Clinicopathological features and prognosis of colonic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: evaluation of a pooled case series

Molecular Profiling of KIT/PDGFRA-Mutant and Wild-Type Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) with Clinicopathological Correlation: An 18-Year Experience at a Tertiary Center in Kuwait

In gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), identifying prototypical mutations in the KIT/PDGFRA oncogenes, or in rare alternate genes, is essential for prognostication and predicting response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Conversely, wild-type GISTs (WT-GIST), which lack known mutations, have limited treatment options. Data on the mutational landscape of GISTs and their impact on disease progression are very limited in Kuwait. Using a targeted next-generation sequencing panel, we investigated the spectrum and frequency of KIT, PDGFRA, and RAS-pathway-related mutations in 95 out of 200 GISTs diagnosed at Kuwait Cancer Center from 2005 to 2023 and assessed their correlation with clinicopathological parameters. Among the 200 tumors (median age 55 years; 15-91), 54% originated in the stomach, 33% in the small bowel, 7% in the colorectum, 1.5% in the peritoneum, and 4.5% had an unknown primary site. Of the 95 molecularly profiled cases, 88% had a mutation: KIT (61%), PDGFRA (25%), NF1 (2%), and one NTRK1 rearrangement. Ten WT-GISTs were identified (stomach = 6, small bowel = 2, and colorectum = 2). WT-GISTs tended to be smaller (median 4.0 cm; 0.5-8.0) (p = 0.018), with mitosis ≤5/5 mm2, and were of lower risk (p = 0.019). KIT mutations were an adverse indicator of disease progression (p = 0.049), while wild-type status did not significantly impact progression (p = 0.934). The genetic landscape in this cohort mirrors that of global studies, but regional collaborations are needed to correlate outcomes with genetic variants.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST): A Remarkable Case Report and Literature Review

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) makes up less than 1% of all gastrointestinal tumors, but it is the most common mesenchymal tumor of the digestive system. It is commonly found in the stomach and the small intestine and rarely seen in the colon and the esophagus. Additionally, sigmoid GIST is quite rare since colorectal GIST often occurs in the rectum. A total of 21 patients (including the study case) were looked at for this study, of which 14 (66.6%) were males and seven (33.3%) were females. We focused on GIST and conducted an online search and systematic analysis of all case presentations.

Clinicopathological features and prognosis of colonic and rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A propensity score matching analysis

Background

Colonic gastrointestinal stromal tumor (cGIST) and rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (rGIST) are two rare subtypes of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). The view that colonic and rectal carcinoma are different is generally accepted; however, whether there is a difference between cGIST and rGIST is still unknown. Here, we aimed to provide evidence for future clinical management and research by comparing the differences between the two types of GIST in the above-mentioned aspects.

Methods

Patients were enrolled from three medical centers in China and published literature was collected following the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Propensity score matching was used to eliminate differences between cohorts.

Results

Between cGIST and rGIST patients, significant differences were observed in age, tumor size, mitotic index, NIH risk category, growth pattern, and symptoms. Adjuvant therapy is used in a high proportion of cGIST patients, and neoadjuvant therapy is used in a high proportion of rGIST patients. Although local resection is the main surgical method in both cohorts, the proportion is higher in cGIST patients. The overall survival of rGIST patients was better than that of the cGIST patients before propensity score matching (PSM). Interestingly, no significant differences in prognosis were observed after PSM.

Conclusions

Although there were significant differences between cGIST and rGIST patients in baseline characteristics, clinicopathological features, treatment choice, and overall survival rate before PSM, no significant differences in long-term survival were observed between the two groups after PSM. In our study, there may be no differences in the tumor entity between cGIST and rGIST.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) arising in uncommon locations: clinicopathologic features and risk assessment of esophageal, colonic, and appendiceal GISTs

