Percutaneously inserted polyurethane central catheters in the NICU: one unit's experience

Safety and feasibility of platelet transfusion through long catheters in the neonatal intensive care unit: an in vitro study

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and feasibility of platelet transfusion through small-bore long lines used in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), including double-lumen umbilical venous catheters (UVCs) and 24 G and 28 G peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs).

DESIGN

Prospective in vitro controlled study.

SETTING

Blood transfusion service laboratory.

METHODS

In vitro platelet transfusions were set up as per NICU practice. Transfusion line pressure was monitored. Post-transfusion swirling, presence of aggregates, pH analysis and automated cell count in vitro activation response by flow cytometry assessing CD62P expression were assessed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

All transfusions completed successfully. The rate of infusion was reduced in 5 of 16 transfusions through 28 G lines due to 'pressure high' alarms. There was no difference in swirling values or transfusion aggregate formation, CD62P expression levels, platelet count, platelet distribution width, mean platelet volume, plateletcrit or platelet to large cell ratio across transfusions post-transfusion.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that in vitro platelet transfusion performed through 24 G and 28 G neonatal PICC lines and double-lumen UVCs is non-inferior to 24 G short cannulas, using outcome measures of platelet clumping, platelet activation and line occlusion. This suggests that where available these lines can be used if necessary for platelet transfusion.

Unveiling Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Fractures and Related Complications in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Concise Review

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) have become popular over tunneled catheters in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) due to their ease of use and convenience. Although rare, a PICC fracture can be a severe and potentially fatal complication. This narrative review aims to identify factors predisposing neonates to PICC fracture and related complications, such as catheter jamming, and explore strategies for preventing and detecting this complication. A thorough search of PubMed and Google Scholar was conducted using relevant keywords to identify articles discussing PICC fracture in neonates. The review encompassed English-language literature on PICC fracture in neonates, with additional pertinent publications identified through citation searching. The incidence of PICC fracture in neonates varies from less than 1% to 10%, with a higher risk associated with prolonged catheterization, lower gestational age and lower birth weight, and the use of multi-lumen catheters. PICC fractures can occur during insertion, maintenance, or removal. Factors such as catheter duration, gestational age, birth weight, and catheter type increase the risk of PICC fracture. Excessive syringe pressure, securement failure, and excessive force during removal are contributing factors. Catheter fatigue and thin-walled catheter design are common causes of breakage. Preventive measures include proper training of healthcare providers, regular monitoring, early recognition, and prompt catheter removal upon fracture. Preventing and detecting PICC fractures is crucial for neonatal safety. Vigilance during insertion, maintenance, and removal, along with care to avoid excessive force during removal and high pressure during flushing, can help prevent catheter breakage. More research is required to improve prevention strategies for PICC fractures in neonates.

Peripherally inserted central cathether migration in neonates: Incidence, timing and risk factors

BACKGROUND

PICC line use is a common practice in neonatal units, but it is associated with various complications. Catheter migration is the most common complication in neonates. Periodic imaging is recommended to monitor the tip position of the PICCs, but the optimal frequency is undetermined. The incidence, timing and risk factors that are associated with PICC migration have not been fully investigated beyond 24 hrs in neonates. The aim of the study was to determine the incidence, timing and risk factors that are associated with peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) migration in neonates.

METHODS

This was a single center, retrospective study of 168 PICCs placed in 141 neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) between 2015 and 2016. The incidence of catheter migration was determined radiographically at 12-24 hrs and every third day after insertion until it was removed.

RESULTS

Overall incidence of PICC migration was 28%and most commonly was detected within the first three days after PICC placement (83%). The incidence of PICC migration was higher in males. The PICC migration was associated with difficulty advancing the PICC at the time of insertion and PICC dressing change.

CONCLUSION

Serial evaluation of PICC placement in neonates is required to maintain proper position. Based on our experience in our unit, we recommend periodic imaging at 12-24 hrs and on the third day after PICC placement as most migration occurred within three days after insertion.

Effect of implementing an Epicutaneo-Caval Catheter team in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Background:

Until the 1980s, central vascular access in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit was predominantly delivered by umbilical catheters and only and if needed by surgical cutdowns or subclavian vein catheterization through blind percutaneous venipuncture. In the early 1980s, epicutaneo-caval catheters were successfully introduced.

