How I deploy arterial grafts

Defining the Role of Anaortic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

As the population ages and co-morbidities become more prevalent, the complexity of patients presenting for coronary artery bypass surgery is increasing. Cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamping in these patients carry increased risk and, indeed, in some patients, with ascending aortic disease, the risks are prohibitive. Total-arterial anaortic coronary artery surgery is a technique that provides complete surgical coronary artery revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass and without manipulating the ascending aorta. The technique essentially eliminates the risk of cerebral embolization of aortic atheroma and aortic injury. Anaortic techniques are an essential skillset for coronary artery surgery centers treating higher-risk patients.

Personalized surgical planning for coronary bypass graft configurations using patient-specific computational modeling to avoid flow competition in arterial grafts

Objectives

Flow competition between coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG) and native coronary arteries is a significant problem affecting arterial graft patency. The objectives of this study were to compare the predictive hemodynamic flow resulting from various total arterial grafting configurations and to evaluate whether the use of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models capable of predicting flow can assist surgeons to make better decisions for individual patients by avoiding poorly functioning grafts.

Methods

Sixteen cardiac surgeons declared their preferred CABG configuration using bilateral internal mammary and radial arteries for each of 5 patients who had differing degrees of severe triple vessel coronary disease. Surgeons selected both a preferred 'aortic' strategy, with at least one graft arising from the ascending aorta, and a preferred "anaortic" strategy which could be performed as a "no-aortic touch" operation. CT coronary angiograms of the 5 patients were coupled to CFD models using a novel flow solver "COMCAB." Twelve different CABG configurations were compared for each patient of which 4 were "aortic" and 8 were "anaortic." Surgeons then selected their preferred grafting configurations after being shown predictive hemodynamic metrics including functional assessment of stenoses (instantaneous wave-free ratio; fractional flow reserve), transit time flowmetry graft parameters (mean graft flow; pulsatility index) and myocardial perfusion.

Results

A total of 87.5% (7/8) of "anaortic" configurations compared to 25% (1/4) of "aortic" configurations led to unsatisfactory grafts in at least 1 of the 5 patients (P = 0.038). The use of the computational models led to a significant decrease in the selection of unsatisfactory grafting configurations when surgeons employed "anaortic" (21.25% (17/80) vs. 1.25% (1/80), P < 0.001) but not "aortic" techniques (5% (4/80) vs. 0% (0/80), P = 0.64). Similarly, there was an increase in the selection of ideal configurations for "anaortic" (6.25% (5/80) vs. 28.75% (23/80), P < 0.001) but not "aortic" techniques (65% (52/80) vs. 61.25% (49/80), P = 0.74). Furthermore, surgeons who planned to use more than one unique "anaortic" configuration across all 5 patients increased (12.5% (2/16) vs. 87.5% (14/16), P<0.001).

Conclusions

"COMCAB" is a promising tool to improve personalized surgical planning particularly for CABG configurations involving composite or sequential grafts which are used more frequently in anaortic operations.

No-Touch Versus Conventional Vein Harvesting Techniques at 12 Months After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery: Multicenter Randomized, Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Vein graft occlusion is deemed a major challenge in coronary artery bypass grafting. Previous studies implied that the no-touch technique for vein graft harvesting could reduce occlusion rate compared with the conventional approach; however, evidence on the clinical benefit and generalizability of the no-touch technique is scare.

METHODS

From April 2017 to June 2019, we randomly assigned 2655 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting at 7 hospitals in a 1:1 ratio to receive no-touch technique or conventional approach for vein harvesting. The primary outcome was vein graft occlusion on computed tomography angiography at 3 months and the secondary outcomes included 12-month vein graft occlusion, recurrence of angina, and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. The generalized estimate equation model was used to account for the cluster effect of grafts from the same patient.

RESULTS

During the follow-up, 2533 (96.0%) participants received computed tomography angiography at 3 months after coronary artery bypass grafting and 2434 (92.2%) received it at 12 months. The no-touch group had significantly lower rates of vein graft occlusion than the conventional group both at 3 months (2.8% versus 4.8%; odds ratio, 0.57 [95% CI, 0.41-0.80]; P<0.001) and 12 months (3.7% versus 6.5%; odds ratio, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.41-0.76]; P<0.001). Recurrence of angina was also less common in the no-touch group at 12 months (2.3% versus 4.1%; odds ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.35-0.85]; P<0.01). Rates of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were of no significant difference between the 2 groups. The no-touch technique was associated with higher rates of leg wound surgical interventions at 3-month follow-up (10.3% versus 4.3%; odds ratio, 2.55 [95% CI, 1.85-3.52]; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the conventional vein harvesting approach in coronary artery bypass grafting, the no-touch technique significantly reduced the risk of vein graft occlusion and improved patient prognosis. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03126409.

How to build a multi-arterial coronary artery bypass programme: a stepwise approach

Observational evidence shows that the use of multiple arterial grafts (MAG) is associated with longer postoperative survival and improved clinical outcomes. The current European Society of Cardiology/European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Guidelines on myocardial revascularization recommend the use of MAG in appropriate patients. However, a significant volume-to-outcome relationship exists for MAG, and lack of sufficient experience is associated with increased operative risk. A stepwise approach to building experience with MAG allows successful implementation of this technique into routine coronary surgery practice.

Toward stroke-free coronary surgery: The role of the anaortic off-pump bypass technique

Surgical coronary revascularization remains the preferred strategy in a significant portion of patients with coronary artery disease due to superior long-term outcomes. However, there is a significant risk of perioperative neurologic injury that has influenced guideline recommendations. These complications occur in 1%-5% of patients, ranging from overt neurologic deficits with permanent disability, to subtle cerebral defects noted on neuroimaging that may result in slow cognitive and functional decline. The primary mechanism by which these events occur is thromboembolism from manipulation of the ascending aorta. This occurs during cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic cross-clamping, and partial occlusion clamping (side clamp). Elderly patients and patients with aortic atheroma are, therefore, at significantly increased risk. Initial surgical techniques addressed this by aggressively debriding or replacing the ascending aorta during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Strategies then moved toward minimizing aortic manipulation through pump-assisted beating heart surgery and off-pump surgery with partial occlusion clamping or proximal anastomosis devices. Finally, anaortic off-pump CABG aims to avoid all manipulation of the ascending aorta through advanced off-pump grafting techniques combined with in situ and composite grafts. This has been demonstrated to result in the greatest reduction in risk. Establishing successful anaortic off-pump CABG programs requires subspecialization and focused interest groups dedicated to advancing CABG outcomes.