Aggressive primary hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: a case report and literature review

The challenges of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: the diagnosis and current treatments of a problematic tumor

BACKGROUND

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is a malignant vascular tumor known for its rarity. The different types of this hepatic tumor (single, multiple-nodular or diffused) indicate different prognosis and treatment plans. However, the heterogenic clinical manifestation creates a dilemma and a wide range of challenges when attending to HEHE patients. This review addresses the unique profile and clinical challenges that complicate the diagnosis and treatment of HEHE while focusing on current therapeutic strategies and their limitations.

MAIN TEXT

The unclear etiology is a challenging feature of HEHE. The exact involvement of potential risk factors and mechanism of development are still undefined. Relevant genetic alterations like WWTR1-CAMTA1 fusion have been investigated; however, they are only applicable as diagnostic markers and their influence on therapeutic efficacy is largely unknown. Other characteristics include asymptomatic manifestation, lack of unique hepatic functional alterations, high rates of misdiagnosis and late-stage identification when metastases already exist. Currently, tissue biopsy is the main tool to establish a definite diagnosis but is challenged with the limited awareness to suspect HEHE at early stages and the lack of relevant guidelines due to the rarity and the insufficiency of relevant research. The absence of treatment guidelines is the greatest challenge of HEHE. Generally, Surgical approaches are recommended due to the benefits of prolonged survival and enhanced prognosis. Nonetheless, only a minority of patients are eligible for resections while liver transplants are faced with severe insufficiency of donor organs and long wait-lists. On the other hand, a variety of non-surgical treatments (like anti-angiogenic agents, interferon alpha-2B and sirolimus) are presented with a promising potential. However, relevant studies are challenged with limited sample-sizes and lack of prospective designs.

CONCLUSION

Regardless to decades passing since its discovery, HEHE still creates a dilemma due to its challenging clinical profile and lack of treatment guidelines. Raising awareness of HEHE in clinical practices improves the ability to diagnose this rare tumor at early stages and develop stronger research strategies and treatment guidelines to regulate the medical care provided to HEHE patients.

Three cases of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma evaluated using conventional and contrast-enhanced ultrasound: Case reports

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is a very rare vascular endothelial cell tumor, which lacks typical clinical manifestations and specificity of imaging features. Whether the background of fatty liver and the difference in Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) characteristics between large and small lesions has not been well defined. In this case reports, we described the ultrasound image features of three patients with HEHE. These three patients with HEHE have certain similar characteristics of conventional ultrasound and CEUS. CEUS imaging features include large nodules show earlier perfusion than liver parenchyma, with rim-enhancement, nonenhancing regions in the center, while small nodules show earlier perfusion than liver parenchyma, with hyperenhancement. All nodules show faster washout than hepatic parenchyma, showing heterogeneous hypoenhancement, and more washout lesions can be found in the PVP and LP. Conventional ultrasound and CEUS not only help to improve the diagnostic confidence of HEHE of rare liver tumors, but also can guide the biopsy area, making it easier to make accurate pathological diagnosis.

Establishment and validation of prognostic nomograms to predict the overall and cancer-specific survival in patients with hepatic malignant vascular tumors

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the clinicopathologic features and to investigate the prognostic nomograms for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with Hepatic malignant vascular tumors (HMVT).

METHOD

Patients diagnosed with HMVT between 1973 and 2015 were screened from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) was used for survival analysis. The univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to identify independent predictors. Furthermore, the prognostic nomograms were established and evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 510 HMVT patients were collected, and randomly divided into HMVT-training (N=308) and validation cohort (N=202) groups. The 3- and 5-year OS for overall HMVT were 21.3% and 19.8%, and the corresponding CSS was 29.8% and 27.7% respectively. Age at diagnosis, grade, tumor size, and histological type were identified as prognostic factors for OS and CSS in patients with HMVT. However, sex was just for predicting CSS, and T stage was only an indicator of OS. These factors were further utilized to construct the nomograms for OS and CSS in the HMVT-training cohort showing credible performance with the C-index of 0.763 and 0.762, respectively. Moreover, the AUC value for 1-, 3-, 5-year OS was 0.873, 0.905 and 0.898, and the corresponding value for CSS was 0.808, 0.794 and 0.788 respectively. Additionally, the calibration curves demonstrated a favorable agreement between the predicted and actual 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates both in the training and validated cohorts.

CONCLUSION

This was the largest population-based study to describe the clinicopathologic characteristics in patients with HMVT. Moreover, we established and validated prognostic nomograms that indicated an accurate prediction for 1-, 3- and 5-year of OS and CSS.

Laparoscopic resection of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: report of eleven rare cases and literature review

BACKGROUND

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is an extremely rare borderline tumor of vascular endothelial origin. Laparoscopic resection of HEHE has never been reported.