Methods:

In our Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, a dedicated team to insert epicutaneo-caval catheters was formally established in January 2017, including 12 neonatologists and 1 neonatal nurse practitioner. A before- versus after-intervention study was designed to determine whether the establishment of the epicutaneo-caval catheter insertion team is associated with increased success rates and a decreased risk of catheter-related complications. Success rates and other catheter-related parameters were traced from 2016 onward. Collected data were analyzed for three consecutive years: 2016, 2017, and 2018.

Results:

The epicutaneo-caval catheter team inserted 1336 catheters over 3 years. Both first prick (from 57.7% to 66.9%; p = 0.023) and overall success (from 81.7% to 97.6%; p < 0.0001) rates significantly improved. In 2018, the number of tunneled or surgically inserted central venous catheters came down to zero (p < 0.0001). Overall catheter-related complications were significantly lower following the epicutaneo-caval catheter team’s establishment (p < 0.0001) while there was no significant decrease noted (p = 0.978) in central line–associated bacterial stream infection rates.

Conclusion:

A dedicated epicutaneo-caval catheter team is a promising intervention to increase success rates and significantly decrease catheter-related complications in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Standardizing epicutaneo-caval catheter placement is important; however, standardizing catheter maintenance seems essential to the improvement of central line–associated bacterial stream infection rates.

Insertion of peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates less than 1.5 kg using ultrasound guidance

BACKGROUND

Neonates commonly require central access, and in those with very low or extremely low birthweight this can be challenging. Described here is a technique that uses ultrasound guidance in the placement of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) in neonates and an analysis of outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted of all patients below 1500 g that underwent placement of a peripherally inserted central catheter under ultrasound guidance between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2014 at a single center. All patients had multiple previous attempts at PICC placement by experienced NICU vascular access nurses prior to referral. Complications were determined based on clinical and procedural notes.

RESULTS

A total of ten patients were found during the study period. The average estimated gestational age was 29.8 weeks (range 26-38 weeks).The average weight at the time of PICC insertion was 968 g (range 485-1390 g). All attempts at placement were successful. There were no complications directly related to PICC insertion.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound guided PICC line placements using ultrasound is an effective technique, which can be applied to very low and extremely low birth weight infants, with excellent success rates and a low risk of complications.

Retrieval of Embolized Intracardiac Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Line: Novel Percutaneous Technique by Utilizing a Flexible Biopsy Forceps

Peripheral catheter embolization to the heart is common but infrequently reported. In view of the hazardous complications of thrombosis, embolism, infection, arrhythmia and even death, percutaneous retrieval of such foreign bodies is usually attempted. Previously reported percutaneous technique of retrieval mainly involved the snaring technique. Herein, we report a novel nonsurgical retrieval technique for successful removal of a 46 cm long embolized intracardiac peripherally inserted central catheter by utilizing a flexible biopsy forceps. To the best of our knowledge, the use of flexible biopsy forceps for retrieval has hitherto been unreported and this case report therefore adds to the repertoire of percutaneous retrieval techniques for safe and easy removal of embolized catheters to the heart.

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters Complicated by Vascular Erosion in Neonates

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are widely used in the pediatric population, and their use continues to grow in popularity. These catheters provide a reliable source of venous access to neonatal patients but can also be the cause of life-threatening complications. There are several well-documented complications such as infections, catheter thrombosis, vascular extravasations, and fractured catheters. However, the complication of vascular erosion into the pleural space using both small and silicone-based catheters is rarely described. After obtaining institutional review board approval, we identified 4 cases to review of PICCs complicated by vascular erosions in the past 2 years. Herein, we also review the current literature of PICC complications. Getting the catheter tip as close to the atrial-caval junction as possible and confirmation of this placement are of the utmost importance. The thick wall of the vena cava near the atrium seems to be less likely to perforate; in addition, this position provides increased volume and turbulence to help dilute the hyperosmolar fluid, which seems to also be a factor in this complication. A daily screening chest x-ray in patients with upper extremity PICCs and ongoing parenteral nutrition (PN) are not necessary at this time given the overall low rate of vascular erosion and concerns regarding excessive radiation exposure in pediatric populations. However, a low threshold for chest x-ray imaging in patients with even mild respiratory symptoms in the setting of upper extremity PN is recommended.

A Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Central Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Objective.

To reduce the rate of late-onset sepsis in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) by decreasing the rate of central line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI).

Methods.

We conducted a quasi-experimental study of an educational intervention designed to improve the quality of clinical practice in an NICU. Participants included all NICU patients with a central venous catheter (CVC). Data were collected during the period from July 1, 2005, to June 30, 2007, to document existing CLABSI rates and CVC-related practices. A multidisciplinary quality improvement committee was established to review these and published data and to create guidelines for CVC placement and management. Educational efforts were conducted to implement these practices. Postintervention CLABSI rates were collected during the period from January 1, 2008, through March 31, 2009, and compared with preintervention data and with benchmark data from the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN).

Results.

The rate of CLABSI in the NICU decreased from 8.40 to 1.28 cases per 1,000 central line–days (adjusted rate ratio, 0.19 [95% confidence interval, 0.08–0.45]). This rate was lower than the NHSN benchmark rate for level III NICUs. The overall rate of late-onset sepsis was reduced from 5.84 to 1.42 cases per 1,000 patient-days (rate difference, −4.42 cases per 1,000 patient-days [95% confidence interval, −5.55 to −3.30 cases per 1,000 patient-days]).

Conclusions.

It is possible to reduce the rate of CLABSI, and therefore the rate of late-onset sepsis, by establishing and adhering to evidence-based guidelines. Sustainability depends on continued data surveillance, knowledge of medical and nursing literature, and timely feedback to the staff. The techniques established are applicable to other populations and areas of inpatient care.

Neonatal peripherally inserted central catheter practices and their association with demographics, training, and radiographic monitoring: results from a national survey

The goal of this secondary analysis of results from a national survey of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) practices in neonates was to determine whether demographics and types of training were associated with differing radiographic confirmation practices of these catheters. Correlational analyses were performed on the 2010 national database of neonatal PICC practices. The sample consisted of 187 respondents, representing 25% of the level III neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) of more than 20 beds in the United States. The key factors examined were geographic location, size of NICU, academic affiliation, and type of training related to radiographic confirmation of the catheter tip position, routine monitoring and reconfirmation of the catheter tip position following adjustments, and associated patient positioning practices for consistent evaluation of the catheter tip position. Formal training and annual retraining were statistically significantly associated with consistent patient positioning practices for more accurate monitoring of the catheter tip position and acceptable tip location. Size of NICU and academic affiliation were not associated with differences in practices. Adherence to specific national guidelines and recommendations for care of infants with PICCs is significantly impacted by formal training and annual retraining. This underscores the importance of education and annual retraining in preventing PICC-related complications beyond the crucial prevention of central line-associated bloodstream infections.

Evaluation of neonatal peripherally inserted central catheter tip movement in a consistent upper extremity position

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of standardized upper extremity position versus varied upper extremity positions on neonatal peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) tip placement and movement. Secondary outcomes assessed were compliance with education, implementation, and complication rates.

STUDY DESIGN

Tip movement was analyzed between 136 post-PICC insertion x-ray pairs from 72 infants in the 6 months before and after standardization of upper extremity position. Tip movement was regressed over days between x-ray pairs, respiratory support, absolute weight change, and insertion vein.

RESULTS

There was no difference in PICC tip movement among varied analysis pairs or when standard position pairs were compared with pairs that were in a same nonstandard position. Days between x-rays, respiratory support, absolute weight change, and insertion vein did not predict tip movement. Attendance at education sessions was 100%. Compliance with the new standard was 73%. Complication rates were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

Standardization of upper extremity position during neonatal PICC confirmation x-rays did not alter PICC tip movement.

A national survey of neonatal peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) practices

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess and describe the practices involved in the insertion and maintenance of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in neonates in level III neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in the United States and to compare the findings with current recommendations and evidence.

SUBJECTS

The study included responses from 187 nurses, nurse practitioners, and neonatologists who place PICCs in NICUs representing 43 states.

METHODS

A 90-question, multiple-choice survey of a variety of PICC practices was sent to NICU directors and nursing staff responsible for PICC insertion. The explorative survey was sent by electronic and standard mail services. A descriptive analysis of the responses was performed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Main outcome measures included the response rate to the survey and the summarized responses of multiple categories of PICC practices.

