, Montréal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada
| | - André Diamant
- Medical Physics Unit, McGill University and Cedars Cancer Center, 1001 Boulevard Décarie, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
| | - Houda Bahig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, 1051 Rue Sanguinet, Montréal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada
| | - François DeBlois
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, 1051 Rue Sanguinet, Montréal, QC H2X 3E4, Canada
| | - Jan Seuntjens
- Medical Physics Unit, McGill University and Cedars Cancer Center, 1001 Boulevard Décarie, Montréal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kawata K, Kamomae T, Oguchi H, Kawabata F, Okudaira K, Kawamura M, Ohtakara K, Itoh Y, Naganawa S. Evaluation of newly implemented dose calculation algorithms for multileaf collimator-based CyberKnife tumor-tracking radiotherapy. Med Phys 2020; 47:1391-1403. [PMID: 31913508 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2019] [Revised: 12/30/2019] [Accepted: 12/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In the previous treatment planning system (TPS) for CyberKnife (CK), multileaf collimator (MLC)-based treatment plans could be created only by using the finite-size pencil beam (FSPB) algorithm. Recently, a new TPS, including the FSPB with lateral scaling option (FSPB+) and Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms, was developed. In this study, we performed basic and clinical end-to-end evaluations for MLC-based CK tumor-tracking radiotherapy using the MC, FSPB+, and FSPB. METHODS Water- and lung-equivalent slab phantoms were combined to obtain the percentage depth dose (PDD) and off-center ratio (OCR). The CK M6 system and Precision TPS were employed, and PDDs and OCRs calculated by the MC, FSPB+, and FSPB were compared with the measured doses obtained for 30.8 × 30.8 mm2 and 60.0 × 61.6 mm2 fields. A lung motion phantom was used for clinical evaluation and MLC-based treatment plans were created using the MC. The doses were subsequently recalculated using the FSPB+ and FSPB, while maintaining the irradiation parameters. The calculated doses were compared with the doses measured using a microchamber (for target doses) or a radiochromic film (for dose profiles). The dose volume histogram (DVH) indices were compared for all plans. RESULTS In homogeneous and inhomogeneous phantom geometries, the PDDs calculated by the MC and FSPB+ agreed with the measurements within ±2.0% for the region between the surface and a depth of 250 mm, whereas the doses calculated by the FSPB in the lung-equivalent phantom region were noticeably higher than the measurements, and the maximum dose differences were 6.1% and 4.4% for the 30.8 × 30.8 mm2 and 60.0 × 61.6 mm2 fields, respectively. The maximum distance to agreement values of the MC, FSPB+, and FSPB at the penumbra regions of OCRs were 1.0, 0.6, and 1.1 mm, respectively, but the best agreement was obtained between the MC-calculated curve and measurements at the boundary of the water- and lung-equivalent slabs, compared with those of the FSPB+ and FSPB. For clinical evaluations using the lung motion phantom, under the static motion condition, the dose errors measured by the microchamber were -1.0%, -1.9%, and 8.8% for MC, FSPB+, and FSPB, respectively; their gamma pass rates for the 3%/2 mm criterion comparing to film measurement were 98.4%, 87.6%, and 31.4% respectively. Under respiratory motion conditions, there was no noticeable decline in the gamma pass rates. In the DVH indices, for most of the gross tumor volume and planning target volume, significant differences were observed between the MC and FSPB, and between the FSPB+ and FSPB. Furthermore, significant differences were observed for lung Dmean , V15 Gy , and V20 Gy between the MC, FSPB+, and FSPB. CONCLUSIONS The results indicate that the doses calculated using the MC and FSPB+ differed remarkably in inhomogeneous regions, compared with the FSPB. Because the MC was the most consistent with the measurements, it is recommended for final dose calculations in inhomogeneous regions such as the lung. Furthermore, the sufficient accuracy of dose delivery using MLC-based tumor-tracking radiotherapy by CK was demonstrated for clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kohei Kawata
- Department of Radiological and Medical Laboratory Sciences, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, 461-8673, Japan
| | - Takeshi Kamomae
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Oguchi
- Department of Radiological and Medical Laboratory Sciences, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, 461-8673, Japan
| | - Fumitaka Kawabata
- Department of Radiological Technology, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8560, Japan
| | - Kuniyasu Okudaira
- Department of Radiological Technology, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8560, Japan
| | - Mariko Kawamura
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Ohtakara
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Itoh
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan
| | - Shinji Naganawa
