Improving HER2 testing reproducibility in HER2-low breast cancer

Computational pathology in the identification of HER2-low breast cancer: Opportunities and challenges

For the past 2 decades, pathologists have been accustomed to reporting the HER2 status of breast cancer as either positive or negative, based on HER2 IHC. Today, however, there is a clinical imperative to employ a 3-tier approach to interpreting HER2 IHC that can also identify tumours categorised as HER2-low. Meeting this need for a finer degree of discrimination may be challenging, and in this article, we consider the potential for the integration of computational approaches to support pathologists in achieving accurate and reproducible HER2 IHC scoring as well as outlining some of the practicalities involved.

The "lows": Update on ER-low and HER2-low breast cancer

ER-low and HER2-low breast cancers have emerged as clinically significant subtypes that challenge traditional diagnostic categories and treatment paradigms. These subtypes, representing a spectrum of disease, exhibit distinct biological behaviors, therapeutic responses, and prognostic outcomes. HER2-low breast cancer, defined by low HER2 protein expression (IHC score of 1+ or 2+ without HER2 gene amplification), has achieved clinical significance, particularly following the DESTINY-Breast trials, which demonstrated the efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in the population of patients with advanced HER2-low disease. Similarly, ER-low breast cancer, characterized by low estrogen receptor expression (in 1%-10 % invasive tumor cells), poses unique challenges due to its intermediate biological behavior and uncertain response to endocrine therapies. The identification of these subtypes is further complicated by inconsistencies in testing methodologies, which can lead to misclassification and impact treatment decisions. As our understanding of these subtypes improves, the need for standardized diagnostic approaches and individualized therapeutic decisions becomes increasingly urgent. Ongoing research and collaboration between pathologists and oncologists are essential for refining diagnostic criteria and improving outcomes for patients with breast cancers characterized by low expression of these theragnostic biomarkers. This review aims to consolidate current knowledge on HER2-low and ER-low breast cancers, focusing on the challenges associated with their identification, the implications for treatment, and future directions in clinical management. By examining recent studies and interlaboratory assessments, this review emphasizes the critical need for accurate and reproducible testing and reporting, and for the development of tailored therapeutic strategies for these "low" expression cancers.

Low interobserver agreement among subspecialised breast pathologists in evaluating HER2-low breast cancer

AIMS

Metastatic HER2-low breast cancer (HLBC) can be treated by trastuzumab deruxtecan. Assessment of low levels of HER2 protein expression suffers from poor interobserver reproducibility. The aim of the study was to evaluate the interobserver agreement among subspecialised breast pathologists and develop a practical algorithm for assessing HLBC.

METHODS

Six breast pathologists (4 juniors, 2 seniors) evaluated 106 HER2 immunostained slides with 0/1+expression. Two rounds (R1, R2) of ring study were performed before and after training with a modified Ki-67 algorithm, and concordance was assessed.

RESULTS

Agreement with 5% increments increased from substantial to almost perfect (R1: 0.796, R2: 0.804), and remained substantial for three categories (<1% vs 1%-10% vs >10%) (R1: 0.768, R2: 0.764). Seniors and juniors had almost perfect agreement with 5% increments (R1: 0.859 and 0.821, R2: 0.872 and 0.813). For the three categories, agreement remained almost perfect among seniors (R1: 0.837, R2: 0.860) and substantial among juniors (R1: 0.792, R2: 0.768). Binary analysis showed suboptimal agreement, decreasing for both juniors and seniors from substantial (R1: 0.650 and 0.620) to moderate (R2: 0.560 and 0.554) using the 1% cut-off, and increasing from moderate to substantial (R1: 0.478, R2: 0.712) among seniors but remaining moderate (R1: 0.576, R2: 0.465) among juniors using the 10% cut-off. The average scoring time per case was higher (72 vs 92 s).

CONCLUSIONS

Subspecialised breast pathologists have suboptimal agreement for immunohistochemical evaluation of HLBC using the modified Ki-67 methodology. An urgent need remains for a new assay/algorithm to reliably evaluate HLBC.