Risk stratification of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is based on experience with tumors of the stomach, small bowel, and rectum, which are far more common than GISTs of other sites. In this study from 47 institutions, we analyzed GISTs of the esophagus (n = 102), colon (n = 136), and appendix (n = 27) for their size, mitotic rate, morphology, and outcome to determine which criteria predict their behavior. Esophageal GISTs were small (median: 2.5 cm) with spindle cell morphology and a low mitotic rate (mean: 3.6/5 mm²). Twelve (12%) tumors progressed, including 11 with a mitotic rate >5/5 mm² and one large (6.8 cm) GIST with a mitotic rate of 2/5 mm². Colonic GISTs were smaller (median: 1.4 cm) and presented with abdominal pain or bleeding in 29% of cases. Most (92%) were composed of spindle cells with a mean mitotic rate of 4.6/5 mm². Sixteen (12%) tumors progressed: 14 had mitotic rates >5/5 mm², and two were >5.0 cm with a mitotic rate <5/5 mm². All but one appendiceal GIST measured <2.0 cm. These tumors were composed of spindle cells with low mitotic rates (<5/5 mm²), and none progressed. Our results suggest that progression risk among esophageal and colonic GISTs is associated with increased mitotic activity (>5/5 mm²) and size >5.0 cm. These findings support the use of size and mitotic rate for prognostication of GISTs in these locations, similar to tumors of the stomach, small bowel, and rectum.

Prognostic Factors and Management of Colorectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Introduction The gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract. Even though it can be found in any location of the digestive tract, the colorectal GIST is rare. With this study, we aim to review the current knowledge regarding the prognosis and management of colorectal GIST.

Methods A literature search was conducted in PubMed, and 717 articles were collected. After analyzing these studies, 60 articles were selected to use in this review.

Results The mitotic index, as well as tumor size and location were identified as good discriminators of prognosis in various studies. Surgery remains the only curative therapy for potentially resectable tumors. However, even after surgical resection, some patients develop disease recurrence and metastasis, especially those with high-risk tumors. Therefore, surgical resection alone might be inadequate for the management of all colorectal GISTs. The discovery of GIST's molecular pathway led to a shift in its therapy, insofar as tyrosine kinase inhibitors became part of the treatment schemes for this tumor, revolutionizing the treatment's outcome and prognosis.

Discussion/Conclusion The controversy concerning colorectal GIST prognosis and treatment can be, in part, attributed to the limited number of studies in the literature. In this review, we gathered the most recent knowledge about the prognosis and management of GIST in this rare location and propose two algorithms for its approach. Lastly, we highlight the importance of an individualized approach in the setting of a multidisciplinary team.

A case of planar-type gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the transverse colon with perforation

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumor of the human gastrointestinal tract. They usually develop in the stomach and small intestine, but extremely rarely in the colon. Although most GISTs form a mass, some cases showing a flatly proliferating lesion called planar-type GIST have been reported in the sigmoid colon and small intestine. Those are often associated with diverticular lesion and/or perforation. We present here a case of planar-type GIST of the transverse colon with perforation. A 49-year-old Japanese woman abruptly complained of abdominal pain, and was clinically diagnosed as perforation of the transverse colon. Partial resection of the transverse colon including the perforated site was done, and no apparent mass lesion was present. Histology showed that spindle cells flatly proliferated around the perforated area and replaced the layers from submucosa to subserosa. Immunohistochemistry revealed that the spindle cells were KIT-, DOG1- and CD34-positive. Codons 557 and 558 of exon 11 of the c-kit gene were heterozygously deleted at the lesional tissue but not at the normal mucosal tissue. Planar-type GIST of the transverse colon has not been reported yet, and the literature search for the similar cases was done.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors of the Small Intestine: Progress in Diagnosis and Treatment Research

In recent years, the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) of the small intestine have been a hot topic due to their rarity and non-specific clinical manifestations. With the development of gene and imaging technology, surgery, and molecular targeted drugs, the diagnosis and treatment of GISTs have achieved great success. For a long time, radical resection was prioritized to treat GISTs of the small intestine. At present, preoperative tumor staging is a novel treatment for unresectable malignant tumors. In addition, karyokinesis exponent is the sole independent predictor of progression-free survival of GISTs. The DNA, miRNA, and protein of exosomes have also been found to be biomarkers with prognostic implications. The research on the treatment of GISTs has become a focus in the era of precision medicine, ushering in the use of standardized, normalized, and individualized treatment.

