Enclosed in the synergistic rings of suffering: The experience of conscious patients under mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit of the causes of suffering

Exploring the Experience of Patients Who Received Mechanical Ventilation Support during Their Intensive Care Unit Stay

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to explore the experiences of patients who received mechanical ventilation (MV) support during their intensive care unit (ICU) stay in Jordan.

METHODS

A phenomenological hermeneutic approach was conducted, informed by the philosophy of Martin Heidegger. Fifteen patients participated in interviews regarding their experiences during their time in the critical care unit of three public hospitals in Jordan. Interpretive Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) was used to analyse the data.

FINDINGS

The findings of the current study indicated that patients who received MV support during their ICU stays experienced both physical and psychological suffering. A pattern of shared experiences among intensive care patients was identified. Five main themes captured the patients' experiences: (1) feeling powerless, (2) being unable to recognise time, (3) feeling dead, (4) experiencing physical pain, and (5) having future concerns.

CONCLUSION

The current study found that mechanically ventilated ICU patients suffer both physically and psychologically. Nurses should use specific strategies to relieve discomfort in addition to pain treatment. This is especially essential for non-verbal patients, whose actions may resemble those of their clinicians in pain.

A Pilot Study on Pain Assessment Using the Japanese Version of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool

BACKGROUND

Critically ill patients experience various types of pain that are difficult to assess because patients cannot communicate verbally due to artificial airways and sustained sedation. The Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) objectively evaluates patients' pain.

AIMS

This study aimed to re-assess the reliability and validity of the Japanese version (CPOT-J) and to reveal limitations of behaviors specific to mechanically ventilated patients.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of observational pilot study and case report.

PARTICIPANTS

  METHODS: We obtained consent preoperatively from 40 cardiovascular surgery patients. CPOT-J scores were evaluated immediately before, immediately after, and 20 minutes after painful stimulation. Inter-rater reliability was determined by the researcher and 18 ICU nurses (minimum one-year ICU experience). Validity was examined by comparing CPOT-J with vital sign values and patients' self-reports of pain. Two cases revealed the tool's characteristics: one score was consistent with patient reports while the other was not.

RESULTS

We evaluated pain in 34 patients (26 men, 8 women; mean age = 66.8 years). Weighted kappa scores ranged from 0.48 to 0.94. The tool only correlated with changes in systolic blood pressure and pulse pressure. Case studies indicated that the tool effectively evaluated mid-sternum-wound pain, but not back pain at rest.

CONCLUSIONS

The CPOT-J can assess pain in mechanically ventilated patients, but being immobile results in a score of 0 for body movement (e.g., being immobile while feeling back pain) and is a limitation of the scoring.

Perception of discomfort by mechanical ventilation patients in the Intensive Care Unit: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Routine care in intensive care units (ICU) results in patient pain and discomfort. While pain is treated with analgesics, discomfort is generally not well characterised or addressed. Since many ICU patients communicate only non-verbally, practitioners often cannot discern between pain or discomfort when treating such patients, potentially leading to inappropriate analgesic administration. A first step in discriminating between pain and discomfort is understanding how patients perceive their discomfort.

OBJECTIVE

To describe mechanically ventilated ICU patients' perceptions of discomfort and how they differentiate discomfort from pain.

METHOD

A qualitative descriptive study using semi-structured interviews conducted with 13 patients in a Medical and General ICU who survived mechanical ventilation. Transcripts were analysed using content analysis.

FINDINGS

Two main discomfort themes were identified: unpleasant physical sensations and unpleasant psychological feelings. Each theme was further divided into subcategories. Most patients did not describe high levels of pain and did not associate physical discomfort with pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Discomfort, as described by patients, stems from both physical sensations and psychological feelings. Pain was less often described as a negative ICU experience, while other non-pain sources of discomfort were more likely to be recalled. Therefore, practitioners should not only focus on treating pain but also on treating overall comfort to improve the quality of the ICU experience and potentially decrease post-ICU psychological sequela.