Comparing the Sensitivity of HER2 Epitope Detection of HercepTest mAb pharmDx (Dako Omnis, GE001) and Ventana PATHWAY Anti-HER-2/neu (4B5) Using IHC Calibrators

Accurate assessment of HER2 expression levels is paramount for determining eligibility for targeted therapies. HER2 immunohistochemistry provides a semiquantitative measurement of HER2 protein overexpression. Historically, little focus has been on the lower end of the HER2 expression range. The advent of novel therapeutic molecules that require fewer membrane epitopes to be effective has prompted a reevaluation of the current immunohistochemistry testing protocols, with special emphasis on the detection limit. Here, we have used Boston Cell Standards technology to determine the sensitivity of 2 commercially available HER2 immunohistochemistry assays, including a lower limit of detection.

The impact of HER2-low status on pathological complete response and disease-free survival in early-stage breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The HER-2 status of breast cancer (BC) has been classified as negative or positive for a long time. Given the efficacy of novel anti-HER2-targeted antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) in HER2-low BC, a distinct subgroup of HER2-low tumors has emerged within BC. The biology and prognostic impact of HER2-low expression are not yet well defined, and inconsistent results were reported. This study aims to evaluate the impact of low HER-2 status on the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and disease- free survival (DFS) rates.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed BC patients treated with NACT from 2017 to 2023 in two cancer centers. HER2-negative patients were included. HER-2 low status was defined by IHC + 1 or + 2/ISH non-amplified, and HER2-zero was defined by IHC 0. Pathological complete response (pCR) rates and DFS between HER2-low and HER2-zero populations were compared.

RESULTS

170 patients were identified. 122 (72%) of these patients were HER2- zero BC, whereas 48 (28%) were HER2-low BC. Overall, pCR was achieved in 35 (20.5%) patients. Of these, pCR was observed in 30 patients (44.6%) from the HER2- zero group, compared to 5 patients (10.4%) from the HER2-low group (p = 0.046), but significance was lost in multivariate analysis. Among the hormone receptor (HR) positive subtype, pCR was achieved 19.8% of HER2-zero tumors and 7.5% of HER2-low tumors (p = 0.08). For HR-negative subtype 34.1% HER2-zero tumors had pCR and 25% of the HER2-low tumors had pCR (p = 0.614). There was no association between DFS and HER2-low status.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that HER2-low status had no impact on pCR or DFS.

The prognostic impact of Her2 status in early triple negative breast cancer: a Turkish Oncology Group (TOG) study

The studies evaluating the impact of Her2 levels in neoadjuvant setting have conflicting data. The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of Her2 status in early triple negative breast cancer(TNBC). In the study TNBC patients who were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and surgery were analyzed retrospectively. The primary aim of the study was to analyze the impact of Her2 status(Her2-0 and Her2-low) on pathological complete response (pCR). The secondary objectives were disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). 620 female triple negative breast cancer patients were evaluated. 427 patients (68.9%) had Her2-0 and 193(31.1%) had her2-low pathology. The pCR rates were similar between Her2-0 and Her2-low patients (33.0% vs. 27.5%, p = 0.098). Although Her2-0 group has better DFS (106 vs. 50 months, p = 0.002), in multivariate analysis it had a HR of 0.74 (p = 0.06). In addition, OS was similar (131 vs. 105 months, p = 0.13) with a HR of 0.88 (p = 0.61). In multivariate analysis; presence of LVI (HR:2.2 (95% CI 1.1-3.5) p = 0.001), Clinical stage T1/T2 (HR:0.39 (95% CI 0.2-0.6) p < 0.001) and lymph node negativity (HR:0.35 (95% CI 0.1-0.9) p = 0.03) were independent factors for OS. Although there were pathological and clinical differences, the pCR, DFS and OS were similar between Her2-0 and Her2-low TNBC patients. The importance of Her2 status of TNBC in neoadjuvant setting should be further studied.

Quantitative proteomic mass spectrometry of protein kinases to determine dynamic heterogeneity of the human kinome

The kinome is a dynamic system of kinases regulating signaling networks in cells and dysfunction of protein kinases contributes to many diseases. Regulation of the protein expression of kinases alters cellular responses to environmental changes and perturbations. We configured a library of 672 proteotypic peptides to quantify >300 kinases in a single LC-MS experiment using ten micrograms protein from human tissues including biopsies. This enables absolute quantitation of kinase protein abundance at attomole-femtomole expression levels, requiring no kinase enrichment and less than ten micrograms of starting protein from flash-frozen and formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissues. Breast cancer biopsies, organoids, and cell lines were analyzed using the SureQuant method, demonstrating the heterogeneity of kinase protein expression across and within breast cancer clinical subtypes. Kinome quantitation was coupled with nanoscale phosphoproteomics, providing a feasible method for novel clinical diagnosis and understanding of patient kinome responses to treatment.

