1
|
Neches SK, DeMartino C, Shay R. Pharmacologic Adjuncts for Neonatal Tracheal Intubation: The Evidence Behind Premedication. Neoreviews 2023; 24:e783-e796. [PMID: 38036442 DOI: 10.1542/neo.24-12-e783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
Premedication such as analgesia, sedation, vagolytics, and paralytics may improve neonatal tracheal intubation success, reduce intubation-associated adverse events, and create optimal conditions for performing this high-risk and challenging procedure. Although rapid sequence induction including a paralytic agent has been adopted for intubations in pediatric and adult critical care, neonatal clinical practice varies. This review aims to summarize details of common classes of neonatal intubation premedication including indications for use, medication route, dosage, potential adverse effects in term and preterm infants, and reversal agents. In addition, this review shares the literature on national and international practice variations; explores evidence in support of establishing premedication guidelines; and discusses unique circumstances in which premedication use has not been established, such as during catheter-based or minimally invasive surfactant delivery. With increasing survival of extremely preterm infants, clear guidance for premedication use in this population will be necessary, particularly considering potential short- and long-term side effects of procedural sedation on the developing brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara K Neches
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Washington School of Medicine and Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA
| | - Cassandra DeMartino
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
| | - Rebecca Shay
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of Colorado School of Medicine and Children's Hospital of Colorado, Denver, CO
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kinoshita M, Borges do Nascimento IJ, Styrmisdóttir L, Bruschettini M. Systemic opioid regimens for postoperative pain in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 4:CD015016. [PMID: 37018131 PMCID: PMC10075508 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd015016.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pain clinical management in neonates has always been a challenging medical issue. Worldwide, several systemic opioid regimens are available for pediatricians, neonatologists, and general practitioners to control pain in neonates undergoing surgical procedures. However, the most effective and safe regimen is still unknown in the current body of literature. OBJECTIVES To determine the effects of different regimens of systemic opioid analgesics in neonates submitted to surgery on all-cause mortality, pain, and significant neurodevelopmental disability. Potentially assessed regimens might include: different doses of the same opioid, different routes of administration of the same opioid, continuous infusion versus bolus administration, or 'as needed' administration versus 'as scheduled' administration. SEARCH METHODS Searches were conducted in June 2022 using the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL], PubMed, and CINAHL. Trial registration records were identified via CENTRAL and an independent search of the ISRCTN registry. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-randomized, cluster-randomized, and cross-over controlled trials evaluating systemic opioid regimens' effects on postoperative pain in neonates (pre-term or full-term). We considered suitable for inclusion: I) studies evaluating different doses of the same opioid; 2) studies evaluating different routes of administration of the same opioid; 3) studies evaluating the effectiveness of continuous infusion versus bolus infusion; and 4) studies establishing an assessment of an 'as needed' administration versus 'as scheduled' administration. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS According to Cochrane methods, two investigators independently screened retrieved records, extracted data, and appraised the risk of bias. We stratified meta-analysis by the type of intervention: studies evaluating the use of opioids for postoperative pain in neonates through continuous infusion versus bolus infusion and studies assessing the 'as needed' administration versus 'as scheduled' administration. We used the fixed-effect model with risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data and mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference (SMD), median, and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous data. Finally, we used the GRADEpro approach for primary outcomes to evaluate the quality of the evidence across included studies. MAIN RESULTS In this review, we included seven randomized controlled clinical trials (504 infants) from 1996 to 2020. We identified no studies comparing different doses of the same opioid, or different routes. The administration of continuous opioid infusion versus bolus administration of opioids was evaluated in six studies, while one study compared 'as needed' versus 'as scheduled' administration of morphine given by parents or nurses. Overall, the effectiveness of continuous infusion of opioids over bolus infusion as measured by the visual analog scale (MD 0.