Nishizawa Y, Hoshino Y, Nagamune K, Araki D, Nagai K, Kurosaka M, Kuroda R. Comparison Between Intra- and Extra-articular Tension of the Graft During Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Arthroscopy 2017;
33:1204-1210. [PMID:
28130031 DOI:
10.1016/j.arthro.2016.11.021]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2015] [Revised: 11/16/2016] [Accepted: 11/28/2016] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE
To evaluate the tension deprivation through the tunnels with and without preconditioning at the time of fixation, and the influences of cyclic loading and pretensioning on graft tension in anatomic single bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a hamstring tendon.
METHODS
Nine fresh-frozen cadaveric knees underwent anatomic ACL reconstruction using hamstring grafts. Each specimen was examined to ensure that there was no severe osteoarthritic change, ligament insufficiency, or torn menisci by manual and arthroscopic evaluation. Applied graft tension was measured at the tibial tunnel outlet using a graft tensor with a load cell. Intra-articular graft tension was evaluated by using an originally developed microforce sensor, which was sutured into the graft. Both tensions were simultaneously measured just after initial tensioning under 3 different conditions: condition 1, just after initial tensioning of 20 N at 20° of knee flexion without preconditioning; condition 2, after the same initial tensioning following 5 rounds of passive cyclic flexion-extension movement; and condition 3, after the same initial tensioning following 5 minutes of static pretensioning of 20 N.
RESULTS
The intra-articular tension was 12.7 ± 5.3 N in condition 1, 12.0 ± 4.8 N in condition 2, and 13.5 ± 4.8 N in condition 3. In these 3 conditions, intra-articular graft tension was significantly lower than the applied tension of around 20 N (no pretension: P = .009, cyclic pretension: P = .004, static pretension: P = .008), with no difference among the 3 conditions (P = .82).
CONCLUSIONS
The intra-articular graft tension was significantly lower than the applied tension from the outside of the joint, even after cyclic loading and pretensioning.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
It is difficult to evaluate the intra-articular graft tension precisely on the basis of the extra-articular tension at time zero in ACL reconstruction.
Collapse