Loss of HER2 in breast cancer: biological mechanisms and technical pitfalls

An overview about biomarkers in breast cancer: Insights into the diagnostic and prognostic significance

Breast cancer (BC) is one of the most significant neoplasms globally due to its high incidence and mortality, particularly among females. As a highly heterogeneous pathology, biomarkers are essential for characterizing specific tumors. Currently, several biological processes are well-described in the context of this neoplasm, such as alterations in BRCA1/2, HER, and pathways involving estrogen and progesterone hormone receptors. These studies have enabled the use of these findings as more precise methods for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. However, beyond patients who do not exhibit these classic markers, some individuals within the same risk group respond differently to treatment. Therefore, the search for biological markers that can improve diagnosis, aid in stratification, or serve as therapeutic targets is continuous and urgent. Genetic signatures have led to molecular tests currently used in clinical practice, though certain limitations persist. Understanding genetic and epigenetic mechanisms facilitates the identification of potential biomarkers. Biomarker targets must undergo experimental and clinical trials on samples of significant size before reaching clinical utility. In this review, we compile the classical markers and describe the potential use of other markers associated with the biological processes of this neoplasm.

HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Treatment and Resistance

HER2-positive (+) breast cancer is an aggressive disease with poor prognosis, a narrative that changed drastically with the advent and approval of trastuzumab, the first humanized monoclonal antibody targeting HER2. In addition to another monoclonal antibody, more classes of HER2-targeted agents, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates were developed in the years that followed. While these potent therapies have substantially improved the outcome of patients with HER2+ breast cancer, resistance has prevailed as a clinical challenge ever since the arrival of targeted agents. Efforts to develop new treatment regimens to treat/overcome resistance is futile without a primary understanding of the mechanistic underpinnings of resistance. Resistance could be attributed to mechanisms that are either specific to the tumor epithelial cells or those that emerge through changes in the tumor microenvironment. Reactivation of the HER receptor layer due to incomplete blockade of the HER receptor layer or due to alterations in the HER receptors is one of the major mechanisms. In other instances, resistance may occur due to deregulations in key downstream signaling such as the PI3K/AKT or RAS/MEK/ERK pathways or due to the emergence of compensatory pathways such as ER, other RTKs, or metabolic pathways. Potent new targeted agents and approaches to target key actionable drivers of resistance have already been identified, many of which are in early clinical development or under preclinical evaluation. Ongoing and future translational research will continue to uncover additional therapeutic vulnerabilities, as well as new targeted agents and approaches to treat and/or overcome anti-HER2 treatment resistance.

Invasive disease-free survival and brain metastasis rates in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab and pertuzumab

Patients with HER2(+) early breast cancer (EBC) receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) have poorer outcomes if they have residual disease (RD). We analyzed IDFS and brain metastasis (BM) rates in patients with HER2(+) EBC treated with NAST and report the outcomes of patients with HER2(-) RD. Patients with HER2(+) EBC who received NAST between 1 Jan 2019 and 31 Jan 2022 were reviewed. IDFS was defined as the time from surgery until first occurrence of invasive breast cancer recurrence, distant recurrence, or death from any cause. The total cohort was 594 patients. pCR (ypT0/isN0) was achieved in 325(55%) and RD was seen in 269(45%) patients. In 269 patients with RD, 45(17%) did not have HER2 retesting and were excluded. In the remaining 224 patients, 143(64%) were HER2(+) and 81(36%) were HER2(-). With a median follow up of 24 months, 8 patients developed BM at initial recurrence, 4/325(1.2%) with pCR and 4/143(2.8%) with HER2(+) RD. IDFS events occurred in 22/594(3%) patients; 14/269(5%) in RD and 8/325(2%) in pCR (p = 0.04). There was no difference in IDFS between 9/143(6%) patients with HER2(+) RD or 5/81(6%) with HER2(-) RD (p = 0.10). Patients with RD had higher IDFS events than those with pCR. In those with RD, 36% lost HER2(+) status; IDFS events appeared similar in those with HER2(+) RD versus those with HER2(-) RD. The BM events seen in those with RD and pCR highlights the need for more effective therapy in NAST and adjuvant setting to minimize BM risk.