Understanding the spectrum of HER2 status in breast cancer: From HER2-positive to ultra-low HER2

HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) status in breast cancer spans a spectrum from HER2-positive to ultra-low HER2, each category influencing prognosis and treatment decisions differently. Approximately 20 % of breast cancers overexpress HER2, correlating with aggressive disease and poorer outcomes without targeted therapy. HER2 status is determined through immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), guiding therapeutic strategies. HER2-positive breast cancer exhibits HER2 protein overexpression or gene amplification, benefiting from HER2-targeted therapies like trastuzumab and pertuzumab. In contrast, HER2-negative breast cancer lacks HER2 overexpression and amplification, treated based on hormone receptor status. HER2-low breast cancer represents a newly recognized category with low HER2 expression, potentially benefiting from evolving therapies. Ultra-low HER2 cancers, characterized by minimal expression without gene amplification, challenge conventional classifications and treatment paradigms. Their distinct molecular profiles and clinical behaviors suggest unique therapeutic approaches. Recent diagnostic guideline updates refine HER2 assessment, enhancing precision in identifying patients for targeted therapies. Challenges remain in accurately classifying HER2-low tumors and optimizing treatment efficacy, necessitating ongoing research and innovative diagnostic methods. Understanding the heterogeneity and evolving landscape of HER2 status in breast cancer is crucial for advancing personalized treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes.

Comparison of clinicopathological characteristics, efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy, and prognosis in HER2-low and HER2-ultralow breast cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aims to analyze potential differences in clinicopathology, efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), and clinical outcome among HER2-null, HER2-ultralow and HER2-low breast cancers.

METHODS

Consecutive cases of HER2-negative breast cancer that received NAT were included. They were classified as HER2-null (no staining), HER2-ultralow (incomplete faint staining in ≤ 10% of tumour cells) and HER2-low (HER2-1 + or HER2-2+, in situ hybridisation negative). Subgroup analysis was performed based on the HER2 expression level.

RESULTS

Out of 302 patients, 215 (71.19%) were HER2-low, 59 (19.54%) were HER2-ultralow, and 28 (9.27%) were HER2-null. In comparison to the HER2-ultralow group, the HER2-low group exhibited higher expression frequencies of ER (p < 0.001), PR (p < 0.001), and AR (p = 0.004), along with a greater prevalence of the luminal subtype (p < 0.001). The HER2-ultralow group also demonstrated a higher prevalence of lymph node metastasis compared to the HER2-null group (p = 0.026). Varied rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) were observed among the three subgroups: HER2-null, HER2-ultralow, and HER2-low, with rates of 35.71%, 22.03%, and 12.56%, respectively. Only the HER2-low subgroup exhibited a significant difference compared to HER2-null (p = 0.001). Despite variations in pCR rates, the three subgroups exhibited comparable disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.571). Importantly, we found HER2-low patients with better treatment response (RCB-0/I) exhibited significantly better DFS than those with significant residual disease (RCB-II/III) (P = 0.036). The overall rate of HER2 immunohistochemical score discordance was 45.24%, mostly driven by the conversion between HER2-0 and HER2-low phenotype. Notably, 32.19% of cases initially classified as HER2-0 phenotype on baseline biopsy were later reclassified as HER2-low after neoadjuvant therapy, and it is noteworthy that 22 out of these cases (78.57%) originally had an HER2-ultralow status in the pretreatment biopsy sample.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate the distinct clinicopathological features of HER2-low and HER2-ultralow breast tumors and confirm that RCB is an effective predictor of prognosis in HER2-low populations for the first time. Notably, our findings demonstrate high instability in both HER2-low and HER2-ultralow expression from the primary baseline biopsy to residual disease after NAT. Furthermore, this study is the first to investigate the clinicopathological feature and the effectiveness of NAT for HER2-ultralow breast cancer.

