Microsurgical seminal reconstruction; our experiences in a single institute

Comparative evaluation of double- and single-armed two-suture longitudinal intussusception techniques in microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of double-armed two-suture longitudinal intussusception microsurgical vasoepididymostomy (LIVE) and single-armed two-suture LIVE techniques in patients with epididymal obstructive azoospermia (EOA). The main outcomes assessed were patency rates, patency time, semen quality and natural pregnancy rates.

METHODS

Data from patients with EOA who underwent two-suture LIVE were obtained from databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. Weighted data were analyzed using a random-effects model, and weighted mean differences were reported.

RESULTS

A total of 1574 patients with EOA from 24 studies were included. The overall patency rate was approximately 68% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 63-72%), with a patency time of approximately 4.63 months (95% CI: 4.15-5.12). The sperm concentration reached 26.90 million/ml and the sperm motility was 23.74%. The natural pregnancy rate was 38% (95% CI: 31-46%). The different definitions of patency do not seem to have any meaningful impact when comparing patency rates. There was no significant difference in patency rates, patency time, semen quality and natural pregnancy rates between the double-armed and single-armed LIVE techniques.

CONCLUSION

The single-armed LIVE is a potential alternative surgical option when high quality double-needle sutures are not easily accessible.

Microscopic Epididymal Sperm Aspiration (MESA) Should be Employed Over Testicular Sperm Extraction (TESE) Sperm Retrieval Surgery for Obstructive Azoospermia (OA)

INTRODUCTION

 Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) has been widely used as a sperm extraction surgery for azoospermia even for obstructive azoospermia (OA) because it does not require surgical skill. However, there are postoperative pain issues, and subsequent testicular atrophy and decreased testosterone levels may occur with TESE. This study examines the usefulness of microscopic epididymal sperm aspiration (MESA) for OA.

METHODS

 We studied 108 patients diagnosed with OA and treated with MESA at our institute between April 2004 and December 2021. The MESA was performed using a micropipette with a micropuncture technique under an operative microscope. When no sperm were present or motility was not observed, additional punctures to the epididymal tubule were performed.

RESULTS

 Motile sperm were recovered in all cases (108 cases). Of these, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using frozen-thawed sperm was performed in 101 cases and the normal fertilization rate was 76.2%. A total of 436 embryo transfer (ET) cycles were performed. The implantation rate per transfer cycle was 47.9%, the clinical pregnancy rate was 41.0%, and the live birth rate was 23.7%. The per-case live birth rate was 84.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

 MESA-ICSI has a very good fertilization rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and delivery rate. Furthermore, the patient's postoperative pain is less, the number of sperm collected is larger, the burden on the embryologist who processes the collected sperm is less, and ICSI can be easily attempted after frozen-thawed sperm. MESA rather than TESE should be employed for the OA subjects.

Current progress on the curative effects of vasoepididymostomy for patients with obstructive azoospermia: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of human studies

BACKGROUND

Obstructive azoospermia (OA) is an important cause of male infertility, and epididymal OA (EOA) is a common disease. Microsurgical reconstruction is a common technique used in the treatment of EOA. In the present study, we analyzed the effectiveness of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy (MVE) at different levels and compared the differences among several MVE techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search was conducted in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The included studies were published in English until May 14, 2021. The R 4.1.2 software was utilized to evaluate the event rate, risk ratio (RR), and 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 51 studies involving 2853 patients with OA were included in our meta-analysis. The overall mean patency rate of patients who underwent MVE was 67.20% (95% [CI]:63.30%-71.10%), and the overall mean natural pregnancy rate of their partners was 40.05% (95% [CI]: 35.30%-45.60%). The pooled results showed that the patency rate of bilateral MVE was higher than that of unilateral MVE (RR = 1.42; 95% [CI]:1.25-1.61; p < 0.00). A comparison of the anastomotic site of MVE showed that the caudal/corpus area was favorable for the patency rate (RR = 1.17; 95% [CI]:1.04 - 1.32; p < 0.00). The caudal area was also advantageous for the patency rate (RR = 1.20; 95% CI:1.03 - 1.41; p < 0.04). Compared with typical MVE (65.20%, 95% [CI]:61.40%-69.10%), deferential vessel-sparing MVE with a higher overall mean patency rate (83.60%, 95% [CI]:75.40%-91.70%).

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analyses indicated that MVE is a high- and cost-effective therapeutic method for patients with EOA, and deferential vessel-sparing MVE could be mainstream in the near future.