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.23 to 0.23; 133 participants, 2 studies; I² = 0); or using the COMFORT scale (MD -0.07, 95% CI -0.89 to 0.75; 133 participants, 2 studies; I² = 0), remains unclear due to study designs' limitations, such as the unclear risk of attrition, reporting bias, and imprecision among reported results (very low certainty of the evidence). None of the included studies reported data on other clinically important outcomes such as all-cause mortality rate during hospitalization, major neurodevelopmental disability, the incidence of severe retinopathy of prematurity or intraventricular hemorrhage, and cognitive- and educational-related outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence is available on continuous infusion compared to intermittent boluses of systemic opioids. We are uncertain whether continuous opioid infusion reduces pain compared with intermittent opioid boluses; none of the studies reported the other primary outcomes of this review, i.e. all-cause mortality during initial hospitalization, significant neurodevelopmental disability, or cognitive and educational outcomes among children older than five years old. Only one small study reported on morphine infusion with parent- or nurse-controlled analgesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mari Kinoshita
- Department of Pediatrics, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Fetal Medicine Research Center, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Israel Junior Borges do Nascimento
- School of Medicine and University Hospital, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | - Matteo Bruschettini
- Paediatrics, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Cochrane Sweden, Department of Research and Education, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kinoshita M, Stempel KS, Borges do Nascimento IJ, Bruschettini M. Systemic opioids versus other analgesics and sedatives for postoperative pain in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 3:CD014876. [PMID: 36870076 PMCID: PMC9983301 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014876.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neonates may undergo surgery because of malformations such as diaphragmatic hernia, gastroschisis, congenital heart disease, and hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, or complications of prematurity, such as necrotizing enterocolitis, spontaneous intestinal perforation, and retinopathy of prematurity that require surgical treatment. Options for treatment of postoperative pain include opioids, non-pharmacological interventions, and other drugs. Morphine, fentanyl, and remifentanil are the opioids most often used in neonates. However, negative impact of opioids on the structure and function of the developing brain has been reported. The assessment of the effects of opioids is of utmost importance, especially for neonates in substantial pain during the postoperative period. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the benefits and harms of systemic opioid analgesics in neonates who underwent surgery on all-cause mortality, pain, and significant neurodevelopmental disability compared to no intervention, placebo, non-pharmacological interventions, different types of opioids, or other drugs. SEARCH METHODS We searched Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE via PubMed and CINAHL in May 2021. We searched the WHO ICTRP, clinicaltrials.gov, and ICTRP trial registries. We searched conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for RCTs and quasi-RCTs. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in preterm and term infants of a postmenstrual age up to 46 weeks and 0 days with postoperative pain where systemic opioids were compared to 1) placebo or no intervention; 2) non-pharmacological interventions; 3) different types of opioids; or 4) other drugs. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were pain assessed with validated methods, all-cause mortality during initial hospitalization, major neurodevelopmental disability, and cognitive and educational outcomes in children more than five years old. We used the fixed-effect model with risk ratio (RR) and risk difference (RD) for dichotomous data and mean difference (MD) for continuous data. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS We included four RCTs enrolling 331 infants in four countries across different continents. Most studies considered patients undergoing large or medium surgical procedures (including major thoracic or abdominal surgery), who potentially required pain control through opioid administration after surgery. The randomized trials did not consider patients undergoing minor surgery (including inguinal hernia repair) and those individuals exposed to opioids before the beginning of the trial. Two RCTs compared opioids with placebo; one fentanyl with tramadol; and one morphine with paracetamol. No meta-analyses could be performed because the included RCTs reported no more than three outcomes within the prespecified comparisons. Certainty of the evidence was very low for all outcomes due to imprecision of the estimates (downgrade by two levels) and study limitations (downgrade by one level). Comparison 1: opioids versus no treatment or placebo Two trials were included in this comparison, comparing either tramadol or tapentadol with placebo. No data were reported on the following critical outcomes: pain; major neurodevelopmental disability; or cognitive and educational outcomes in children more than five years old. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of tramadol compared with placebo on all-cause mortality during initial hospitalization (RR 0.32, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.01 to 7.70; RD -0.03, 95% CI -0.10 to 0.05, 71 participants, 1 study; I² = not applicable). No data were reported on: retinopathy of prematurity; or intraventricular hemorrhage. Comparison 2: opioids versus non-pharmacological interventions No trials were included in this comparison. Comparison 3: head-to-head comparisons of different opioids One trial comparing fentanyl with tramadol was included in this comparison. No data were reported on the following critical outcomes: pain; major neurodevelopmental disability; or cognitive and educational outcomes in children more than five years old. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of fentanyl compared with tramadol on all-cause mortality during initial hospitalization (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.64; RD 0.00, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.13, 171 participants, 1 study; I² = not applicable). No data were reported on: retinopathy of prematurity; or intraventricular hemorrhage. Comparison 4: opioids versus other analgesics and sedatives One trial comparing morphine with paracetamol was included in this comparison. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of morphine compared with paracetamol on COMFORT pain scores (MD 0.10, 95% CI -0.85 to 1.05; 71 participants, 1 study; I² = not applicable). No data were reported on the other critical outcomes, i.e. major neurodevelopmental disability; cognitive and educational outcomes in children more than five years old, all-cause mortality during initial hospitalization; retinopathy of prematurity; or intraventricular hemorrhage. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Limited evidence is available on opioid administration for postoperative pain in newborn infants compared to either placebo, other opioids, or paracetamol. We are uncertain whether tramadol reduces mortality compared to placebo; none of the studies reported pain scores, major neurodevelopmental disability, cognitive and educational outcomes in children older than five years old, retinopathy of prematurity, or intraventricular hemorrhage. We are uncertain whether fentanyl reduces mortality compared to tramadol; none of the studies reported pain scores, major neurodevelopmental disability, cognitive and educational outcomes in children older than five years old, retinopathy of prematurity, or intraventricular hemorrhage. We are uncertain whether morphine reduces pain compared to paracetamol; none of the studies reported major neurodevelopmental disability, cognitive and educational outcomes in children more than five years old, all-cause mortality during initial hospitalization, retinopathy of prematurity, or intraventricular hemorrhage. We identified no studies comparing opioids versus non-pharmacological interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mari Kinoshita
- Department of Pediatrics, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Fetal Medicine Research Center, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Israel Junior Borges do Nascimento
- School of Medicine and University Hospital, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Matteo Bruschettini
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Paediatrics, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Cochrane Sweden, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Naujorks S, Knob GH, Dotto PP, Henn R, Zamberlan C. Analgesia and sedation for intratracheal intubation in the neonatal period: an integrative literature review. J Pediatr (Rio J) 2023; 99:112-119. [PMID: 36375493 PMCID: PMC10031350 DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2022.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE to assess evidence available in the literature about the use of sedation and analgesia for intratracheal intubation of newborns. DATA SOURCES by means of an integrative literature review, the authors looked for evidence related to the theme from the last ten years, indexed in the Pubmed, Medline, Lilacs, Scielo, and Scopus databases, by combining the descriptors: newborn, intratracheal intubation, and analgesia. Articles in Portuguese, English, and Spanish that met the research purpose were included. DATA SUMMARY After applying the eligibility criteria, ten articles on the topic were obtained, predominantly narrative reviews, retrospective studies, observational studies, and only one non-randomized clinical trial, which characterizes the literature related to the topic as having a low level of scientific evidence. There is still no consensus in the literature on which medications and indications are for use in non-elective intubations, despite the ethical recommendation. DISCUSSION pain and its deleterious effects should not be neglected. Neonatal Intensive Care Units should have their own protocols regarding sedation and analgesia for intubation considering the individual characteristics of each patient. There is an ethical recommendation regarding the use of sedation and analgesia for intubation since it is a known painful procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Naujorks
- Pediatrician and Neonatologist, Master's student in Maternal and Child Health at Universidade Franciscana, Santa Maria, Brazil.