PRINCIPAL RESULTS

Of the 460 level III NICUs contacted, 187 returned surveys meeting criteria for analysis, yielding a 42% response rate. Responses showed wide variation of PICC practices in multiple aspects of PICC insertion and maintenance. The greatest level of conformity was seen with the following practices: use of 2 nurses to perform a dressing change, trimming the PICC, using a kit or cart containing insertion supplies, use of maximal sterile barrier precautions during insertion, catheter tip residing in the superior vena cava for upper body insertions, and not heparin locking, infusing blood products, performing catheter repair, or inserting using Modified Seldinger Technique. Some identified practices, such as infusion tubing change and catheter entry techniques, were contrary to current evidence and demonstrated a lack of correct information, and some represented safety concerns for the neonates having PICCs.

CONCLUSION

This extensive national survey of NICU PICC practices showed wide variation in multiple aspects of PICC insertion and maintenance. A gap between the evidence and current practice was evident in many facets of training, insertion techniques, and maintenance processes. The data suggest a need for an increase in awareness of clinicians of current practice guidelines and standards and the need for further research to develop an evidence basis for many aspects of PICC care where lacking.

Effect of heparin and other factors associated with complications of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in neonates

OBJECTIVE

To identify factors associated with complications necessitating unplanned removal of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) in neonates.

STUDY DESIGN

A before-and-after comparison following the exclusion of heparin from continuous infusions through PICCs placed by a designated team. Duration of use was assessed during epochs immediately preceding and following the practice change. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors associated with unplanned catheter removal.

RESULT

We analyzed 189 PICC placements with heparin (epoch 1) and 188 with no heparin (epoch 2) added to infusions. Rates of complication (23.7 vs 17.2 per 1000 catheter days) and median durations of use (7 vs 8 days) did not differ significantly between the epochs. Non-central position of the catheter tip, use of dual lumen catheters and placement through the cephalic vein were independently associated with complications (each P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

In neonates requiring short-term intravenous access, heparin may be safely omitted from continuous infusions without compromising catheter usability.

A randomized trial of the Vein Viewer versus standard technique for placement of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in neonates

OBJECTIVE

Peripherally inserted central catheters are important but can be difficult to place in neonates. Therefore, we compared a near-infrared device, the Vein Viewer, to determine if its use would increase successful line placement, with standard techniques.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial in preterm and term neonates in a level 3 Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

RESULT

In all, 115 subjects were enrolled with 59 randomized to the Vein Viewer group and 56 to the control group. Overall, use of the Vein Viewer showed a trend to more successful placement 86 versus 75%; unadjusted odds ratio 2.33 (0.90, 6.04; P=0.08). Infants randomized to the Vein Viewer were more mature (30 ± 2 weeks gestational age (GA) versus 28 ± 2 weeks GA; P=0.08). After adjusting for GA, use of the Vein Viewer was significantly more likely to lead to successful line placement (adjusted odds ratio 3.05 (1.10, 1.82)).

CONCLUSION

The Vein Viewer improved successful placement with the most benefit seen in infants of greater GA.

Neonatal PICC: one unit's six-year experience with limiting catheter complications

Safe dressing techniques for neonatal peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) remain controversial in the literature. This article describes one unit's experience with the placement and management of 491 PICCs during a six-year period with more than 5,600 catheter days. The dressing technique described in this article differs from that seen in the literature with the addition of a protective base layer. Catheter complication rates are low, and catheter dressing changes are minimized with this dressing technique.

Are supine chest and abdominal radiographs the best way to confirm PICC placement in neonates?

BACKGROUND

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are commonly used in NICUs. Although they have many benefits, they also have many potential complications. Confirming catheter tip position is essential to decreasing complications, but the best method to achieve confirmation is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

Literature review for studies that address line position confirmation to assist health care providers in evaluating the available research and to identify gaps in the literature.

METHOD

A literature search of four major databases followed by an ancestry approach was performed. Articles reviewed specifically discuss PICC lines and PICC line placement confirmation.