The Impact of Imatinib on Survival and Treatment Trends for Small Bowel and Colorectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to assess treatment trends and overall survival (OS) in small bowel (SB) and colorectal (CR) gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) with respect to the introduction of imatinib in 2008.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with SB and CR GIST were identified from the National Cancer Database (2004-2015). The primary outcome was 5- and 10-year OS. Patients were stratified by tumor site, time period (before and after imatinib), and treatment type. OS was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

A total of 8441 cases were included (SB 81.66%; CR 18.34%). Radical resection was the most common treatment (SB 42.33%; CR 38.69%). The addition of chemotherapy to radical resection for SB GIST increased between the two time periods (31.76 to 40.43%; p < 0.001), and was associated with improved unadjusted and adjusted OS (2009-2015: adjusted HR [AHR] 0.73, 95% CI 0.59-0.89, p = 0.002). Patients with SB GIST had better 5- and 10-year OS compared with CR (SB 69.83% and 47.68%; CR 61.33% and 45.39%; p < 0.001), even after stratifying by treatment type and tumor size and adjusting for other factors (SB 5-year AHR 1.35, 95% CI 1.19-1.53; 10-year AHR 1.23, 95% CI 1.09-1.38; each p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

CR GIST are associated with lower OS than SB GIST. Radical resection is the most common treatment type for both sites. Chemotherapy with radical resection offers better OS in SB GIST, but not in CR GIST. Further studies are needed to assess the biology of CR GIST to explain the worse OS.

Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Located in the Jejunum and Ileum

BACKGROUND

Data about the clinicopathological features and prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) located in jejunum and ileum are lacking. The present study aims to investigate the features and prognosis of jejunal and ileal GISTs based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cases of jejunal and ileal GISTs were extracted from SEER database. Clinicopathological characteristics and survival data of patients were recorded. The clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 399 male (56.8%) and 303 female (43.2%). The median age was 60 years (17-96). Four hundred and seventy-two tumors were located in the jejunum (67.2%) and 230 tumors in the ileum (32.8%). The median tumor size was 7.0 cm (0.5-90). The 5-, 10-, and 20-year disease specific survival (DSS) was 84.4, 71.2, and 54.2% respectively. Clinicopathological features were comparable between tumors located in the jejunum and ileum (all p > 0.05) except gender and tumor size (both p < 0.05). Jejunal GISTs, rather than ileal GISTs (p = 0.043), were commonly found in the males. The tumor size of jejunal GISTs was smaller than that of ileal GISTs (p = 0.010). The DSS of jejunal GISTs was comparable to that of ileal GISTs (p = 0.269).

CONCLUSIONS

Jejunal GISTs were more common than ileal GISTs. The prognosis was comparable between jejunal and ileal GISTs.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: 16 years' experience within a university hospital

AIM

the aim was to convey our 16-year experience regarding gastrointestinal stromal tumors within in a high volume university hospital. Factors that may impact on patient survival were evaluated.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

all patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumors in our clinic over a 16-year period were retrospectively evaluated. All patients included in the study had their tumors surgically resected. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival time comparisons between groups were performed using the log-rank test. The effect of continuous variables on survival times were evaluated via a Cox-regression analysis with a backward conditional method.

RESULTS

one hundred and thirty-five patients (76 males and 59 females) were included into the study and the mean age was 62.8 ± 13.3 years. Overall survival time was 121.3 ± 7.0 months and the 5-year survival rate was 66.6 ± 4.2%. Patients with colorectal tumors had significantly lower survival times than patients with tumors located in the stomach (p = 0.001) and small intestine (p = 0.033). Patients with moderate risk scores had a significantly longer survival compared to patients with high risk scores (p = 0.003) and patients with tumor recurrence had a significantly shorter survival (p < 0.001). There was no significant relationship between survival and factors such as gender and tumor size (p > 0.05). However, age, Ki-67 and the mitotic index were poor prognostic factors and C-kit was considered as a good prognostic factor.

CONCLUSION

some of the findings in this study are consistent with published data. However, our data significantly differs from previous studies such as the common finding of the effect of gender and tumor size on survival.