| | - Gabriele H Knob
- Nurse and Master in Maternal and Child Health at Universidade Franciscana, Santa Maria, Brazil
| | - Patrícia P Dotto
- Dentist, Radiologist, PhD in Oral Biopathology, Area of Concentration Dental Radiology at FOSJC/UNESP, São José dos Campos, SP. Professor of the Professional Master's Degree of Maternal and Child Health at Universidade Franciscana, RS, Brazil
| | - Roseli Henn
- Pediatrician and Neonatologist, PhD in Medicine, Pediatrics and Child Health from the Pontifícia Universidade Católica of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, Professor of the medical course at Federal University of Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
| | - Cláudia Zamberlan
- Nurse Specialist in Intensive Care, PhD in Nursing. Professor of the Professional Master's Degree of Maternal and Child Health at Universidade Franciscana, RS, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kinoshita M, Borges do Nascimento IJ, Styrmisdóttir L, Bruschettini M. Systemic opioid regimens for postoperative pain in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2023; 1:CD015016. [PMID: 36645224 PMCID: PMC9841767 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd015016.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative pain clinical management in neonates has always been a challenging medical issue. Worldwide, several systemic opioid regimens are available for pediatricians, neonatologists, and general practitioners to control pain in neonates undergoing surgical procedures. However, the most effective and safe regimen is still unknown in the current body of literature. OBJECTIVES To determine the effects of different regimens of systemic opioid analgesics in neonates submitted to surgery on all-cause mortality, pain, and significant neurodevelopmental disability. Potentially assessed regimens might include: different doses of the same opioid, different routes of administration of the same opioid, continuous infusion versus bolus administration, or 'as needed' administration versus 'as scheduled' administration. SEARCH METHODS Searches were conducted in June 2022 using the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL], PubMed, and CINAHL. Trial registration records were identified via CENTRAL and an independent search of the ISRCTN registry. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-randomized, cluster-randomized, and cross-over controlled trials evaluating systemic opioid regimens' effects on postoperative pain in neonates (pre-term or full-term). We considered suitable for inclusion: I) studies evaluating different doses of the same opioid; 2) studies evaluating different routes of administration of the same opioid; 3) studies evaluating the effectiveness of continuous infusion versus bolus infusion; and 4) studies establishing an assessment of an 'as needed' administration versus 'as scheduled' administration. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS According to Cochrane methods, two investigators independently screened retrieved records, extracted data, and appraised the risk of bias. We stratified meta-analysis by the type of intervention: studies evaluating the use of opioids for postoperative pain in neonates through continuous infusion versus bolus infusion and studies assessing the 'as needed' administration versus 'as scheduled' administration. We used the fixed-effect model with risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data and mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference (SMD), median, and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous data. Finally, we used the GRADEpro approach for primary outcomes to evaluate the quality of the evidence across included studies. MAIN RESULTS In this review, we included seven randomized controlled clinical trials (504 infants) from 1996 to 2020. We identified no studies comparing different doses of the same opioid, or different routes. The administration of continuous opioid infusion versus bolus administration of opioids was evaluated in six studies, while one study compared 'as needed' versus 'as scheduled' administration of morphine given by parents or nurses. Overall, the effectiveness of continuous infusion of opioids over bolus infusion as measured by the visual analog scale (MD 0.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.23 to 0.23; 133 participants, 2 studies; I² = 0); or using the COMFORT scale (MD -0.07, 95% CI -0.89 to 0.75; 133 participants, 2 studies; I² = 0), remains unclear due to study designs' limitations, such as the unclear risk of attrition, reporting bias, and imprecision among reported results (very low certainty of the evidence). None of the included studies reported data on other clinically important outcomes such as all-cause mortality rate during hospitalization, major neurodevelopmental disability, the incidence of severe retinopathy of prematurity or intraventricular hemorrhage, and cognitive- and educational-related outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence is available on continuous infusion compared to intermittent boluses of systemic opioids. We are uncertain whether continuous opioid infusion reduces pain compared with intermittent opioid boluses; none of the studies reported the other primary outcomes of this review, i.e. all-cause mortality during initial hospitalization, significant neurodevelopmental disability, or cognitive and educational outcomes among children older than five years old. Only one small study reported on morphine infusion with parent- or nurse-controlled analgesia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mari Kinoshita
- Department of Pediatrics, Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Fetal Medicine Research Center, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Israel Junior Borges do Nascimento
- School of Medicine and University Hospital, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | - Matteo Bruschettini
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Paediatrics, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Cochrane Sweden, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
O'Connor TL. Premedication for Nonemergent Neonatal Intubation: A Systematic Review. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2022; 36:284-296. [PMID: 35894726 DOI: 10.1097/jpn.0000000000000613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
This systematic review evaluates research regarding the use of premedication for nonemergent neonatal intubation. Unmedicated intubation is associated with adverse outcomes such as physiologic instability and decompensation, repeat and prolonged intubation attempts, and trauma. Included studies compared medicated intervention groups against an unmedicated control. Medications vary greatly across studies and include anesthetics, opioids, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, vagolytics, and neuromuscular blockades (muscle relaxants). A comprehensive search of randomized control trials, retrospective cohort studies, and prospective observational studies was completed from the electronic databases of CINAHL EBSCOhost, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Collaboration, and ClinicalTrials.gov and footnotes were used to complete the search. Twelve studies are included in this review dating back to 1984 and are from 5 countries. Outcome measures include changes in heart rate, oxygen saturation, and blood pressure; number and duration of attempts to intubate; and trauma to the oral cavity and upper airway. Twelve studies are included in this review and include 5410 patients. No studies were excluded based on level of evidence or quality appraisal. Findings in this review support the recommendation that opioids and vagolytic agents should be used for premedication for nonemergent neonatal intubation and adjuvant sedation and muscle relaxants should be considered.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To determine the effects of different regimens of systemic opioid analgesics in neonates (term or preterm) undergoing surgery, on mortality, pain and major neurodevelopmental disability. These different regimens may include: different doses of the same opioid; different routes of administration of the same opioid; continuous infusion versus bolus administration; or 'as needed' administration versus 'as scheduled' administration.