RESULTS

Data on confirming PICC placement were lacking. Fluoroscopic placement is ideal, but cannot be done at the bedside and is costly. Supine chest radiograph is the most widely used method and is convenient, but when line tip position is unclear, contrast or ultrasound confirmation can be used. When PICC lines are placed in the saphenous vein, infants may benefit from supine and lateral abdominal radiographs to ensure placement in the inferior vena cava.

DISCUSSION

More studies are needed to generalize findings. PICC line tips should be located in the superior vena cava or inferior vena cava close to the junction with the right atrium (0.5-1 cm outside of the cardiac chambers in premature infants and 1-2 cm outside of the cardiac chambers in larger infants). Arm position is very important when performing radiographs for placement because movement of the arm can cause migration of the catheter. There is also significant inter-observer variability when identifying line tip position.

Securing PICC lines

Ms. Shirland raises a valid concern regarding safe securement of the neonatal PICC catheter and its role in preventing catheter fracture and catheter embolism. Ms. Paulson and Ms. Miller’s response is appreciated [see the author’s response in Neonatal Network, November/December 2008, p. 427]. In Dislodgement Rates and Impact of Securement Methods for Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICCs) in Children, Frey and Schears report methods of PICC securement include transparent dressings, skin closure strips, sutures, and catheter-specific securement devices.1 However, a specific procedure for the appropriate placement of the skin closure strips is not delineated. In PICC Complications in Neonates and Children, Frey describes catheter fracture, where the damage was caused by a “sterile-tape thread” in a skin closure strip.2 Given the extended dwell time expected with PICC catheters, placement of skin closure strips including sterile tape fibers directly overlying the catheter would, in combination with infant mobility, support the possibility of external forces (fibers, adhesive agent, activity) causing severance of the catheter over time, which cannot be discounted. In cases of catheter embolism, catheter fragments required cardiac catheterization for retrieval.2

Localização inicial da ponta de cateter central de inserção periférica (PICC) em recém-nascidos

Estudo transversal com coleta prospectiva de dados, que objetivouidentificar o posicionamento inicial da ponta do cateter central de inserção periférica (PICC) e verificar a prevalência de sucesso de sua inserção em neonatos. Os dados foram coletados no berçário anexo à maternidade do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, entre março e setembro de 2006. Dos 37 neonatos submetidos à inserção do cateter PICC, a taxa de sucesso no procedimento foi de 72,3% (27 neonatos); destes, quatro (14,8%) estavam com as pontas dos cateteres alojadas nas veias axilar ou inominada; outros três (11,1%), alojadas em veia jugular. Estes cateteres foram removidos por desvio de trajeto. 13 (48,2%) estavam com as pontas alojadas em átrio direito, cujos cateteres foram tracionados para reposicionamento da ponta para a veia cava superior.

Neonatal peripherally inserted central catheters: recommendations for prevention of insertion and postinsertion complications

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) continue to be necessary in neonatal care. They benefit many premature infants and those needing long-term intravenous access. An experienced inserter, early recognition of PICC candidates, early PICC placement, knowledge of anatomy, and correct choice of vein all increase placement success. As with any invasive procedure, there are risks. These include pain, difficulty advancing the catheter, damage to vessels, catheter malposition, and bleeding. Utilizing assessment skills, following the product manufacturer's instructions, and carefully placing the catheter should minimize most of these risks. Additional risks include postinsertion complications such as occlusions, thrombosis, catheter failure, infection, and catheter malposition. Proper nursing care--which includes controlling infection, properly securing the catheter, and changing the dressing as needed--is key to preventing complications and maintaining the PICC until treatment has been completed.

Tiny patients, tiny dressings: a guide to the neonatal PICC dressing change

Advances in neonatology now support the survival of the tiniest of infants. The peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) has now become an integral part of routine practice in neonatal intensive care units around the world. Keen attention to safe maintenance of these devices is essential. A properly applied and maintained PICC dressing is the first line of defense to minimize the risk of complications such as dislodgement, migration, and infection. This article describes a neonatal PICC dressing change and discusses the frequently encountered quandaries surrounding this important procedure, including dressing materials, frequency, site preparation, barrier precautions, and other relevant concerns.

Percutaneously inserted central catheter for total parenteral nutrition in neonates: complications rates related to upper versus lower extremity insertion

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the complication rates of upper versus lower extremity percutaneously inserted central catheters used for total parenteral nutrition in neonates.