Effect of HER2-low status on brain metastasis-free survival and survival after brain metastasis in patients with breast cancer

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The discovery of novel human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed antibody‒drug conjugates has accelerated the identification of the HER2-low subtype. However, the biological significance of low HER2 expression in breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) is unclear.

METHODS

Patients with HER2-negative BC and brain metastasis were retrospectively screened between February 2012 and November 2023. Brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS) and survival after brain metastasis (SABM) were analyzed according to HER2 expression.

RESULTS

A total of 201 female patients, 84 of whom were HER2-low and 117 of whom were HER2-zero, were evaluated. The median BMFS in the entire cohort was 35.6 months (95% CI 29.8-41.4). Although HER2-low patients had numerically longer median BMFS than HER2-zero patients (43.7 m vs. 30.1 m, p = 0.025), multivariate analysis revealed that the difference was not significant (p = 0.167). BMFS between the HER2-low and HER2-zero groups was similar in the hormone receptor (HR)-positive (52.8 m vs. 47.6 m, p = 0.276) and HR-negative (15.3 m vs. 19.7 m, p = 0.930) cohorts. The median SABM in the entire cohort was 6.0 months (95% CI 3.8-8.1). HER2-low and HER2-zero patients had similar median SAMB (5.4 m vs. 6.1 m, p = 0.816). The SABM between the HER2-low and HER2-zero groups was similar in the HR-positive (6.3 m vs. 8.7 m, p = 0.375) and HR-negative (3.3 m vs. 4.2 m, p = 0.783) cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Low HER2 expression does not affect BMFS or SAMB in brain metastatic breast cancer patients in this real-world population.

Early Breast Cancer Risk Assessment: Integrating Histopathology with Artificial Intelligence

Effective risk assessment in early breast cancer is essential for informed clinical decision-making, yet consensus on defining risk categories remains challenging. This paper explores evolving approaches in risk stratification, encompassing histopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular biomarkers alongside cutting-edge artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. Leveraging machine learning, deep learning, and convolutional neural networks, AI is reshaping predictive algorithms for recurrence risk, thereby revolutionizing diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning. Beyond detection, AI applications extend to histological subtyping, grading, lymph node assessment, and molecular feature identification, fostering personalized therapy decisions. With rising cancer rates, it is crucial to implement AI to accelerate breakthroughs in clinical practice, benefiting both patients and healthcare providers. However, it is important to recognize that while AI offers powerful automation and analysis tools, it lacks the nuanced understanding, clinical context, and ethical considerations inherent to human pathologists in patient care. Hence, the successful integration of AI into clinical practice demands collaborative efforts between medical experts and computational pathologists to optimize patient outcomes.

Novel approach to HER2 quantification using phosphor-integrated dots in human breast invasive cancer microarray

HER2 expression in breast cancer is evaluated to select patients for anti-HER2 therapy. With the advent of newly approved HER2-targeted drugs for low HER2 expression breast cancer, more solid evidence on the whole spectrum of HER2 expression is needed. In this study, we quantitatively assessed HER2 expression from the whole core by combining high-intensity phosphor-integrated dot (PID) immunostaining and whole slide imaging (WSI) analysis. Two types of staining were performed using a 170-core tissue microarray of invasive breast cancer. First, HER2 was stained by immunohistochemistry (IHC), and IHC scores were determined by two practicing pathologists according to the ASCO/CAP HER2 guideline. Second, HER2 was stained with PID, and tentative PID scores were determined by quantitative analysis. The results show that PID can numerically classify HER2 expression status into scores 3+, 2+, 1+, and 0. The HER2 value quantified by PID strongly correlated with the 3, 3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB) IHC score determined by pathologists (R2 = 0.93). PID IHC score 1+ cases included both DAB IHC score 1+ and 0 cases, and low HER2 expression cases appeared to be often evaluated as DAB IHC score 0. Therefore, digital image analysis by PID and WSI can help stratify HER2 IHC. It may also help classify low HER2 expression.