Early Breast Cancer Risk Assessment: Integrating Histopathology with Artificial Intelligence

Effective risk assessment in early breast cancer is essential for informed clinical decision-making, yet consensus on defining risk categories remains challenging. This paper explores evolving approaches in risk stratification, encompassing histopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular biomarkers alongside cutting-edge artificial intelligence (AI) techniques. Leveraging machine learning, deep learning, and convolutional neural networks, AI is reshaping predictive algorithms for recurrence risk, thereby revolutionizing diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning. Beyond detection, AI applications extend to histological subtyping, grading, lymph node assessment, and molecular feature identification, fostering personalized therapy decisions. With rising cancer rates, it is crucial to implement AI to accelerate breakthroughs in clinical practice, benefiting both patients and healthcare providers. However, it is important to recognize that while AI offers powerful automation and analysis tools, it lacks the nuanced understanding, clinical context, and ethical considerations inherent to human pathologists in patient care. Hence, the successful integration of AI into clinical practice demands collaborative efforts between medical experts and computational pathologists to optimize patient outcomes.

Evolution of HER2 expression between pre-treatment biopsy and residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

We have previously found that HER2 expression is dynamic, and can change from the primary breast tumor to matched recurrences. With this work, we aimed to assess the dynamics of HER2 during neoadjuvant treatment.(NAT).

METHODS

We reviewed HER2 expression in pre- and post-treatment samples from consecutive patients with early-stage breast cancer that received NAT and underwent surgery at Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center between 01/2016-08/2022. The primary outcome was evolution of HER2 expression from pre- to post-NAT specimens in patients with residual disease.

RESULTS

Among 1613 patients receiving NAT, 1080 had residual disease at surgery. A total of 319 patients (29.5%) experienced a change in HER2 expression (HER2 0 vs. HER2-low vs. HER2-positive) from the pre-treatment sample to residual disease, with roughly equal distribution between decreased (50.5%) and increased HER2 expression (49.5%). Similar rates of change in HER2 expression were observed with anthracycline-based (31.8%) or taxane/platinum-based regimens (32.4%). Patients with HER2-0 or HER2-low tumors at diagnosis were likelier to experience a change in HER2 expression post-NAT compared to HER2-positive (32.3% vs. 21.3%, p < 0.001). Changes in HER2 expression post-NAT were prognostic among patients with HER2-positive tumors at diagnosis (3-year recurrence-free survival for change vs. no change: 71.6% vs. 89.6%, p = 0.006) but not among those with HER2-negative tumors at diagnosis (3-year recurrence-free survival for change vs. no change: 79.3% vs. 81.1%, p = 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 30% of patients with early-stage breast cancer showed a change in HER2 expression after NAT. Changes in HER2 expression post-NAT were only prognostic in the setting of HER2-positive tumors becoming HER2-negative at surgery.

Tumor heterogeneity and clinically invisible micrometastases in metastatic breast cancer-a call for enhanced surveillance strategies

The biology of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is understudied, primarily due to the difficulty of procuring multiple samples from patients with oligometastatic breast cancer. We developed a rapid postmortem tissue procurement program that allows the collection and analysis of numerous metastatic lesions, subclinical locations, and potential pre-metastatic niches that fall within this scope. We conducted a rapid postmortem tissue collection study on 9 patients with MBC. Patients and their families consented to donate tissues immediately after death in an IRB-approved study. Various disease subtypes, progression histories, organ involvement, and final causes of death are reported. In patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) disease, estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, and Ki-67 expression were heterogeneous across metastatic lesions within individual patients. Disease phenotype at the end of life trended toward complete loss of HR expression. Nearly all (n = 7) patients exhibited extensive tumor involvement of additional organs that had not been previously diagnosed clinically and were not retrospectively visible on recent imaging. Of these seven individuals, three included organs uncommonly associated with MBC: kidney, spleen, pancreas, and ovary. Finally, we identified clinically undetectable micrometastases in several organs uncommonly involved in MBC. Our findings raise several clinically relevant questions regarding the mechanisms of metastatic progression. Insights from this study argue for better surveillance strategies for monitoring MBC. We highlight the need to capture more accurate biomarker information in the context of heterogeneous disease and urge the consideration of treatment strategies that combine multiple targeted therapies.