METHODS

During a 48-month study period, 396 neonates were identified as having had percutaneously inserted central venous catheters. A total of 370 catheters were inserted from the upper and 107 from the lower extremity. Data retrieved and analyzed were birth weight, gestational age, age at placement, duration in place, duration of total parenteral nutrition, type of infusates, catheter-related bloodstream infection, phlebitis, leakage, occlusion, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage, serum creatinine, liver function tests, and length of hospitalization.

RESULTS

The median birth weight and gestational age were 940 g and 28 weeks. The rate of catheter-related bloodstream infection was 11.6% for the upper and 9.3% in the lower extremity catheters. The most common organism was coagulase-negative Staphylococcus for both upper and lower extremity catheters and significantly higher with catheters from the upper extremity. Lower extremity catheters were in place longer, and the time from insertion to complication was also longer. The rate of cholestasis was higher for the upper extremity catheters. Multiple regression analysis showed that the most significant contributor to cholestasis was duration of time the catheters were in place and the duration of total parenteral nutrition administration. Receiver operating characteristics curve demonstrated higher sensitivity for duration of catheters in predicting cholestasis with duration of total parenteral nutrition being more specific.

CONCLUSION

Lower extremity percutaneously inserted central venous catheters had lower rates of catheter-related bloodstream infection, longer time to first complication, and lower cholestasis despite longer duration of total parenteral nutrition. When possible, lower extremity inserted catheters should be used for the administration of total parenteral nutrition.

Retained central venous lines in the newborn: report of one case and systematic review of the literature

The use of percutaneously inserted central catheters (PICCs) is an established practice in most NICUs. With the widespread use of these catheters, an increasing number of PICC complications has been reported in neonates. We present one case of a PICC retained and tethered in the vein in a very low birth weight infant, as well as a systematic review of PICC retention cases. Ten previous cases of PICC retention in neonates were found. Among those cases, the most common associated factors were coagulase-negative staphylococcus catheter colonization/bactcremia and long duration of catheterization. Occlusion was not a usefiul sign for predicting catheter retention. Once retention was established, heparin or urokinase instillations were ineffective. Although surgical exploration was sometimes required, firm, continuous traction applied to the catheter over several hours or intermittent, moderately strong pulling maneuvers were successful in 44.4 percent of the cases in which they were performed. Traction did not show major side effects. Our case provides additional support for use of traction as the initial approach in the management of this rare complication.

Neonatal peripherally inserted central catheter team. Evolution and outcomes of a bedside-nurse-designed program

Percutaneously inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) have been used to provide central venous access for more than 25 years. Although these lines initially were placed by physicians, currently there are many adult, pediatric, and neonatal nurse-based PICC teams. This article describes the inception and growth of 1 team which, during the last 14 years, has placed more than 3400 catheters and trained more than 50 bedside nurses to insert PICCs. It highlights the development of the team, including details of how team members were selected and trained. Management of ongoing issues was handled by a self-directed nurse team organized into a committee structure composed of an oversight committee and education, guideline, qualifications, and quality improvement subcommittees. This team set and achieved the goals of training bedside nurses to place PICCs, providing consistent management of PICCs, and closely monitoring outcomes.

A randomized trial comparing long-term and short-term use of umbilical venous catheters in premature infants with birth weights of less than 1251 grams

BACKGROUND

Umbilical vein and percutaneous central venous catheters are often used in preterm infants, but they can lead to complications, including infection.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that long-term umbilical vein catheter use would result in fewer infections than short-term umbilical vein catheter use followed by percutaneous central venous catheter placement.

DESIGN/METHODS

Infants < or = 1250 g with umbilical vein catheters placed at admission were randomly assigned to a long-term (umbilical vein catheter up to 28 days) or short-term (umbilical vein catheter for 7-10 days followed by percutaneous central venous catheter) group. Catheter infection was defined as symptoms and > or = 1 positive blood culture for definite pathogens or >1 positive culture for other organisms, with a catheter in place. Clinically significant echocardiogram findings were defined as thrombi threatening vascular occlusion, crossing/blocking heart valves, or otherwise felt to be significant by the cardiologist. The primary outcome was time from birth to catheter infection, analyzed by the log-rank test.