A gene expression-based classifier for HER2-low breast cancer

In clinical trials evaluating antibody-conjugated drugs (ADCs), HER2-low breast cancer is defined through protein immunohistochemistry scoring (IHC) 1+ or 2+ without gene amplification. However, in daily practice, the accuracy of IHC is compromised by inter-observer variability. Herein, we aimed to identify HER2-low breast cancer primary tumors by leveraging gene expression profiling. A discovery approach was applied to gene expression profile of institutional INT1 (n = 125) and INT2 (n = 84) datasets. We identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in each specific HER2 IHC category 0, 1+, 2+ and 3+. Principal Component Analysis was used to generate a HER2-low signature whose performance was evaluated in the independent INT3 (n = 95), and in the publicly available TCGA and GSE81538 datasets. The association between the HER2-low signature and HER2 IHC categories was evaluated by Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc pair-wise comparisons. The HER2-low signature discriminatory capability was assessed by estimating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Gene Ontology and KEGG analyses were performed to evaluate the HER2-low signature genes functional enrichment. A HER2-low signature was computed based on HER2 IHC category-specific DEGs. The twenty genes included in the signature were significantly enriched with lipid and steroid metabolism pathways, peptidase regulation, and humoral immune response. The HER2-low signature values showed a bell-shaped distribution across IHC categories (low values in 0 and 3+; high values in 1+ and 2+), effectively distinguishing HER2-low from 0 (p < 0.001) to 3+ (p < 0.001). Notably, the signature values were higher in tumors scored with 1+ as compared to 0. The HER2-low signature association with IHC categories and its bell-shaped distribution was confirmed in the independent INT3, TCGA and GSE81538 datasets. In the combined INT1 and INT3 datasets, the HER2-low signature achieved an AUC value of 0.74 (95% confidence interval, CI 0.67-0.81) in distinguishing HER2-low vs. the other categories, outperforming the individual ERBB2 mRNA AUC value of 0.52 (95% CI 0.43-0.60). These results represent a proof-of-concept for an observer-independent gene-expression-based classifier of HER2-low status. The herein identified 20-gene signature shows promise in distinguishing between HER2 0 and HER2-low expressing tumors, including those scored as 1+ at IHC, and in developing a selection approach for ADCs candidates.

Molecular Targeting of the Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 (HER2) Genes across Various Cancers

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) belongs to the ErbB family, a group of four transmembrane glycoproteins with tyrosine kinase activity, all structurally related to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). These tyrosine kinases are involved in the transmission of cellular signals controlling normal cell growth and differentiation. If this transmission goes awry, it can lead to dysregulated growth of the cell. HER2 specifically can be implicated in the pathogenesis of at least eight malignancies. HER2 positivity quickly became a well-characterized indicator of aggressiveness and poor prognosis, with high rates of disease progression and mortality. After realizing the implication of HER2, it first became investigated as a target for treatment in breast cancer, and later expanded to areas of research in other cancer types. To this day, the most therapeutic advancements of anti-HER2 therapy have been in breast cancer; however, there have been strong advancements made in the incorporation of anti-HER2 therapy in other cancer types as well. This comprehensive review dissects HER2 to its core, incorporating the most up to date information. The topics touched upon are discussed in detail and up to 200 published sources from the most highly recognized journals have been integrated. The importance of knowing about HER2 is exemplified by the groundbreaking advancements that have been made, and the change in treatment plans it has brought to the oncological world in the last twenty years. Since its groundbreaking discovery there have been significant breakthroughs in knowledge regarding the actual receptor, the receptors biology, its mechanism of action, and advancements in tests to detect HER2 and significant strides on how to best incorporate targeted treatment. Due to the success of this field thus far, the review concludes by discussing the future of novel anti-HER2 therapy currently in development that everyone should be aware of.

Standardized pathology report for HER2 testing in compliance with 2023 ASCO/CAP updates and 2023 ESMO consensus statements on HER2-low breast cancer