Standardized pathology report for HER2 testing in compliance with 2023 ASCO/CAP updates and 2023 ESMO consensus statements on HER2-low breast cancer

Since the release of the DESTINY-Breast04 (DB-04) trial findings in June 2022, the field of pathology has seen a renaissance of HER2 as a predictive biomarker in breast cancer. The trial focused on patients with metastatic breast cancer who were classified as "HER2-low," i.e., those with immunohistochemistry (IHC) HER2 1 + or 2 + and negative in situ hybridization (ISH) results. The study revealed that treating these patients with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) instead of the oncologist's chosen chemotherapy led to outstanding improvements in survival. This has challenged the existing binary HER2 pathological classification system, which categorized tumors as either positive (overexpression/amplification) or negative, as per the ASCO/CAP 2018 guideline reaffirmed by ASCO/CAP 2023 guideline update. Given that DB-04 excluded patients with HER2 IHC score 0 status, the results of the ongoing DB-06 trial may shed further light on the potential benefits of T-DXd therapy for these patients. Roughly half of all breast cancers are estimated to belong to the HER2-low category, which does not represent a distinct or specific subtype of cancer. Instead, it encompasses a diverse group of tumors that exhibit clinical, morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular variations. However, HER2-low offers a distinctive biomarker status that identifies a specific therapeutic regimen (i.e., T-DXd) linked to a favorable prognosis in breast cancer. This unique association emphasizes the importance of accurately identifying these tumors. Differentiating between a HER2 IHC score 0 and score 1 + has not been clinically significant until now. To ensure accurate classification and avoid misdiagnosis, it is necessary to adopt standardized procedures, guidelines, and specialized training for pathologists in interpreting HER2 expression in the lower spectrum. Additionally, the utilization of artificial intelligence holds promise in supporting this endeavor. Here, we address the current state of the art and unresolved issues in assessing HER2-low status, with a particular emphasis on the score 0. We explore the dilemma surrounding the exclusion of HER2-zero patients from potentially beneficial therapy based on traditional HER2 testing. Additionally, we examine the clinical context, considering that DB-04 primarily involved heavily pretreated late-stage metastatic breast cancers. We also delve into emerging evidence suggesting that extrapolating HER2-low status from the original diagnosis may lead to misleading results. Finally, we provide recommendations for conducting high-quality testing and propose a standardized pathology report in compliance with 2023 ASCO/CAP updates and 2023 ESMO consensus statements on HER2-low breast cancer.

Targeting autophagy for breast cancer prevention and therapy: From classical methods to phytochemical agents

Breast cancer is a heterogeneous illness comprising diverse biological subtypes, each of which differs in incidence, response to therapies, and prognosis. Despite the presence of novel medications that effectively target vital cellular signaling pathways and their application in clinical practice, breast cancer can still develop resistance to therapies by various mechanisms. Autophagy is a conserved catabolic cellular process that maintains intracellular metabolic homeostasis by removing dysfunctional or unnecessary cellular materials to recycle cytosolic components. This process serves as an adaptive survival response to diverse stress stimuli, thereby contributing to tumor initiation, progression, and drug resistance, leading to restriction of the effectiveness of chemotherapeutic treatments. Regarding this potential role of autophagy, molecular regulation and signal transduction of this process represent an attractive approach to combat cancer development and drug resistance. Among various therapeutic agents, bioactive plant-derived compounds have received significant interest as promising anticancer drugs. A plethora of evidence has shown that phytochemicals with the capacity to modulate autophagy may have the potential to be used as inhibitors of breast cancer growth. In this review, we describe recent findings on autophagy targeting along with conventional methods for breast cancer therapy. Subsequently, we introduce phytochemical compounds with the capacity to modulate autophagy for breast cancer treatment.

Clinicopathological features and survival outcomes of luminal-like breast tumors with estrogen receptor loss at metastatic recurrence: A case-control study

INTRODUCTION

Estrogen receptor (ER) loss at metastatic relapse occurs in up to 20% of luminal-like primary breast tumors. Data about clinicopathological features associated with ER loss and its prognostic significance are limited.

METHODS

In a nested-case-control study, we compared clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes between a cohort of 51 patients with primary ER+ /HER2- and paired triple-negative metastasis (LUM-TN) and two control cohorts of paired early-metastatic ER+ /HER2- (LUM-LUM, n = 50) and triple-negative (TN-TN, n = 49) breast cancers. Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were assessed according to the TILs Working Group recommendations as continuous and discrete variables with cutoffs (20%, 40%).