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, 466-8550, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Pan Y, Yang R, Li J, Zhang X, Liu L, Wang J. Film-based dose validation of Monte Carlo algorithm for Cyberknife system with a CIRS thorax phantom. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19:142-148. [PMID: 29603564 PMCID: PMC5978558 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2017] [Revised: 01/01/2018] [Accepted: 02/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Monte Carlo (MC) simulation, as the most accurate dose calculation algorithm, is available in the MultiPlan treatment planning system for Cyberknife. The main purpose of this work was to perform experiments to thoroughly investigate the accuracy of the MC dose calculation algorithm. Besides the basic MC beam commissioning, two test scenarios were designed. First, single beam tests were performed with a solid water phantom to verify the MC source model in simple geometry. Then, a lung treatment plan on a CIRS thorax phantom was created to mimic the clinical patient treatment. The plan was optimized and calculated using ray tracing (RT) algorithm and then recalculated using MC algorithm. Measurements were performed in both a homogeneous phantom and a heterogeneous phantom (CIRS). Ion‐chamber and radiochromic film were used to obtain absolute point dose and dose distributions. Ion‐chamber results showed that the differences between measured and MC calculated dose were within 3% for all tests. On the film measurements, MC calculation results showed good agreements with the measured dose for all single beam tests. As for the lung case, the gamma passing rate between measured and MC calculated dose was 98.31% and 97.28% for homogeneous and heterogeneous situation, respectively, using 3%/2 mm criteria. However, RT algorithm failed with the passing rate of 79.25% (3%/2 mm) for heterogeneous situation. These results demonstrated that MC dose calculation algorithm in the Multiplan system is accurate enough for patient dose calculation. It is strongly recommended to use MC algorithm in heterogeneous media.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuxi Pan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ruijie Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xile Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Lu Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Junjie Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fogliata A, Cozzi L. Dose calculation algorithm accuracy for small fields in non-homogeneous media: The lung SBRT case. Phys Med 2017; 44:157-162. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.11.104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2016] [Revised: 11/02/2016] [Accepted: 11/10/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
8
|
Shen ZT, Zhou H, Li AM, Li B, Shen JS, Zhu XX. Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of stereotactic body radiation therapy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Oncotarget 2017; 8:93541-93550. [PMID: 29212171 PMCID: PMC5706817 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.19972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2016] [Accepted: 07/18/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been an emerging non-invasive treatment modality for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) when surgical treatment cannot be applied. The CyberKnife® is a SBRT system that allows for real-time tracking of the tumor. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors for ICC patients receiving this treatment. Twenty-eight patients with ICC were enrolled in the present study. The median prescription dose was 45 Gy (range, 36-54 Gy), fractionated 3 to 5 times with a 70% to 92% isodose line. Local control, overall survival, progression-free survival and toxicity were studied. The median follow-up time was 16 months (3-42 months). Based on modified Response Evaluation and Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), response rate and disease control rate of SBRT in ICC were 46.4% (13/28) and 89.3% (25/28), respectively. Median overall survival was 15 months (95% CI, 7.22-22.78). 1- and 2-years survival rates were 57.1% and 32.1%, and 1- and 2- years Progression-free Survival rates were 50.0 % and 21.4 %. Multivariate analysis revealed that number of lesions (solitary vs. multiple nodules), CA19-9 levels (≤37 U/mL vs. 37-600/>600) and TNM stage (AJCC stage) were independent prognostic factors for ICC patients treated with SBRT. Toxicity was mostly transient and tolerable. No greater than grade 3 toxicity was observed. These results suggested that CyberKnife SBRT might be a good alternative treatment for unresectable ICC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ze-Tian Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Han Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Ao-Mei Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Bing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jun-Shu Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xi-Xu Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Iwata H, Ishikura S, Murai T, Iwabuchi M, Inoue M, Tatewaki K, Ohta S, Yokota N, Shibamoto Y. A phase I/II study on stereotactic body radiotherapy with real-time tumor tracking using CyberKnife based on the Monte Carlo algorithm for lung tumors. Int J Clin Oncol 2017; 22:706-714. [DOI: 10.1007/s10147-017-1123-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2016] [Accepted: 04/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|