Collapse
|
8
|
Kinoshita M, Stempel KS, Borges do Nascimento IJ, Bruschettini M. Systemic opioids versus other analgesics and sedatives for postoperative pain in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd014876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mari Kinoshita
- Fetal Medicine Research Center; University of Barcelona; Barcelona Spain
- Department of Pediatrics; Lund University; Lund Sweden
| | | | - Israel Junior Borges do Nascimento
- School of Medicine and University Hospital; Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG); Belo Horizonte Brazil
- Department of Medicine; Medical College of Wisconsin; Milwaukee Wisconsin USA
| | - Matteo Bruschettini
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Paediatrics; Lund University, Skåne University Hospital; Lund Sweden
- Cochrane Sweden; Lund University, Skåne University Hospital; Lund Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
O'Connor TL. Premedication for Nonemergent Intubation in the NICU: A Call for Standardized Practice. Neonatal Netw 2021; 40:8-13. [PMID: 33479006 DOI: 10.1891/0730-0832/11-t-668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/01/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
This paper discusses neonatal endotracheal intubation and the need for standardization in practice regarding the use of premedication. Intubation is common in the NICU because of resuscitation, surfactant administration, congenital anomalies, apnea, and sedation for procedures or surgery. Intubation is both painful and stressful. Unmedicated intubation is associated with several adverse outcomes including repeat and prolonged attempts, airway trauma, bradycardia, severe desaturation, and need for resuscitation. Most providers believe intubation is painful and that premedication should be provided; however, there is still resistance to provide premedication and inconsistency in doing so. Reasons for not providing premedication include concerns about medication side effects such as chest wall rigidity or prolonged respiratory depression inhibiting immediate extubation after surfactant administration. Premedication should include an opioid analgesic for pain, a benzodiazepine for an adjuvant sedation, a vagolytic to decrease bradycardia, and the optional use of a muscle relaxant for paralysis.
Collapse
|
10
|
Zemlin M, Buxmann H, Felgentreff S, Wittekindt B, Goedicke-Fritz S, Rogosch T, Göbert P, Meyer S, Sauer H, Greene BH, Schloesser RL, Maier RF. Different Effects of Two Protocols for Pre-Procedural Analgosedation on Vital Signs in Neonates during and after Endotracheal Intubation. KLINISCHE PADIATRIE 2021; 233:181-188. [PMID: 33465783 DOI: 10.1055/a-1330-8538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Analgosedation is often used for endotracheal intubation in neonates, but no consensus exists on the optimal pre-procedural medication. AIMS To compare the time to intubation and vital signs during and after intubation in 2 NICUs using different premedication protocols. METHODS Prospective observational study in 2 tertiary NICUs, comparing fentanyl and optional vecuronium for elective neonatal endotracheal intubation (NICU-1) with atropine, morphine, midazolam and optional pancuronium (NICU-2). Primary endpoints were: time to intubate and number of intubation attempts; secondary endpoints were: deviations of heart rate, oxygen saturation and blood pressure from baseline until 20 min post intubation. RESULTS 45 and 30 intubations were analyzed in NICU-1 and NICU-2. Time to intubation was longer in NICU-1 (7 min) than in NICU-2 (4 min; p=0.029), but the mean number of intubation attempts did not differ significantly. Bradycardias (34 vs. 1, p<0.001) and hypoxemias (136 vs. 48, p<0.001) were more frequent in NICU-1, and tachycardias (59 vs. 72, p<0.001) more frequent in NICU-2. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) increased in NICU-1 (+6.18 mmHg) and decreased in NICU-2 (-5.83 mmHg), whereas mean heart rates (HR) decreased in NICU-1 (-19.29 bpm) and increased in NICU-2 (+15.93 bpm). MAP and HR returned to baseline 6-10 min after intubation in NICU-1 and after 11-15 min and 16-20 min in NICU-2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The two protocols yielded significant differences in the time to intubation and in the extent and duration of physiologic changes during and post-intubation. Short acting drugs should be preferred and vital signs should be closely monitored at least 20 min post intubation. More studies are required to identify analgosedation protocols that minimize potentially harmful events during endotracheal intubation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Zemlin
