Advances in the endoscopic management of malignant biliary obstruction

Photodynamic Therapy or Palliative Resection Versus Biliary Stenting for Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis

Background: We assessed the efficacy of evaluating palliative resection (R1/R2 resection), photodynamic therapy (PDT), and biliary stenting (stent) alone in the treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma using a reticulated meta-analysis. Methods: A systematical retrieval in PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was performed for relative literature on the effects of PDT, palliative resection, and simple biliary stenting in the treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma. A literature search updated to January 30, 2024, was performed. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tools were used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies, and Addis-1.16 0.6 software for reticulated meta-analysis. Results: The results showed that PDT and palliative resection were superior to biliary stenting alone in improving 1-, 2-, and 3-year survivals, and the incidence of cholangitis. The relative effectiveness of PDT, palliative resection, and biliary stent placement alone in improving survival was as follows: PDT, palliative resection, and biliary stent placement alone. Conclusion: There is no significant difference between PDT and palliative resection in improving patient survival time, and PDT does not increase the incidence of cholangitis.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage vs percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography failure

In a recent issue of the World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, a meta-analysis investigated the safety and efficacy of electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stent (ECE-LAMS) implantation for managing malignant biliary obstruction following failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. This manuscript endeavors to offer a comprehensive look at the progression of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) technologies, weighing their merits and drawbacks against traditional percutaneous methods. Several meta-analyses and randomized controlled trials have compared the performance of EUS-BD and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage (PTCD). These studies revealed that the technical success rate, clinical success rate, and adverse events were similar between EUS-BD and PTCD. Nevertheless, given that most of these studies predate 2015, the safety and effectiveness of novel EUS-BD techniques, including ECE-LAMS, compared with those of percutaneous biliary drainage remain elusive. Further investigation is imperative to ascertain whether these novel EUS-BD techniques can safely and efficaciously replace conventional percutaneous therapeutic approaches.

Comparison of robot-assisted, open, and laparoscopic-assisted surgery for cholangiocarcinoma: a network meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of robot-assisted, laparoscopic-assisted and open surgery in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma, and to evaluate the clinical effect of three surgical methods in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma by network Meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematical retrieval in PubMed and Web of Science was performed for relative literature on the effects of robot-assisted(RA), laparoscopy-assisted(LA), and open surgery(OA) for cholangiocarcinoma in treating cholangiocarcinoma. A literature search updated to September 1st, 2024, was performed.

RESULTS

Studies have shown that the length of R0 resection, complication rate, 30-day mortality, Transfusion rate, Lymph Node Metastasis Rate, and hospital stay in RA are superior to LA and open surgery. The relative effectiveness of the three surgical methods in terms of operation time were: open surgery, laparoscope-assisted surgery, and robot-assisted surgery, and there was no significant difference among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted surgery is safe and feasible in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma, but more clinical evidence is needed to confirm these findings.

Safety and effectiveness of consecutive 191 endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage procedures: a single-center experience

<b>Introduction:</b> The development of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has enabled extra-anatomical transmural access to the bile ducts, thus making it possible to perform endoscopic biliary anastomoses with the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and obtain extra-anatomical transpapillary access. EUS provides an alternative to the existing methods of biliary drainage (BD) for cases in which endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is ineffective.<b>Aim:</b> This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of extraanatomical endoscopic biliary access methods for the treatment of benign and malignant biliary strictures.<b>Material and methods:</b> This retrospective analysis included treatment results of all patients with obstructive jaundice and biliary strictures who were treated endoscopically in our department between 2016 and 2023. The study group comprised patients in whom EUS-guided transmural access was used during ERCP because of biliary strictures and the lack of transpapillary access.<b>Results:</b> Twenty-eight patients (14.66%) underwent endoscopic transpapillary biliary stenting via a transmural approach under EUS guidance. The remaining 163 patients (85.34%) underwent extraanatomical transmural biliodigestive anastomosis. Technical success was achieved in 186 of 191 (97.38%) patients. Clinical success was achieved in 170 of 191 (89.01%) patients. Complications were reported for 32 of 191 (16.75%) patients, including fatal complications for 6 of 191 (3.14%) patients.<b>Conclusions:</b> Advanced endoscopic techniques involving EUS-guided transmural access are effective and safe for biliary strictures. They provide an alternative to other drainage techniques when ERCP is ineffective and improve the quality of life of patients undergoing palliative treatment for biliary strictures with unresectable cancer of the biliopancreatic area.

Case report: The diagnostic dilemma of indeterminate biliary strictures: report on two cases with a literature review

Background

It is still a challenging problem for clinicians to explore the nature of the indeterminate biliary strictures (IBSs). Approximately 20% of biliary strictures remain undetermined after a thorough preoperative assessment.

Case presentation

Here, we present two cases of indeterminate biliary strictures patients, whose cross- sectional imaging and endoscopic examination were nondiagnostic. The patients underwent exploratory laparotomy finally and were confirmed as malignancy. We also reviewed the recent reports in literatures regarding the evaluation of IBSs.

Conclusions

Given the majority of the biliary strictures are malignancy, preoperative differentiation between benign and malignant is critical for choosing the best therapeutic regimen. Thus, close follow-up, multiple multidisciplinary discussion, and prompt surgical exploration are necessary for some difficult diagnostic cases.

Palliative endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction in Korea: A nationwide assessment

BACKGROUND

Malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) is usually caused by biliary tract cancer or pancreatic cancer. This study was performed to summarize the current situation regarding palliative endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD) for MBO in Korea and to determine its clinical significance by analyzing representative nationwide data.

METHODS

Patients that underwent palliative ERBD for MBO between 2012 and 2015 were identified using the Health Insurance Review and Assessment database, which covers the entire Korean population. We assessed clinical characteristics and complications and compared the clinical impacts of initial metal and plastic stenting in these patients.

RESULTS

A total of 9,728 subjects (mean age, 65 ± 11.4 years; male, 61.4%) were identified and analyzed. The most common diagnosis was malignant neoplasm of liver and intrahepatic bile ducts (32.1%) and this was followed by extrahepatic or Ampulla of Vater cancer and pancreatic cancer. Initial plastic stent(s) placement was performed in 52.9% of the study subjects, and metal stent(s) placement was performed in 23.3%. The number of sessions of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) was significantly higher in patients that underwent initial plastic stenting than in patients that underwent metal stenting (2.2 ± 1.7 vs 1.8 ± 1.4, P < 0.0001), but rates of post-ERCP pancreatitis, hospital days, and time to second ERCP or PTBD were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

This nationwide assessment study suggests that initial metal stenting is associated with fewer sessions of total ERCP or PTBD following the initial procedure, despite the preference for initial plastic stenting in Korea.