RESULTS

There were 106 subjects in the short-term group and 104 in the long-term group with birth weights of 915 +/- 198 and 931 +/- 193 g and gestational ages of 27.8 +/- 2.0 and 27.7 +/- 2.2 weeks, respectively. The distribution of time to catheter infection did not differ between the groups. The overall incidence of catheter infection was 13% in the short-term group and 20% in the long-term group. Median age at catheter infection was 11.5 days in the short-term group and 14 days in the long-term group. There were 7.4 infections per 1000 catheter-days in the short-term group and 11.5 per 1000 in the long-term group. Seven infections in the short-term group were in umbilical vein catheters, and 18 infections in the long-term group were in umbilical vein catheter. Echocardiograms detected 4 infants in the short-term group and 7 infants in the long-term group with significant thrombosis. All significant thrombi were at the site of the umbilical vein catheter tip. No thrombus caused hemodynamic compromise, no child had clinical symptoms of thrombosis, and none required therapy. Of the 45 small-for-gestational-age infants in the study, 9 developed thrombi (short-term group, 4; long-term group, 5). The incidence of thrombi was higher in the small-for-gestational-age group (20%) versus other study subjects (9%). There were no differences in time to full feedings or to regain birth weight or in the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis or death.

CONCLUSIONS

Infection and complication rates were similar between infants managed with an umbilical vein catheter in place for up to 28 days compared with infants managed with an umbilical vein catheter replaced by a percutaneous central venous catheter after 7 to 10 days. Umbilical vein catheter durations beyond the current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-recommended limit of 14 days may be reasonable.

Assessment of infants with peripherally inserted central catheters: Part 2. Detecting less frequently occurring complications

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are frequently placed in neonates to optimize nutrition and provide stable infusions of critical medications into the central vascular system. PICCs have been associated with a number of device-specific complications that can manifest during insertion, while the line is indwelling, and/or after the removal of the line. The first article of this series in Focus on the Physical, titled "Assessment of Infants With Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: Part I. Detecting the Most Frequently Occurring Complications," presented assessment strategies to detect common complications such as catheter occlusions and catheter-related bloodstream infections. Part 2 of this series emphasizes the importance of ongoing systematic assessment of PICCs for device-specific complications such as catheter migration, dislodgement, breakage, phlebitis, and thrombosis, as well as the life-threatening complications of pleural and pericardial effusion and tamponade. Each complication is described, along with a review of the etiology, a description of presenting signs and symptoms, and key clinical interventions.

Assessment of infants with peripherally inserted central catheters: Part 1. Detecting the most frequently occurring complications

Inserting, maintaining, and monitoring vascular access are integral components of neonatal care. Advances in vascular access technology have led to the insertion of peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) to provide stable venous access for early and aggressive parenteral nutrition. Medications that are irritating or damaging, or those with a high osmolality or a nonphysiologic pH, can also be safely administered into the central venous system. The need for repeated peripheral intravenous attempts, as well as the associated pain and physiologic instability, are virtually eliminated once a PICC line is placed. Complications related to PICCs may occur at any phase of therapy: during insertion, while indwelling, or after discontinuing the line. The risk factors associated with PICCs are distinctly different from peripheral intravenous lines because of their long dwell time, central placement, and potential to migrate. Part 1 of Focus on the Physical offers a review of the relevant anatomy of the vascular system and a discussion of the appropriate sites for catheter tip placement. Guidelines for a systematic physical assessment, along with recommendations for standardized PICC documentation, are provided. A review of the signs and symptoms of more frequently occurring complications, such as catheter occlusion and bloodstream infections, is presented to enhance awareness of PICC-specific complications in the neonate and to expedite early detection and treatment. Part 2 of this series will focus on systematic assessment for less common complications such as catheter migration, dislodgement, breakage, and thrombosis, as well as the life-threatening complications of pleural and pericardial effusion.

The safety and efficacy of peripheral intravenous catheters in ill neonates

This article describes the use of a quality improvement clinical audit approach to identify insertion practices, duration of therapy, and complications related to peripheral intravenous catheters. These data provide evidence for adherence to practice standards and benchmarks for evaluation of new interventions to improve the safety and efficacy of intravenous access practices. Implications for quality improvement and clinical research related to intravenous-device practices within the neonatal intensive care unit are discussed.