Since the release of the DESTINY-Breast04 (DB-04) trial findings in June 2022, the field of pathology has seen a renaissance of HER2 as a predictive biomarker in breast cancer. The trial focused on patients with metastatic breast cancer who were classified as "HER2-low," i.e., those with immunohistochemistry (IHC) HER2 1 + or 2 + and negative in situ hybridization (ISH) results. The study revealed that treating these patients with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) instead of the oncologist's chosen chemotherapy led to outstanding improvements in survival. This has challenged the existing binary HER2 pathological classification system, which categorized tumors as either positive (overexpression/amplification) or negative, as per the ASCO/CAP 2018 guideline reaffirmed by ASCO/CAP 2023 guideline update. Given that DB-04 excluded patients with HER2 IHC score 0 status, the results of the ongoing DB-06 trial may shed further light on the potential benefits of T-DXd therapy for these patients. Roughly half of all breast cancers are estimated to belong to the HER2-low category, which does not represent a distinct or specific subtype of cancer. Instead, it encompasses a diverse group of tumors that exhibit clinical, morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular variations. However, HER2-low offers a distinctive biomarker status that identifies a specific therapeutic regimen (i.e., T-DXd) linked to a favorable prognosis in breast cancer. This unique association emphasizes the importance of accurately identifying these tumors. Differentiating between a HER2 IHC score 0 and score 1 + has not been clinically significant until now. To ensure accurate classification and avoid misdiagnosis, it is necessary to adopt standardized procedures, guidelines, and specialized training for pathologists in interpreting HER2 expression in the lower spectrum. Additionally, the utilization of artificial intelligence holds promise in supporting this endeavor. Here, we address the current state of the art and unresolved issues in assessing HER2-low status, with a particular emphasis on the score 0. We explore the dilemma surrounding the exclusion of HER2-zero patients from potentially beneficial therapy based on traditional HER2 testing. Additionally, we examine the clinical context, considering that DB-04 primarily involved heavily pretreated late-stage metastatic breast cancers. We also delve into emerging evidence suggesting that extrapolating HER2-low status from the original diagnosis may lead to misleading results. Finally, we provide recommendations for conducting high-quality testing and propose a standardized pathology report in compliance with 2023 ASCO/CAP updates and 2023 ESMO consensus statements on HER2-low breast cancer.

Think "HER2" different: integrative diagnostic approaches for HER2-low breast cancer

This work explores the complex field of HER2 testing in the HER2-low breast cancer era, with a focus on methodological aspects. We aim to propose clear positions to scientific societies, institutions, pathologists, and oncologists to guide and shape the appropriate diagnostic strategies for HER2-low breast cancer. The fundamental question at hand is whether the necessary tools to effectively translate our knowledge about HER2 into practical diagnostic schemes for the lower spectrum of expression are available. Our investigation is centered on the significance of distinguishing between an immunohistochemistry (IHC) score 0 and score 1+ in light of the clinical implications now apparent, as patients with HER2-low breast cancer become eligible for trastuzumab-deruxtecan treatment. Furthermore, we discuss the definition of HER2-low beyond its conventional boundaries and assess the reliability of established diagnostic procedures designed at a time when therapeutic perspectives were non-existent for these cases. In this regard, we examine potential complementary technologies, such as gene expression analysis and liquid biopsy. Ultimately, we consider the potential role of artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of digital pathology and its integration into HER2 testing, with a particular emphasis on its application in the context of HER2-low breast cancer.

Molecular and serological biomarkers to predict trastuzumab responsiveness in HER-2 positive breast cancer

HER-2-positive breast cancer is characterized by its aggressive nature, poor prognosis, and reduced overall survival. The emergence of trastuzumab resistance is currently considered a global problem. The immune system plays a pivotal role in tumor progression and development. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein-4 (CTLA-4) and other immune checkpoint proteins may be potential prognostic factors and therapeutic targets for breast cancer. This study aimed to determine the correlation between CTLA-4 expression in peripheral blood and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) serum levels and their impact on trastuzumab responsiveness in HER-2-positive patients with breast cancer. CTLA-4 expression was analyzed in peripheral blood cells using quantitative PCR, while IGF-1 serum levels were assessed through electrochemiluminescence assays. There was a significant increase in CTLA-4 expression at cycle 9, which continued to increase until it reached 4.6 at cycle 17. High IGF-1 levels were observed in newly diagnosed HER-2 positive patients before trastuzumab therapy, significantly decreasing post-therapy (p=0.001). Co-targeting HER-2 and IGF-1 receptors may reduce the risk of recurrence and improve outcomes. In addition, targeted CTLA-4 molecules may improve patient survival and prevent recurrence.