- Children's hospital, Philipps University Marburg Faculty of Medicine, Marburg, Germany.,Department of General Pediatrics and Neonatology, Saarland University Hospital and Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, Homburg, Germany
| | - Horst Buxmann
- Department of Pediatrics, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Sabine Felgentreff
- Children's hospital, Philipps University Marburg Faculty of Medicine, Marburg, Germany
| | - Boris Wittekindt
- Department of Pediatrics, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Sybelle Goedicke-Fritz
- Children's hospital, Philipps University Marburg Faculty of Medicine, Marburg, Germany.,Department of General Pediatrics and Neonatology, Saarland University Hospital and Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, Homburg, Germany
| | - Tobias Rogosch
- Children's hospital, Philipps University Marburg Faculty of Medicine, Marburg, Germany
| | - Pia Göbert
- Children's hospital, Philipps University Marburg Faculty of Medicine, Marburg, Germany
| | - Sascha Meyer
- Department of General Pediatrics and Neonatology, Saarland University Hospital and Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, Homburg, Germany
| | - Harald Sauer
- Pediatric Cardiology, Saarland University Hospital and Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, Homburg, Germany
| | - Brandon H Greene
- Institute for Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Philipps University Marburg Faculty of Medicine, Marburg, Germany
| | - Rolf L Schloesser
- Department of Pediatrics, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Rolf Felix Maier
- Children's hospital, Philipps University Marburg Faculty of Medicine, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kinoshita M, Stempel K, do Nascimento IJB, Vejayaram DN, Norman E, Bruschettini M. Opioids and alpha-2-agonists for analgesia and sedation in newborn infants: protocol of a systematic review. Syst Rev 2020; 9:183. [PMID: 32819417 PMCID: PMC7441710 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01436-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hospitalized newborn infants may require analgesia and sedation either for the management of procedural pain, during or after surgery, and other painful conditions. The benefits and harms of opioids administered at different doses and routes of administration have been reported in numerous trials and systematic reviews. The use of alpha-2-agonists such as clonidine and dexmedetomidine in newborn infants is more recent, and they might be prescribed to reduce the total amount of opioids which are thought to have more side effects. Moreover, alpha-2-agonists might play an important role in the management of agitation and discomfort. METHODS We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of opioids, alpha-2-agonists, or the combination of both drugs. We will include randomized controlled trials to assess benefits and harms and observational studies to assess adverse events and pharmacokinetics; preterm and term infants; studies on any opioids or alpha-2-agonists administered for any indication and by any route except spinal, intraosseous, or administration for nerve blocks and wound infusions. The use of opioids or alpha-2-agonists will be compared to no intervention; placebo with normal saline or other non-sedative, non-analgesic drug; control with oral sugar solution or non-pharmacological intervention; same drug of different dose or route; or a different drug (not limiting to opioids and alpha-2-agonists) or combinations of such drugs. The primary outcomes for this review will be all-cause mortality during initial hospitalization and hypotension requiring medical therapy. We will conduct a search in the following databases: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. Two review authors will independently screen records for inclusion, undertake data abstraction using a data extraction form and assess the risk of bias of all included trials using the Cochrane "Risk of bias" tool. DISCUSSION This systematic review will summarize and update our knowledge about neonatal analgesia and sedation including pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, and provide a platform for developing evidence-based guidelines that we can immediately apply to our clinical practice. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020170852.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mari Kinoshita
- Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Israel Junior Borges do Nascimento
- School of Medicine at Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte, Brazil
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI USA
| | | | - Elisabeth Norman
- Lund University, Skane University Hospital, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Pediatrics, Lund, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|