Mitchell KM, McMillan DE. A curriculum-wide assessment of writing self-efficacy in a baccalaureate nursing program.
NURSE EDUCATION TODAY 2018;
70:20-27. [PMID:
30125867 DOI:
10.1016/j.nedt.2018.08.003]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2017] [Revised: 07/14/2018] [Accepted: 08/08/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
This study explores patterns of writing self-efficacy fluctuation across three academic years in a baccalaureate nursing program. The goal was to assess if writing self-efficacy predicted program grades.
DESIGN
Longitudinal exploratory design.
SETTING
Three-year accelerated nursing program in a college setting in Canada.
PARTICIPANTS
Follow-up cohort included 49 students; 32 (65.3%) synchronous in program progression and 17 (34.7%) had become asynchronous between first and third year.
METHODS
Data was collected five times between August 2013 and May 2016 at program admission, the start of their discipline-specific first-year writing course, the end of the writing course, start of third-year, and the end of third-year. Variables assessed included writing self-efficacy (two measures), writing anxiety, entrance degrees of reading power (DRP) scores, final college cumulative grade point average (GPA), and grades earned on first, second, and third-year papers.
RESULTS
Writing self-efficacy statistically significantly improved from the start of the nursing program to the finish (p < .001). Writing self-efficacy fluctuated decreasing from post first-year writing course to the start of the third-year, returning to or exceeding end of writing course levels by the end of the third year. Students who progressed normally through the program (synchronous) were academically stronger (paper grades, DRP, GPA scores) and had higher writing self-efficacy scores than asynchronous students. Using hierarchical regression, DRP scores and synchronous/asynchronous status in the program made a larger contribution to the prediction of final program GPA and paper grades, while the inclusion of writing self-efficacy in the models made a minor contribution to overall variance.
CONCLUSIONS
Writing self-efficacy will fluctuate based on context and complexity of writing demanded in academic programs. Second and third-year students require continued support with writing beyond an introductory course. Programs should attend to developing reading comprehension in students as part of their across-the-curriculum writing plans.
Collapse