Advancing the PD-L1 CPS test in metastatic TNBC: Insights from pathologists and findings from a nationwide survey

Pembrolizumab has received approval as a first-line treatment for unresectable/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) with a PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of ≥ 10. However, assessing CPS in mTNBC poses challenges. Firstly, it represents a novel analysis for breast pathologists. Secondly, the heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in mTNBC further complicates the assessment. Lastly, the lack of standardized assays and staining platforms adds to the complexity. In KEYNOTE trials, PD-L1 expression was evaluated using the IHC 22C3 pharmDx kit as a companion diagnostic test. However, both the 22C3 pharmDx and VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) assays are validated for CPS assessment. Consequently, assay-platform choice, staining conditions, and scoring methods can significantly impact the testing outcomes. This consensus paper aims to discuss the intricacies of PD-L1 CPS testing in mTNBC and provide practical recommendations for pathologists. Additionally, we present findings from a nationwide Italian survey elucidating the state-of-the-art in PD-L1 CPS testing in mTNBC.

Can we define breast cancer HER2 status by liquid biopsy?

Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) assessment is crucial for breast cancer treatment. Therapeutic decisions for recurrent cases often rely on primary tumor status. However, mounting evidence suggests that tumors show dynamic changes and up to 10% of breast cancer modify their initial status during progression. It is still debated whether these changes reflect a biological evolution of the disease or are secondary to primary tumor heterogeneity. Certainly, repeating HER2 assessment during breast cancer trajectory is important for the increasing availability of effective anti-HER2 drugs. In response to this need, circulating biomarkers such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) offer the potential to safely and repeatedly assess HER2 status over time. This chapter outlines current methods for testing HER2 in CTCs and ctDNA, and reviews clinical trials evaluating its prognostic and predictive value in patients with breast cancer, as well as recent advances in the field.

Low and Ultra-Low HER2 in Human Breast Cancer: An Effort to Define New Neoplastic Subtypes

HER2-low and ultra-low breast cancer (BC) have been recently proposed as new subcategories of HER2 BC, supporting a re-consideration of immunohistochemical negative scores of 0, 1+ and the 2+/in situ hybridization (ISH) negative phenotype. In the present review, we outline the criteria needed to exactly distinguish HER2-low and ultra-low BC. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated significant clinical benefits of novel HER2 directing antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) in treating these groups of tumors. In particular, trastuzumab-deruxtecan (T-Dxd), a HER2-directing ADC, has been recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as the first targeted therapy to treat HER2-low BC. Furthermore, ongoing trials, such as the DESTINY-Breast06 trial, are currently evaluating ADCs in patients with HER2-ultra low BC. Finally, we hope that new guidelines may help to codify HER2-low and ultra-low BC, increasing our knowledge of tumor biology and improving a targetable new therapeutical treatment.

HER2-Low Breast Cancer: Current Landscape and Future Prospects

More than 50% of breast cancers are currently defined as "Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) low breast cancer (BC)", with HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) scores of +1 or +2 with a negative fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) test. In most studies that compared the clinical and biological characteristics of HER2-low BC with HER2-negative BC, HER2-low was not associated with unique clinical and molecular characteristics, and it seems that the importance of HER2 in these tumors is being a docking site for the antibody portion of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs). Current pathological methods may underestimate the proportion of BCs that express low levels of HER2 due to analytical limitations and tumor heterogeneity. In this review we summarize and contextualize the most recent literature on HER2-low breast cancers, including clinical and translational studies We also review the challenges of assessing low HER2 expression in BC and discuss the current and future therapeutic landscape for these tumors.

Multiomic analysis of HER2-enriched and AR-positive breast carcinoma with apocrine differentiation and an oligometastatic course: a case report

Breast carcinoma is the most prevalent cancer among women globally. It has variable clinical courses depending on the stage and clinical-biological features. This case report describes a 56-year-old female with invasive breast cancer without estrogen or progesterone receptor expression, with apocrine differentiation, and with no germline variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Throughout the clinical course, the patient exhibited discordant results for HER2 in immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. During the second relapse, the disease displayed apocrine microscopic features. The tumor underwent analysis for the androgen receptor, GCDFP-15, RNA-seq, and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) to identify the breast cancer subtype and to characterize the cancer genome. Our bioinformatic analysis revealed 20,323 somatic SNV/Indels, including five mutations in cancer-related genes that are believed to be responsible for the tumor's development. Two of these mutations were found in the PIK3CA and TP53 genes. Furthermore, the tumor tissue exhibited large copy number alterations to the chromosomes, which could impact gene expression through complex mechanisms and contribute to the tumor phenotype. Clustering algorithms applied on RNA-sequencing data categorized this cancer as a HER2+ subtype. The second-line capecitabine chemotherapy treatment is ongoing, and the patient is responding well. Bioinformatic results support the current treatment decision and open the way to further treatments.