METHODS

The clinical data of eleven patients with HEHE (4 women and 7 men) who were diagnosed and treated at the Union Hospital (Wuhan, China), and Wuhan Asia General Hospital (Wuhan, China), between March 2012 and July 2020 were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The mean age of HEHE patients was 42.4 ± 13.9 years (range 22-67 years). All patients underwent laparoscopic surgery alone or in combination with radiofrequency ablation. Most tumors showed aggressive growth or metastasis. By immunohistochemistry, tumor cells were positive for CD31, CD34, ERG, PCK, FLi-1, TFE-3, and Ki-67 (labeling index range, 5-15%). In one of the patients, the tumor was accompanied by partial necrosis with a local appearance of epithelioid angiosarcoma. Postoperative adjuvant treatment included chemotherapy, sorafenib, and Huaier granule. As of July 2020, the median follow-up duration was 36 months (range, 9-60 months), with 2 (18.2%) patients experiencing tumor recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report of laparoscopic hepatectomy of HEHE. Curative laparoscopic hepatectomy might be an acceptable treatment for appropriate HEHE patients.

Laparoscopic repeat liver resection for hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma

BACKGROUND

Optimal treatment for patients with hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) remains unclear. Laparoscopic repeat liver resection (LR) is a minimally invasive and potentially effective surgical option for multiple HEHEs.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 42-year-old woman with no relevant history was admitted for multiple liver tumors. Six tumors were observed on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including one in S2, two in S3, two in S7, and one in S8. Pathological evaluation of percutaneous tumor biopsy tissue suggested a diagnosis of HEHE and laparoscopic LR was planned. The procedure began with partial resection of S7 and partial resection of S8 and left lateral sectionectomy were performed. Another tumor was found intraoperatively on the surface of S6, necessitating removal by partial resection. Pathological evaluation of the resected tumor tissue from all seven tumors concurred with that of the preoperative biopsy. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 6 without any complications. A follow-up MRI 15 months after the primary surgery revealed one tumor each in S4, S6, and S8. Laparoscopic repeat LR was performed. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 5 without any complications. All three recurrent tumors were pathologically confirmed as HEHEs.

CONCLUSIONS

We successfully treated primary and recurrent HEHEs with laparoscopic LR, which is a reasonable minimally invasive procedure considering the possibility of multiple courses of liver surgery in patients with HEHE.

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma: Update on diagnosis and therapy

With an estimated incidence of only 1-2 cases in every 1 million people, hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is a rare vascular endothelial cell tumor occurring in the liver and consisting of epithelioid and histiocyte-like vascular endothelial cells in mucus or a fibrotic matrix. HEHE is characterized as a low-to-moderate grade malignant tumor and is classified into three types: solitary, multiple, and diffuse. Both the etiology and characteristic clinical manifestations of HEHE are unclear. However, HEHE has a characteristic appearance on imaging including ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography/computerized tomography. Still, its diagnosis depends mainly on pathological findings, with immunohistochemical detection of endothelial markers cluster of differentiation 31 (CD31), CD34, CD10, vimentin, and factor VIII antigen as the basis of diagnosis. Hepatectomy and/or liver transplantation are the first choice for treatment, but various chemotherapeutic drugs are reportedly effective, providing a promising treatment option. In this review, we summarize the literature related to the diagnosis and treatment of HEHE, which provides future perspectives for the clinical management of HEHE.

Metastatic Hepatic Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma Treated with Olaratumab: A Falling Star Rising?

Epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) is a rare vascular malignant tumor with indolent course. Liver transplantation for local disease is the treatment of choice. In the metastatic setting there is no consensus regarding the appropriate systemic treatment. We present two cases of metastatic hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (hEHE) treated with the combination of Doxorubicin and Olaratumab. Both patients showed Stable Disease (SD) as a response, after the completion of six cycles of this combination therapy.

Treatment and prognosis of hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma based on SEER data analysis from 1973 to 2014

BACKGROUND

Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEH) is a rare tumor of vascular origin with an unknown etiology, a low incidence, and a variable natural course. We evaluated the management and prognosis of HEH from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program and changes in treatment modalities of HEH over 30 years.

METHODS

From 1973 to 2014 in the SEER database, we selected patients diagnosed with HEH. We analyzed the clinical characteristics, patterns of management, and clinical outcomes of patients with HEH.

RESULTS

We identified 79 patients with HEH (median age: 54.0 years; male to female ratio: 1:2.6). The initial extent of disease was local in 22 (27.8%) patients, regional metastasis in 22 (27.8%), distant metastasis in 31 (39.2%) and unknown in 4 (5.1%). The median size of primary tumor was 3.85 cm (interquartile range, 2.50-7.93 cm). Among 74 patients with available management data, the most common management was no treatment (29/74, 39.2%), followed by chemotherapy only (22/74, 29.7%), liver resection-based (13/74, 17.6%), and transplantation-based therapy (6/74, 8.1%). The 5-year cancer-specific survival rate was 57.8%. Patients who underwent surgical treatment had significantly higher survival than those who underwent non-surgical treatment (5-year survival; 88% vs. 49%, P = 0.019). Multivariate analysis revealed that surgical therapy was the only independent prognostic factor for survival (hazard ratio: 0.20, P = 0.040).

CONCLUSIONS

Resection or liver transplantation is worth considering for treatment of patients with HEH.