RESULTS

LUM-TN tumors had lower ER expression than LUM-LUM tumors, but lower grade and Ki67 than TN-TN cases. Median distant-metastasis free survival was similar for LUM-TN and LUM-LUM cohorts, but significantly longer than in TN-TN cases (log-rank P < 0.001). LUM-TN and TN-TN cohorts had a comparable survival from the time of metastatic recurrence, which was significantly shorter than in patients with LUM-LUM tumors (log-rank P < 0.001). High TILs were associated with worse outcomes in patients with ER loss (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Breast tumors with ER loss at metastatic relapse have intermediate features and outcomes compared with metastatic luminal-like and ab initio triple-negative tumors. Further investigation on the biological mechanisms underpinning the loss of ER expression is ongoing.

Advancing the PD-L1 CPS test in metastatic TNBC: Insights from pathologists and findings from a nationwide survey

Pembrolizumab has received approval as a first-line treatment for unresectable/metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) with a PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) of ≥ 10. However, assessing CPS in mTNBC poses challenges. Firstly, it represents a novel analysis for breast pathologists. Secondly, the heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression in mTNBC further complicates the assessment. Lastly, the lack of standardized assays and staining platforms adds to the complexity. In KEYNOTE trials, PD-L1 expression was evaluated using the IHC 22C3 pharmDx kit as a companion diagnostic test. However, both the 22C3 pharmDx and VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) assays are validated for CPS assessment. Consequently, assay-platform choice, staining conditions, and scoring methods can significantly impact the testing outcomes. This consensus paper aims to discuss the intricacies of PD-L1 CPS testing in mTNBC and provide practical recommendations for pathologists. Additionally, we present findings from a nationwide Italian survey elucidating the state-of-the-art in PD-L1 CPS testing in mTNBC.

Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Breast Cancer: Ascent to Destiny and Beyond-A 2023 Review

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are revolutionizing cancer treatment, adding another important new class of systemic therapy. ADCs are a specially designed class of therapeutics that target cells expressing specific cancer antigens using directed antibody-drug delivery and release a cytotoxic chemotherapeutic payload. Over the past two decades, improvements in ADC design, development, and research, particularly in breast cancer, have led to several recent landmark publications. These advances have significantly changed various treatment paradigms and revamped traditional classifications of breast cancer with the introduction of a potential new subtype: "HER2-low". This review will focus on several ADCs developed for breast cancer treatment, including trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), sacituzumab govitecan (SG) and other newer emerging agents. It will provide an overview of the role of ADCs in breast cancer and discuss the opportunities and challenges they present. Additionally, our review will discuss future research directions to improve the selection of targets, combination therapies, and aim to improve drug safety. Important first-line metastatic and adjuvant clinical trials are underway, which may expand the role of ADC therapy in breast cancer. We foresee ADCs driving a new era of breast cancer treatment, adding to the steady incremental survival advantage observed in recent years.

HER2 Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Breast Cancer, an Evolving Concept

Amplification and/or overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in breast cancer is associated with an adverse prognosis. The introduction of anti-HER2 targeted therapy has dramatically improved the clinical outcomes of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Unfortunately, a significant number of patients eventually relapse and develop distant metastasis. HER2 intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) has been reported to be associated with poor prognosis in patients with anti-HER2 targeted therapies and was proposed to be a potential mechanism for anti-HER2 resistance. In this review, we described the current definition, common types of HER2 ITH in breast cancer, the challenge in interpretation of HER2 status in cases showing ITH and the clinical applications of anti-HER2 agents in breast cancer showing heterogeneous HER2 expression. Digital image analysis has emerged as an objective and reproducible scoring method and its role in the assessment of HER2 status with ITH remains to be demonstrated.

Unlocking the Resistance to Anti-HER2 Treatments in Breast Cancer: The Issue of HER2 Spatial Distribution

Approximately 15% of breast cancers are classified as HER2-positive, with an amplification of the ERBB2 gene and/or an overexpression of the HER2 protein. Up to 30% of HER2-positive breast cancers shows heterogeneity in HER2 expression and different patterns of spatial distribution, i.e., the variability in the distribution and expression of the HER2 protein within a single tumour. Spatial heterogeneity may potentially affect treatment, response, assessment of HER2 status and consequently, may impact on the best treatment strategy. Understanding this feature can help clinicians to predict response to HER2-targeted therapies and patient outcomes, and to fine tune treatment decisions. This review summarizes the available evidence on HER2 heterogeneity and spatial distribution and how this may affect current available treatment choices, exploring possible opportunities for overcoming this issue, such as novel pharmacological agents, belonging to the group of antibody-drug conjugates.