Pathological identification of HER2-low breast cancer: Tips, tricks, and troubleshooting for the optimal test

The introduction of novel anti-HER2 antibody-drug conjugates (ADC) for the treatment of HER2-low breast cancers has transformed the traditional dichotomy of HER2 status to an expanded spectrum. However, the identification of HER2-low (i.e., immunohistochemistry (IHC) score 1 + or IHC score 2+, without gene amplification) tumors is challenged by methodological and analytical variables that might influence the sensitivity and reproducibility of HER2 testing. To open all possible therapeutic opportunities for HER2-low breast cancer patients the implementation of more accurate and reproducible testing strategies is mandatory. Here, we provide an overview of the existing barriers that may trouble HER2-low identification in breast cancer and discuss practical solutions that could enhance HER-low assessment.

ELISA-like QDB method to meet the emerging need of Her2 assessment for breast cancer patients

Inherent issues of subjectivity and inconsistency have long plagued immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based Her2 assessment, leading to the repeated issuance of guidelines by the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) for its standardization for breast cancer patients. Yet, all these efforts may prove insufficient with the advent of Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-Dxd), a drug with the promise to expand to tumors traditionally defined as Her2 negative (Her2-). In this study, we attempted to address these issues by exploring an ELISA-like quantitative dot blot (QDB) method as an alternative to IHC. The QDB method has been used to measure multiple protein biomarkers including ER, PR, Ki67, and cyclin D1 in breast cancer specimens. Using an independent cohort (cohort 2) of breast cancer formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens, we validated cutoffs developed in cohort 1 (Yu et al., Scientific Reports 2020 10:10502) with overall 100% specificity (95% CI: 100-100) and 97.56% sensitivity (95% CI: 92.68-100) in cohort 2 against standard practice with the dichotomized absolutely quantitated values. Using the limit of detection (LOD) of the QDB method as the putative cutoff point, tumors with no Her2 expression were identified with the number comparable to those of IHC 0. Our results support further evaluation of the QDB method as an alternative to IHC to meet the emerging need of identifying tumors with low Her2 expression (Her2-low) in daily clinical practice.

Unlocking the Resistance to Anti-HER2 Treatments in Breast Cancer: The Issue of HER2 Spatial Distribution

Approximately 15% of breast cancers are classified as HER2-positive, with an amplification of the ERBB2 gene and/or an overexpression of the HER2 protein. Up to 30% of HER2-positive breast cancers shows heterogeneity in HER2 expression and different patterns of spatial distribution, i.e., the variability in the distribution and expression of the HER2 protein within a single tumour. Spatial heterogeneity may potentially affect treatment, response, assessment of HER2 status and consequently, may impact on the best treatment strategy. Understanding this feature can help clinicians to predict response to HER2-targeted therapies and patient outcomes, and to fine tune treatment decisions. This review summarizes the available evidence on HER2 heterogeneity and spatial distribution and how this may affect current available treatment choices, exploring possible opportunities for overcoming this issue, such as novel pharmacological agents, belonging to the group of antibody-drug conjugates.

HER2 in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Pathology, Somatic Alterations, and Perspectives for Novel Therapeutic Schemes

HER2 is an emerging biomarker in colorectal cancer (CRC). This oncogene plays an essential role in regulating cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, and, more in general, tumorigenesis and tumor progression. The most frequent types of HER2 alterations in CRC include gene amplification and missense mutations in 7-8% of CRC, often being mirrored by HER2 protein overexpression, representing founder events in solid tumors, including CRC. There are currently no approved HER2-targeted therapy guidelines for CRC; however, several studies have shown that HER2 can be effectively targeted in meta-static CRC settings. In this review, we discuss the current knowledge of HER2 testing in CRC and the immediate future perspectives for HER2 targeting in the metastatic setting.